* [PATCH v4 1/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: fix terminology and improve clarity
2014-09-09 9:57 [PATCH v4 0/5] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements Juri Lelli
@ 2014-09-09 9:57 ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-16 10:56 ` [tip:sched/core] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Fix " tip-bot for Luca Abeni
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Rewrite section 4 intro Juri Lelli
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Juri Lelli @ 2014-09-09 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peterz
Cc: luca.abeni, rdunlap, mingo, henrik, raistlin, juri.lelli,
juri.lelli, linux-doc, linux-kernel
From: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Several small changes regarding SCHED_DEADLINE documentation that fix
terminology and improve clarity and readability:
- "current runtime" becomes "remaining runtime"
- readablity of an equation is improved by introducing more spacing
- clarify when admission control will certainly fail
- new URL for CBS technical report
- substitue "smallest" with "earliest"
Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 38 ++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
index 18adc92..a029891 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
@@ -45,17 +45,17 @@ CONTENTS
every time the task wakes up, the scheduler computes a "scheduling deadline"
consistent with the guarantee (using the CBS[2,3] algorithm). Tasks are then
scheduled using EDF[1] on these scheduling deadlines (the task with the
- smallest scheduling deadline is selected for execution). Notice that this
+ earliest scheduling deadline is selected for execution). Notice that this
guaranteed is respected if a proper "admission control" strategy (see Section
"4. Bandwidth management") is used.
Summing up, the CBS[2,3] algorithms assigns scheduling deadlines to tasks so
that each task runs for at most its runtime every period, avoiding any
interference between different tasks (bandwidth isolation), while the EDF[1]
- algorithm selects the task with the smallest scheduling deadline as the one
- to be executed first. Thanks to this feature, also tasks that do not
- strictly comply with the "traditional" real-time task model (see Section 3)
- can effectively use the new policy.
+ algorithm selects the task with the earliest scheduling deadline as the one
+ to be executed next. Thanks to this feature, tasks that do not strictly comply
+ with the "traditional" real-time task model (see Section 3) can effectively
+ use the new policy.
In more details, the CBS algorithm assigns scheduling deadlines to
tasks in the following way:
@@ -64,45 +64,45 @@ CONTENTS
"deadline", and "period" parameters;
- The state of the task is described by a "scheduling deadline", and
- a "current runtime". These two parameters are initially set to 0;
+ a "remaining runtime". These two parameters are initially set to 0;
- When a SCHED_DEADLINE task wakes up (becomes ready for execution),
the scheduler checks if
- current runtime runtime
- ---------------------------------- > ----------------
- scheduling deadline - current time period
+ remaining runtime runtime
+ ---------------------------------- > ---------
+ scheduling deadline - current time period
then, if the scheduling deadline is smaller than the current time, or
this condition is verified, the scheduling deadline and the
- current budget are re-initialised as
+ remaining runtime are re-initialised as
scheduling deadline = current time + deadline
- current runtime = runtime
+ remaining runtime = runtime
- otherwise, the scheduling deadline and the current runtime are
+ otherwise, the scheduling deadline and the remaining runtime are
left unchanged;
- When a SCHED_DEADLINE task executes for an amount of time t, its
- current runtime is decreased as
+ remaining runtime is decreased as
- current runtime = current runtime - t
+ remaining runtime = remaining runtime - t
(technically, the runtime is decreased at every tick, or when the
task is descheduled / preempted);
- - When the current runtime becomes less or equal than 0, the task is
+ - When the remaining runtime becomes less or equal than 0, the task is
said to be "throttled" (also known as "depleted" in real-time literature)
and cannot be scheduled until its scheduling deadline. The "replenishment
time" for this task (see next item) is set to be equal to the current
value of the scheduling deadline;
- When the current time is equal to the replenishment time of a
- throttled task, the scheduling deadline and the current runtime are
+ throttled task, the scheduling deadline and the remaining runtime are
updated as
scheduling deadline = scheduling deadline + period
- current runtime = current runtime + runtime
+ remaining runtime = remaining runtime + runtime
3. Scheduling Real-Time Tasks
@@ -147,6 +147,8 @@ CONTENTS
and the absolute deadlines (d_j) coincide, so a proper admission control
allows to respect the jobs' absolute deadlines for this task (this is what is
called "hard schedulability property" and is an extension of Lemma 1 of [2]).
+ Notice that if runtime > deadline the admission control will surely reject
+ this task, as it is not possible to respect its temporal constraints.
References:
1 - C. L. Liu and J. W. Layland. Scheduling algorithms for multiprogram-
@@ -156,7 +158,7 @@ CONTENTS
Real-Time Systems. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Real-time Systems
Symposium, 1998. http://retis.sssup.it/~giorgio/paps/1998/rtss98-cbs.pdf
3 - L. Abeni. Server Mechanisms for Multimedia Applications. ReTiS Lab
- Technical Report. http://xoomer.virgilio.it/lucabe72/pubs/tr-98-01.ps
+ Technical Report. http://disi.unitn.it/~abeni/tr-98-01.pdf
4. Bandwidth management
=======================
--
2.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [tip:sched/core] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Fix terminology and improve clarity
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: fix terminology and improve clarity Juri Lelli
@ 2014-09-16 10:56 ` tip-bot for Luca Abeni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Luca Abeni @ 2014-09-16 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: linux-kernel, luca.abeni, hpa, mingo, henrik, torvalds, peterz,
rdunlap, raistlin, juri.lelli, tglx, juri.lelli
Commit-ID: ad67dc316f000df4756b027f3559ad0491497d9e
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/ad67dc316f000df4756b027f3559ad0491497d9e
Author: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
AuthorDate: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:57:12 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:23:00 +0200
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Fix terminology and improve clarity
Several small changes regarding SCHED_DEADLINE documentation
that fix terminology and improve clarity and readability:
- "current runtime" becomes "remaining runtime"
- readablity of an equation is improved by introducing more spacing
- clarify when admission control will certainly fail
- new URL for CBS technical report
- substitue "smallest" with "earliest"
Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1410256636-26171-2-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 38 ++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
index 18adc92..a029891 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
@@ -45,17 +45,17 @@ CONTENTS
every time the task wakes up, the scheduler computes a "scheduling deadline"
consistent with the guarantee (using the CBS[2,3] algorithm). Tasks are then
scheduled using EDF[1] on these scheduling deadlines (the task with the
- smallest scheduling deadline is selected for execution). Notice that this
+ earliest scheduling deadline is selected for execution). Notice that this
guaranteed is respected if a proper "admission control" strategy (see Section
"4. Bandwidth management") is used.
Summing up, the CBS[2,3] algorithms assigns scheduling deadlines to tasks so
that each task runs for at most its runtime every period, avoiding any
interference between different tasks (bandwidth isolation), while the EDF[1]
- algorithm selects the task with the smallest scheduling deadline as the one
- to be executed first. Thanks to this feature, also tasks that do not
- strictly comply with the "traditional" real-time task model (see Section 3)
- can effectively use the new policy.
