* 2.6.31-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
@ 2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-08-10 89 27 24
2009-08-02 76 36 28
2009-07-27 70 51 43
2009-07-07 35 25 21
2009-06-29 22 22 15
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13950
Subject : Oops when USB Serial disconnected while in use
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-08 17:47 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124975432900466&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (3 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel@blinkenlights.ch>
Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (2 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13914
Subject : e1000e reports invalid NVM Checksum on 82566DM-2 (bisected)
Submitter : <jsbronder@gentoo.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 18:06 (6 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (6 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
Subject : Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124913190304149&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13895
Subject : 2.6.31-rc4 - slab entry tak_delay_info leaking ???
Submitter : Paul Rolland <rol@as2917.net>
Date : 2009-07-29 08:20 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124884847925375&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (12 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13848
Subject : iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Date : 2009-07-26 7:57 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124859658502866&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
Subject : LEDs switched off permanently by power saving with rt61pci driver
Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (28 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13837
Subject : Input : regression - touchpad not detected
Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 07:13 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124780763701571&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13833
Subject : Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
Submitter : Tobias Diedrich <ranma@tdiedrich.de>
Date : 2009-07-15 14:20 (26 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=15bce40cb3133bcc07d548013df97e4653d363c1
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124766049207807&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124704927819769&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
Subject : system freeze when switching to console
Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (18 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (19 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Subject : X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-07 15:19 (34 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (35 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13716
Subject : The AIC-7892P controller does not work any more
Submitter : Andrej Podzimek <andrej@podzimek.org>
Date : 2009-07-05 19:23 (36 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13713
Subject : [drm/i915] Possible regression due to commit "Change GEM throttling to be 20ms (...)"
Submitter : <kazikcz@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-05 10:49 (36 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b962442e46a9340bdbc6711982c59ff0cc2b5afb
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (54 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13946
Subject : x86 MCE malfunction on Thinkpad T42p
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 17:09 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124966500232399&w=4
Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37908/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13944
Subject : MD raid regression
Submitter : Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-08-05 15:06 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=449aad3e25358812c43afc60918c5ad3819488e7
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124948481218857&w=4
Handled-By : NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/39521/
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.30,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* 2.6.31-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
@ 2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-08-10 89 27 24
2009-08-02 76 36 28
2009-07-27 70 51 43
2009-07-07 35 25 21
2009-06-29 22 22 15
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13950
Subject : Oops when USB Serial disconnected while in use
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-08 17:47 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124975432900466&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (3 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel@blinkenlights.ch>
Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (2 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13914
Subject : e1000e reports invalid NVM Checksum on 82566DM-2 (bisected)
Submitter : <jsbronder@gentoo.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 18:06 (6 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (6 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
Subject : Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124913190304149&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13895
Subject : 2.6.31-rc4 - slab entry tak_delay_info leaking ???
Submitter : Paul Rolland <rol@as2917.net>
Date : 2009-07-29 08:20 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124884847925375&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (12 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13848
Subject : iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Date : 2009-07-26 7:57 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124859658502866&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
Subject : LEDs switched off permanently by power saving with rt61pci driver
Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (28 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13837
Subject : Input : regression - touchpad not detected
Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 07:13 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124780763701571&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13833
Subject : Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
Submitter : Tobias Diedrich <ranma@tdiedrich.de>
Date : 2009-07-15 14:20 (26 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=15bce40cb3133bcc07d548013df97e4653d363c1
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124766049207807&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124704927819769&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
Subject : system freeze when switching to console
Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (18 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (19 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Subject : X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-07 15:19 (34 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (35 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13716
Subject : The AIC-7892P controller does not work any more
Submitter : Andrej Podzimek <andrej@podzimek.org>
Date : 2009-07-05 19:23 (36 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13713
Subject : [drm/i915] Possible regression due to commit "Change GEM throttling to be 20ms (...)"
Submitter : <kazikcz@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-05 10:49 (36 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b962442e46a9340bdbc6711982c59ff0cc2b5afb
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (54 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13946
Subject : x86 MCE malfunction on Thinkpad T42p
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 17:09 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124966500232399&w=4
Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37908/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13944
Subject : MD raid regression
Submitter : Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-08-05 15:06 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=449aad3e25358812c43afc60918c5ad3819488e7
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124948481218857&w=4
Handled-By : NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/39521/
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.30,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13645] NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, poornima nayak
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (54 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Anholt, ling.ma, Linus Torvalds,
Ma Ling, Reinette Chatre
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
Subject : system freeze when switching to console
Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (18 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Anholt, ling.ma-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w,
Linus Torvalds, Ma Ling, Reinette Chatre
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
Subject : system freeze when switching to console
Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (18 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13740] X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Subject : X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-07 15:19 (34 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13740] X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Subject : X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-07 15:19 (34 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13716] The AIC-7892P controller does not work any more
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrej Podzimek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13716
Subject : The AIC-7892P controller does not work any more
Submitter : Andrej Podzimek <andrej@podzimek.org>
Date : 2009-07-05 19:23 (36 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13716] The AIC-7892P controller does not work any more
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrej Podzimek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13716
Subject : The AIC-7892P controller does not work any more
Submitter : Andrej Podzimek <andrej-+Hii8LNHG6Ng9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-07-05 19:23 (36 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13713] [drm/i915] Possible regression due to commit "Change GEM throttling to be 20ms (...)"
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Anholt, Jesse Barnes, kazikcz
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13713
Subject : [drm/i915] Possible regression due to commit "Change GEM throttling to be 20ms (...)"
Submitter : <kazikcz@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-05 10:49 (36 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b962442e46a9340bdbc6711982c59ff0cc2b5afb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13809] oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jerome Marchand
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (19 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13733] 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Niel Lambrechts
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (35 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13836] suspend script fails, related to stdout?
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tomas M.
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13833] Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, David Brownell, David Woodhouse, Eric Miao,
Pavel Machek, Tobias Diedrich
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13833
Subject : Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device
Submitter : Tobias Diedrich <ranma@tdiedrich.de>
Date : 2009-07-15 14:20 (26 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=15bce40cb3133bcc07d548013df97e4653d363c1
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124766049207807&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124704927819769&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13837] Input : regression - touchpad not detected
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 2:14 ` Dave Young
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dave Young, Jiri Kosina
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13837
Subject : Input : regression - touchpad not detected
Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 07:13 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124780763701571&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13837] Input : regression - touchpad not detected
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13837] Input : regression - touchpad not detected Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-10 2:14 ` Dave Young
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Dave Young @ 2009-08-10 2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jiri Kosina
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Rafael, I can not produce the bug recent days. I upgraded dell bios to
A12, don't know if it is related.
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13837
> Subject : Input : regression - touchpad not detected
> Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-07-17 07:13 (24 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124780763701571&w=4
>
>
>
--
Regards
dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13837] Input : regression - touchpad not detected
@ 2009-08-10 2:14 ` Dave Young
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Dave Young @ 2009-08-10 2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jiri Kosina
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Rafael, I can not produce the bug recent days. I upgraded dell bios to
A12, don't know if it is related.
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13837
> Subject : Input : regression - touchpad not detected
> Submitter : Dave Young <hidave.darkstar-Re5JQEeQqe8@public.gmane.orgm>
> Date : 2009-07-17 07:13 (24 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124780763701571&w=4
>
>
>
--
Regards
dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13837] Input : regression - touchpad not detected
@ 2009-08-10 14:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-10 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Young; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jiri Kosina
On Monday 10 August 2009, Dave Young wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
> Rafael, I can not produce the bug recent days. I upgraded dell bios to
> A12, don't know if it is related.
OK, I closed the bug as not reproducible.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13837] Input : regression - touchpad not detected
@ 2009-08-10 14:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-10 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Young; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Jiri Kosina
On Monday 10 August 2009, Dave Young wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
> Rafael, I can not produce the bug recent days. I upgraded dell bios to
> A12, don't know if it is related.
OK, I closed the bug as not reproducible.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13846] LEDs switched off permanently by power saving with rt61pci driver
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 10:11 ` Chris Clayton
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Chris Clayton
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
Subject : LEDs switched off permanently by power saving with rt61pci driver
Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (28 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13846] LEDs switched off permanently by power saving with rt61pci driver
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13846] LEDs switched off permanently by power saving with rt61pci driver Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-10 10:11 ` Chris Clayton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Chris Clayton @ 2009-08-10 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, linux-wireless
Hi Rafael,
On Sunday 09 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
Ivo sent a test patch for this and I tested it., but without success. I reported my findings but
didn't get a reply. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=124940189007154&w=4.
I suspect the failure is due to the same PS hardware probelms that were at the route of my original
report.. Unless one of the wireless folks say otherwise, I think we should close this on the basis
of busted hardware. I'm happy to simply eject the card and re-insert it now that I have some udev
scripts to tear down the wireless configuration on the ejection and set it uop again when the card
is re-inserted.
Thanks
Chris
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
> Subject : LEDs switched off permanently by power saving with rt61pci
> driver Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
> Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (28 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
--
No, Sir; there is nothing which has yet been contrived by man, by which so much happiness is
produced as by a good tavern or inn - Doctor Samuel Johnson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13846] LEDs switched off permanently by power saving with rt61pci driver
@ 2009-08-10 10:11 ` Chris Clayton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Chris Clayton @ 2009-08-10 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Hi Rafael,
On Sunday 09 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
Ivo sent a test patch for this and I tested it., but without success. I reported my findings but
didn't get a reply. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=124940189007154&w=4.
I suspect the failure is due to the same PS hardware probelms that were at the route of my original
report.. Unless one of the wireless folks say otherwise, I think we should close this on the basis
of busted hardware. I'm happy to simply eject the card and re-insert it now that I have some udev
scripts to tear down the wireless configuration on the ejection and set it uop again when the card
is re-inserted.
Thanks
Chris
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
> Subject : LEDs switched off permanently by power saving with rt61pci
> driver Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (28 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
--
No, Sir; there is nothing which has yet been contrived by man, by which so much happiness is
produced as by a good tavern or inn - Doctor Samuel Johnson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13846] LEDs switched off permanently by power saving with rt61pci driver
@ 2009-08-10 14:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-10 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: chris2553; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, linux-wireless
On Monday 10 August 2009, Chris Clayton wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Sunday 09 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
>
> Ivo sent a test patch for this and I tested it., but without success. I reported my findings but
> didn't get a reply. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=124940189007154&w=4.
>
> I suspect the failure is due to the same PS hardware probelms that were at the route of my original
> report.. Unless one of the wireless folks say otherwise, I think we should close this on the basis
> of busted hardware. I'm happy to simply eject the card and re-insert it now that I have some udev
> scripts to tear down the wireless configuration on the ejection and set it uop again when the card
> is re-inserted.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13846] LEDs switched off permanently by power saving with rt61pci driver
@ 2009-08-10 14:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-10 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: chris2553-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On Monday 10 August 2009, Chris Clayton wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Sunday 09 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
>
> Ivo sent a test patch for this and I tested it., but without success. I reported my findings but
> didn't get a reply. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=124940189007154&w=4.
>
> I suspect the failure is due to the same PS hardware probelms that were at the route of my original
> report.. Unless one of the wireless folks say otherwise, I think we should close this on the basis
> of busted hardware. I'm happy to simply eject the card and re-insert it now that I have some udev
> scripts to tear down the wireless configuration on the ejection and set it uop again when the card
> is re-inserted.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13869] Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 0:10 ` Duncan
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Duncan
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (12 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13869] Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13869] Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-10 0:10 ` Duncan
2009-08-10 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: Duncan @ 2009-08-10 0:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday 09 August 2009 13:44:24 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
> Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
> Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
> Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (12 days old)
Yes, as of today's pull, it's still there.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13869] Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
@ 2009-08-10 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-10 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Duncan; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, DRI
On Monday 10 August 2009, Duncan wrote:
> On Sunday 09 August 2009 13:44:24 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
> > Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
> > Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
> > Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (12 days old)
>
> Yes, as of today's pull, it's still there.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13869] Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
@ 2009-08-10 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-10 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Duncan; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, DRI
On Monday 10 August 2009, Duncan wrote:
> On Sunday 09 August 2009 13:44:24 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
> > Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
> > Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan-j9pdmedNgrk@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (12 days old)
>
> Yes, as of today's pull, it's still there.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13848] iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Lukas Hejtmanek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13848
Subject : iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Date : 2009-07-26 7:57 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124859658502866&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13906] Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Clemens Eisserer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (6 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13906] Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Clemens Eisserer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (6 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13899] Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 3:42 ` Gene Heskett
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gene Heskett
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
Subject : Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124913190304149&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13899] Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13899] Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-10 3:42 ` Gene Heskett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2009-08-10 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday 09 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>of recent regressions.
>
>The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>(either way).
>
>
>Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
>Subject : Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
>Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
>Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (9 days old)
>References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124913190304149&w=4
Yes, it is still doing it to rc5 but only on the first invocation after the
bootup. Strangely, it apparently has no other effect, either on the machine,
or how amanda itself works.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
<https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp>
If I set here and stare at nothing long enough, people might think
I'm an engineer working on something.
-- S.R. McElroy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13899] Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
@ 2009-08-10 3:42 ` Gene Heskett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2009-08-10 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday 09 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>of recent regressions.
>
>The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>(either way).
>
>
>Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
>Subject : Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
>Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett-H+0wwilmMs3R7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
>Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (9 days old)
>References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124913190304149&w=4
Yes, it is still doing it to rc5 but only on the first invocation after the
bootup. Strangely, it apparently has no other effect, either on the machine,
or how amanda itself works.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.
<https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp>
If I set here and stare at nothing long enough, people might think
I'm an engineer working on something.
-- S.R. McElroy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13899] Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
@ 2009-08-10 14:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-10 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gene Heskett; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 10 August 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 09 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >of recent regressions.
> >
> >The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> >(either way).
> >
> >
> >Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
> >Subject : Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
> >Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
> >Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (9 days old)
> >References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124913190304149&w=4
>
> Yes, it is still doing it to rc5 but only on the first invocation after the
> bootup. Strangely, it apparently has no other effect, either on the machine,
> or how amanda itself works.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13899] Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
@ 2009-08-10 14:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-10 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gene Heskett; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 10 August 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 09 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >of recent regressions.
> >
> >The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> >(either way).
> >
> >
> >Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
> >Subject : Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
> >Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett-H+0wwilmMs3R7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
> >Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (9 days old)
> >References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124913190304149&w=4
>
> Yes, it is still doing it to rc5 but only on the first invocation after the
> bootup. Strangely, it apparently has no other effect, either on the machine,
> or how amanda itself works.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13914] e1000e reports invalid NVM Checksum on 82566DM-2 (bisected)
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, jsbronder
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13914
Subject : e1000e reports invalid NVM Checksum on 82566DM-2 (bisected)
Submitter : <jsbronder@gentoo.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 18:06 (6 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13914] e1000e reports invalid NVM Checksum on 82566DM-2 (bisected)
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, jsbronder
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13914
Subject : e1000e reports invalid NVM Checksum on 82566DM-2 (bisected)
Submitter : <jsbronder@gentoo.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 18:06 (6 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13895] 2.6.31-rc4 - slab entry tak_delay_info leaking ???
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Paul Rolland
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13895
Subject : 2.6.31-rc4 - slab entry tak_delay_info leaking ???
Submitter : Paul Rolland <rol@as2917.net>
Date : 2009-07-29 08:20 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124884847925375&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Martin-Éric Racine
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Martin-Éric Racine
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-13 8:52 ` Martin-Éric Racine
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-13 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Yes, this bug is still valid.
Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly bisecting
our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30 to find the
commit that introduced this regression. Please stay tuned.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
> Subject : x86 Geode issue
> Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
> Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (7 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-13 8:52 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-13 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Yes, this bug is still valid.
Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly bisecting
our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30 to find the
commit that introduced this regression. Please stay tuned.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
> Subject : x86 Geode issue
> Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
> Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (7 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-13 9:07 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-08-13 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin-Éric Racine, Alexander Viro
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
* Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>
> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
> tuned.
hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
the jpg at:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
Which could be a VFS bug, or a filesystem bug, or some unrelated
memory corruption hitting the inode data structure.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-13 9:07 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-08-13 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin-Éric Racine, Alexander Viro
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
* Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>
> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
> tuned.
hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
the jpg at:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
Which could be a VFS bug, or a filesystem bug, or some unrelated
memory corruption hitting the inode data structure.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-13 9:44 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-13 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Alexander Viro, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
>
>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>>
>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>> tuned.
>
> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>
> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>
> the jpg at:
>
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>
> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
There's a few more JPEG images below that have a slightly sharper image.
> Which could be a VFS bug, or a filesystem bug, or some unrelated
> memory corruption hitting the inode data structure.
It could indeed be many things.
I've been trying to boot this into a larger framebuffer to be able to
fit more data into my snapshots, but it appears that vga=795 doesn't
work anymore. Have we reverted to Hex values again or is this just an
issue of some kernel module missing from initrd?
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-13 9:44 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-13 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Alexander Viro, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>>
>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>> tuned.
>
> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>
> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>
> the jpg at:
>
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>
> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
There's a few more JPEG images below that have a slightly sharper image.
> Which could be a VFS bug, or a filesystem bug, or some unrelated
> memory corruption hitting the inode data structure.
It could indeed be many things.
I've been trying to boot this into a larger framebuffer to be able to
fit more data into my snapshots, but it appears that vga=795 doesn't
work anymore. Have we reverted to Hex values again or is this just an
issue of some kernel module missing from initrd?
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-13 10:40 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-13 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Alexander Viro, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
>>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>>>
>>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>>> tuned.
>>
>> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>>
>> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>>
>> the jpg at:
>>
>> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>>
>> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
>> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
This one might be a bit better:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>> Which could be a VFS bug, or a filesystem bug, or some unrelated
>> memory corruption hitting the inode data structure.
>
> It could indeed be many things.
>
> I've been trying to boot this into a larger framebuffer to be able to
> fit more data into my snapshots, but it appears that vga=795 doesn't
> work anymore. Have we reverted to Hex values again or is this just an
> issue of some kernel module missing from initrd?
Never mind. Seems that vesafb was blacklisted. Works now. See the
image above. :)
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-13 10:40 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-13 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Alexander Viro, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>>>
>>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>>> tuned.
>>
>> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>>
>> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>>
>> the jpg at:
>>
>> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>>
>> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
>> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
This one might be a bit better:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>> Which could be a VFS bug, or a filesystem bug, or some unrelated
>> memory corruption hitting the inode data structure.
>
> It could indeed be many things.
>
> I've been trying to boot this into a larger framebuffer to be able to
> fit more data into my snapshots, but it appears that vga=795 doesn't
> work anymore. Have we reverted to Hex values again or is this just an
> issue of some kernel module missing from initrd?
Never mind. Seems that vesafb was blacklisted. Works now. See the
image above. :)
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-13 14:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-13 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: q-funk
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
> >>>
> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
> >>> tuned.
> >>
> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
> >>
> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
> >>
> >> the jpg at:
> >>
> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
> >>
> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
>
> This one might be a bit better:
>
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>
> >> Which could be a VFS bug, or a filesystem bug, or some unrelated
> >> memory corruption hitting the inode data structure.
> >
> > It could indeed be many things.
> >
> > I've been trying to boot this into a larger framebuffer to be able to
> > fit more data into my snapshots, but it appears that vga=795 doesn't
> > work anymore. Have we reverted to Hex values again or is this just an
> > issue of some kernel module missing from initrd?
>
> Never mind. Seems that vesafb was blacklisted. Works now. See the
> image above. :)
OK, so I guess the bug should be closed?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-13 14:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-13 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
> >>>
> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
> >>> tuned.
> >>
> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
> >>
> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
> >>
> >> the jpg at:
> >>
> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
> >>
> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
>
> This one might be a bit better:
>
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>
> >> Which could be a VFS bug, or a filesystem bug, or some unrelated
> >> memory corruption hitting the inode data structure.
> >
> > It could indeed be many things.
> >
> > I've been trying to boot this into a larger framebuffer to be able to
> > fit more data into my snapshots, but it appears that vga=795 doesn't
> > work anymore. Have we reverted to Hex values again or is this just an
> > issue of some kernel module missing from initrd?
>
> Never mind. Seems that vesafb was blacklisted. Works now. See the
> image above. :)
OK, so I guess the bug should be closed?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-13 15:00 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-13 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>:
>> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
>> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>> >>>
>> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>> >>> tuned.
>> >>
>> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>> >>
>> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>> >>
>> >> the jpg at:
>> >>
>> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>> >>
>> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
>> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
>>
>> This one might be a bit better:
>>
>> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>>
>> >> Which could be a VFS bug, or a filesystem bug, or some unrelated
>> >> memory corruption hitting the inode data structure.
>> >
>> > It could indeed be many things.
>> >
>> > I've been trying to boot this into a larger framebuffer to be able to
>> > fit more data into my snapshots, but it appears that vga=795 doesn't
>> > work anymore. Have we reverted to Hex values again or is this just an
>> > issue of some kernel module missing from initrd?
>>
>> Never mind. Seems that vesafb was blacklisted. Works now. See the
>> image above. :)
>
> OK, so I guess the bug should be closed?
No, it cannot. Please read the above more carefully.
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-13 15:00 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-13 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>:
>> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>> >>>
>> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>> >>> tuned.
>> >>
>> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>> >>
>> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>> >>
>> >> the jpg at:
>> >>
>> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>> >>
>> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
>> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
>>
>> This one might be a bit better:
>>
>> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>>
>> >> Which could be a VFS bug, or a filesystem bug, or some unrelated
>> >> memory corruption hitting the inode data structure.
>> >
>> > It could indeed be many things.
>> >
>> > I've been trying to boot this into a larger framebuffer to be able to
>> > fit more data into my snapshots, but it appears that vga=795 doesn't
>> > work anymore. Have we reverted to Hex values again or is this just an
>> > issue of some kernel module missing from initrd?
>>
>> Never mind. Seems that vesafb was blacklisted. Works now. See the
>> image above. :)
>
> OK, so I guess the bug should be closed?
No, it cannot. Please read the above more carefully.
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-13 18:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-13 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: q-funk
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>:
> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
> >> >>> tuned.
> >> >>
> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
> >> >>
> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
> >> >>
> >> >> the jpg at:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
> >> >>
> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
> >>
> >> This one might be a bit better:
> >>
> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-13 18:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-13 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>:
> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
> >> >>> tuned.
> >> >>
> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
> >> >>
> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
> >> >>
> >> >> the jpg at:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
> >> >>
> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
> >>
> >> This one might be a bit better:
> >>
> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-16 19:17 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-16 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>:
>> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
>> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>> >> >>> tuned.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>> >> >>
>> >> >> the jpg at:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>> >> >>
>> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
>> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
>> >>
>> >> This one might be a bit better:
>> >>
>> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>
> Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
down to the following:
commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
add caching of ACLs in struct inode
No helpers, no conversions yet.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Best Regards,
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-16 19:17 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-16 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>:
>> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>> >> >>> tuned.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>> >> >>
>> >> >> the jpg at:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>> >> >>
>> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
>> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
>> >>
>> >> This one might be a bit better:
>> >>
>> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>
> Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
down to the following:
commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
Author: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
add caching of ACLs in struct inode
No helpers, no conversions yet.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
Best Regards,
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-16 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-08-16 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin-Éric Racine
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
* Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>:
> >> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
> >> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
> >> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
> >> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
> >> >> >>> tuned.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> the jpg at:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
> >> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
> >> >>
> >> >> This one might be a bit better:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
> >
> > Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
>
> The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
> down to the following:
>
> commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
> Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
>
> add caching of ACLs in struct inode
>
> No helpers, no conversions yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Weird. If the functions do what their name suggests, i.e. if
inode_init_always() is an always called constructor and if
destroy_inode() is an unconditional destructor then this patch
should have no functional effect on the VFS side.
