All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] [v3] x86, syscalls: use SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros for sys_modify_ldt()
@ 2017-10-18 17:21 Dave Hansen
  2017-10-20 12:25 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/entry: Use " tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2017-10-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Dave Hansen, luto, brgerst, x86


Changes from v2:
 * Fixed UML compile error from not including syscall header

Changes from v1:
 * Added cast to (unsigned int)
 * Added comments

--

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

We do not have tracepoints for sys_modify_ldt() because we define
it directly instead of using the normal SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros.

However, there is a reason sys_modify_ldt() does not use the macros:
it has an 'int' return type instead of 'unsigned long'.  This is
a bug, but it's a bug cemented in the ABI.

What does this mean?  If we return -EINVAL from a function that
returns 'int', we have 0x00000000ffffffea in %rax.  But, if we
return -EINVAL from a function returning 'unsigned long', we end
up with 0xffffffffffffffea in %rax, which is wrong.

To work around this and maintain the 'int' behavior while using
the SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros, so we add a cast to 'unsigned int'
in both implementations of sys_modify_ldt().

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
---

 b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h |    2 +-
 b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c           |   16 +++++++++++++---
 b/arch/x86/um/ldt.c               |    7 +++++--
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h~x86-syscall-macros-modify_ldt arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h~x86-syscall-macros-modify_ldt	2017-10-18 09:21:54.210460494 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h	2017-10-18 09:21:54.217460834 -0700
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_ioperm(unsigned long
 asmlinkage long sys_iopl(unsigned int);
 
 /* kernel/ldt.c */
-asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int, void __user *, unsigned long);
+asmlinkage long sys_modify_ldt(int, void __user *, unsigned long);
 
 /* kernel/signal.c */
 asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigreturn(void);
diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c~x86-syscall-macros-modify_ldt arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c~x86-syscall-macros-modify_ldt	2017-10-18 09:21:54.212460591 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c	2017-10-18 09:21:54.218460882 -0700
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
@@ -294,8 +295,8 @@ out:
 	return error;
 }
 
-asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr,
-			      unsigned long bytecount)
+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(modify_ldt, int , func , void __user * , ptr ,
+		unsigned long , bytecount)
 {
 	int ret = -ENOSYS;
 
@@ -313,5 +314,14 @@ asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int func,
 		ret = write_ldt(ptr, bytecount, 0);
 		break;
 	}
-	return ret;
+	/*
+	 * The SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros give us an 'unsigned long'
+	 * return type, but tht ABI for sys_modify_ldt() expects
+	 * 'int'.  This cast gives us an int-sized value in %rax
+	 * for the return code.  The 'unsigned' is necessary so
+	 * the compiler does not try to sign-extend the negative
+	 * return codes into the high half of the register when
+	 * taking the value from int->long.
+	 */
+	return (unsigned int)ret;
 }
diff -puN arch/x86/um/ldt.c~x86-syscall-macros-modify_ldt arch/x86/um/ldt.c
--- a/arch/x86/um/ldt.c~x86-syscall-macros-modify_ldt	2017-10-18 09:21:54.214460688 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/um/ldt.c	2017-10-18 09:25:55.128131160 -0700
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/unistd.h>
 #include <os.h>
@@ -369,7 +370,9 @@ void free_ldt(struct mm_context *mm)
 	mm->arch.ldt.entry_count = 0;
 }
 
-int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr, unsigned long bytecount)
+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(modify_ldt, int , func , void __user * , ptr ,
+		unsigned long , bytecount)
 {
-	return do_modify_ldt_skas(func, ptr, bytecount);
+	/* See non-um modify_ldt() for why we do this cast */
+	return (unsigned int)do_modify_ldt_skas(func, ptr, bytecount);
 }
_

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/asm] x86/entry: Use SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros for sys_modify_ldt()
  2017-10-18 17:21 [PATCH] [v3] x86, syscalls: use SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros for sys_modify_ldt() Dave Hansen
@ 2017-10-20 12:25 ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen @ 2017-10-20 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: dave.hansen, mingo, torvalds, peterz, linux-kernel, brgerst,
	luto, tglx, hpa

Commit-ID:  da20ab35180780e4a6eadc804544f1fa967f3567
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/da20ab35180780e4a6eadc804544f1fa967f3567
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:21:07 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 10:37:33 +0200

x86/entry: Use SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros for sys_modify_ldt()

We do not have tracepoints for sys_modify_ldt() because we define
it directly instead of using the normal SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros.

However, there is a reason sys_modify_ldt() does not use the macros:
it has an 'int' return type instead of 'unsigned long'.  This is
a bug, but it's a bug cemented in the ABI.

What does this mean?  If we return -EINVAL from a function that
returns 'int', we have 0x00000000ffffffea in %rax.  But, if we
return -EINVAL from a function returning 'unsigned long', we end
up with 0xffffffffffffffea in %rax, which is wrong.

To work around this and maintain the 'int' behavior while using
the SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros, so we add a cast to 'unsigned int'
in both implementations of sys_modify_ldt().

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171018172107.1A79C532@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c           | 16 +++++++++++++---
 arch/x86/um/ldt.c               |  7 +++++--
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h
index 91dfcaf..bad25bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_ioperm(unsigned long, unsigned long, int);
 asmlinkage long sys_iopl(unsigned int);
 
 /* kernel/ldt.c */
-asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int, void __user *, unsigned long);
+asmlinkage long sys_modify_ldt(int, void __user *, unsigned long);
 
 /* kernel/signal.c */
 asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigreturn(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
index f0e64db..0402d44 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
@@ -294,8 +295,8 @@ out:
 	return error;
 }
 
-asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr,
-			      unsigned long bytecount)
+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(modify_ldt, int , func , void __user * , ptr ,
+		unsigned long , bytecount)
 {
 	int ret = -ENOSYS;
 
@@ -313,5 +314,14 @@ asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr,
 		ret = write_ldt(ptr, bytecount, 0);
 		break;
 	}
-	return ret;
+	/*
+	 * The SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros give us an 'unsigned long'
+	 * return type, but tht ABI for sys_modify_ldt() expects
+	 * 'int'.  This cast gives us an int-sized value in %rax
+	 * for the return code.  The 'unsigned' is necessary so
+	 * the compiler does not try to sign-extend the negative
+	 * return codes into the high half of the register when
+	 * taking the value from int->long.
+	 */
+	return (unsigned int)ret;
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/um/ldt.c b/arch/x86/um/ldt.c
index 836a1eb..3ee234b6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/um/ldt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/um/ldt.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/unistd.h>
 #include <os.h>
@@ -369,7 +370,9 @@ void free_ldt(struct mm_context *mm)
 	mm->arch.ldt.entry_count = 0;
 }
 
-int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr, unsigned long bytecount)
+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(modify_ldt, int , func , void __user * , ptr ,
+		unsigned long , bytecount)
 {
-	return do_modify_ldt_skas(func, ptr, bytecount);
+	/* See non-um modify_ldt() for why we do this cast */
+	return (unsigned int)do_modify_ldt_skas(func, ptr, bytecount);
 }

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-20 12:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-18 17:21 [PATCH] [v3] x86, syscalls: use SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros for sys_modify_ldt() Dave Hansen
2017-10-20 12:25 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/entry: Use " tip-bot for Dave Hansen

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.