+ algorithm selects the task with the earliest scheduling deadline as the one
+ to be executed next. Thanks to this feature, tasks that do not strictly comply
+ with the "traditional" real-time task model (see Section 3) can effectively
+ use the new policy.
In more details, the CBS algorithm assigns scheduling deadlines to
tasks in the following way:
@@ -64,45 +64,45 @@ CONTENTS
"deadline", and "period" parameters;
- The state of the task is described by a "scheduling deadline", and
- a "current runtime". These two parameters are initially set to 0;
+ a "remaining runtime". These two parameters are initially set to 0;
- When a SCHED_DEADLINE task wakes up (becomes ready for execution),
the scheduler checks if
- current runtime runtime
- ---------------------------------- > ----------------
- scheduling deadline - current time period
+ remaining runtime runtime
+ ---------------------------------- > ---------
+ scheduling deadline - current time period
then, if the scheduling deadline is smaller than the current time, or
this condition is verified, the scheduling deadline and the
- current budget are re-initialised as
+ remaining runtime are re-initialised as
scheduling deadline = current time + deadline
- current runtime = runtime
+ remaining runtime = runtime
- otherwise, the scheduling deadline and the current runtime are
+ otherwise, the scheduling deadline and the remaining runtime are
left unchanged;
- When a SCHED_DEADLINE task executes for an amount of time t, its
- current runtime is decreased as
+ remaining runtime is decreased as
- current runtime = current runtime - t
+ remaining runtime = remaining runtime - t
(technically, the runtime is decreased at every tick, or when the
task is descheduled / preempted);
- - When the current runtime becomes less or equal than 0, the task is
+ - When the remaining runtime becomes less or equal than 0, the task is
said to be "throttled" (also known as "depleted" in real-time literature)
and cannot be scheduled until its scheduling deadline. The "replenishment
time" for this task (see next item) is set to be equal to the current
value of the scheduling deadline;
- When the current time is equal to the replenishment time of a
- throttled task, the scheduling deadline and the current runtime are
+ throttled task, the scheduling deadline and the remaining runtime are
updated as
scheduling deadline = scheduling deadline + period
- current runtime = current runtime + runtime
+ remaining runtime = remaining runtime + runtime
3. Scheduling Real-Time Tasks
@@ -147,6 +147,8 @@ CONTENTS
and the absolute deadlines (d_j) coincide, so a proper admission control
allows to respect the jobs' absolute deadlines for this task (this is what is
called "hard schedulability property" and is an extension of Lemma 1 of [2]).
+ Notice that if runtime > deadline the admission control will surely reject
+ this task, as it is not possible to respect its temporal constraints.
References:
1 - C. L. Liu and J. W. Layland. Scheduling algorithms for multiprogram-
@@ -156,7 +158,7 @@ CONTENTS
Real-Time Systems. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Real-time Systems
Symposium, 1998. http://retis.sssup.it/~giorgio/paps/1998/rtss98-cbs.pdf
3 - L. Abeni. Server Mechanisms for Multimedia Applications. ReTiS Lab
- Technical Report. http://xoomer.virgilio.it/lucabe72/pubs/tr-98-01.ps
+ Technical Report. http://disi.unitn.it/~abeni/tr-98-01.pdf
4. Bandwidth management
=======================
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Rewrite section 4 intro
2014-09-09 9:57 [PATCH v4 0/5] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements Juri Lelli
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: fix terminology and improve clarity Juri Lelli
@ 2014-09-09 9:57 ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-16 10:57 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Juri Lelli
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: improve and clarify AC bits Juri Lelli
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Juri Lelli @ 2014-09-09 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peterz
Cc: luca.abeni, rdunlap, mingo, henrik, raistlin, juri.lelli,
juri.lelli, linux-doc, linux-kernel
Section 4 intro was still describing the old interface. Rewrite it.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 51 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
index a029891..f75d832 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
@@ -165,39 +165,38 @@ CONTENTS
In order for the -deadline scheduling to be effective and useful, it is
important to have some method to keep the allocation of the available CPU
- bandwidth to the tasks under control.
- This is usually called "admission control" and if it is not performed at all,
- no guarantee can be given on the actual scheduling of the -deadline tasks.
-
- Since when RT-throttling has been introduced each task group has a bandwidth
- associated, calculated as a certain amount of runtime over a period.
- Moreover, to make it possible to manipulate such bandwidth, readable/writable
- controls have been added to both procfs (for system wide settings) and cgroupfs
- (for per-group settings).
- Therefore, the same interface is being used for controlling the bandwidth
- distrubution to -deadline tasks.
-
- However, more discussion is needed in order to figure out how we want to manage
- SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth at the task group level. Therefore, SCHED_DEADLINE
- uses (for now) a less sophisticated, but actually very sensible, mechanism to
- ensure that a certain utilization cap is not overcome per each root_domain.
-
- Another main difference between deadline bandwidth management and RT-throttling
+ bandwidth to the tasks under control. This is usually called "admission
+ control" and if it is not performed at all, no guarantee can be given on
+ the actual scheduling of the -deadline tasks.
+
+ The interface used to control the fraction of CPU bandwidth that can be
+ allocated to -deadline tasks is similar to the one already used for -rt
+ tasks with real-time group scheduling (a.k.a. RT-throttling - see
+ Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt), and is based on readable/
+ writable control files located in procfs (for system wide settings).
+ Notice that per-group settings (controlled through cgroupfs) are still not
+ defined for -deadline tasks, because more discussion is needed in order to
+ figure out how we want to manage SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth at the task group
+ level.
+
+ A main difference between deadline bandwidth management and RT-throttling
is that -deadline tasks have bandwidth on their own (while -rt ones don't!),
- and thus we don't need an higher level throttling mechanism to enforce the
- desired bandwidth.
+ and thus we don't need a higher level throttling mechanism to enforce the
+ desired bandwidth. Therefore, using this simple interface we can put a cap
+ on total utilization of -deadline tasks (i.e., \Sum (runtime_i / period_i) <
+ global_dl_utilization_cap).
4.1 System wide settings
------------------------
The system wide settings are configured under the /proc virtual file system.
- For now the -rt knobs are used for dl admission control and the -deadline
- runtime is accounted against the -rt runtime. We realise that this isn't
- entirely desirable; however, it is better to have a small interface for now,
- and be able to change it easily later. The ideal situation (see 5.) is to run
- -rt tasks from a -deadline server; in which case the -rt bandwidth is a direct
- subset of dl_bw.
+ For now the -rt knobs are used for -deadline admission control and the
+ -deadline runtime is accounted against the -rt runtime. We realise that this
+ isn't entirely desirable; however, it is better to have a small interface for
+ now, and be able to change it easily later. The ideal situation (see 5.) is to
+ run -rt tasks from a -deadline server; in which case the -rt bandwidth is a
+ direct subset of dl_bw.
This means that, for a root_domain comprising M CPUs, -deadline tasks
can be created while the sum of their bandwidths stays below:
--
2.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [tip:sched/core] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Rewrite section 4 intro
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Rewrite section 4 intro Juri Lelli
@ 2014-09-16 10:57 ` tip-bot for Juri Lelli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Juri Lelli @ 2014-09-16 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: linux-kernel, luca.abeni, hpa, mingo, henrik, torvalds, peterz,
rdunlap, raistlin, juri.lelli, tglx, juri.lelli
Commit-ID: 0d9ba8b03cfaed2696de42fe15ed410ba2ec7dbe
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/0d9ba8b03cfaed2696de42fe15ed410ba2ec7dbe
Author: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:57:13 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:23:01 +0200
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Rewrite section 4 intro
Section 4 intro was still describing the old interface. Rewrite
it.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1410256636-26171-3-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 51 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
index a029891..f75d832 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
@@ -165,39 +165,38 @@ CONTENTS
In order for the -deadline scheduling to be effective and useful, it is
important to have some method to keep the allocation of the available CPU
- bandwidth to the tasks under control.
- This is usually called "admission control" and if it is not performed at all,
- no guarantee can be given on the actual scheduling of the -deadline tasks.
-
- Since when RT-throttling has been introduced each task group has a bandwidth
- associated, calculated as a certain amount of runtime over a period.
- Moreover, to make it possible to manipulate such bandwidth, readable/writable
- controls have been added to both procfs (for system wide settings) and cgroupfs
- (for per-group settings).
- Therefore, the same interface is being used for controlling the bandwidth
- distrubution to -deadline tasks.
-
- However, more discussion is needed in order to figure out how we want to manage
- SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth at the task group level. Therefore, SCHED_DEADLINE
- uses (for now) a less sophisticated, but actually very sensible, mechanism to
- ensure that a certain utilization cap is not overcome per each root_domain.
-
- Another main difference between deadline bandwidth management and RT-throttling
+ bandwidth to the tasks under control. This is usually called "admission
+ control" and if it is not performed at all, no guarantee can be given on
+ the actual scheduling of the -deadline tasks.
+
+ The interface used to control the fraction of CPU bandwidth that can be
+ allocated to -deadline tasks is similar to the one already used for -rt
+ tasks with real-time group scheduling (a.k.a. RT-throttling - see
+ Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt), and is based on readable/
+ writable control files located in procfs (for system wide settings).
+ Notice that per-group settings (controlled through cgroupfs) are still not
+ defined for -deadline tasks, because more discussion is needed in order to
+ figure out how we want to manage SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth at the task group
+ level.
+
+ A main difference between deadline bandwidth management and RT-throttling
is that -deadline tasks have bandwidth on their own (while -rt ones don't!),
- and thus we don't need an higher level throttling mechanism to enforce the
- desired bandwidth.
+ and thus we don't need a higher level throttling mechanism to enforce the
+ desired bandwidth. Therefore, using this simple interface we can put a cap
+ on total utilization of -deadline tasks (i.e., \Sum (runtime_i / period_i) <
+ global_dl_utilization_cap).
4.1 System wide settings
------------------------
The system wide settings are configured under the /proc virtual file system.
- For now the -rt knobs are used for dl admission control and the -deadline
- runtime is accounted against the -rt runtime. We realise that this isn't
- entirely desirable; however, it is better to have a small interface for now,
- and be able to change it easily later. The ideal situation (see 5.) is to run
- -rt tasks from a -deadline server; in which case the -rt bandwidth is a direct
- subset of dl_bw.
+ For now the -rt knobs are used for -deadline admission control and the
+ -deadline runtime is accounted against the -rt runtime. We realise that this
+ isn't entirely desirable; however, it is better to have a small interface for
+ now, and be able to change it easily later. The ideal situation (see 5.) is to
+ run -rt tasks from a -deadline server; in which case the -rt bandwidth is a
+ direct subset of dl_bw.
This means that, for a root_domain comprising M CPUs, -deadline tasks
can be created while the sum of their bandwidths stays below:
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: improve and clarify AC bits
2014-09-09 9:57 [PATCH v4 0/5] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements Juri Lelli
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: fix terminology and improve clarity Juri Lelli
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Rewrite section 4 intro Juri Lelli
@ 2014-09-09 9:57 ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-16 10:57 ` [tip:sched/core] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Improve " tip-bot for Luca Abeni
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add tests suite appendix Juri Lelli
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Juri Lelli @ 2014-09-09 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peterz
Cc: luca.abeni, rdunlap, mingo, henrik, raistlin, juri.lelli,
juri.lelli, linux-doc, linux-kernel
From: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Admission control is of key importance for SCHED_DEADLINE, since it guarantees
system schedulability (or tells us something about the degree of guarantees
we can provide to the user).
This patch improves and clarifies bits and pieces regarding AC, both for UP
and SMP systems.
Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
index f75d832..0ce5e2c 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
@@ -38,16 +38,17 @@ CONTENTS
==================
SCHED_DEADLINE uses three parameters, named "runtime", "period", and
- "deadline" to schedule tasks. A SCHED_DEADLINE task is guaranteed to receive
+ "deadline", to schedule tasks. A SCHED_DEADLINE task should receive
"runtime" microseconds of execution time every "period" microseconds, and
these "runtime" microseconds are available within "deadline" microseconds
from the beginning of the period. In order to implement this behaviour,
every time the task wakes up, the scheduler computes a "scheduling deadline"
consistent with the guarantee (using the CBS[2,3] algorithm). Tasks are then
scheduled using EDF[1] on these scheduling deadlines (the task with the
- earliest scheduling deadline is selected for execution). Notice that this
- guaranteed is respected if a proper "admission control" strategy (see Section
- "4. Bandwidth management") is used.
+ earliest scheduling deadline is selected for execution). Notice that the
+ task actually receives "runtime" time units within "deadline" if a proper
+ "admission control" strategy (see Section "4. Bandwidth management") is used
+ (clearly, if the system is overloaded this guarantee cannot be respected).
Summing up, the CBS[2,3] algorithms assigns scheduling deadlines to tasks so
that each task runs for at most its runtime every period, avoiding any
@@ -134,6 +135,50 @@ CONTENTS
A real-time task can be periodic with period P if r_{j+1} = r_j + P, or
sporadic with minimum inter-arrival time P is r_{j+1} >= r_j + P. Finally,
d_j = r_j + D, where D is the task's relative deadline.
+ The utilisation of a real-time task is defined as the ratio between its
+ WCET and its period (or minimum inter-arrival time), and represents
+ the fraction of CPU time needed to execute the task.
+
+ If the total utilisation sum_i(WCET_i/P_i) is larger than M (with M equal
+ to the number of CPUs), then the scheduler is unable to respect all the
+ deadlines.
+ Note that total utilisation is defined as the sum of the utilisations
+ WCET_i/P_i over all the real-time tasks in the system. When considering
+ multiple real-time tasks, the parameters of the i-th task are indicated
+ with the "_i" suffix.
+ Moreover, if the total utilisation is larger than M, then we risk starving
+ non- real-time tasks by real-time tasks.
+ If, instead, the total utilisation is smaller than M, then non real-time
+ tasks will not be starved and the system might be able to respect all the
+ deadlines.
+ As a matter of fact, in this case it is possible to provide an upper bound
+ for tardiness (defined as the maximum between 0 and the difference
+ between the finishing time of a job and its absolute deadline).
+ More precisely, it can be proven that using a global EDF scheduler the
+ maximum tardiness of each task is smaller or equal than
+ ((M − 1) · WCET_max − WCET_min)/(M − (M − 2) · U_max) + WCET_max
+ where WCET_max = max_i{WCET_i} is the maximum WCET, WCET_min=min_i{WCET_i}
+ is the minimum WCET, and U_max = max_i{WCET_i/P_i} is the maximum utilisation.
+
+ If M=1 (uniprocessor system), or in case of partitioned scheduling (each
+ real-time task is statically assigned to one and only one CPU), it is
+ possible to formally check if all the deadlines are respected.
+ If D_i = P_i for all tasks, then EDF is able to respect all the deadlines
+ of all the tasks executing on a CPU if and only if the total utilisation
+ of the tasks running on such a CPU is smaller or equal than 1.
+ If D_i != P_i for some task, then it is possible to define the density of
+ a task as C_i/min{D_i,T_i}, and EDF is able to respect all the deadlines
+ of all the tasks running on a CPU if the sum sum_i C_i/min{D_i,T_i} of the
+ densities of the tasks running on such a CPU is smaller or equal than 1
+ (notice that this condition is only sufficient, and not necessary).
+
+ On multiprocessor systems with global EDF scheduling (non partitioned
+ systems), a sufficient test for schedulability can not be based on the
+ utilisations (it can be shown that task sets with utilisations slightly
+ larger than 1 can miss deadlines regardless of the number of CPUs M).
+ However, as previously stated, enforcing that the total utilisation is smaller
+ than M is enough to guarantee that non real-time tasks are not starved and
+ that the tardiness of real-time tasks has an upper bound.
SCHED_DEADLINE can be used to schedule real-time tasks guaranteeing that
the jobs' deadlines of a task are respected. In order to do this, a task
@@ -163,14 +208,22 @@ CONTENTS
4. Bandwidth management
=======================
- In order for the -deadline scheduling to be effective and useful, it is
- important to have some method to keep the allocation of the available CPU
- bandwidth to the tasks under control. This is usually called "admission
- control" and if it is not performed at all, no guarantee can be given on
- the actual scheduling of the -deadline tasks.
-
- The interface used to control the fraction of CPU bandwidth that can be
- allocated to -deadline tasks is similar to the one already used for -rt
+ As previously mentioned, in order for -deadline scheduling to be
+ effective and useful (that is, to be able to provide "runtime" time units
+ within "deadline"), it is important to have some method to keep the allocation
+ of the available fractions of CPU time to the various tasks under control.
+ This is usually called "admission control" and if it is not performed, then
+ no guarantee can be given on the actual scheduling of the -deadline tasks.
+
+ As already stated in Section 3, a necessary condition to be respected to
+ correctly schedule a set of real-time tasks is that the total utilisation
+ is smaller than M. When talking about -deadline tasks, this requires that
+ the sum of the ratio between runtime and period for all tasks is smaller
+ than M. Notice that the ratio runtime/period is equivalent to the utilisation
+ of a "traditional" real-time task, and is also often referred to as
+ "bandwidth".
+ The interface used to control the CPU bandwidth that can be allocated
+ to -deadline tasks is similar to the one already used for -rt
tasks with real-time group scheduling (a.k.a. RT-throttling - see
Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt), and is based on readable/
writable control files located in procfs (for system wide settings).
@@ -182,9 +235,13 @@ CONTENTS
A main difference between deadline bandwidth management and RT-throttling
is that -deadline tasks have bandwidth on their own (while -rt ones don't!),
and thus we don't need a higher level throttling mechanism to enforce the
- desired bandwidth. Therefore, using this simple interface we can put a cap
- on total utilization of -deadline tasks (i.e., \Sum (runtime_i / period_i) <
- global_dl_utilization_cap).
+ desired bandwidth. In other words, this means that interface parameters are
+ only used at admission control time (i.e., when the user calls
+ sched_setattr()). Scheduling is then performed considering actual tasks'
+ parameters, so that CPU bandwidth is allocated to SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
+ respecting their needs in terms of granularity. Therefore, using this simple
+ interface we can put a cap on total utilization of -deadline tasks (i.e.,
+ \Sum (runtime_i / period_i) < global_dl_utilization_cap).
4.1 System wide settings
------------------------
@@ -232,8 +289,16 @@ CONTENTS
950000. With rt_period equal to 1000000, by default, it means that -deadline
tasks can use at most 95%, multiplied by the number of CPUs that compose the
root_domain, for each root_domain.
-
- A -deadline task cannot fork.
+ This means that non -deadline tasks will receive at least 5% of the CPU time,
+ and that -deadline tasks will receive their runtime with a guaranteed
+ worst-case delay respect to the "deadline" parameter. If "deadline" = "period"
+ and the cpuset mechanism is used to implement partitioned scheduling (see
+ Section 5), then this simple setting of the bandwidth management is able to
+ deterministically guarantee that -deadline tasks will receive their runtime
+ in a period.
+
+ Finally, notice that in order not to jeopardize the admission control a
+ -deadline task cannot fork.
5. Tasks CPU affinity
=====================
--
2.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [tip:sched/core] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Improve and clarify AC bits
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: improve and clarify AC bits Juri Lelli
@ 2014-09-16 10:57 ` tip-bot for Luca Abeni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Luca Abeni @ 2014-09-16 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: linux-kernel, luca.abeni, hpa, mingo, henrik, torvalds, peterz,
rdunlap, raistlin, juri.lelli, tglx, juri.lelli
Commit-ID: b56bfc6cd13c25264f614320de9183a5dbcab6ca
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b56bfc6cd13c25264f614320de9183a5dbcab6ca
Author: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
AuthorDate: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:57:14 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:23:01 +0200
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Improve and clarify AC bits
Admission control is of key importance for SCHED_DEADLINE, since
it guarantees system schedulability (or tells us something about
the degree of guarantees we can provide to the user).
This patch improves and clarifies bits and pieces regarding AC,
both for UP and SMP systems.
Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1410256636-26171-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
index f75d832..0ce5e2c 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
@@ -38,16 +38,17 @@ CONTENTS
==================
SCHED_DEADLINE uses three parameters, named "runtime", "period", and
- "deadline" to schedule tasks. A SCHED_DEADLINE task is guaranteed to receive
+ "deadline", to schedule tasks. A SCHED_DEADLINE task should receive
"runtime" microseconds of execution time every "period" microseconds, and
these "runtime" microseconds are available within "deadline" microseconds
from the beginning of the period. In order to implement this behaviour,
every time the task wakes up, the scheduler computes a "scheduling deadline"
consistent with the guarantee (using the CBS[2,3] algorithm). Tasks are then
scheduled using EDF[1] on these scheduling deadlines (the task with the
- earliest scheduling deadline is selected for execution). Notice that this
- guaranteed is respected if a proper "admission control" strategy (see Section
- "4. Bandwidth management") is used.
+ earliest scheduling deadline is selected for execution). Notice that the
+ task actually receives "runtime" time units within "deadline" if a proper
+ "admission control" strategy (see Section "4. Bandwidth management") is used
+ (clearly, if the system is overloaded this guarantee cannot be respected).
Summing up, the CBS[2,3] algorithms assigns scheduling deadlines to tasks so
that each task runs for at most its runtime every period, avoiding any
@@ -134,6 +135,50 @@ CONTENTS
A real-time task can be periodic with period P if r_{j+1} = r_j + P, or
sporadic with minimum inter-arrival time P is r_{j+1} >= r_j + P. Finally,
d_j = r_j + D, where D is the task's relative deadline.
+ The utilisation of a real-time task is defined as the ratio between its
+ WCET and its period (or minimum inter-arrival time), and represents
+ the fraction of CPU time needed to execute the task.
+
+ If the total utilisation sum_i(WCET_i/P_i) is larger than M (with M equal
+ to the number of CPUs), then the scheduler is unable to respect all the
+ deadlines.
+ Note that total utilisation is defined as the sum of the utilisations
+ WCET_i/P_i over all the real-time tasks in the system. When considering
+ multiple real-time tasks, the parameters of the i-th task are indicated
+ with the "_i" suffix.
+ Moreover, if the total utilisation is larger than M, then we risk starving
+ non- real-time tasks by real-time tasks.
+ If, instead, the total utilisation is smaller than M, then non real-time
+ tasks will not be starved and the system might be able to respect all the
+ deadlines.
+ As a matter of fact, in this case it is possible to provide an upper bound
+ for tardiness (defined as the maximum between 0 and the difference
+ between the finishing time of a job and its absolute deadline).
+ More precisely, it can be proven that using a global EDF scheduler the
+ maximum tardiness of each task is smaller or equal than
+ ((M − 1) · WCET_max − WCET_min)/(M − (M − 2) · U_max) + WCET_max
+ where WCET_max = max_i{WCET_i} is the maximum WCET, WCET_min=min_i{WCET_i}
+ is the minimum WCET, and U_max = max_i{WCET_i/P_i} is the maximum utilisation.
+
+ If M=1 (uniprocessor system), or in case of partitioned scheduling (each
+ real-time task is statically assigned to one and only one CPU), it is
+ possible to formally check if all the deadlines are respected.
+ If D_i = P_i for all tasks, then EDF is able to respect all the deadlines
+ of all the tasks executing on a CPU if and only if the total utilisation
+ of the tasks running on such a CPU is smaller or equal than 1.
+ If D_i != P_i for some task, then it is possible to define the density of
+ a task as C_i/min{D_i,T_i}, and EDF is able to respect all the deadlines
+ of all the tasks running on a CPU if the sum sum_i C_i/min{D_i,T_i} of the
+ densities of the tasks running on such a CPU is smaller or equal than 1
+ (notice that this condition is only sufficient, and not necessary).
+
+ On multiprocessor systems with global EDF scheduling (non partitioned
+ systems), a sufficient test for schedulability can not be based on the
+ utilisations (it can be shown that task sets with utilisations slightly
+ larger than 1 can miss deadlines regardless of the number of CPUs M).
+ However, as previously stated, enforcing that the total utilisation is smaller
+ than M is enough to guarantee that non real-time tasks are not starved and
+ that the tardiness of real-time tasks has an upper bound.
SCHED_DEADLINE can be used to schedule real-time tasks guaranteeing that
the jobs' deadlines of a task are respected. In order to do this, a task
@@ -163,14 +208,22 @@ CONTENTS
4. Bandwidth management
=======================
- In order for the -deadline scheduling to be effective and useful, it is
- important to have some method to keep the allocation of the available CPU
- bandwidth to the tasks under control. This is usually called "admission
- control" and if it is not performed at all, no guarantee can be given on
- the actual scheduling of the -deadline tasks.
-
- The interface used to control the fraction of CPU bandwidth that can be
- allocated to -deadline tasks is similar to the one already used for -rt
+ As previously mentioned, in order for -deadline scheduling to be
+ effective and useful (that is, to be able to provide "runtime" time units
+ within "deadline"), it is important to have some method to keep the allocation
+ of the available fractions of CPU time to the various tasks under control.
+ This is usually called "admission control" and if it is not performed, then
+ no guarantee can be given on the actual scheduling of the -deadline tasks.
+
+ As already stated in Section 3, a necessary condition to be respected to
+ correctly schedule a set of real-time tasks is that the total utilisation
+ is smaller than M. When talking about -deadline tasks, this requires that
+ the sum of the ratio between runtime and period for all tasks is smaller
+ than M. Notice that the ratio runtime/period is equivalent to the utilisation
+ of a "traditional" real-time task, and is also often referred to as
+ "bandwidth".
+ The interface used to control the CPU bandwidth that can be allocated
+ to -deadline tasks is similar to the one already used for -rt
tasks with real-time group scheduling (a.k.a. RT-throttling - see
Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt), and is based on readable/
writable control files located in procfs (for system wide settings).
@@ -182,9 +235,13 @@ CONTENTS
A main difference between deadline bandwidth management and RT-throttling
is that -deadline tasks have bandwidth on their own (while -rt ones don't!),
and thus we don't need a higher level throttling mechanism to enforce the
- desired bandwidth. Therefore, using this simple interface we can put a cap
- on total utilization of -deadline tasks (i.e., \Sum (runtime_i / period_i) <
- global_dl_utilization_cap).
+ desired bandwidth. In other words, this means that interface parameters are
+ only used at admission control time (i.e., when the user calls
+ sched_setattr()). Scheduling is then performed considering actual tasks'
+ parameters, so that CPU bandwidth is allocated to SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
+ respecting their needs in terms of granularity. Therefore, using this simple
+ interface we can put a cap on total utilization of -deadline tasks (i.e.,
+ \Sum (runtime_i / period_i) < global_dl_utilization_cap).
4.1 System wide settings
------------------------
@@ -232,8 +289,16 @@ CONTENTS
950000. With rt_period equal to 1000000, by default, it means that -deadline
tasks can use at most 95%, multiplied by the number of CPUs that compose the
root_domain, for each root_domain.
-
- A -deadline task cannot fork.
