[PATCH 1/2] irqchip: mips-gic: Cleanup chip & handler setup

* [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: mips-gic: Cleanup chip & handler setup
@ 2016-08-19 17:07 ` Paul Burton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paul Burton @ 2016-08-19 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Marc Zyngier, linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-mips, stable, Paul Burton

gic_shared_irq_domain_map() is called from gic_irq_domain_alloc() where
the wrong chip has been set, and is then overwritten. Tidy this up by
setting the correct chip the first time, and setting the
handle_level_irq handler from gic_irq_domain_alloc() too.

gic_shared_irq_domain_map() is also called from gic_irq_domain_map(),
which now calls irq_set_chip_and_handler() to retain its previous
behaviour.

This patch also prepares for a follow-on which will call
gic_shared_irq_domain_map() from a callback where the lock on the struct
irq_desc is held, which without this change would cause the call to
irq_set_chip_and_handler() to lead to a deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Fixes: c98c1822ee13 ("irqchip/mips-gic: Add device hierarchy domain")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.6+
---
Marked with the Fixes: tag as it's a prerequisite for the following bug fix
patch. Feel free to drop the tag if it's considered clearer without.
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
index 70ed1d0..d7ec984 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
@@ -713,9 +713,6 @@ static int gic_shared_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int i;
 
-	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &gic_level_irq_controller,
-				 handle_level_irq);
-
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
 	gic_map_to_pin(intr, gic_cpu_pin);
 	gic_map_to_vpe(intr, mips_cm_vp_id(vpe));
@@ -732,6 +729,10 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
 {
 	if (GIC_HWIRQ_TO_LOCAL(hw) < GIC_NUM_LOCAL_INTRS)
 		return gic_local_irq_domain_map(d, virq, hw);
+
+	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &gic_level_irq_controller,
+				 handle_level_irq);
+
 	return gic_shared_irq_domain_map(d, virq, hw, 0);
 }
 
@@ -771,11 +772,13 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
 			hwirq = GIC_SHARED_TO_HWIRQ(base_hwirq + i);
 
 			ret = irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(d, virq + i, hwirq,
-							    &gic_edge_irq_controller,
+							    &gic_level_irq_controller,
 							    NULL);
 			if (ret)
 				goto error;
 
+			irq_set_handler(virq + i, handle_level_irq);
+
 			ret = gic_shared_irq_domain_map(d, virq + i, hwirq, cpu);
 			if (ret)
 				goto error;
-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread