* [PATCH] t6022, t6046: fix flaky files-are-updated checks
@ 2020-03-13 18:57 Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-03-13 19:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-03-13 20:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget @ 2020-03-13 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: Elijah Newren, Elijah Newren
From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Several tests wanted to verify that files were actually modified by a
merge, which it would do by checking that the mtime was updated. In
order to avoid problems with the merge completing so fast that the mtime
at the beginning and end of the operation was the same, these tests
would first set the mtime of a file to something "old". This "old"
value was usually determined as current system clock minus one second,
truncated to the nearest integer. Unfortunately, it appears the system
clock and filesystem clock are different and comparing across the two
runs into race problems resulting in flaky tests.
From https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14392975/timestamp-accuracy-on-ext4-sub-millsecond:
date will call the gettimeofday system call which will always return
the most accurate time available based on the cached kernel time,
adjusted by the CPU cycle time if available to give nanosecond
resolution. The timestamps stored in the file system however, are
only based on the cached kernel time. ie The time calculated at the
last timer interrupt.
and from https://apenwarr.ca/log/20181113:
Does mtime get set to >= the current time?
No, this depends on clock granularity. For example, gettimeofday()
can return times in microseconds on my system, but ext4 rounds
timestamps down to the previous ~10ms (but not exactly 10ms)
increment, with the surprising result that a newly-created file is
almost always created in the past:
$ python -c "
import os, time
t0 = time.time()
open('testfile', 'w').close()
print os.stat('testfile').st_mtime - t0
"
-0.00234484672546
So, instead of trying to compare across what are effectively two
different clocks, just avoid using the system clock. Any new updates to
files have to give an mtime at least as big as what is already in the
file, so define "old" as one second before the mtime found in the file
before the merge starts.
Also, clarify in one test where we check the mtime of different files
that it really was intentional. I totally forgot the reasons for that
and assumed it was a bug when asked.
Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
---
t6022, t6046: fix flaky files-are-updated checks
Who knew that the system clock and the filesystem clock were apparently
different things, causing mtime comparisons to be flaky?
Definitely not me. Fix the flaky tests that SZEDER reported and helped
track down the cause of.
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-725%2Fnewren%2Ftest-cleanup-more-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-725/newren/test-cleanup-more-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/725
t/t6022-merge-rename.sh | 19 ++++++++++---------
t/t6046-merge-skip-unneeded-updates.sh | 21 +++++++--------------
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh b/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh
index d97cf48495b..23d51c55c8b 100755
--- a/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh
+++ b/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh
@@ -243,8 +243,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge of identical changes in a renamed file' '
git reset --hard &&
git checkout change+rename &&
- test-tool chmtime =31337 B &&
- test-tool chmtime --get B >old-mtime &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 B >old-mtime &&
GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge change >out &&
test-tool chmtime --get B >new-mtime &&
@@ -253,10 +252,12 @@ test_expect_success 'merge of identical changes in a renamed file' '
git reset --hard HEAD^ &&
git checkout change &&
- test-tool chmtime =-1 M &&
- test-tool chmtime --get M >old-mtime &&
+ # A will be renamed to B; we check mtimes and file presence
+ test_path_is_missing B &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 A >old-mtime &&
GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge change+rename >out &&
+ test_path_is_missing A &&
test-tool chmtime --get B >new-mtime &&
test $(cat old-mtime) -lt $(cat new-mtime)
'
@@ -645,7 +646,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup avoid unnecessary update, normal rename' '
test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, normal rename' '
git checkout -q avoid-unnecessary-update-1^0 &&
- test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 rename >expect &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 rename >expect &&
git merge merge-branch-1 &&
test-tool chmtime --get rename >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual # "rename" should have stayed intact
@@ -677,7 +678,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup to test avoiding unnecessary update, with D/F conflic
test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, with D/F conflict' '
git checkout -q avoid-unnecessary-update-2^0 &&
- test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 df >expect &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 df >expect &&
git merge merge-branch-2 &&
test-tool chmtime --get df >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual # "df" should have stayed intact
@@ -708,7 +709,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup avoid unnecessary update, dir->(file,nothing)' '
test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, dir->(file,nothing)' '
git checkout -q master^0 &&
- test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 df >expect &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 df >expect &&
git merge side &&
test-tool chmtime --get df >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual # "df" should have stayed intact
@@ -737,7 +738,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup avoid unnecessary update, modify/delete' '
test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, modify/delete' '
git checkout -q master^0 &&
- test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 file >expect &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 file >expect &&
test_must_fail git merge side &&
test-tool chmtime --get file >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual # "file" should have stayed intact
@@ -765,7 +766,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup avoid unnecessary update, rename/add-dest' '
test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, rename/add-dest' '
git checkout -q master^0 &&
- test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 newfile >expect &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 newfile >expect &&
git merge side &&
test-tool chmtime --get newfile >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual # "file" should have stayed intact
diff --git a/t/t6046-merge-skip-unneeded-updates.sh b/t/t6046-merge-skip-unneeded-updates.sh
index 962030ecdb6..c7d0abb4ca3 100755
--- a/t/t6046-merge-skip-unneeded-updates.sh
+++ b/t/t6046-merge-skip-unneeded-updates.sh
@@ -71,8 +71,7 @@ test_expect_success '1a-L: Modify(A)/Modify(B), change on B subset of A' '
git checkout A^0 &&
- test-tool chmtime =-1 b &&
- test-tool chmtime --get b >old-mtime &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 b >old-mtime &&
GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
@@ -102,8 +101,7 @@ test_expect_success '1a-R: Modify(A)/Modify(B), change on B subset of A' '
git checkout B^0 &&
- test-tool chmtime =-1 b &&
- test-tool chmtime --get b >old-mtime &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 b >old-mtime &&
GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive A^0 >out 2>err &&
# Make sure b WAS updated
@@ -198,8 +196,7 @@ test_expect_success '2a-R: Modify/rename, merge into rename side' '
git checkout B^0 &&
- test-tool chmtime =-1 c &&
- test-tool chmtime --get c >old-mtime &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 c >old-mtime &&
GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive A^0 >out 2>err &&
# Make sure c WAS updated
@@ -266,8 +263,7 @@ test_expect_success '2b-L: Rename+Mod(A)/Mod(B), B mods subset of A' '
git checkout A^0 &&
- test-tool chmtime =-1 c &&
- test-tool chmtime --get c >old-mtime &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 c >old-mtime &&
GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
test_must_be_empty err &&
@@ -373,8 +369,7 @@ test_expect_success '2c: Modify b & add c VS rename b->c' '
git checkout A^0 &&
- test-tool chmtime =-1 c &&
- test-tool chmtime --get c >old-mtime &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 c >old-mtime &&
GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 &&
export GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY &&
test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
@@ -679,8 +674,7 @@ test_expect_failure '4a: Change on A, change on B subset of A, dirty mods presen
git checkout A^0 &&
echo "File rewritten" >b &&
- test-tool chmtime =-1 b &&
- test-tool chmtime --get b >old-mtime &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 b >old-mtime &&
GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
@@ -747,8 +741,7 @@ test_expect_success '4b: Rename+Mod(A)/Mod(B), change on B subset of A, dirty mo
git checkout A^0 &&
echo "File rewritten" >c &&
- test-tool chmtime =-1 c &&
- test-tool chmtime --get c >old-mtime &&
+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 c >old-mtime &&
GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
base-commit: 30e9940356dc67959877f4b2417da33ebdefbb79
--
gitgitgadget