It increases the size of struct inode, so if you have some old
module (built to an older version of fs.h) still around it might
corrupt your inode data structure.
Or the size change might trigger some dormant bug. It might move a
critical inode right into the path of a pre-existing (but not
visibly crash-triggering) data corruption.
The possibilities on the 'weird bug' front are endless - the
crash/oops itself should be turned into text, posted here and
analyzed.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-16 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-08-16 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin-Éric Racine
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
* Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>:
> >> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
> >> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
> >> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
> >> >> >>> tuned.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> the jpg at:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
> >> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
> >> >>
> >> >> This one might be a bit better:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
> >
> > Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
>
> The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
> down to the following:
>
> commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
> Author: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
>
> add caching of ACLs in struct inode
>
> No helpers, no conversions yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
Weird. If the functions do what their name suggests, i.e. if
inode_init_always() is an always called constructor and if
destroy_inode() is an unconditional destructor then this patch
should have no functional effect on the VFS side.
It increases the size of struct inode, so if you have some old
module (built to an older version of fs.h) still around it might
corrupt your inode data structure.
Or the size change might trigger some dormant bug. It might move a
critical inode right into the path of a pre-existing (but not
visibly crash-triggering) data corruption.
The possibilities on the 'weird bug' front are endless - the
crash/oops itself should be turned into text, posted here and
analyzed.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-16 21:01 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-08-16 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin-Éric Racine
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > >> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>:
> > >> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > >> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
> > >> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
> > >> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
> > >> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
> > >> >> >>> tuned.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> the jpg at:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
> > >> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
> > >> >>
> > >> >> This one might be a bit better:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
> > >
> > > Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
> >
> > The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
> > down to the following:
> >
> > commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
> > Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> > Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
> >
> > add caching of ACLs in struct inode
> >
> > No helpers, no conversions yet.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>
> Weird. If the functions do what their name suggests, i.e. if
> inode_init_always() is an always called constructor and if
> destroy_inode() is an unconditional destructor then this patch
> should have no functional effect on the VFS side.
>
> It increases the size of struct inode, so if you have some old
> module (built to an older version of fs.h) still around it might
> corrupt your inode data structure.
>
> Or the size change might trigger some dormant bug. It might move a
> critical inode right into the path of a pre-existing (but not
> visibly crash-triggering) data corruption.
>
> The possibilities on the 'weird bug' front are endless - the
> crash/oops itself should be turned into text, posted here and
> analyzed.
Btw., before you invest any time into the 'weird crash' theory, i'd
suggest to double check the bisection result:
f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0 crashes
f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0~1 boots fine
You can save yourself from a lot of head scratching that way - the
bisection result looks weird. (albeit plausible - a VFS crash points
to a VFS commit.)
_Maybe_ the bisection is just off a little bit (there was a
bisection mistake in the last few steps), and the real buggy commit
is one of the nearby ones:
1cbd20d: switch xfs to generic acl caching helpers
073aaa1: helpers for acl caching + switch to those
06b16e9: switch shmem to inode->i_acl
281eede: switch reiserfs to inode->i_acl
7a77b15: switch reiserfs to usual conventions for caching ACLs
e68888b: reiserfs: minimal fix for ACL caching
d441b1c: switch nilfs2 to inode->i_acl
5affd88: switch btrfs to inode->i_acl
290c263: switch jffs2 to inode->i_acl
05fc079: switch jfs to inode->i_acl
d4bfe2f: switch ext4 to inode->i_acl
6582a0e: switch ext3 to inode->i_acl
5e78b43: switch ext2 to inode->i_acl
f19d4a8: add caching of ACLs in struct inode
3e63cbb: fs: Add new pre-allocation ioctls to vfs for compatibility with legacy xfs ioctls
01c0319: cleanup __writeback_single_inode
f21f622: ... and the same for vfsmount id/mount group id
c63e09e: Make allocation of anon devices cheaper
7e325d3: update Documentation/filesystems/Locking
f6cc746: devpts: remove module-related code
3b22edc: VFS: Switch init_mount_tree() to use the new create_mnt_ns() helper
654f562: vfs: fix nd->root leak in do_filp_open()
b5450d9: reiserfs: remove stray unlock_super in reiserfs_resize
c912e7a: ALSA: hda - Fix support for Samsung P50 with AD1986A codec
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-16 21:01 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-08-16 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin-Éric Racine
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
* Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > >> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>:
> > >> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
> > >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
> > >> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
> > >> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
> > >> >> >>> tuned.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> the jpg at:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
> > >> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
> > >> >>
> > >> >> This one might be a bit better:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
> > >
> > > Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
> >
> > The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
> > down to the following:
> >
> > commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
> > Author: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
> > Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
> >
> > add caching of ACLs in struct inode
> >
> > No helpers, no conversions yet.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
>
> Weird. If the functions do what their name suggests, i.e. if
> inode_init_always() is an always called constructor and if
> destroy_inode() is an unconditional destructor then this patch
> should have no functional effect on the VFS side.
>
> It increases the size of struct inode, so if you have some old
> module (built to an older version of fs.h) still around it might
> corrupt your inode data structure.
>
> Or the size change might trigger some dormant bug. It might move a
> critical inode right into the path of a pre-existing (but not
> visibly crash-triggering) data corruption.
>
> The possibilities on the 'weird bug' front are endless - the
> crash/oops itself should be turned into text, posted here and
> analyzed.
Btw., before you invest any time into the 'weird crash' theory, i'd
suggest to double check the bisection result:
f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0 crashes
f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0~1 boots fine
You can save yourself from a lot of head scratching that way - the
bisection result looks weird. (albeit plausible - a VFS crash points
to a VFS commit.)
_Maybe_ the bisection is just off a little bit (there was a
bisection mistake in the last few steps), and the real buggy commit
is one of the nearby ones:
1cbd20d: switch xfs to generic acl caching helpers
073aaa1: helpers for acl caching + switch to those
06b16e9: switch shmem to inode->i_acl
281eede: switch reiserfs to inode->i_acl
7a77b15: switch reiserfs to usual conventions for caching ACLs
e68888b: reiserfs: minimal fix for ACL caching
d441b1c: switch nilfs2 to inode->i_acl
5affd88: switch btrfs to inode->i_acl
290c263: switch jffs2 to inode->i_acl
05fc079: switch jfs to inode->i_acl
d4bfe2f: switch ext4 to inode->i_acl
6582a0e: switch ext3 to inode->i_acl
5e78b43: switch ext2 to inode->i_acl
f19d4a8: add caching of ACLs in struct inode
3e63cbb: fs: Add new pre-allocation ioctls to vfs for compatibility with legacy xfs ioctls
01c0319: cleanup __writeback_single_inode
f21f622: ... and the same for vfsmount id/mount group id
c63e09e: Make allocation of anon devices cheaper
7e325d3: update Documentation/filesystems/Locking
f6cc746: devpts: remove module-related code
3b22edc: VFS: Switch init_mount_tree() to use the new create_mnt_ns() helper
654f562: vfs: fix nd->root leak in do_filp_open()
b5450d9: reiserfs: remove stray unlock_super in reiserfs_resize
c912e7a: ALSA: hda - Fix support for Samsung P50 with AD1986A codec
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-09-11 12:36 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-09-11 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
2009/8/17 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
>>
>> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> > > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> > >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> > >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> > >> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>:
>> > >> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>> > >> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
>> > >> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>> > >> >> >>>
>> > >> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>> > >> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>> > >> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>> > >> >> >>> tuned.
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> the jpg at:
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
>> > >> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> This one might be a bit better:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>> > >
>> > > Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
>> >
>> > The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
>> > down to the following:
>> >
>> > commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
>> > Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>> > Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
>> >
>> > add caching of ACLs in struct inode
>> >
>> > No helpers, no conversions yet.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>>
>> Weird. If the functions do what their name suggests, i.e. if
>> inode_init_always() is an always called constructor and if
>> destroy_inode() is an unconditional destructor then this patch
>> should have no functional effect on the VFS side.
>>
>> It increases the size of struct inode, so if you have some old
>> module (built to an older version of fs.h) still around it might
>> corrupt your inode data structure.
>>
>> Or the size change might trigger some dormant bug. It might move a
>> critical inode right into the path of a pre-existing (but not
>> visibly crash-triggering) data corruption.
>>
>> The possibilities on the 'weird bug' front are endless - the
>> crash/oops itself should be turned into text, posted here and
>> analyzed.
>
> Btw., before you invest any time into the 'weird crash' theory, i'd
> suggest to double check the bisection result:
>
> f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0 crashes
> f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0~1 boots fine
>
> You can save yourself from a lot of head scratching that way - the
> bisection result looks weird. (albeit plausible - a VFS crash points
> to a VFS commit.)
>
> _Maybe_ the bisection is just off a little bit (there was a
> bisection mistake in the last few steps), and the real buggy commit
> is one of the nearby ones:
We double checked again last week with fresh builds and validated that
the above result is correct.
What puzzles us is the start of the crash:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffb4ff
IP: [<c01f716b>] __destroy_inode+0x4b/0x80
*pde = 00810067 *pte = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/power/resume
Any ideas?
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-09-11 12:36 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-09-11 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
2009/8/17 Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> > >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> > >> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>:
>> > >> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>> > >> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > >> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>> > >> >> >>>
>> > >> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>> > >> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>> > >> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>> > >> >> >>> tuned.
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> the jpg at:
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
>> > >> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> This one might be a bit better:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>> > >
>> > > Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
>> >
>> > The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
>> > down to the following:
>> >
>> > commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
>> > Author: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
>> > Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
>> >
>> > add caching of ACLs in struct inode
>> >
>> > No helpers, no conversions yet.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> Weird. If the functions do what their name suggests, i.e. if
>> inode_init_always() is an always called constructor and if
>> destroy_inode() is an unconditional destructor then this patch
>> should have no functional effect on the VFS side.
>>
>> It increases the size of struct inode, so if you have some old
>> module (built to an older version of fs.h) still around it might
>> corrupt your inode data structure.
>>
>> Or the size change might trigger some dormant bug. It might move a
>> critical inode right into the path of a pre-existing (but not
>> visibly crash-triggering) data corruption.
>>
>> The possibilities on the 'weird bug' front are endless - the
>> crash/oops itself should be turned into text, posted here and
>> analyzed.
>
> Btw., before you invest any time into the 'weird crash' theory, i'd
> suggest to double check the bisection result:
>
> f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0 crashes
> f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0~1 boots fine
>
> You can save yourself from a lot of head scratching that way - the
> bisection result looks weird. (albeit plausible - a VFS crash points
> to a VFS commit.)
>
> _Maybe_ the bisection is just off a little bit (there was a
> bisection mistake in the last few steps), and the real buggy commit
> is one of the nearby ones:
We double checked again last week with fresh builds and validated that
the above result is correct.
What puzzles us is the start of the crash:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffb4ff
IP: [<c01f716b>] __destroy_inode+0x4b/0x80
*pde = 00810067 *pte = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/power/resume
Any ideas?
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-16 21:12 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-16 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
2009/8/16 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>:
>
> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> >> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>:
>> >> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>> >> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>> >> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>> >> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>> >> >> >>> tuned.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> the jpg at:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
>> >> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This one might be a bit better:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>> >
>> > Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
>>
>> The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
>> down to the following:
>>
>> commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
>> Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>> Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
>>
>> add caching of ACLs in struct inode
>>
>> No helpers, no conversions yet.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>
> Weird. If the functions do what their name suggests, i.e. if
> inode_init_always() is an always called constructor and if
> destroy_inode() is an unconditional destructor then this patch
> should have no functional effect on the VFS side.
>
> It increases the size of struct inode, so if you have some old
> module (built to an older version of fs.h) still around it might
> corrupt your inode data structure.
>
> Or the size change might trigger some dormant bug. It might move a
> critical inode right into the path of a pre-existing (but not
> visibly crash-triggering) data corruption.
>
> The possibilities on the 'weird bug' front are endless - the
> crash/oops itself should be turned into text, posted here and
> analyzed.
If you mean something else than the large-size snapshot of the whole
panic output that was linked earlier in this thread, I'd appreciate
instructions on how to turn that crash into text.
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-16 21:12 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-16 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
2009/8/16 Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>:
>
> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> >> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>:
>> >> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>> >> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>> >> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>> >> >> >>> tuned.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> the jpg at:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
>> >> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This one might be a bit better:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>> >
>> > Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
>>
>> The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
>> down to the following:
>>
>> commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
>> Author: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
>> Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
>>
>> add caching of ACLs in struct inode
>>
>> No helpers, no conversions yet.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
>
> Weird. If the functions do what their name suggests, i.e. if
> inode_init_always() is an always called constructor and if
> destroy_inode() is an unconditional destructor then this patch
> should have no functional effect on the VFS side.
>
> It increases the size of struct inode, so if you have some old
> module (built to an older version of fs.h) still around it might
> corrupt your inode data structure.
>
> Or the size change might trigger some dormant bug. It might move a
> critical inode right into the path of a pre-existing (but not
> visibly crash-triggering) data corruption.
>
> The possibilities on the 'weird bug' front are endless - the
> crash/oops itself should be turned into text, posted here and
> analyzed.
If you mean something else than the large-size snapshot of the whole
panic output that was linked earlier in this thread, I'd appreciate
instructions on how to turn that crash into text.
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-16 21:34 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-08-16 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin-Éric Racine
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
* Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
> 2009/8/16 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>:
> >
> > * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >> >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >> >> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>:
> >> >> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
> >> >> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
> >> >> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
> >> >> >> >>> tuned.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> the jpg at:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
> >> >> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This one might be a bit better:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
> >> >
> >> > Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
> >>
> >> The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
> >> down to the following:
> >>
> >> commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
> >> Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> >> Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
> >>
> >> add caching of ACLs in struct inode
> >>
> >> No helpers, no conversions yet.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> >
> > Weird. If the functions do what their name suggests, i.e. if
> > inode_init_always() is an always called constructor and if
> > destroy_inode() is an unconditional destructor then this patch
> > should have no functional effect on the VFS side.
> >
> > It increases the size of struct inode, so if you have some old
> > module (built to an older version of fs.h) still around it might
> > corrupt your inode data structure.
> >
> > Or the size change might trigger some dormant bug. It might move a
> > critical inode right into the path of a pre-existing (but not
> > visibly crash-triggering) data corruption.
> >
> > The possibilities on the 'weird bug' front are endless - the
> > crash/oops itself should be turned into text, posted here and
> > analyzed.
>
> If you mean something else than the large-size snapshot of the
> whole panic output that was linked earlier in this thread, I'd
> appreciate instructions on how to turn that crash into text.
it's still a JPG - posting the transcribed oops in email text would
certainly help more folks looking over it.
(painful i know ...)
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-16 21:34 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-08-16 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin-Éric Racine
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
* Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 2009/8/16 Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>:
> >
> > * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >> >> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>:
> >> >> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
> >> >> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
> >> >> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
> >> >> >> >>> tuned.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> the jpg at:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
> >> >> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This one might be a bit better:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
> >> >
> >> > Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
> >>
> >> The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
> >> down to the following:
> >>
> >> commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
> >> Author: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
> >> Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
> >>
> >> add caching of ACLs in struct inode
> >>
> >> No helpers, no conversions yet.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > Weird. If the functions do what their name suggests, i.e. if
> > inode_init_always() is an always called constructor and if
> > destroy_inode() is an unconditional destructor then this patch
> > should have no functional effect on the VFS side.
> >
> > It increases the size of struct inode, so if you have some old
> > module (built to an older version of fs.h) still around it might
> > corrupt your inode data structure.
> >
> > Or the size change might trigger some dormant bug. It might move a
> > critical inode right into the path of a pre-existing (but not
> > visibly crash-triggering) data corruption.
> >
> > The possibilities on the 'weird bug' front are endless - the
> > crash/oops itself should be turned into text, posted here and
> > analyzed.
>
> If you mean something else than the large-size snapshot of the
> whole panic output that was linked earlier in this thread, I'd
> appreciate instructions on how to turn that crash into text.
it's still a JPG - posting the transcribed oops in email text would
certainly help more folks looking over it.
(painful i know ...)
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-17 21:02 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-17 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
2009/8/17 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>:
>
> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
>
>> 2009/8/16 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>:
>> >
>> > * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> >> >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> >> >> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>:
>> >> >> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>> >> >> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>> >> >> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>> >> >> >> >>> tuned.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> the jpg at:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
>> >> >> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> This one might be a bit better:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>> >> >
>> >> > Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
>> >>
>> >> The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
>> >> down to the following:
>> >>
>> >> commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
>> >> Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>> >> Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
>> >>
>> >> add caching of ACLs in struct inode
>> >>
>> >> No helpers, no conversions yet.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>> >
>> > Weird. If the functions do what their name suggests, i.e. if
>> > inode_init_always() is an always called constructor and if
>> > destroy_inode() is an unconditional destructor then this patch
>> > should have no functional effect on the VFS side.
>> >
>> > It increases the size of struct inode, so if you have some old
>> > module (built to an older version of fs.h) still around it might
>> > corrupt your inode data structure.
>> >
>> > Or the size change might trigger some dormant bug. It might move a
>> > critical inode right into the path of a pre-existing (but not
>> > visibly crash-triggering) data corruption.
>> >
>> > The possibilities on the 'weird bug' front are endless - the
>> > crash/oops itself should be turned into text, posted here and
>> > analyzed.
>>
>> If you mean something else than the large-size snapshot of the
>> whole panic output that was linked earlier in this thread, I'd
>> appreciate instructions on how to turn that crash into text.
>
> it's still a JPG - posting the transcribed oops in email text would
> certainly help more folks looking over it.
>
> (painful i know ...)
I welcome suggestions for proper OCR software that can extract the
text displayed therein. Manually transcribing it is too error-prone to
even try.
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-17 21:02 ` Martin-Éric Racine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-08-17 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List
2009/8/17 Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>:
>
> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> 2009/8/16 Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>:
>> >
>> > * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >> >> > On Thursday 13 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> >> >> >> 2009/8/13 Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>:
>> >> >> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> * Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>> Yes, this bug is still valid.
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> Ubuntu kernel team member Leann Ogasawara and I are slowly
>> >> >> >> >>> bisecting our way through the changes that took place since 2.6.30
>> >> >> >> >>> to find the commit that introduced this regression. Please stay
>> >> >> >> >>> tuned.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> hm, the only outright Geode related commit was:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> d6c585a: x86: geode: Mark mfgpt irq IRQF_TIMER to prevent resume failure
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> the jpg at:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28892781/00002.jpg
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> is very out of focus - but what i could decypher suggests a
>> >> >> >> >> pagefault crash in the VFS code, in generic_delete_inode().
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> This one might be a bit better:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30267494/2.6.31-5.24.jpg
>> >> >
>> >> > Hmm. This looks like a sysfs oops to my untrained eye.
>> >>
>> >> The bisect I did with Leann Ogasawara has narrowed the kernel panic
>> >> down to the following:
>> >>
>> >> commit f19d4a8fa6f9b6ccf54df0971c97ffcaa390b7b0
>> >> Author: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
>> >> Date: Mon Jun 8 19:50:45 2009 -0400
>> >>
>> >> add caching of ACLs in struct inode
>> >>
>> >> No helpers, no conversions yet.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
>> >
>> > Weird. If the functions do what their name suggests, i.e. if
>> > inode_init_always() is an always called constructor and if
>> > destroy_inode() is an unconditional destructor then this patch
>> > should have no functional effect on the VFS side.
>> >
>> > It increases the size of struct inode, so if you have some old
>> > module (built to an older version of fs.h) still around it might
>> > corrupt your inode data structure.
>> >
>> > Or the size change might trigger some dormant bug. It might move a
>> > critical inode right into the path of a pre-existing (but not
>> > visibly crash-triggering) data corruption.
>> >
>> > The possibilities on the 'weird bug' front are endless - the
>> > crash/oops itself should be turned into text, posted here and
>> > analyzed.
>>
>> If you mean something else than the large-size snapshot of the
>> whole panic output that was linked earlier in this thread, I'd
>> appreciate instructions on how to turn that crash into text.
>
> it's still a JPG - posting the transcribed oops in email text would
> certainly help more folks looking over it.
>
> (painful i know ...)
I welcome suggestions for proper OCR software that can extract the
text displayed therein. Manually transcribing it is too error-prone to
even try.
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-18 4:50 ` Willy Tarreau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Willy Tarreau @ 2009-08-18 4:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin-Éric Racine
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:02:34AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
(...)
> > it's still a JPG - posting the transcribed oops in email text would
> > certainly help more folks looking over it.
> >
> > (painful i know ...)
>
> I welcome suggestions for proper OCR software that can extract the
> text displayed therein. Manually transcribing it is too error-prone to
> even try.
Well, there are less risks of errors retyping by hand than passing via
an OCR. At least *you* know that everything you see are hex numbers, the
OCR does not. Eventhough it's quite annoying to do that by hand, it
generally takes less than 5 minutes to retype an oops, which is not that
much. Of course, the serial cable to another machine to get a panic dump
is the easiest solution ;-)
Willy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
@ 2009-08-18 4:50 ` Willy Tarreau
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Willy Tarreau @ 2009-08-18 4:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin-Éric Racine
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:02:34AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
(...)
> > it's still a JPG - posting the transcribed oops in email text would
> > certainly help more folks looking over it.
> >
> > (painful i know ...)
>
> I welcome suggestions for proper OCR software that can extract the
> text displayed therein. Manually transcribing it is too error-prone to
> even try.
Well, there are less risks of errors retyping by hand than passing via
an OCR. At least *you* know that everything you see are hex numbers, the
OCR does not. Eventhough it's quite annoying to do that by hand, it
generally takes less than 5 minutes to retype an oops, which is not that
much. Of course, the serial cable to another machine to get a panic dump
is the easiest solution ;-)
Willy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue
2009-08-18 4:50 ` Willy Tarreau
(?)
@ 2009-09-11 12:31 ` Martin-Éric Racine
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Martin-Éric Racine @ 2009-09-11 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Rafael J. Wysocki, Alexander Viro,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
2009/8/18 Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:02:34AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> (...)
>> > it's still a JPG - posting the transcribed oops in email text would
>> > certainly help more folks looking over it.
>> >
>> > (painful i know ...)
>>
>> I welcome suggestions for proper OCR software that can extract the
>> text displayed therein. Manually transcribing it is too error-prone to
>> even try.
>
> Well, there are less risks of errors retyping by hand than passing via
> an OCR. At least *you* know that everything you see are hex numbers, the
> OCR does not. Eventhough it's quite annoying to do that by hand, it
> generally takes less than 5 minutes to retype an oops, which is not that
> much. Of course, the serial cable to another machine to get a panic dump
> is the easiest solution ;-)
That would be assuming that a serial console is available. This is
not the case here. No legacy port whatsoever.
Martin-Éric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13935] 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Adrian Ulrich, Jiri Kosina
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel@blinkenlights.ch>
Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (2 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13935] 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Adrian Ulrich, Jiri Kosina
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel-4ZM2p5qjiQGewZBzVTKGGg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (2 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13935] 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-11 13:02 ` Jan Scholz
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-08-11 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Adrian Ulrich,
Jiri Kosina
Hi,
I can confirm the reported bug, but for me reverting fa047e4f6fa63a6 is
not sufficient. I have to remove the device id of the mighty mouse from
the hid_blacklist list in drivers/hid/hid-core.c as well, see the patch below.
Concerning the need for the quirks: I think there might be some
dependence on the version of X that is used. If I recall correctly, with
xorg-server-1.3 the quirk "APPLE_INVERT_HWHEEL" was necessary, but this
changed when I switched to xorg-server-1.5.3, where now horizontal
scrolling moves in directions you'd expect from vertical scrolling.
...but I wouldn't bet on my memory regarding things with xorg-server-1.3
since it's been quite some time ago and I never really liked the
horizontal scrolling anyway.
Cheers,
Jan
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
> Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
> Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel@blinkenlights.ch>
> Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (2 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
>
>From b7393ed6dfe00c9e126a2dd34659156548df15cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Scholz <Scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:33:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] HID: commit fa047e4f is incomplete
Commit fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343 "HID: fix inverted
wheel for bluetooth version of apple mighty mouse" is incomplete. If
we remove Apple MightyMouse (bluetooth version) from the list of
apple_devices in drivers/hid/hid-apple.c we have to remove it from
hid_blacklist in drivers/hid/hid-core.c as well.
Signed-off-by: Jan Scholz <Scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
---
drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
index 5eb10c2..047844d 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
@@ -1319,7 +1319,6 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_blacklist[] = {
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0005) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0030) },
- { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE, 0x030c) },
{ HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_PRESENTER_8K_BT) },
{ }
};
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13935] 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
@ 2009-08-11 13:02 ` Jan Scholz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-08-11 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Adrian Ulrich,
Jiri Kosina
Hi,
I can confirm the reported bug, but for me reverting fa047e4f6fa63a6 is
not sufficient. I have to remove the device id of the mighty mouse from
the hid_blacklist list in drivers/hid/hid-core.c as well, see the patch below.
Concerning the need for the quirks: I think there might be some
dependence on the version of X that is used. If I recall correctly, with
xorg-server-1.3 the quirk "APPLE_INVERT_HWHEEL" was necessary, but this
changed when I switched to xorg-server-1.5.3, where now horizontal
scrolling moves in directions you'd expect from vertical scrolling.
...but I wouldn't bet on my memory regarding things with xorg-server-1.3
since it's been quite some time ago and I never really liked the
horizontal scrolling anyway.
Cheers,
Jan
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
> Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
> Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel-4ZM2p5qjiQGewZBzVTKGGg@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (2 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
>
From b7393ed6dfe00c9e126a2dd34659156548df15cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Scholz <Scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:33:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] HID: commit fa047e4f is incomplete
Commit fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343 "HID: fix inverted
wheel for bluetooth version of apple mighty mouse" is incomplete. If
we remove Apple MightyMouse (bluetooth version) from the list of
apple_devices in drivers/hid/hid-apple.c we have to remove it from
hid_blacklist in drivers/hid/hid-core.c as well.
Signed-off-by: Jan Scholz <Scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
index 5eb10c2..047844d 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
@@ -1319,7 +1319,6 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_blacklist[] = {
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0005) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0030) },
- { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE, 0x030c) },
{ HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_PRESENTER_8K_BT) },
{ }
};
--
1.6.3.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13935] 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
@ 2009-08-11 15:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-11 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Scholz
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Adrian Ulrich,
Jiri Kosina, Jiri Slaby
On Tuesday 11 August 2009, Jan Scholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can confirm the reported bug, but for me reverting fa047e4f6fa63a6 is
> not sufficient. I have to remove the device id of the mighty mouse from
> the hid_blacklist list in drivers/hid/hid-core.c as well, see the patch below.
>
> Concerning the need for the quirks: I think there might be some
> dependence on the version of X that is used. If I recall correctly, with
> xorg-server-1.3 the quirk "APPLE_INVERT_HWHEEL" was necessary, but this
> changed when I switched to xorg-server-1.5.3, where now horizontal
> scrolling moves in directions you'd expect from vertical scrolling.
> ...but I wouldn't bet on my memory regarding things with xorg-server-1.3
> since it's been quite some time ago and I never really liked the
> horizontal scrolling anyway.
Thanks for the information.
Best,
Rafael
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
> > Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
> > Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel@blinkenlights.ch>
> > Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (2 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
> >
>
> From b7393ed6dfe00c9e126a2dd34659156548df15cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Scholz <Scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:33:27 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] HID: commit fa047e4f is incomplete
>
> Commit fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343 "HID: fix inverted
> wheel for bluetooth version of apple mighty mouse" is incomplete. If
> we remove Apple MightyMouse (bluetooth version) from the list of
> apple_devices in drivers/hid/hid-apple.c we have to remove it from
> hid_blacklist in drivers/hid/hid-core.c as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Scholz <Scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> index 5eb10c2..047844d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> @@ -1319,7 +1319,6 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_blacklist[] = {
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0005) },
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0030) },
>
> - { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE, 0x030c) },
> { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_PRESENTER_8K_BT) },
> { }
> };
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13935] 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
@ 2009-08-11 15:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-11 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Scholz
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Adrian Ulrich,
Jiri Kosina, Jiri Slaby
On Tuesday 11 August 2009, Jan Scholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can confirm the reported bug, but for me reverting fa047e4f6fa63a6 is
> not sufficient. I have to remove the device id of the mighty mouse from
> the hid_blacklist list in drivers/hid/hid-core.c as well, see the patch below.
>
> Concerning the need for the quirks: I think there might be some
> dependence on the version of X that is used. If I recall correctly, with
> xorg-server-1.3 the quirk "APPLE_INVERT_HWHEEL" was necessary, but this
> changed when I switched to xorg-server-1.5.3, where now horizontal
> scrolling moves in directions you'd expect from vertical scrolling.
> ...but I wouldn't bet on my memory regarding things with xorg-server-1.3
> since it's been quite some time ago and I never really liked the
> horizontal scrolling anyway.
Thanks for the information.
Best,
Rafael
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
> > Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
> > Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel-4ZM2p5qjiQGewZBzVTKGGg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (2 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
> >
>
> From b7393ed6dfe00c9e126a2dd34659156548df15cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Scholz <Scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:33:27 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] HID: commit fa047e4f is incomplete
>
> Commit fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343 "HID: fix inverted
> wheel for bluetooth version of apple mighty mouse" is incomplete. If
> we remove Apple MightyMouse (bluetooth version) from the list of
> apple_devices in drivers/hid/hid-apple.c we have to remove it from
> hid_blacklist in drivers/hid/hid-core.c as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Scholz <Scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> index 5eb10c2..047844d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> @@ -1319,7 +1319,6 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_blacklist[] = {
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0005) },
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0030) },
>
> - { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE, 0x030c) },
> { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_PRESENTER_8K_BT) },
> { }
> };
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13935] 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
@ 2009-09-30 13:21 ` Jan Scholz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-09-30 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Scholz
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Adrian Ulrich, Jiri Kosina
Hi,
now that the patch "HID: completely remove apple mightymouse from
blacklist" is merged upstream as
"42960a13001aa6df52ca9952ce996f94a744ea65" I think it should be merged
in the v2.6.31-stable series as well.
Best regards,
Jan
Jan Scholz <scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de> writes:
> I can confirm the reported bug, but for me reverting fa047e4f6fa63a6 is
> not sufficient. I have to remove the device id of the mighty mouse from
> the hid_blacklist list in drivers/hid/hid-core.c as well, see the patch below.
>
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
>> Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
>> Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel@blinkenlights.ch>
>> Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (2 days old)
>> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
>>
>
> From b7393ed6dfe00c9e126a2dd34659156548df15cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Scholz <Scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:33:27 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] HID: commit fa047e4f is incomplete
>
> Commit fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343 "HID: fix inverted
> wheel for bluetooth version of apple mighty mouse" is incomplete. If
> we remove Apple MightyMouse (bluetooth version) from the list of
> apple_devices in drivers/hid/hid-apple.c we have to remove it from
> hid_blacklist in drivers/hid/hid-core.c as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Scholz <Scholz@fias.uni-frankfurt.de>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> index 5eb10c2..047844d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> @@ -1319,7 +1319,6 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_blacklist[] = {
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0005) },
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0030) },
>
> - { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE, 0x030c) },
> { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_PRESENTER_8K_BT) },
> { }
> };
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13935] 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
@ 2009-09-30 13:21 ` Jan Scholz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Jan Scholz @ 2009-09-30 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Scholz
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Adrian Ulrich, Jiri Kosina
Hi,
now that the patch "HID: completely remove apple mightymouse from
blacklist" is merged upstream as
"42960a13001aa6df52ca9952ce996f94a744ea65" I think it should be merged
in the v2.6.31-stable series as well.
Best regards,
Jan
Jan Scholz <scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org> writes:
> I can confirm the reported bug, but for me reverting fa047e4f6fa63a6 is
> not sufficient. I have to remove the device id of the mighty mouse from
> the hid_blacklist list in drivers/hid/hid-core.c as well, see the patch below.
>
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
>> Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
>> Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel-4ZM2p5qjiQGewZBzVTKGGg@public.gmane.org>
>> Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (2 days old)
>> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
>>
>
> From b7393ed6dfe00c9e126a2dd34659156548df15cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Scholz <Scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:33:27 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] HID: commit fa047e4f is incomplete
>
> Commit fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343 "HID: fix inverted
> wheel for bluetooth version of apple mighty mouse" is incomplete. If
> we remove Apple MightyMouse (bluetooth version) from the list of
> apple_devices in drivers/hid/hid-apple.c we have to remove it from
> hid_blacklist in drivers/hid/hid-core.c as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Scholz <Scholz-wOpdxP1gw6Cc+IqHO83+wjjhTm2NLCe8@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> index 5eb10c2..047844d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> @@ -1319,7 +1319,6 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_blacklist[] = {
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0005) },
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0030) },
>
> - { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE, 0x030c) },
> { HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, USB_DEVICE_ID_MS_PRESENTER_8K_BT) },
> { }
> };
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13935] 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
2009-09-30 13:21 ` Jan Scholz
(?)
@ 2009-09-30 15:25 ` Jiri Kosina
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Kosina @ 2009-09-30 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Scholz
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Adrian Ulrich
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Jan Scholz wrote:
> now that the patch "HID: completely remove apple mightymouse from
> blacklist" is merged upstream as
> "42960a13001aa6df52ca9952ce996f94a744ea65" I think it should be merged
> in the v2.6.31-stable series as well.
Agreed. As it didn't have "Cc: stable@kernel.org" in the changelog, it
will not be picked up automagically.
Will do.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13944] MD raid regression
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 1:31 ` Neil Brown
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Mike Snitzer, NeilBrown
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13944
Subject : MD raid regression
Submitter : Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-08-05 15:06 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=449aad3e25358812c43afc60918c5ad3819488e7
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124948481218857&w=4
Handled-By : NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/39521/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13944] MD raid regression
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13944] MD raid regression Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-10 1:31 ` Neil Brown
2009-08-10 14:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2009-08-10 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mike Snitzer
On Sunday August 9, rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Yes, it still should be listed. The first patch didn't quite fix it.
A second one probably does.
Thanks.
NeilBrown
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13944
> Subject : MD raid regression
> Submitter : Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> Date : 2009-08-05 15:06 (5 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=449aad3e25358812c43afc60918c5ad3819488e7
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124948481218857&w=4
> Handled-By : NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/39521/
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13944] MD raid regression
@ 2009-08-10 14:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-10 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mike Snitzer
On Monday 10 August 2009, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Sunday August 9, rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
> Yes, it still should be listed. The first patch didn't quite fix it.
> A second one probably does.
Thanks for the update.
Is the patch listed below the right one?
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13944
> > Subject : MD raid regression
> > Submitter : Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> > Date : 2009-08-05 15:06 (5 days old)
> > Handled-By : NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/39521/
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13944] MD raid regression
@ 2009-08-10 14:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-10 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Mike Snitzer
On Monday 10 August 2009, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Sunday August 9, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
> Yes, it still should be listed. The first patch didn't quite fix it.
> A second one probably does.
Thanks for the update.
Is the patch listed below the right one?
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13944
> > Subject : MD raid regression
> > Submitter : Mike Snitzer <snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-05 15:06 (5 days old)
> > Handled-By : NeilBrown <neilb-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/39521/
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13944] MD raid regression
@ 2009-08-10 14:21 ` Mike Snitzer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Mike Snitzer @ 2009-08-10 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Neil Brown, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Mon, Aug 10 2009 at 10:11am -0400,
Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Monday 10 August 2009, Neil Brown wrote:
> > On Sunday August 9, rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> >
> > Yes, it still should be listed. The first patch didn't quite fix it.
> > A second one probably does.
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Is the patch listed below the right one?
>
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13944
> > > Subject : MD raid regression
> > > Submitter : Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> > > Date : 2009-08-05 15:06 (5 days old)
> > > Handled-By : NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/39521/
The updated patch is here:
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/40328/
I haven't yet tested it but will do so shortly.
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13944] MD raid regression
@ 2009-08-10 14:21 ` Mike Snitzer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Mike Snitzer @ 2009-08-10 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Neil Brown, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Mon, Aug 10 2009 at 10:11am -0400,
Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Monday 10 August 2009, Neil Brown wrote:
> > On Sunday August 9, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> >
> > Yes, it still should be listed. The first patch didn't quite fix it.
> > A second one probably does.
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Is the patch listed below the right one?
>
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13944
> > > Subject : MD raid regression
> > > Submitter : Mike Snitzer <snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date : 2009-08-05 15:06 (5 days old)
> > > Handled-By : NeilBrown <neilb-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
> > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/39521/
The updated patch is here:
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/40328/
I haven't yet tested it but will do so shortly.
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13944] MD raid regression
@ 2009-08-11 15:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-11 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Snitzer; +Cc: Neil Brown, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 10 August 2009, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10 2009 at 10:11am -0400,
> Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 10 August 2009, Neil Brown wrote:
> > > On Sunday August 9, rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of recent regressions.
> > > >
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > (either way).
> > >
> > > Yes, it still should be listed. The first patch didn't quite fix it.
> > > A second one probably does.
> >
> > Thanks for the update.
> >
> > Is the patch listed below the right one?
> >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13944
> > > > Subject : MD raid regression
> > > > Submitter : Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> > > > Date : 2009-08-05 15:06 (5 days old)
> > > > Handled-By : NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> > > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/39521/
>
> The updated patch is here:
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/40328/
Thanks, bug entry updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13944] MD raid regression
@ 2009-08-11 15:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-11 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Snitzer; +Cc: Neil Brown, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Monday 10 August 2009, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10 2009 at 10:11am -0400,
> Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 10 August 2009, Neil Brown wrote:
> > > On Sunday August 9, rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org wrote:
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of recent regressions.
> > > >
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > (either way).
> > >
> > > Yes, it still should be listed. The first patch didn't quite fix it.
> > > A second one probably does.
> >
> > Thanks for the update.
> >
> > Is the patch listed below the right one?
> >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13944
> > > > Subject : MD raid regression
> > > > Submitter : Mike Snitzer <snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > > > Date : 2009-08-05 15:06 (5 days old)
> > > > Handled-By : NeilBrown <neilb-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
> > > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/39521/
>
> The updated patch is here:
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/40328/
Thanks, bug entry updated.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13942] Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bruno Prémont
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Fabio Comolli, Luis R. Rodriguez
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Fabio Comolli, Luis R. Rodriguez
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-10 6:55 ` Fabio Comolli
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Comolli @ 2009-08-10 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Luis R. Rodriguez
It happened only once so it's hard to tell. I'm going to test -rc6
when it comes out and report back.
Regards,
Fabio
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
> Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (4 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
@ 2009-08-10 6:55 ` Fabio Comolli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Comolli @ 2009-08-10 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Luis R. Rodriguez
It happened only once so it's hard to tell. I'm going to test -rc6
when it comes out and report back.
Regards,
Fabio
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
> Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (4 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
2009-08-10 6:55 ` Fabio Comolli
(?)
@ 2009-08-10 14:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-10 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Comolli
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Luis R. Rodriguez
On Monday 10 August 2009, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> It happened only once so it's hard to tell. I'm going to test -rc6
> when it comes out and report back.
OK, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13946] x86 MCE malfunction on Thinkpad T42p
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Johannes Stezenbach
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13946
Subject : x86 MCE malfunction on Thinkpad T42p
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 17:09 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124966500232399&w=4
Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37908/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13950] Oops when USB Serial disconnected while in use
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Bruno Prémont
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13950
Subject : Oops when USB Serial disconnected while in use
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-08 17:47 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124975432900466&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Daniel Mack, John W. Linville, Roel Kluin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (3 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13948] ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-09 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bob Copeland, Johannes Stezenbach, Nick Kossifidis
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-10 14:30 ` James Bottomley
[not found] ` <1249914643.4089.3.camel-0iu6Cu4xQGLYCGPCin2YbQ@public.gmane.org>
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2009-08-10 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List,
Linux Wireless List, DRI
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 22:36 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13716
> Subject : The AIC-7892P controller does not work any more
> Submitter : Andrej Podzimek <andrej@podzimek.org>
> Date : 2009-07-05 19:23 (36 days old)
This one sounds like an IRQ routing error, so probably ACPI, but we've
been totally unsuccessful at getting any further information out of the
submitter. Use your own time judgement on this, but if he hasn't been
responding to you either for 36 days, I'd suggest closing this as
unresponsive.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.31-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-10 14:30 ` James Bottomley
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2009-08-10 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Adrian Bunk, DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development,
Linux Wireless List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Natalie Protasevich, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 22:36 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13716
> Subject : The AIC-7892P controller does not work any more
> Submitter : Andrej Podzimek <andrej@podzimek.org>
> Date : 2009-07-05 19:23 (36 days old)
This one sounds like an IRQ routing error, so probably ACPI, but we've
been totally unsuccessful at getting any further information out of the
submitter. Use your own time judgement on this, but if he hasn't been
responding to you either for 36 days, I'd suggest closing this as
unresponsive.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* wireless regressions -- Re: 2.6.31-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2009-08-10 15:04 ` John W. Linville
2009-08-10 15:50 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: John W. Linville @ 2009-08-10 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Wireless List
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:36:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
> are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
> please let me know.
Wireless-related ones...
> Unresolved regressions
> ----------------------
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
> Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
> Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
> Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (3 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
> Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
> Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (4 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
> Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
> Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
> Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (3 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13848
> Subject : iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
> Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
> Date : 2009-07-26 7:57 (15 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124859658502866&w=4
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13846
> Subject : LEDs switched off permanently by power saving with rt61pci driver
> Submitter : Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
> Date : 2009-07-13 8:27 (28 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124747418828398&w=4
> Regressions with patches
> ------------------------
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
> Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
> Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
> Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (3 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
> Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
Hth...
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: wireless regressions -- Re: 2.6.31-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
2009-08-10 15:04 ` wireless regressions -- " John W. Linville
@ 2009-08-10 15:50 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-10 16:04 ` Bob Copeland
0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2009-08-10 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John W. Linville, Fabio Comolli, Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Wireless List
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:04 AM, John W. Linville<linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:36:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
>> are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
>> please let me know.
>
> Wireless-related ones...
Some notes on some of these.
>> Unresolved regressions
>> ----------------------
>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
>> Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
>> Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
>> Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (3 days old)
>> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
>> Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
>> Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
>> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
>> Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (4 days old)
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
As I noted earlier this comes from the fact that a driver or mac80211
is queuing work onto the mac80211 workqueue when we already ran the
mac80211 suspend callbacks and we haven't yet resumed. There have been
several fixes for these, for both drivers and mac80211. We've already
pushed them to wireless-testing but I do not recall which ones have
been propagated to 2.6.31 as fixes.
So we have two options, we either treat all these as real issues for
2.6.31 and try to backport all related fixes, or we downgrade this
warning to just bail out. The problem with debugging these issues
as-is on 2.6.31 is that the caller which queued the work remains
invisible to the trace from the warning -- the warning comes from the
workqueue callback not the routine which ran queue_work(). This was
recently changed in wireless-testing and we now issue the warnings
from the callers of queue_work() for the mac80211 workqueue so we
*can* easily see the root cause to the issue and easily fix this.
We can surely fix this issue alone but we're sure bound to see this
warning later from other buggy drivers/mac80211 on 2.6.31 so we do
need to address how we want to address this issue as a whole for
2.6.31.
Fabio to help iron out this issue can you please use wireless-testing,
use IBSS as you were and go through the suspend-resume cycle to see if
you see a new warning with ath5k.
>> Regressions with patches
>> ------------------------
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
>> Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
>> Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
>> Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (3 days old)
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
>> Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
>> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
This bug report status is now RESOLVED PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE .
Luis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: wireless regressions -- Re: 2.6.31-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
2009-08-10 15:50 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
@ 2009-08-10 16:04 ` Bob Copeland
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Bob Copeland @ 2009-08-10 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis R. Rodriguez
Cc: John W. Linville, Fabio Comolli, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Wireless List
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez<mcgrof@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:04 AM, John W. Linville<linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:36:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
>>> are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
>>> please let me know.
>>
>> Wireless-related ones...
>
> Some notes on some of these.
>
>>> Unresolved regressions
>>> ----------------------
>>
>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
>>> Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
>>> Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
>>> Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (3 days old)
>>> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
>>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
>>> Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
>>> Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
>>> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
>>> Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (4 days old)
>>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
>
> As I noted earlier this comes from the fact that a driver or mac80211
> is queuing work onto the mac80211 workqueue when we already ran the
> mac80211 suspend callbacks and we haven't yet resumed. There have been
> several fixes for these, for both drivers and mac80211. We've already
> pushed them to wireless-testing but I do not recall which ones have
> been propagated to 2.6.31 as fixes.
This is on my todo and I haven't looked into this very hard yet,
but afaik ath5k doesn't (directly) use the mac80211 workqueue, so
my guess in Fabio's case would be further up the stack.
--
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* 2.6.31-rc6-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
@ 2009-08-19 20:20 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-19 20:26 ` [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-08-20 102 32 29
2009-08-10 89 27 24
2009-08-02 76 36 28
2009-07-27 70 51 43
2009-07-07 35 25 21
2009-06-29 22 22 15
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14018
Subject : kernel freezes, inotify problem
Submitter : Christoph Thielecke <christoph.thielecke@gmx.de>
Date : 2009-08-19 12:48 (1 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125068616818353&w=4
Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14016
Subject : mm/ipw2200 regression
Submitter : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-15 16:56 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125036437221408&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14015
Subject : pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-08-14 23:41 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125029329805643&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14014
Subject : kernel bug at shut down
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date : 2009-08-14 9:11 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125024112418870&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
Subject : hd don't show up
Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
Date : 2009-08-14 8:26 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125023842514480&w=4
Handled-By : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14012
Subject : latest git fried my x86_64 imac
Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-13 07:20 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014080427090&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14011
Subject : Kernel paging request failed in kmem_cache_alloc
Submitter : Matthias Dahl <ml_kernel@mortal-soul.de>
Date : 2009-08-10 22:26 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124993603825082&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14003
Subject : Infinite loop on bootup while handling DMAR
Submitter : Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero@arklinux.org>
Date : 2009-08-18 14:54 (2 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14002
Subject : WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock_destruct+0x164/0x1c0()
Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt <ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de>
Date : 2009-08-18 12:37 (2 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987
Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (5 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13960
Subject : rtl8187 not connect to wifi
Submitter : okias <d.okias@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-10 19:16 (10 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13950
Subject : Oops when USB Serial disconnected while in use
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-08 17:47 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124975432900466&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (14 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (16 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (17 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel@blinkenlights.ch>
Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13914
Subject : e1000e reports invalid NVM Checksum on 82566DM-2 (bisected)
Submitter : <jsbronder@gentoo.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 18:06 (16 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (16 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13899
Subject : Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom.
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Date : 2009-08-01 13:04 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124913190304149&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (22 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13848
Subject : iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Date : 2009-07-26 7:57 (25 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124859658502866&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (34 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
Subject : system freeze when switching to console
Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (28 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (29 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Subject : X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-07 15:19 (44 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (45 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (64 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017
Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map
Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (7 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13946
Subject : x86 MCE malfunction on Thinkpad T42p
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 17:09 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124966500232399&w=4
Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/37908/
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.30,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
2009-08-19 20:20 2.6.31-rc6-git5: " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-19 23:54 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-19 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
2009-08-19 20:26 ` [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-19 23:54 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira @ 2009-08-19 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Yes, 2.6.31-rc6 still has the bug.
On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
> Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
> Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
> Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (13 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
@ 2009-08-19 23:54 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira @ 2009-08-19 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Yes, 2.6.31-rc6 still has the bug.
On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
> Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
> Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm-cOTmPFJTJjbk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (13 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200908200054.36939.storm-cOTmPFJTJjbk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
2009-08-19 23:54 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
@ 2009-08-20 14:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira wrote:
> Yes, 2.6.31-rc6 still has the bug.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
> On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
> > Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
> > Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm-cOTmPFJTJjbk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (13 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
@ 2009-08-20 14:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-20 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, ACPI Devel Maling List
On Thursday 20 August 2009, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira wrote:
> Yes, 2.6.31-rc6 still has the bug.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
> On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
> > Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
> > Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
> > Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (13 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <bug-13940-13546@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>]
* 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
@ 2009-08-25 20:00 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-08-26 108 33 26
2009-08-20 102 32 29
2009-08-10 89 27 24
2009-08-02 76 36 28
2009-07-27 70 51 43
2009-07-07 35 25 21
2009-06-29 22 22 15
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14060
Subject : oops: sysfs_remove_link and i915
Submitter : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Date : 2009-08-22 5:48 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125092139113955&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
Subject : Oops in fsnotify
Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk>
Date : 2009-08-20 15:48 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125078450923133&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14057
Subject : Strange network timeouts w/ e100
Submitter : Walt Holman <walt@holmansrus.com>
Date : 2009-08-20 0:21 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125072831831443&w=4
Handled-By : Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14031
Subject : dvb_usb_af9015: Oops on hotplugging
Submitter : Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.L-H@gmx.de>
Date : 2009-08-05 20:32 (21 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124949716608828&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14018
Subject : kernel freezes, inotify problem
Submitter : Christoph Thielecke <christoph.thielecke@gmx.de>
Date : 2009-08-19 12:48 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125068616818353&w=4
Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14016
Subject : mm/ipw2200 regression
Submitter : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-15 16:56 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125036437221408&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14015
Subject : pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-08-14 23:41 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125029329805643&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
Subject : hd don't show up
Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
Date : 2009-08-14 8:26 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125023842514480&w=4
Handled-By : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14012
Subject : latest git fried my x86_64 imac
Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-13 07:20 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014080427090&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14011
Subject : Kernel paging request failed in kmem_cache_alloc
Submitter : Matthias Dahl <ml_kernel@mortal-soul.de>
Date : 2009-08-10 22:26 (16 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124993603825082&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987
Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (11 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13950
Subject : Oops when USB Serial disconnected while in use
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-08 17:47 (18 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124975432900466&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (20 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (22 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (23 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel@blinkenlights.ch>
Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (18 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (22 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (28 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13848
Subject : iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Date : 2009-07-26 7:57 (31 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124859658502866&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (40 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
Subject : system freeze when switching to console
Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (34 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (35 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Subject : X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-07 15:19 (50 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (70 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14062
Subject : Failure to boot as xen guest
Submitter : Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
Date : 2009-08-25 15:48 (1 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=83b519e8b9572c319c8e0c615ee5dd7272856090
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125121534229538&w=4
Handled-By : Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43799/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14061
Subject : Crash due to buggy flat_phys_pkg_id
Submitter : Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Date : 2009-08-24 18:26 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125114085701508&w=4
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43806/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14030
Subject : Kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008, pty-related
Submitter : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date : 2009-08-20 5:46 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125074724623423&w=4
Handled-By : Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43679/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017
Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map
Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13960
Subject : rtl8187 not connect to wifi
Submitter : okias <d.okias@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-10 19:16 (16 days old)
Handled-By : Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=22798
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (19 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43114/
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.30,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
2009-08-25 20:00 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-25 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
@ 2009-08-25 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-25 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm-cOTmPFJTJjbk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
2009-08-25 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-08-26 0:00 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira @ 2009-08-26 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
A patch has been proposed in the bugreport that fixes the problem, so if the
patch is commited, the regression is fixed for me. I don't think the patch was
commited yet.
On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
> Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
> Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
> Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (19 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
@ 2009-08-26 0:00 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira @ 2009-08-26 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
A patch has been proposed in the bugreport that fixes the problem, so if the
patch is commited, the regression is fixed for me. I don't think the patch was
commited yet.
On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
> Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
> Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm-cOTmPFJTJjbk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (19 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
@ 2009-08-26 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-26 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira wrote:
> A patch has been proposed in the bugreport that fixes the problem, so if the
> patch is commited, the regression is fixed for me. I don't think the patch was
> commited yet.
Well, honestly, it doesn't seem it will be applied.
Thanks for the update anyway.
Rafael
> On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
> > Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
> > Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
> > Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (19 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
@ 2009-08-26 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-08-26 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira wrote:
> A patch has been proposed in the bugreport that fixes the problem, so if the
> patch is commited, the regression is fixed for me. I don't think the patch was
> commited yet.
Well, honestly, it doesn't seem it will be applied.
Thanks for the update anyway.
Rafael
> On Tuesday 25 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
> > Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
> > Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm-cOTmPFJTJjbk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (19 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* 2.6.31-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.30
@ 2009-09-06 17:15 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-06 17:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-09-06 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.30, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.30, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the
entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-09-06 123 34 27
2009-08-26 108 33 26
2009-08-20 102 32 29
2009-08-10 89 27 24
2009-08-02 76 36 28
2009-07-27 70 51 43
2009-07-07 35 25 21
2009-06-29 22 22 15
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141
Subject : order 2 page allocation failures
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-09-06 7:40 (1 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125222287419691&w=4
Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14139
Subject : Output to external monitor is broken
Submitter : Carlos R. Mafra <crmafra2@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-06 14:22 (1 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f8aed700c6ec46ddade6570004ce25332283b306
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125224701520738&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14135
Subject : NULL pointer dereference in ima_counts_put
Submitter : Ciprian Docan <docan@eden.rutgers.edu>
Date : 2009-09-02 13:49 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=94e5d714f604d4cb4cb13163f01ede278e69258b
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125190146028116&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14133
Subject : WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:117 native_smp_send_reschedule
Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Date : 2009-08-31 20:43 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125175143918050&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14114
Subject : Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7
Submitter : Tsvety Petrov <Tsvetoslav.Petrov@itron.com>
Date : 2009-09-03 21:06 (4 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14103
Subject : cdc_acm gives I/O error
Submitter : Paul Martin <pm@debian.org>
Date : 2009-09-01 13:30 (6 days old)
Handled-By : Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14095
Subject : Asus EeePC 1005HA-M: Suspend hangs and disables the wireless
Submitter : Karsten Jaeger <lists@oss42.com>
Date : 2009-08-31 10:14 (7 days old)
References : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-eeepc-devel/2009-August/002513.html
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14070
Subject : lockdep warning triggered by dup_fd
Submitter : Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-23 09:36 (15 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/23/8
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
Subject : Oops in fsnotify
Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk>
Date : 2009-08-20 15:48 (18 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125078450923133&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14043
Subject : System sometimes hangs during boot
Submitter : Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-23 18:04 (15 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14018
Subject : kernel freezes, inotify problem
Submitter : Christoph Thielecke <christoph.thielecke@gmx.de>
Date : 2009-08-19 12:48 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125068616818353&w=4
Handled-By : Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
Subject : hd don't show up
Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
Date : 2009-08-14 8:26 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125023842514480&w=4
Handled-By : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987
Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (23 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13950
Subject : Oops when USB Serial disconnected while in use
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-08 17:47 (30 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124975432900466&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (32 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (34 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (35 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (31 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel@blinkenlights.ch>
Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (30 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (34 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (40 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (52 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13819
Subject : system freeze when switching to console
Submitter : Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Date : 2009-07-23 17:57 (46 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (47 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13740
Subject : X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-07 15:19 (62 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (63 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (82 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14140
Subject : 2.6.31-rc9 breaks gianfar
Submitter : Michael Guntsche <mike@it-loops.com>
Date : 2009-09-06 7:27 (1 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=38bddf04bcfe661fbdab94888c3b72c32f6873b3
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125222206218784&w=4
Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45965/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14138
Subject : Regression in suspend to ram
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-31 11:51 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125171952817851&w=4
Handled-By : OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45945/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14137
Subject : usb console regressions
Submitter : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Date : 2009-09-05 21:08 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125218501310512&w=4
Handled-By : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45953/
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45952/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14136
Subject : readcd Oops
Submitter : Bob Tracy <rct@gherkin.frus.com>
Date : 2009-09-03 3:39 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125195043617418&w=4
Handled-By : Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45347/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017
Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map
Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (25 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (31 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13947
Subject : Libertas: Association request to the driver failed
Submitter : Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Date : 2009-08-07 19:11 (31 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=57921c312e8cef72ba35a4cfe870b376da0b1b87
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124967234311481&w=4
Handled-By : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43114/
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.30,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
2009-09-06 17:15 2.6.31-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-09-06 17:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-09-06 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (31 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
@ 2009-09-06 17:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-09-06 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm-cOTmPFJTJjbk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (31 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
2009-09-06 17:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-09-06 20:55 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira @ 2009-09-06 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday 06 September 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Yes, the regression is still present.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
@ 2009-09-06 20:55 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
0 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira @ 2009-09-06 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday 06 September 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
Yes, the regression is still present.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
2009-09-06 20:55 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
(?)
@ 2009-09-06 21:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-09-06 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday 06 September 2009, Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira wrote:
> On Sunday 06 September 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
> Yes, the regression is still present.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
* 2.6.32-rc1-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31
@ 2009-10-01 19:53 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-01 19:55 ` [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 136+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-10-01 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
[Notes:
* Quite a number of new regressions from 2.6.30 has been reported during
the last three weeks.
* The number of unresolved regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 is now the second
highest ever.]
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and
2.6.31, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.30
and 2.6.31, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2009-10-02 151 49 42
2009-09-06 123 34 27
2009-08-26 108 33 26
2009-08-20 102 32 29
2009-08-10 89 27 24
2009-08-02 76 36 28
2009-07-27 70 51 43
2009-07-07 35 25 21
2009-06-29 22 22 15
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14301
Subject : WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154
Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de>
Date : 2009-09-30 12:24 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125431350218137&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14294
Subject : kernel BUG at drivers/ide/ide-disk.c:187
Submitter : Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty@manty.net>
Date : 2009-09-30 11:05 (2 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125430926311466&w=4
Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14270
Subject : Cannot boot on a PIII Celeron
Submitter : Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Date : 2009-09-28 15:26 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125415160524110&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14267
Subject : Disassociating atheros wlan
Submitter : Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-24 10:16 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125378723723384&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14266
Subject : regression in page writeback
Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Date : 2009-09-22 5:49 (10 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d7831a0bdf06b9f722b947bb0c205ff7d77cebd8
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125359858117176&w=4
Handled-By : Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14265
Subject : ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x8020 w/ e100
Submitter : Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-15 12:05 (17 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125301636509517&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14264
Subject : ehci problem - mouse dead on scroll
Submitter : Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-09-12 7:46 (20 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125274202707893&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14257
Subject : Not able to boot on 32 bit System
Submitter : Rishikesh <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-09-21 15:25 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125354604314412&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14256
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125351816109264&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14255
Subject : WARNING: at drivers/char/tty_io.c:1267
Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Date : 2009-09-20 11:37 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125344629506309&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/8/393
Handled-By : Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14254
Subject : Hibernation broken by clocksource: Save mult_orig in clocksource_disable()
Submitter : Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
Date : 2009-09-19 19:55 (13 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=c7121843685de2bf7f3afd3ae1d6a146010bf1fc
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125339012527719&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14252
Subject : WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000
Submitter : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
Date : 2009-09-20 11:26 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125344599006033&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14251
Subject : 2.6.31: no login prompt
Submitter : Frédéric L. W. Meunier <fredlwm@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-19 22:43 (13 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125340020804711&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14249
Subject : BUG: oops in gss_validate on 2.6.31
Submitter : Bastian Blank <bastian@waldi.eu.org>
Date : 2009-09-16 10:29 (16 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125309700417283&w=4
Handled-By : Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14248
Subject : 2.6.31 wireless: WARNING: at net/wireless/ibss.c:34
Submitter : Jurriaan <thunder8@xs4all.nl>
Date : 2009-09-13 7:32 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125282721113553&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14222
Subject : Hibernation oopses for the 2nd time with 2.6.31 (won't fit the screen)
Submitter : Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
Date : 2009-09-24 14:07 (8 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=c7121843685de2bf7f3afd3ae1d6a146010bf1fc
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14205
Subject : Intel DX58SO mainboard - powering off takes really long
Submitter : Tomasz Chmielewski <tch@wpkg.org>
Date : 2009-09-22 10:14 (10 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14204
Subject : MCE prevent booting on my computer(pentium iii @500Mhz)
Submitter : GNUtoo <GNUtoo@no-log.org>
Date : 2009-09-21 20:36 (11 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14185
Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class
Submitter : <lars_ericsson@telia.com>
Date : 2009-09-17 05:09 (15 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6e03a201bbe8137487f340d26aa662110e324b20
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14181
Subject : b43 causes panic at system shutdown
Submitter : Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@freedesktop.org>
Date : 2009-09-15 18:34 (17 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14157
Subject : end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/cXdX, sector 0
Submitter : <jiri.harcarik@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-09-11 07:42 (21 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14143
Subject : OOPS when setting nr_requests for md devices
Submitter : aCaB <acab@clamav.net>
Date : 2009-09-08 08:48 (24 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14141
Subject : order 2 page allocation failures in iwlagn
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2009-09-06 7:40 (26 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125222287419691&w=4
Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14133
Subject : WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:117 native_smp_send_reschedule
Submitter : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Date : 2009-08-31 20:43 (32 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125175143918050&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14114
Subject : Tuning a saa7134 based card is broken in kernel 2.6.31-rc7
Submitter : Tsvety Petrov <Tsvetoslav.Petrov@itron.com>
Date : 2009-09-03 21:06 (29 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14090
Subject : WARNING: at fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c:394
Submitter : Joerg Platte <bugzilla@jako.ping.de>
Date : 2009-08-30 15:21 (33 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14070
Subject : lockdep warning triggered by dup_fd
Submitter : Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-23 09:36 (40 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/23/8
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14058
Subject : Oops in fsnotify
Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk>
Date : 2009-08-20 15:48 (43 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125078450923133&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
Subject : hd don't show up
Submitter : Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
Date : 2009-08-14 8:26 (49 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125023842514480&w=4
Handled-By : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13987
Subject : Received NMI interrupt at resume
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2009-08-15 07:55 (48 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13950
Subject : Oops when USB Serial disconnected while in use
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-08 17:47 (55 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124975432900466&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13943
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-06 20:15 (57 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124958978600600&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
Subject : Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object
Submitter : Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date : 2009-08-04 10:12 (59 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124938117104811&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Subject : x86 Geode issue
Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@iki.fi>
Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (60 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940
Subject : iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Submitter : Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira <storm@sys49152.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 22:33 (56 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968457731107&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13935
Subject : 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version)
Submitter : Adrian Ulrich <kernel@blinkenlights.ch>
Date : 2009-08-08 22:08 (55 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fa047e4f6fa63a6e9d0ae4d7749538830d14a343
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906
Subject : Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops
Submitter : Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-08-04 09:02 (59 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13869
Subject : Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot.
Submitter : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Date : 2009-07-29 16:44 (65 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13836
Subject : suspend script fails, related to stdout?
Submitter : Tomas M. <tmezzadra@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-17 21:24 (77 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124785853811667&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13809
Subject : oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Date : 2009-07-22 13:35 (72 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13733
Subject : 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared
Submitter : Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-07-06 18:32 (88 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124690524027166&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Subject : NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt)
Submitter : poornima nayak <mpnayak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-06-17 17:56 (107 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/194
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14275
Subject : kernel>=2.6.31: ahci.c: do not force unconditionally sb600 to 32bit dma any more?
Submitter : gabriele balducci <balducci@units.it>
Date : 2009-09-30 15:02 (2 days old)
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14275#c0
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14261
Subject : e1000e jumbo frames no longer work: 'Unsupported MTU setting'
Submitter : Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Date : 2009-09-26 11:16 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125396433321342&w=4
Handled-By : Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/50277/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14258
Subject : Memory leak in SCSI initialization
Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date : 2009-09-22 4:18 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125359311312243&w=4
Handled-By : Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/49258/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14253
Subject : Oops in driversbasefirmware_class
Submitter : Lars Ericsson <Lars_Ericsson@telia.com>
Date : 2009-09-16 20:44 (16 days old)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/16/461
Handled-By : Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@xprog.eu>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/49914/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14137
Subject : usb console regressions
Submitter : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Date : 2009-09-05 21:08 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125218501310512&w=4
Handled-By : Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45953/
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/45952/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14017
Subject : _end symbol missing from Symbol.map
Submitter : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Date : 2009-08-13 6:45 (50 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=091e52c3551d3031343df24b573b770b4c6c72b6
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Handled-By : Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125014649102253&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13948
Subject : ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram
Submitter : Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Date : 2009-08-07 21:51 (56 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124968192727854&w=4
Handled-By : Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13615
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 136+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-01 23:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 136+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-09 20:36 2.6.31-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:36 ` [Bug #13645] NULL pointer dereference at (null) (level2_spare_pgt) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13819] system freeze when switching to console Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13740] X server crashes with 2.6.31-rc2 when options are changed Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13716] The AIC-7892P controller does not work any more Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13713] [drm/i915] Possible regression due to commit "Change GEM throttling to be 20ms (...)" Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13809] oprofile: possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13733] 2.6.31-rc2: irq 16: nobody cared Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13836] suspend script fails, related to stdout? Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13833] Kernel Oops when trying to suspend with ubifs mounted on block2mtd mtd device Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13837] Input : regression - touchpad not detected Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 2:14 ` Dave Young
2009-08-10 2:14 ` Dave Young
2009-08-10 14:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 14:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13846] LEDs switched off permanently by power saving with rt61pci driver Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 10:11 ` Chris Clayton
2009-08-10 10:11 ` Chris Clayton
2009-08-10 14:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 14:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13869] Radeon framebuffer (w/o KMS) corruption at boot Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 0:10 ` Duncan
2009-08-10 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13848] iwlwifi (4965) regression since 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13906] Huawei E169 GPRS connection causes Ooops Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13899] Oops from tar, 2.6.31-rc5, 32 bit on quad core phenom Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 3:42 ` Gene Heskett
2009-08-10 3:42 ` Gene Heskett
2009-08-10 14:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 14:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13914] e1000e reports invalid NVM Checksum on 82566DM-2 (bisected) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13895] 2.6.31-rc4 - slab entry tak_delay_info leaking ??? Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13941] x86 Geode issue Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-13 8:52 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-13 8:52 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-13 9:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-13 9:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-13 9:44 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-13 9:44 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-13 10:40 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-13 10:40 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-13 14:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-13 14:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-13 15:00 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-13 15:00 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-13 18:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-13 18:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-16 19:17 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-16 19:17 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-16 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-16 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-16 21:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-16 21:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-11 12:36 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-09-11 12:36 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-16 21:12 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-16 21:12 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-16 21:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-16 21:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-17 21:02 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-17 21:02 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-18 4:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-08-18 4:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-09-11 12:31 ` Martin-Éric Racine
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13935] 2.6.31-rcX breaks Apple MightyMouse (Bluetooth version) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-11 13:02 ` Jan Scholz
2009-08-11 13:02 ` Jan Scholz
2009-08-11 15:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-11 15:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-30 13:21 ` Jan Scholz
2009-09-30 13:21 ` Jan Scholz
2009-09-30 15:25 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13944] MD raid regression Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 1:31 ` Neil Brown
2009-08-10 14:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 14:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 14:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-08-10 14:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-08-11 15:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-11 15:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13942] Troubles with AoE and uninitialized object Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13943] WARNING: at net/mac80211/mlme.c:2292 with ath5k Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 6:55 ` Fabio Comolli
2009-08-10 6:55 ` Fabio Comolli
2009-08-10 14:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13946] x86 MCE malfunction on Thinkpad T42p Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13950] Oops when USB Serial disconnected while in use Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13947] Libertas: Association request to the driver failed Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-09 20:44 ` [Bug #13948] ath5k broken after suspend-to-ram Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 14:30 ` 2.6.31-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.30 James Bottomley
[not found] ` <1249914643.4089.3.camel-0iu6Cu4xQGLYCGPCin2YbQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-10 14:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 14:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-10 14:30 ` James Bottomley
2009-08-10 15:04 ` wireless regressions -- " John W. Linville
2009-08-10 15:50 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-08-10 16:04 ` Bob Copeland
2009-08-19 20:20 2.6.31-rc6-git5: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-19 20:26 ` [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-19 23:54 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
2009-08-19 23:54 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
[not found] ` <200908200054.36939.storm-cOTmPFJTJjbk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-20 14:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-20 14:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] <bug-13940-13546@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
[not found] ` <200908251555.n7PFt7Wt015763@demeter.kernel.org>
2009-08-25 17:56 ` [Bug 13940] " Yinghai Lu
2009-08-25 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-08-25 19:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-08-26 17:44 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-08-25 20:00 2.6.31-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 20:34 ` [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-25 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 0:00 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
2009-08-26 0:00 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
2009-08-26 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-08-26 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-06 17:15 2.6.31-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.30 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-06 17:24 ` [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-06 17:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-06 20:55 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
2009-09-06 20:55 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
2009-09-06 21:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-01 19:53 2.6.32-rc1-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-01 19:55 ` [Bug #13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related Rafael J. Wysocki
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.