* can we allow -t abbreviation for --track in 'git branch'
@ 2009-05-09 8:50 Sitaram Chamarty
2009-05-09 9:17 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-05-09 15:15 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sitaram Chamarty @ 2009-05-09 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Hello,
Would it make sense to teach "git branch" the short option
"-t" the same way that "git checkout" knows it, (ie., as an
abbreviation for "--track")?
I use both frequently, and often forget that in "git branch"
the short option does not work.
If people think it's OK I'll submit a patch (code and doc).
Regards,
Sitaram
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: can we allow -t abbreviation for --track in 'git branch'
2009-05-09 8:50 can we allow -t abbreviation for --track in 'git branch' Sitaram Chamarty
@ 2009-05-09 9:17 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-05-09 15:15 ` Junio C Hamano
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Sebrecht @ 2009-05-09 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sitaram Chamarty; +Cc: git
The 09/05/09, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would it make sense to teach "git branch" the short option
> "-t" the same way that "git checkout" knows it, (ie., as an
> abbreviation for "--track")?
It makes sense for me.
> I use both frequently, and often forget that in "git branch"
> the short option does not work.
Same here. :-)
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: can we allow -t abbreviation for --track in 'git branch'
2009-05-09 8:50 can we allow -t abbreviation for --track in 'git branch' Sitaram Chamarty
2009-05-09 9:17 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
@ 2009-05-09 15:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-05-10 4:23 ` Sitaram Chamarty
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2009-05-09 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sitaram Chamarty; +Cc: git
Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@gmail.com> writes:
> Would it make sense to teach "git branch" the short option
> "-t" the same way that "git checkout" knows it, (ie., as an
> abbreviation for "--track")?
>
> I use both frequently, and often forget that in "git branch"
> the short option does not work.
>
> If people think it's OK I'll submit a patch (code and doc).
I have <20090428152119.GA18935@atc.tcs.com> (aka $gmane/117790) in my
inbox.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: can we allow -t abbreviation for --track in 'git branch'
2009-05-09 15:15 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2009-05-10 4:23 ` Sitaram Chamarty
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sitaram Chamarty @ 2009-05-10 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
On 2009-05-09, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Would it make sense to teach "git branch" the short option
>> "-t" the same way that "git checkout" knows it, (ie., as an
>> abbreviation for "--track")?
>>
>> I use both frequently, and often forget that in "git branch"
>> the short option does not work.
>>
>> If people think it's OK I'll submit a patch (code and doc).
>
> I have <20090428152119.GA18935@atc.tcs.com> (aka $gmane/117790) in my
> inbox.
Thanks. I posted it some days ago, but then began to wonder
if there was more to that change than I thought, and perhaps
I should have *asked* first.
Sitaram
PS: And I saw http://gitster.livejournal.com/33638.html only
just now... :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-10 4:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-09 8:50 can we allow -t abbreviation for --track in 'git branch' Sitaram Chamarty
2009-05-09 9:17 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-05-09 15:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-05-10 4:23 ` Sitaram Chamarty
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.