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] t6022, t6046: fix flaky files-are-updated checks 2020-03-13 18:57 [PATCH] t6022, t6046: fix flaky files-are-updated checks Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget @ 2020-03-13 19:18 ` Junio C Hamano 2020-03-13 19:27 ` Elijah Newren 2020-03-13 20:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2020-03-13 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget; +Cc: git, Elijah Newren "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > > Several tests wanted to verify that files were actually modified by a > merge, which it would do by checking that the mtime was updated. In > order to avoid problems with the merge completing so fast that the mtime > at the beginning and end of the operation was the same, these tests > would first set the mtime of a file to something "old". This "old" > value was usually determined as current system clock minus one second, > truncated to the nearest integer. Unfortunately, it appears the system > clock and filesystem clock are different and comparing across the two > runs into race problems resulting in flaky tests. Good observation (and if we were doing networked filesystems, things would be worse). > So, instead of trying to compare across what are effectively two > different clocks, just avoid using the system clock. Any new updates to > files have to give an mtime at least as big as what is already in the > file, so define "old" as one second before the mtime found in the file > before the merge starts. Is there a reason why we prefer as small an offset as possible? I am not objecting to the choice of 1 second, but am curious if anything bad happens if we used a larger offset, say, 2 hours. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] t6022, t6046: fix flaky files-are-updated checks 2020-03-13 19:18 ` Junio C Hamano @ 2020-03-13 19:27 ` Elijah Newren 2020-03-13 19:42 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Elijah Newren @ 2020-03-13 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget, Git Mailing List On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:18 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: > > "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > > > From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > > > > Several tests wanted to verify that files were actually modified by a > > merge, which it would do by checking that the mtime was updated. In > > order to avoid problems with the merge completing so fast that the mtime > > at the beginning and end of the operation was the same, these tests > > would first set the mtime of a file to something "old". This "old" > > value was usually determined as current system clock minus one second, > > truncated to the nearest integer. Unfortunately, it appears the system > > clock and filesystem clock are different and comparing across the two > > runs into race problems resulting in flaky tests. > > Good observation (and if we were doing networked filesystems, things > would be worse). > > > So, instead of trying to compare across what are effectively two > > different clocks, just avoid using the system clock. Any new updates to > > files have to give an mtime at least as big as what is already in the > > file, so define "old" as one second before the mtime found in the file > > before the merge starts. > > Is there a reason why we prefer as small an offset as possible? I > am not objecting to the choice of 1 second, but am curious if > anything bad happens if we used a larger offset, say, 2 hours. I was thinking about putting in some magic larger number, but was wondering if I needed to explain it or if people might spend cycles thinking about the significance of the random number selected. However, a larger value might be useful in the face of leap seconds and ntp time updates, so I should probably move that direction. Any preferences on whether I should I pick something like 3600 (large but easily recognizable), something more round like 10000, or something else? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] t6022, t6046: fix flaky files-are-updated checks 2020-03-13 19:27 ` Elijah Newren @ 2020-03-13 19:42 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2020-03-13 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Elijah Newren; +Cc: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget, Git Mailing List Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes: > However, a larger value might be useful in the face of leap seconds > and ntp time updates, so I should probably move that direction. > > Any preferences on whether I should I pick something like 3600 (large > but easily recognizable), something more round like 10000, or > something else? As long as filesystem timestamp monotonically increases, any value that is the same or larger than the time granularity should be OK, and it sounds reasonable for filesystem timestamp to have at least 1 second resolution. Ehh, do we still need to worry about the ones that has 2 second resolution or coarser? What does "adjust the file timestamp by decrementing 1 second from the current value" do? Do we risk ending up with the same timestamp as we started with? I have no strong preference between 3600 and 10000, but to me 1 smells a bit iffy. "test-tool chmtime --get -9 file" is still spelled in the same number of bytes as one second offset and has a larger margin ;-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] t6022, t6046: fix flaky files-are-updated checks 2020-03-13 18:57 [PATCH] t6022, t6046: fix flaky files-are-updated checks Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2020-03-13 19:18 ` Junio C Hamano @ 2020-03-13 20:03 ` Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget @ 2020-03-13 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git; +Cc: Elijah Newren, Elijah Newren From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Several tests wanted to verify that files were