[PATCH] ASoC: qcom: qdsp6: Use IS_ERR() instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL()

[PATCH] ASoC: qcom: qdsp6: Use IS_ERR() instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL()

[Tang Bin]

In the function q6adm_open(), q6adm_alloc_copp() doesn't return 
NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() to validate the returned value instead 
of IS_ERR_OR_NULL(). And delete the extra line.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
 sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6adm.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6adm.c b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6adm.c
index d8069864b..44ac0728f 100644
--- a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6adm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6adm.c
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ struct q6copp *q6adm_open(struct device *dev, int port_id, int path, int rate,
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&adm->copps_list_lock, flags);
 	copp = q6adm_alloc_copp(adm, port_id);
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(copp)) {
+	if (IS_ERR(copp)) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adm->copps_list_lock, flags);
 		return ERR_CAST(copp);
 	}
@@ -419,7 +419,6 @@ struct q6copp *q6adm_open(struct device *dev, int port_id, int path, int rate,
 	copp->bit_width = bit_width;
 	copp->app_type = app_type;
 
-
 	ret = q6adm_device_open(adm, copp, port_id, path, topology,
 				channel_mode, bit_width, rate);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-- 
2.20.1.windows.1

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: qdsp6: Use IS_ERR() instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL()

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:27:44 +0800, Tang Bin wrote:
> In the function q6adm_open(), q6adm_alloc_copp() doesn't return
> NULL. Thus use IS_ERR() to validate the returned value instead
> of IS_ERR_OR_NULL(). And delete the extra line.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: qcom: qdsp6: Use IS_ERR() instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL()
      commit: 16bf5e82facd703ba8f206f00f064e786ea8318c

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark