From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com"
<joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-man@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"selinux@vger.kernel.org" <selinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
oprofile-list@lists.sf.net, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 00/12] Introduce CAP_PERFMON to secure system performance monitoring and observability
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:28:47 +1100 (AEDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2003271026290.14767@namei.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200302001913.GA21145@sl>
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Thanks, this looks good to me, in keeping with the CAP_SYSLOG break.
>
> Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
>
> for the set.
>
> James/Ingo/Peter, if noone has remaining objections, whose branch
> should these go in through?
>
> thanks,
> -serge
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:55:54PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there anything else I could do in order to move the changes forward
> > or is something still missing from this patch set?
> > Could you please share you mind?
Alexey,
It seems some of the previous Acks are not included in this patchset, e.g.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/22/655
Every patch needs a Reviewed-by or Acked-by from maintainers of the code
being changed.
You have enough from the security folk, but I can't see any included from
the perf folk.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com"
<joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>,
Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>,
oprofile-list@lists.sf.net, Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
"selinux@vger.kernel.org" <selinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 00/12] Introduce CAP_PERFMON to secure system performance monitoring and observability
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:28:47 +1100 (AEDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2003271026290.14767@namei.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200302001913.GA21145@sl>
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Thanks, this looks good to me, in keeping with the CAP_SYSLOG break.
>
> Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
>
> for the set.
>
> James/Ingo/Peter, if noone has remaining objections, whose branch
> should these go in through?
>
> thanks,
> -serge
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:55:54PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there anything else I could do in order to move the changes forward
> > or is something still missing from this patch set?
> > Could you please share you mind?
Alexey,
It seems some of the previous Acks are not included in this patchset, e.g.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/22/655
Every patch needs a Reviewed-by or Acked-by from maintainers of the code
being changed.
You have enough from the security folk, but I can't see any included from
the perf folk.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com"
<joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>,
Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>,
oprofile-list@lists.sf.net, Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
"selinux@vger.kernel.org" <selinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 00/12] Introduce CAP_PERFMON to secure system performance monitoring and observability
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:28:47 +1100 (AEDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2003271026290.14767@namei.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200302001913.GA21145@sl>
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Thanks, this looks good to me, in keeping with the CAP_SYSLOG break.
>
> Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
>
> for the set.
>
> James/Ingo/Peter, if noone has remaining objections, whose branch
> should these go in through?
>
> thanks,
> -serge
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:55:54PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there anything else I could do in order to move the changes forward
> > or is something still missing from this patch set?
> > Could you please share you mind?
Alexey,
It seems some of the previous Acks are not included in this patchset, e.g.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/22/655
Every patch needs a Reviewed-by or Acked-by from maintainers of the code
being changed.
You have enough from the security folk, but I can't see any included from
the perf folk.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@akamai.com>,
oprofile-list@lists.sf.net, Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
"selinux@vger.kernel.org" <selinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 00/12] Introduce CAP_PERFMON to secure system performance monitoring and observability
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:28:47 +1100 (AEDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2003271026290.14767@namei.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200302001913.GA21145@sl>
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Thanks, this looks good to me, in keeping with the CAP_SYSLOG break.
>
> Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
>
> for the set.
>
> James/Ingo/Peter, if noone has remaining objections, whose branch
> should these go in through?
>
> thanks,
> -serge
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:55:54PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there anything else I could do in order to move the changes forward
> > or is something still missing from this patch set?
> > Could you please share you mind?
Alexey,
It seems some of the previous Acks are not included in this patchset, e.g.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/22/655
Every patch needs a Reviewed-by or Acked-by from maintainers of the code
being changed.
You have enough from the security folk, but I can't see any included from
the perf folk.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-26 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-17 8:02 [PATCH v7 00/12] Introduce CAP_PERFMON to secure system performance monitoring and observability Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:02 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:02 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:06 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] capabilities: introduce CAP_PERFMON to kernel and user space Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:06 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:06 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-18 18:22 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-02-18 18:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Stephen Smalley
2020-02-18 18:22 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-02-18 18:22 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-02-18 19:21 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " James Morris
2020-02-18 19:21 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:21 ` James Morris
2020-02-19 7:54 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-19 7:54 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-19 7:54 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-19 7:54 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:06 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] perf/core: open access to the core for CAP_PERFMON privileged process Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:06 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:06 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-18 19:22 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " James Morris
2020-02-18 19:22 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:22 ` James Morris
2020-02-17 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] perf/core: open access to probes " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:07 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:07 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-18 19:22 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " James Morris
2020-02-18 19:22 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:22 ` James Morris
2020-02-17 8:08 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] perf tool: extend Perf tool with CAP_PERFMON capability support Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:08 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:08 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-18 19:24 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " James Morris
2020-02-18 19:24 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:24 ` James Morris
2020-02-17 8:08 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] drm/i915/perf: open access for CAP_PERFMON privileged process Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:08 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:08 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-18 19:25 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " James Morris
2020-02-18 19:25 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:25 ` James Morris
2020-02-17 8:09 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] trace/bpf_trace: " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:09 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:09 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-18 19:25 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " James Morris
2020-02-18 19:25 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:25 ` James Morris
2020-02-17 8:10 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] powerpc/perf: " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:10 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:10 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:10 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-18 19:28 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " James Morris
2020-02-18 19:28 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:28 ` James Morris
2020-02-17 8:10 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] parisc/perf: " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:10 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:10 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:10 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-18 19:29 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " James Morris
2020-02-18 19:29 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:29 ` James Morris
2020-02-17 8:11 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] drivers/perf: " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:11 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:11 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-18 19:43 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " James Morris
2020-02-18 19:43 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:43 ` James Morris
2020-02-17 8:12 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] drivers/oprofile: " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:12 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:12 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-18 19:44 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " James Morris
2020-02-18 19:44 ` James Morris
2020-02-18 19:44 ` James Morris
2020-02-17 8:12 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] doc/admin-guide: update perf-security.rst with CAP_PERFMON information Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:12 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:12 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:13 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] doc/admin-guide: update kernel.rst " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:13 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 8:13 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-17 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce CAP_PERFMON to secure system performance monitoring and observability (rev4) Patchwork
2020-02-17 15:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-02-25 9:55 ` [PATCH v7 00/12] Introduce CAP_PERFMON to secure system performance monitoring and observability Alexey Budankov
2020-02-25 9:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alexey Budankov
2020-02-25 9:55 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-02-25 9:55 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-03-02 0:19 ` [Intel-gfx] " Serge Hallyn
2020-03-02 0:19 ` Serge Hallyn
2020-03-02 0:19 ` Serge Hallyn
2020-03-02 0:19 ` Serge Hallyn
2020-03-02 19:44 ` James Morris
2020-03-02 19:44 ` James Morris
2020-03-02 19:44 ` James Morris
2020-03-02 19:44 ` James Morris
2020-03-26 23:28 ` James Morris [this message]
2020-03-26 23:28 ` James Morris
2020-03-26 23:28 ` James Morris
2020-03-26 23:28 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.21.2003271026290.14767@namei.org \
--to=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=ilubashe@akamai.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sf.net \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.