+ This means that non -deadline tasks will receive at least 5% of the CPU time,
+ and that -deadline tasks will receive their runtime with a guaranteed
+ worst-case delay respect to the "deadline" parameter. If "deadline" = "period"
+ and the cpuset mechanism is used to implement partitioned scheduling (see
+ Section 5), then this simple setting of the bandwidth management is able to
+ deterministically guarantee that -deadline tasks will receive their runtime
+ in a period.
+
+ Finally, notice that in order not to jeopardize the admission control a
+ -deadline task cannot fork.
5. Tasks CPU affinity
=====================
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 4/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add tests suite appendix
2014-09-09 9:57 [PATCH v4 0/5] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements Juri Lelli
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: improve and clarify AC bits Juri Lelli
@ 2014-09-09 9:57 ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-16 10:57 ` [tip:sched/core] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Add " tip-bot for Juri Lelli
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add minimal main() appendix Juri Lelli
2014-09-09 21:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements Henrik Austad
5 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Juri Lelli @ 2014-09-09 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peterz
Cc: luca.abeni, rdunlap, mingo, henrik, raistlin, juri.lelli,
juri.lelli, linux-doc, linux-kernel
Add an appendix briefly describing tools that can be used to test SCHED_DEADLINE
(and the scheduler in general). Links to where source code of the tools is hosted
are also provided.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
index 0ce5e2c..b4aad31 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ CONTENTS
5. Tasks CPU affinity
5.1 SCHED_DEADLINE and cpusets HOWTO
6. Future plans
+ A. Test suite
0. WARNING
@@ -345,3 +346,54 @@ CONTENTS
throttling patches [https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/23/239] but we still are in
the preliminary phases of the merge and we really seek feedback that would
help us decide on the direction it should take.
+
+Appendix A. Test suite
+======================
+
+ The SCHED_DEADLINE policy can be easily tested using two applications that
+ are part of a wider Linux Scheduler validation suite. The suite is
+ available as a GitHub repository: https://github.com/scheduler-tools.
+
+ The first testing application is called rt-app and can be used to
+ start multiple threads with specific parameters. rt-app supports
+ SCHED_{OTHER,FIFO,RR,DEADLINE} scheduling policies and their related
+ parameters (e.g., niceness, priority, runtime/deadline/period). rt-app
+ is a valuable tool, as it can be used to synthetically recreate certain
+ workloads (maybe mimicking real use-cases) and evaluate how the scheduler
+ behaves under such workloads. In this way, results are easily reproducible.
+ rt-app is available at: https://github.com/scheduler-tools/rt-app.
+
+ Thread parameters can be specified from the command line, with something like
+ this:
+
+ # rt-app -t 100000:10000:d -t 150000:20000:f:10 -D5
+
+ The above creates 2 threads. The first one, scheduled by SCHED_DEADLINE,
+ executes for 10ms every 100ms. The second one, scheduled at SCHED_FIFO
+ priority 10, executes for 20ms every 150ms. The test will run for a total
+ of 5 seconds.
+
+ More interestingly, configurations can be described with a json file that
+ can be passed as input to rt-app with something like this:
+
+ # rt-app my_config.json
+
+ The parameters that can be specified with the second method are a superset
+ of the command line options. Please refer to rt-app documentation for more
+ details (<rt-app-sources>/doc/*.json).
+
+ The second testing application is a modification of schedtool, called
+ schedtool-dl, which can be used to setup SCHED_DEADLINE parameters for a
+ certain pid/application. schedtool-dl is available at:
+ https://github.com/scheduler-tools/schedtool-dl.git.
+
+ The usage is straightforward:
+
+ # schedtool -E -t 10000000:100000000 -e ./my_cpuhog_app
+
+ With this, my_cpuhog_app is put to run inside a SCHED_DEADLINE reservation
+ of 10ms every 100ms (note that parameters are expressed in microseconds).
+ You can also use schedtool to create a reservation for an already running
+ application, given that you know its pid:
+
+ # schedtool -E -t 10000000:100000000 my_app_pid
--
2.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [tip:sched/core] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Add tests suite appendix
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add tests suite appendix Juri Lelli
@ 2014-09-16 10:57 ` tip-bot for Juri Lelli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Juri Lelli @ 2014-09-16 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, henrik, torvalds, peterz, rdunlap,
raistlin, juri.lelli, tglx, juri.lelli
Commit-ID: f5801933ce595ba6eb77d170ab0dfbcd5c894e11
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/f5801933ce595ba6eb77d170ab0dfbcd5c894e11
Author: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:57:15 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:23:02 +0200
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Add tests suite appendix
Add an appendix briefly describing tools that can be used to
test SCHED_DEADLINE (and the scheduler in general). Links to
where source code of the tools is hosted are also provided.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1410256636-26171-5-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
index 0ce5e2c..b4aad31 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ CONTENTS
5. Tasks CPU affinity
5.1 SCHED_DEADLINE and cpusets HOWTO
6. Future plans
+ A. Test suite
0. WARNING
@@ -345,3 +346,54 @@ CONTENTS
throttling patches [https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/23/239] but we still are in
the preliminary phases of the merge and we really seek feedback that would
help us decide on the direction it should take.
+
+Appendix A. Test suite
+======================
+
+ The SCHED_DEADLINE policy can be easily tested using two applications that
+ are part of a wider Linux Scheduler validation suite. The suite is
+ available as a GitHub repository: https://github.com/scheduler-tools.
+
+ The first testing application is called rt-app and can be used to
+ start multiple threads with specific parameters. rt-app supports
+ SCHED_{OTHER,FIFO,RR,DEADLINE} scheduling policies and their related
+ parameters (e.g., niceness, priority, runtime/deadline/period). rt-app
+ is a valuable tool, as it can be used to synthetically recreate certain
+ workloads (maybe mimicking real use-cases) and evaluate how the scheduler
+ behaves under such workloads. In this way, results are easily reproducible.
+ rt-app is available at: https://github.com/scheduler-tools/rt-app.
+
+ Thread parameters can be specified from the command line, with something like
+ this:
+
+ # rt-app -t 100000:10000:d -t 150000:20000:f:10 -D5
+
+ The above creates 2 threads. The first one, scheduled by SCHED_DEADLINE,
+ executes for 10ms every 100ms. The second one, scheduled at SCHED_FIFO
+ priority 10, executes for 20ms every 150ms. The test will run for a total
+ of 5 seconds.
+
+ More interestingly, configurations can be described with a json file that
+ can be passed as input to rt-app with something like this:
+
+ # rt-app my_config.json
+
+ The parameters that can be specified with the second method are a superset
+ of the command line options. Please refer to rt-app documentation for more
+ details (<rt-app-sources>/doc/*.json).
+
+ The second testing application is a modification of schedtool, called
+ schedtool-dl, which can be used to setup SCHED_DEADLINE parameters for a
+ certain pid/application. schedtool-dl is available at:
+ https://github.com/scheduler-tools/schedtool-dl.git.
