[PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Add support for tgl-h

[PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Add support for tgl-h

[Kai Vehmanen]

From: Rander Wang <rander.wang@intel.com>

SOF will support tgl-h and tgl-lp in different FW binaries due to
hardware difference, so create another dev_desc entry with FW name
of sof-tgl-h.ri and dsp_desc named tglh_chip_info for tgl-h.

Fixes: c8d2e2bfaeffa ("ASoC: SOF: Intel: add PCI IDs for ICL-H and TGL-H")
Signed-off-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
---
 sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.h   |  1 +
 sound/soc/sof/intel/tgl.c   | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.h b/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.h
index f0f8f95c082b..659868da4068 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.h
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.h
@@ -737,6 +737,7 @@ extern const struct sof_intel_dsp_desc cnl_chip_info;
 extern const struct sof_intel_dsp_desc skl_chip_info;
 extern const struct sof_intel_dsp_desc icl_chip_info;
 extern const struct sof_intel_dsp_desc tgl_chip_info;
+extern const struct sof_intel_dsp_desc tglh_chip_info;
 extern const struct sof_intel_dsp_desc ehl_chip_info;
 extern const struct sof_intel_dsp_desc jsl_chip_info;
 
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/intel/tgl.c b/sound/soc/sof/intel/tgl.c
index f8d04fd66ceb..0278b67de1ec 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/tgl.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/tgl.c
@@ -135,3 +135,19 @@ const struct sof_intel_dsp_desc tgl_chip_info = {
 	.ssp_base_offset = CNL_SSP_BASE_OFFSET,
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS(tgl_chip_info, SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_HDA_COMMON);
+
+const struct sof_intel_dsp_desc tglh_chip_info = {
+	/* Tigerlake-H */
+	.cores_num = 2,
+	.init_core_mask = 1,
+	.host_managed_cores_mask = BIT(0),
+	.ipc_req = CNL_DSP_REG_HIPCIDR,
+	.ipc_req_mask = CNL_DSP_REG_HIPCIDR_BUSY,
+	.ipc_ack = CNL_DSP_REG_HIPCIDA,
+	.ipc_ack_mask = CNL_DSP_REG_HIPCIDA_DONE,
+	.ipc_ctl = CNL_DSP_REG_HIPCCTL,
+	.rom_init_timeout	= 300,
+	.ssp_count = ICL_SSP_COUNT,
+	.ssp_base_offset = CNL_SSP_BASE_OFFSET,
+};
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS(tglh_chip_info, SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_HDA_COMMON);
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c b/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c
index 3ec380945466..8c53f6935417 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c
@@ -223,6 +223,22 @@ static const struct sof_dev_desc tgl_desc = {
 	.nocodec_tplg_filename = "sof-tgl-nocodec.tplg",
 	.ops = &sof_tgl_ops,
 };
+
+static const struct sof_dev_desc tglh_desc = {
+	.machines               = snd_soc_acpi_intel_tgl_machines,
+	.alt_machines		= snd_soc_acpi_intel_tgl_sdw_machines,
+	.resindex_lpe_base      = 0,
+	.resindex_pcicfg_base   = -1,
+	.resindex_imr_base      = -1,
+	.irqindex_host_ipc      = -1,
+	.resindex_dma_base      = -1,
+	.chip_info = &tglh_chip_info,
+	.default_fw_path = "intel/sof",
+	.default_tplg_path = "intel/sof-tplg",
+	.default_fw_filename = "sof-tgl-h.ri",
+	.nocodec_tplg_filename = "sof-tgl-nocodec.tplg",
+	.ops = &sof_tgl_ops,
+};
 #endif
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_ELKHARTLAKE)
@@ -457,7 +473,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id sof_pci_ids[] = {
 	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0xa0c8), /* TGL-LP */
 		.driver_data = (unsigned long)&tgl_desc},
 	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x43c8), /* TGL-H */
-		.driver_data = (unsigned long)&tgl_desc},
+		.driver_data = (unsigned long)&tglh_desc},
 
 #endif
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_ELKHARTLAKE)
-- 
2.27.0

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Add support for tgl-h

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:36:09 +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> SOF will support tgl-h and tgl-lp in different FW binaries due to
> hardware difference, so create another dev_desc entry with FW name
> of sof-tgl-h.ri and dsp_desc named tglh_chip_info for tgl-h.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Add support for tgl-h
      commit: 30ee3738f849b3f4af623c20adec73cdc4573a2e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark