All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of waking process
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:59:33 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111213155933.36cd824a.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111213155710.5b453415.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>

There is a small race between try_to_wake_up() and sched_move_task(), which is trying
to move the process being woken up.

    try_to_wake_up() on CPU0       sched_move_task() on CPU1
--------------------------------+---------------------------------
  raw_spin_lock_irqsave(p->pi_lock)
  task_waking_fair()
    ->p.se.vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime
  ttwu_queue()
    ->send reschedule IPI to another CPU1
  raw_spin_unlock_irqsave(p->pi_lock)
                                   task_rq_lock()
                                     -> tring to aquire both p->pi_lock and rq->lock
                                        with IRQ disabled
                                   task_move_group_fair()
                                     ->p.se.vruntime -= (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime
                                     ->p.se.vruntime += (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime
                                   task_rq_unlock()

                                   (via IPI)
                                   sched_ttwu_pending()
                                     raw_spin_lock(rq->lock)
                                     ttwu_do_activate()
                                       ...
                                       enqueue_entity()
                                         child.se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime
                                     raw_spin_unlock(rq->lock)

As a result, vruntime of the process becomes far bigger than min_vruntime,
if (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime >> (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime.

This patch fixes this problem by just ignoring such process in task_move_group_fair(),
because the vruntime has already been normalized in task_waking_fair().

Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
---
 kernel/sched_fair.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index bdaa4ab..3feb3a2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -4925,10 +4925,10 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq)
 	 * to another cgroup's rq. This does somewhat interfere with the
 	 * fair sleeper stuff for the first placement, but who cares.
 	 */
-	if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
+	if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING && p->state != TASK_WAKING)
 		p->se.vruntime -= cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime;
 	set_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p));
-	if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
+	if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING && p->state != TASK_WAKING)
 		p->se.vruntime += cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime;
 }
 #endif
-- 
1.7.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura-YQH0OdQVrdy45+QrQBaojngSJqDPrsil@public.gmane.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra
	<a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of waking process
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:59:33 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111213155933.36cd824a.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111213155710.5b453415.nishimura-YQH0OdQVrdy45+QrQBaojngSJqDPrsil@public.gmane.org>

There is a small race between try_to_wake_up() and sched_move_task(), which is trying
to move the process being woken up.

    try_to_wake_up() on CPU0       sched_move_task() on CPU1
--------------------------------+---------------------------------
  raw_spin_lock_irqsave(p->pi_lock)
  task_waking_fair()
    ->p.se.vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime
  ttwu_queue()
    ->send reschedule IPI to another CPU1
  raw_spin_unlock_irqsave(p->pi_lock)
                                   task_rq_lock()
                                     -> tring to aquire both p->pi_lock and rq->lock
                                        with IRQ disabled
                                   task_move_group_fair()
                                     ->p.se.vruntime -= (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime
                                     ->p.se.vruntime += (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime
                                   task_rq_unlock()

                                   (via IPI)
                                   sched_ttwu_pending()
                                     raw_spin_lock(rq->lock)
                                     ttwu_do_activate()
                                       ...
                                       enqueue_entity()
                                         child.se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime
                                     raw_spin_unlock(rq->lock)

As a result, vruntime of the process becomes far bigger than min_vruntime,
if (new)cfs_rq->min_vruntime >> (old)cfs_rq->min_vruntime.

This patch fixes this problem by just ignoring such process in task_move_group_fair(),
because the vruntime has already been normalized in task_waking_fair().

Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura-YQH0OdQVrdy45+QrQBaojngSJqDPrsil@public.gmane.org>
---
 kernel/sched_fair.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index bdaa4ab..3feb3a2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -4925,10 +4925,10 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq)
 	 * to another cgroup's rq. This does somewhat interfere with the
 	 * fair sleeper stuff for the first placement, but who cares.
 	 */
-	if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
+	if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING && p->state != TASK_WAKING)
 		p->se.vruntime -= cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime;
 	set_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p));
-	if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
+	if (!on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING && p->state != TASK_WAKING)
 		p->se.vruntime += cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime;
 }
 #endif
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-13  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-13  6:57 [PATCH 0/3] sched: some fixes for vruntime calculation related to cgroup movement Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13  6:57 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13  6:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of newly created process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13  6:57   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13 12:01   ` Paul Turner
2011-12-13 12:01     ` Paul Turner
2011-12-14  1:04     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-14  1:04       ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13 12:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-13 12:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-14  1:05     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-14  1:05       ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13  6:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of forking process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13  6:58   ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13 12:22   ` Paul Turner
2011-12-13 12:22     ` Paul Turner
2011-12-13  6:59 ` Daisuke Nishimura [this message]
2011-12-13  6:59   ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of waking process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-13 12:24   ` Paul Turner
2011-12-13 12:24     ` Paul Turner
2011-12-15  5:35 ` [PATCH -tip 0/3] sched: some fixes for vruntime calculation related to cgroup movement(v2) Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-15  5:36   ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of newly created process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-15  5:36     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-21 11:45     ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix " tip-bot for Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-15  5:36   ` [PATCH 2/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of forking process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-15  5:36     ` Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-21 11:44     ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix " tip-bot for Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-21 17:26       ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-21 17:37         ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-22  1:54           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-22  2:01             ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-15  5:37   ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: fix cgroup movement of waking process Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-21 11:45     ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix " tip-bot for Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-19  2:55   ` [PATCH -tip 0/3] sched: some fixes for vruntime calculation related to cgroup movement(v2) Daisuke Nishimura
2011-12-19  2:55     ` Daisuke Nishimura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111213155933.36cd824a.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --to=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.