actually modified by a merge, which it would do by checking that the mtime was updated. In order to avoid problems with the merge completing so fast that the mtime at the beginning and end of the operation was the same, these tests would first set the mtime of a file to something "old". This "old" value was usually determined as current system clock minus one second, truncated to the nearest integer. Unfortunately, it appears the system clock and filesystem clock are different and comparing across the two runs into race problems resulting in flaky tests. From https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14392975/timestamp-accuracy-on-ext4-sub-millsecond: date will call the gettimeofday system call which will always return the most accurate time available based on the cached kernel time, adjusted by the CPU cycle time if available to give nanosecond resolution. The timestamps stored in the file system however, are only based on the cached kernel time. ie The time calculated at the last timer interrupt. and from https://apenwarr.ca/log/20181113: Does mtime get set to >= the current time? No, this depends on clock granularity. For example, gettimeofday() can return times in microseconds on my system, but ext4 rounds timestamps down to the previous ~10ms (but not exactly 10ms) increment, with the surprising result that a newly-created file is almost always created in the past: $ python -c " import os, time t0 = time.time() open('testfile', 'w').close() print os.stat('testfile').st_mtime - t0 " -0.00234484672546 So, instead of trying to compare across what are effectively two different clocks, just avoid using the system clock. Any new updates to files have to give an mtime at least as big as what is already in the file, so we could define "old" as one second before the mtime found in the file before the merge starts. But, to avoid problems with leap seconds, ntp updates, filesystems that only provide two second resolution, and other such weirdness, let's just pick an hour before the mtime found in the file before the merge starts. Also, clarify in one test where we check the mtime of different files that it really was intentional. I totally forgot the reasons for that and assumed it was a bug when asked. Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> --- t6022, t6046: fix flaky files-are-updated checks Who knew that the system clock and the filesystem clock were apparently different things, causing mtime comparisons to be flaky? Definitely not me. Fix the flaky tests that SZEDER reported and helped track down the cause of. Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-725%2Fnewren%2Ftest-cleanup-more-v2 Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-725/newren/test-cleanup-more-v2 Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/725 Range-diff vs v1: 1: dfe1f66112b ! 1: 6f603695093 t6022, t6046: fix flaky files-are-updated checks @@ -43,8 +43,11 @@ So, instead of trying to compare across what are effectively two different clocks, just avoid using the system clock. Any new updates to files have to give an mtime at least as big as what is already in the - file, so define "old" as one second before the mtime found in the file - before the merge starts. + file, so we could define "old" as one second before the mtime found in + the file before the merge starts. But, to avoid problems with leap + seconds, ntp updates, filesystems that only provide two second + resolution, and other such weirdness, let's just pick an hour before the + mtime found in the file before the merge starts. Also, clarify in one test where we check the mtime of different files that it really was intentional. I totally forgot the reasons for that @@ -62,7 +65,7 @@ - test-tool chmtime =31337 B && - test-tool chmtime --get B >old-mtime && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 B >old-mtime && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 B >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge change >out && test-tool chmtime --get B >new-mtime && @@ -74,7 +77,7 @@ - test-tool chmtime --get M >old-mtime && + # A will be renamed to B; we check mtimes and file presence + test_path_is_missing B && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 A >old-mtime && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 A >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge change+rename >out && + test_path_is_missing A && @@ -86,7 +89,7 @@ test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, normal rename' ' git checkout -q avoid-unnecessary-update-1^0 && - test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 rename >expect && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 rename >expect && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 rename >expect && git merge merge-branch-1 && test-tool chmtime --get rename >actual && test_cmp expect actual # "rename" should have stayed intact @@ -95,7 +98,7 @@ test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, with D/F conflict' ' git checkout -q avoid-unnecessary-update-2^0 && - test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 df >expect && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 df >expect && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 