+
+ The usage is straightforward:
+
+ # schedtool -E -t 10000000:100000000 -e ./my_cpuhog_app
+
+ With this, my_cpuhog_app is put to run inside a SCHED_DEADLINE reservation
+ of 10ms every 100ms (note that parameters are expressed in microseconds).
+ You can also use schedtool to create a reservation for an already running
+ application, given that you know its pid:
+
+ # schedtool -E -t 10000000:100000000 my_app_pid
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 5/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add minimal main() appendix
2014-09-09 9:57 [PATCH v4 0/5] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements Juri Lelli
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add tests suite appendix Juri Lelli
@ 2014-09-09 9:57 ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-16 10:57 ` [tip:sched/core] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Add " tip-bot for Juri Lelli
2014-09-09 21:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements Henrik Austad
5 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Juri Lelli @ 2014-09-09 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peterz
Cc: luca.abeni, rdunlap, mingo, henrik, raistlin, juri.lelli,
juri.lelli, linux-doc, linux-kernel
Add an appendix providing a simple self-contained code snippet showing
how SCHED_DEADLINE reservations can be created by application developers.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 126 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
index b4aad31..cd8274c 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ CONTENTS
5.1 SCHED_DEADLINE and cpusets HOWTO
6. Future plans
A. Test suite
+ B. Minimal main()
0. WARNING
@@ -397,3 +398,128 @@ Appendix A. Test suite
application, given that you know its pid:
# schedtool -E -t 10000000:100000000 my_app_pid
+
+Appendix B. Minimal main()
+==========================
+
+ We provide in what follows a simple (ugly) self-contained code snippet
+ showing how SCHED_DEADLINE reservations can be created by a real-time
+ application developer.
+
+ #define _GNU_SOURCE
+ #include <unistd.h>
+ #include <stdio.h>
+ #include <stdlib.h>
+ #include <string.h>
+ #include <time.h>
+ #include <linux/unistd.h>
+ #include <linux/kernel.h>
+ #include <linux/types.h>
+ #include <sys/syscall.h>
+ #include <pthread.h>
+
+ #define gettid() syscall(__NR_gettid)
+
+ #define SCHED_DEADLINE 6
+
+ /* XXX use the proper syscall numbers */
+ #ifdef __x86_64__
+ #define __NR_sched_setattr 314
+ #define __NR_sched_getattr 315
+ #endif
+
+ #ifdef __i386__
+ #define __NR_sched_setattr 351
+ #define __NR_sched_getattr 352
+ #endif
+
+ #ifdef __arm__
+ #define __NR_sched_setattr 380
+ #define __NR_sched_getattr 381
+ #endif
+
+ static volatile int done;
+
+ struct sched_attr {
+ __u32 size;
+
+ __u32 sched_policy;
+ __u64 sched_flags;
+
+ /* SCHED_NORMAL, SCHED_BATCH */
+ __s32 sched_nice;
+
+ /* SCHED_FIFO, SCHED_RR */
+ __u32 sched_priority;
+
+ /* SCHED_DEADLINE (nsec) */
+ __u64 sched_runtime;
+ __u64 sched_deadline;
+ __u64 sched_period;
+ };
+
+ int sched_setattr(pid_t pid,
+ const struct sched_attr *attr,
+ unsigned int flags)
+ {
+ return syscall(__NR_sched_setattr, pid, attr, flags);
+ }
+
+ int sched_getattr(pid_t pid,
+ struct sched_attr *attr,
+ unsigned int size,
+ unsigned int flags)
+ {
+ return syscall(__NR_sched_getattr, pid, attr, size, flags);
+ }
+
+ void *run_deadline(void *data)
+ {
+ struct sched_attr attr;
+ int x = 0;
+ int ret;
+ unsigned int flags = 0;
+
+ printf("deadline thread started [%ld]\n", gettid());
+
+ attr.size = sizeof(attr);
+ attr.sched_flags = 0;
+ attr.sched_nice = 0;
+ attr.sched_priority = 0;
+
+ /* This creates a 10ms/30ms reservation */
+ attr.sched_policy = SCHED_DEADLINE;
+ attr.sched_runtime = 10 * 1000 * 1000;
+ attr.sched_period = attr.sched_deadline = 30 * 1000 * 1000;
+
+ ret = sched_setattr(0, &attr, flags);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ done = 0;
+ perror("sched_setattr");
+ exit(-1);
+ }
+
+ while (!done) {
+ x++;
+ }
+
+ printf("deadline thread dies [%ld]\n", gettid());
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ int main (int argc, char **argv)
+ {
+ pthread_t thread;
+
+ printf("main thread [%ld]\n", gettid());
+
+ pthread_create(&thread, NULL, run_deadline, NULL);
+
+ sleep(10);
+
+ done = 1;
+ pthread_join(thread, NULL);
+
+ printf("main dies [%ld]\n", gettid());
+ return 0;
+ }
--
2.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [tip:sched/core] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Add minimal main() appendix
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add minimal main() appendix Juri Lelli
@ 2014-09-16 10:57 ` tip-bot for Juri Lelli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Juri Lelli @ 2014-09-16 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, henrik, torvalds, peterz, rdunlap,
raistlin, juri.lelli, tglx, juri.lelli
Commit-ID: 13924d2a983fc1557eb737ea59e2324adb538fa2
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/13924d2a983fc1557eb737ea59e2324adb538fa2
Author: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:57:16 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:23:45 +0200
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Add minimal main() appendix
Add an appendix providing a simple self-contained code snippet
showing how SCHED_DEADLINE reservations can be created by
application developers.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1410256636-26171-6-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com
[ Fixed some whitespace inconsistencies. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 126 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
index b4aad31..21461a0 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ CONTENTS
5.1 SCHED_DEADLINE and cpusets HOWTO
6. Future plans
A. Test suite
+ B. Minimal main()
0. WARNING
@@ -397,3 +398,128 @@ Appendix A. Test suite
application, given that you know its pid:
# schedtool -E -t 10000000:100000000 my_app_pid
+
+Appendix B. Minimal main()
+==========================
+
+ We provide in what follows a simple (ugly) self-contained code snippet
+ showing how SCHED_DEADLINE reservations can be created by a real-time
+ application developer.
+
+ #define _GNU_SOURCE
+ #include <unistd.h>
+ #include <stdio.h>
+ #include <stdlib.h>
+ #include <string.h>
+ #include <time.h>
+ #include <linux/unistd.h>
+ #include <linux/kernel.h>
+ #include <linux/types.h>
+ #include <sys/syscall.h>
+ #include <pthread.h>
+
+ #define gettid() syscall(__NR_gettid)
+
+ #define SCHED_DEADLINE 6
+
+ /* XXX use the proper syscall numbers */
+ #ifdef __x86_64__
+ #define __NR_sched_setattr 314
+ #define __NR_sched_getattr 315
+ #endif
+
+ #ifdef __i386__
+ #define __NR_sched_setattr 351
+ #define __NR_sched_getattr 352
+ #endif
+
+ #ifdef __arm__
+ #define __NR_sched_setattr 380
+ #define __NR_sched_getattr 381
+ #endif
+
+ static volatile int done;
+
+ struct sched_attr {
+ __u32 size;
+
+ __u32 sched_policy;
+ __u64 sched_flags;
+
+ /* SCHED_NORMAL, SCHED_BATCH */
+ __s32 sched_nice;
+
+ /* SCHED_FIFO, SCHED_RR */
+ __u32 sched_priority;
+
+ /* SCHED_DEADLINE (nsec) */
+ __u64 sched_runtime;
+ __u64 sched_deadline;
+ __u64 sched_period;
+ };
+
+ int sched_setattr(pid_t pid,
+ const struct sched_attr *attr,
+ unsigned int flags)
+ {
+ return syscall(__NR_sched_setattr, pid, attr, flags);
+ }
+
+ int sched_getattr(pid_t pid,
+ struct sched_attr *attr,
+ unsigned int size,
+ unsigned int flags)
+ {
+ return syscall(__NR_sched_getattr, pid, attr, size, flags);
+ }
+
+ void *run_deadline(void *data)
+ {
+ struct sched_attr attr;
+ int x = 0;
+ int ret;
+ unsigned int flags = 0;
+
+ printf("deadline thread started [%ld]\n", gettid());
+
+ attr.size = sizeof(attr);
+ attr.sched_flags = 0;
+ attr.sched_nice = 0;
+ attr.sched_priority = 0;
+
+ /* This creates a 10ms/30ms reservation */
+ attr.sched_policy = SCHED_DEADLINE;
+ attr.sched_runtime = 10 * 1000 * 1000;
+ attr.sched_period = attr.sched_deadline = 30 * 1000 * 1000;
+
+ ret = sched_setattr(0, &attr, flags);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ done = 0;
+ perror("sched_setattr");
+ exit(-1);
+ }
+
+ while (!done) {
+ x++;
+ }
+
+ printf("deadline thread dies [%ld]\n", gettid());
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ int main (int argc, char **argv)
+ {
+ pthread_t thread;
+
+ printf("main thread [%ld]\n", gettid());
+
+ pthread_create(&thread, NULL, run_deadline, NULL);
+
+ sleep(10);
+
+ done = 1;
+ pthread_join(thread, NULL);
+
+ printf("main dies [%ld]\n", gettid());
+ return 0;
+ }
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements
2014-09-09 9:57 [PATCH v4 0/5] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements Juri Lelli
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-09-09 9:57 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add minimal main() appendix Juri Lelli
@ 2014-09-09 21:17 ` Henrik Austad
2014-09-10 8:03 ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-10 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
5 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Henrik Austad @ 2014-09-09 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juri Lelli
Cc: peterz, luca.abeni, rdunlap, mingo, raistlin, juri.lelli,
linux-doc, linux-kernel
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:57:11AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hello everyone,
Hi Juri,
Looks good! Didn't spot anything and pleased to see that minimal main()
made it into the appendix! :D
> This is version 4 of a small patchset that fixes and improves SCHED_DEADLINE
> documentation.
>
> Patch 1/5 fixes and clarifies terminology; patch 2/5 aligns Section 4 to
> the current interface; patch 3/5 improves and clarifies what admission
> control means on UP an SMP systems; patch 4/5 introduces an appendix about
> testing; patch 5/5 introduces an appendix with a minimal main() for
> application developers.
>
> Changes since v1:
>
> - fixed typos spotted by Randy and Peter (thanks!)
>
> Changes since v2:
>
> - fixed typos and rewrote paragraphs as suggested by Ingo (thanks!)
>
> Changes since v3:
>
> - addressed comments made by Henrik (thanks!)
> - added patch 5/5 (as Henrik asked)
To the whole series,
Reviewed-by: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
> Best Regards,
>
> - Juri
>
> Juri Lelli (3):
> Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Rewrite section 4 intro
> Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add tests suite appendix
> Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add minimal main()
> appendix
>
> Luca Abeni (2):
> Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: fix terminology and
> improve clarity
> Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: improve and clarify AC
> bits
>
> Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 340 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 292 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.0.4
>
>
--
Henrik Austad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements
2014-09-09 21:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements Henrik Austad
@ 2014-09-10 8:03 ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-10 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Juri Lelli @ 2014-09-10 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Henrik Austad
Cc: peterz, luca.abeni, rdunlap, mingo, raistlin, juri.lelli,
linux-doc, linux-kernel
Hi Henrik,
On 09/09/14 22:17, Henrik Austad wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:57:11AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>
> Hi Juri,
>
> Looks good! Didn't spot anything and pleased to see that minimal main()
> made it into the appendix! :D
>
Great! Thanks a lot.
Best,
- Juri
>> This is version 4 of a small patchset that fixes and improves SCHED_DEADLINE
>> documentation.
>>
>> Patch 1/5 fixes and clarifies terminology; patch 2/5 aligns Section 4 to
>> the current interface; patch 3/5 improves and clarifies what admission
>> control means on UP an SMP systems; patch 4/5 introduces an appendix about
>> testing; patch 5/5 introduces an appendix with a minimal main() for
>> application developers.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>
>> - fixed typos spotted by Randy and Peter (thanks!)
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>>
>> - fixed typos and rewrote paragraphs as suggested by Ingo (thanks!)
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>>
>> - addressed comments made by Henrik (thanks!)
>> - added patch 5/5 (as Henrik asked)
>
> To the whole series,
>
> Reviewed-by: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> - Juri
>>
>> Juri Lelli (3):
>> Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: Rewrite section 4 intro
>> Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add tests suite appendix
>> Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: add minimal main()
>> appendix
>>
>> Luca Abeni (2):
>> Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: fix terminology and
>> improve clarity
>> Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt: improve and clarify AC
>> bits
>>
>> Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt | 340 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 292 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.0.4
>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements
2014-09-09 21:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation fixes and improvements Henrik Austad
2014-09-10 8:03 ` Juri Lelli
@ 2014-09-10 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2014-09-10 8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Henrik Austad
Cc: Juri Lelli, luca.abeni, rdunlap, mingo, raistlin, juri.lelli,
linux-doc, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 826 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:17:39PM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:57:11AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
>
> Hi Juri,
>
> Looks good! Didn't spot anything and pleased to see that minimal main()
> made it into the appendix! :D
>
> > This is version 4 of a small patchset that fixes and improves SCHED_DEADLINE
> > documentation.
> >
> > Patch 1/5 fixes and clarifies terminology; patch 2/5 aligns Section 4 to
> > the current interface; patch 3/5 improves and clarifies what admission
> > control means on UP an SMP systems; patch 4/5 introduces an appendix about
> > testing; patch 5/5 introduces an appendix with a minimal main() for
> > application developers.
> >
> To the whole series,
>
> Reviewed-by: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Thanks guys!
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread