All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp,
	tj@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix cgroup movement of waking process
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:45:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-62af3783e4fd8ba9e28416e8e91cb3bdd9fb133e@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111215143741.df82dd50.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>

Commit-ID:  62af3783e4fd8ba9e28416e8e91cb3bdd9fb133e
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/62af3783e4fd8ba9e28416e8e91cb3bdd9fb133e
Author:     Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
AuthorDate: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:37:41 +0900
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:34:52 +0100

sched: Fix cgroup movement of waking process

There is a small race between try_to_wake_up() and sched_move_task(),
which is trying to move the process being woken up.

    try_to_wake_up() on CPU0       sched_move_task() on CPU1
--------------------------------+---------------------------------
  raw_spin_lock_irqsave(p->pi_lock)
  task_waking_fair()
    ->p.se.vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime
  ttwu_queue()
    ->send reschedule IPI to CPU1
  raw_spin_unlock_irqsave(p->pi_lock)
                                   task_rq_lock()
                                     -> tring to aquire both p->pi_lock and
                                        rq->lock with IRQ disabled
                                   task_move_group_fair()
                                     -> p.se.vruntime
                                          -= (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime
                                          += (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime
                                   task_rq_unlock()

                                   (via IPI)
                                   sched_ttwu_pending()
                                     raw_spin_lock(rq->lock)
                                     ttwu_do_activate()
                                       ...
                                       enqueue_entity()
                                         child.se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime
                                     raw_spin_unlock(rq->lock)

As a result, vruntime of the process becomes far bigger than min_vruntime,
if (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime >> (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime.

This patch fixes this problem by just ignoring such process in
task_move_group_fair(), because the vruntime has already been normalized in
task_waking_fair().

Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111215143741.df82dd50.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |    4 +++-
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 2d1ac6e..bdf1883 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5344,11 +5344,13 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq)
 	 *
 	 * - Moving a forked child which is waiting for being woken up by
 	 *   wake_up_new_task().
+	 * - Moving a task which has been woken up by try_to_wake_up() and
+	 *   waiting for actually being woken up by sched_ttwu_pending().
 	 *
 	 * To prevent boost or penalty in the new cfs_rq caused by delta
 	 * min_vruntime between the two cfs_rqs, we skip vruntime adjustment.
 	 */
-	if (!on_rq && !p->se.sum_exec_runtime)
+	if (!on_rq && (!p->se.sum_exec_runtime || p->state == TASK_WAKING))
 		on_rq = 1;
 
 	if (!on_rq)

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-21 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-13  6:57 [PATCH 0/3] sched: some fixes for vruntime calculation related to cgroup movement Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13  6:57 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13  6:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of newly created process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13  6:57   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13 12:01   ` Paul Turner
2011-12-13 12:01     ` Paul Turner
2011-12-14  1:04     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-14  1:04       ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13 12:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-13 12:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-14  1:05     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-14  1:05       ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13  6:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of forking process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13  6:58   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13 12:22   ` Paul Turner
2011-12-13 12:22     ` Paul Turner
2011-12-13  6:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of waking process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13  6:59   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13 12:24   ` Paul Turner
2011-12-13 12:24     ` Paul Turner
2011-12-15  5:35 ` [PATCH -tip 0/3] sched: some fixes for vruntime calculation related to cgroup movement(v2) Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-15  5:36   ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of newly created process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-15  5:36     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-21 11:45     ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix " tip-bot for Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-15  5:36   ` [PATCH 2/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of forking process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-15  5:36     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-21 11:44     ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix " tip-bot for Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-21 17:26       ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-21 17:37         ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-22  1:54           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-22  2:01             ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-15  5:37   ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of waking process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-21 11:45     ` tip-bot for Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2011-12-19  2:55   ` [PATCH -tip 0/3] sched: some fixes for vruntime calculation related to cgroup movement(v2) Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-19  2:55     ` Daisuke Nishimura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-62af3783e4fd8ba9e28416e8e91cb3bdd9fb133e@git.kernel.org \
    --to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.