df >expect && git merge merge-branch-2 && test-tool chmtime --get df >actual && test_cmp expect actual # "df" should have stayed intact @@ -104,7 +107,7 @@ test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, dir->(file,nothing)' ' git checkout -q master^0 && - test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 df >expect && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 df >expect && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 df >expect && git merge side && test-tool chmtime --get df >actual && test_cmp expect actual # "df" should have stayed intact @@ -113,7 +116,7 @@ test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, modify/delete' ' git checkout -q master^0 && - test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 file >expect && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 file >expect && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 file >expect && test_must_fail git merge side && test-tool chmtime --get file >actual && test_cmp expect actual # "file" should have stayed intact @@ -122,7 +125,7 @@ test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, rename/add-dest' ' git checkout -q master^0 && - test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 newfile >expect && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 newfile >expect && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 newfile >expect && git merge side && test-tool chmtime --get newfile >actual && test_cmp expect actual # "file" should have stayed intact @@ -136,7 +139,7 @@ - test-tool chmtime =-1 b && - test-tool chmtime --get b >old-mtime && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 b >old-mtime && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 b >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && @@ -146,7 +149,7 @@ - test-tool chmtime =-1 b && - test-tool chmtime --get b >old-mtime && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 b >old-mtime && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 b >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive A^0 >out 2>err && # Make sure b WAS updated @@ -156,7 +159,7 @@ - test-tool chmtime =-1 c && - test-tool chmtime --get c >old-mtime && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 c >old-mtime && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 c >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive A^0 >out 2>err && # Make sure c WAS updated @@ -166,7 +169,7 @@ - test-tool chmtime =-1 c && - test-tool chmtime --get c >old-mtime && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 c >old-mtime && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 c >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && test_must_be_empty err && @@ -176,7 +179,7 @@ - test-tool chmtime =-1 c && - test-tool chmtime --get c >old-mtime && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 c >old-mtime && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 c >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 && export GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY && test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && @@ -186,7 +189,7 @@ - test-tool chmtime =-1 b && - test-tool chmtime --get b >old-mtime && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 b >old-mtime && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 b >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && @@ -196,7 +199,7 @@ - test-tool chmtime =-1 c && - test-tool chmtime --get c >old-mtime && -+ test-tool chmtime --get -1 c >old-mtime && ++ test-tool chmtime --get -3600 c >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && t/t6022-merge-rename.sh | 19 ++++++++++--------- t/t6046-merge-skip-unneeded-updates.sh | 21 +++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh b/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh index d97cf48495b..bbbba3dcbf0 100755 --- a/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh +++ b/t/t6022-merge-rename.sh @@ -243,8 +243,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge of identical changes in a renamed file' ' git reset --hard && git checkout change+rename && - test-tool chmtime =31337 B && - test-tool chmtime --get B >old-mtime && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 B >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge change >out && test-tool chmtime --get B >new-mtime && @@ -253,10 +252,12 @@ test_expect_success 'merge of identical changes in a renamed file' ' git reset --hard HEAD^ && git checkout change && - test-tool chmtime =-1 M && - test-tool chmtime --get M >old-mtime && + # A will be renamed to B; we check mtimes and file presence + test_path_is_missing B && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 A >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge change+rename >out && + test_path_is_missing A && test-tool chmtime --get B >new-mtime && test $(cat old-mtime) -lt $(cat new-mtime) ' @@ -645,7 +646,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup avoid unnecessary update, normal rename' ' test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, normal rename' ' git checkout -q avoid-unnecessary-update-1^0 && - test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 rename >expect && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 rename >expect && git merge merge-branch-1 && test-tool chmtime --get rename >actual && test_cmp expect actual # "rename" should have stayed intact @@ -677,7 +678,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup to test avoiding unnecessary update, with D/F conflic test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, with D/F conflict' ' git checkout -q avoid-unnecessary-update-2^0 && - test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 df >expect && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 df >expect && git merge merge-branch-2 && test-tool chmtime --get df >actual && test_cmp expect actual # "df" should have stayed intact @@ -708,7 +709,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup avoid unnecessary update, dir->(file,nothing)' ' test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, dir->(file,nothing)' ' git checkout -q master^0 && - test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 df >expect && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 df >expect && git merge side && test-tool chmtime --get df >actual && test_cmp expect actual # "df" should have stayed intact @@ -737,7 +738,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup avoid unnecessary update, modify/delete' ' test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, modify/delete' ' git checkout -q master^0 && - test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 file >expect && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 file >expect && test_must_fail git merge side && test-tool chmtime --get file >actual && test_cmp expect actual # "file" should have stayed intact @@ -765,7 +766,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup avoid unnecessary update, rename/add-dest' ' test_expect_success 'avoid unnecessary update, rename/add-dest' ' git checkout -q master^0 && - test-tool chmtime --get =1000000000 newfile >expect && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 newfile >expect && git merge side && test-tool chmtime --get newfile >actual && test_cmp expect actual # "file" should have stayed intact diff --git a/t/t6046-merge-skip-unneeded-updates.sh b/t/t6046-merge-skip-unneeded-updates.sh index 962030ecdb6..1ddc9e6626b 100755 --- a/t/t6046-merge-skip-unneeded-updates.sh +++ b/t/t6046-merge-skip-unneeded-updates.sh @@ -71,8 +71,7 @@ test_expect_success '1a-L: Modify(A)/Modify(B), change on B subset of A' ' git checkout A^0 && - test-tool chmtime =-1 b && - test-tool chmtime --get b >old-mtime && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 b >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && @@ -102,8 +101,7 @@ test_expect_success '1a-R: Modify(A)/Modify(B), change on B subset of A' ' git checkout B^0 && - test-tool chmtime =-1 b && - test-tool chmtime --get b >old-mtime && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 b >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive A^0 >out 2>err && # Make sure b WAS updated @@ -198,8 +196,7 @@ test_expect_success '2a-R: Modify/rename, merge into rename side' ' git checkout B^0 && - test-tool chmtime =-1 c && - test-tool chmtime --get c >old-mtime && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 c >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive A^0 >out 2>err && # Make sure c WAS updated @@ -266,8 +263,7 @@ test_expect_success '2b-L: Rename+Mod(A)/Mod(B), B mods subset of A' ' git checkout A^0 && - test-tool chmtime =-1 c && - test-tool chmtime --get c >old-mtime && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 c >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && test_must_be_empty err && @@ -373,8 +369,7 @@ test_expect_success '2c: Modify b & add c VS rename b->c' ' git checkout A^0 && - test-tool chmtime =-1 c && - test-tool chmtime --get c >old-mtime && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 c >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 && export GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY && test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && @@ -679,8 +674,7 @@ test_expect_failure '4a: Change on A, change on B subset of A, dirty mods presen git checkout A^0 && echo "File rewritten" >b && - test-tool chmtime =-1 b && - test-tool chmtime --get b >old-mtime && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 b >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && @@ -747,8 +741,7 @@ test_expect_success '4b: Rename+Mod(A)/Mod(B), change on B subset of A, dirty mo git checkout A^0 && echo "File rewritten" >c && - test-tool chmtime =-1 c && - test-tool chmtime --get c >old-mtime && + test-tool chmtime --get -3600 c >old-mtime && GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY=3 git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && base-commit: 30e9940356dc67959877f4b2417da33ebdefbb79 -- gitgitgadget ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-13 20:03 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-03-13 18:57 [PATCH] t6022, t6046: fix flaky files-are-updated checks Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget 2020-03-13 19:18 ` Junio C Hamano 2020-03-13 19:27 ` Elijah Newren 2020-03-13 19:42 ` Junio C Hamano 2020-03-13 20:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.