Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] ASoC: Intel: Add catpt device

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 10:57:41PM +0200, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
> Declare base structures, registers and device routines for the catpt
> solution. Catpt deprecates and is a direct replacement for
> sound/soc/intel/haswell. Supports Lynxpoint and Wildcat Point both.

Before doing v5 give a chance to review entire series, please!

...

> +static inline bool catpt_resource_overlapping(struct resource *r1,
> +					      struct resource *r2,
> +					      struct resource *ret)
> +{
> +	if (!resource_overlaps(r1, r2))
> +		return false;
> +	ret->start = max(r1->start, r2->start);
> +	ret->end = min(r1->end, r2->end);
> +	return true;
> +}

JFYI, I have just submitted a series [1] that includes this helper [2]
to be available for all.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20200813175729.15088-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20200813175729.15088-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/

...

> +struct catpt_dev {
> +	struct device *dev;

> +	struct dw_dma_chip *dmac;

Is it possible to use opaque pointer here? It will be better if in the future
(I think unlikely, but still) somebody decides to use this with another DMA
engine.

> +	struct catpt_ipc ipc;
> +
> +	void __iomem *pci_ba;
> +	void __iomem *lpe_ba;
> +	u32 lpe_base;
> +	int irq;
> +
> +	const struct catpt_spec *spec;
> +	struct completion fw_ready;
> +
> +	struct resource dram;
> +	struct resource iram;
> +	struct resource *scratch;
> +
> +	struct catpt_mixer_stream_info mixer;
> +	struct catpt_module_type modules[CATPT_MODULE_COUNT];
> +	struct catpt_ssp_device_format devfmt[CATPT_SSP_COUNT];
> +	struct list_head stream_list;
> +	spinlock_t list_lock;
> +	struct mutex clk_mutex;
> +
> +	struct catpt_dx_context dx_ctx;
> +	void *dxbuf_vaddr;
> +	dma_addr_t dxbuf_paddr;
> +};

...

> +#define CATPT_IPC_ERROR(err) ((err < 0) ? err : -EREMOTEIO)

err -> (err) in all cases of right side.

...

> +struct catpt_stream_runtime {
> +	struct snd_pcm_substream *substream;
> +
> +	struct catpt_stream_template *template;
> +	struct catpt_stream_info info;
> +	struct resource *persistent;
> +	struct snd_dma_buffer pgtbl;
> +

> +	bool allocated:1;
> +	bool prepared:1;

Does this ':1' make any sense?

> +	struct list_head node;
> +};

...

> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM

Perhaps __maybe_unused?

...

> +	ret = catpt_dsp_stall(cdev, true);
> +	if (ret < 0)

I'm wondering if all these ' < 0' all over the code make sense? What do you
expect out of positive returned values if any?

> +		goto exit;

...

> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

Perhaps __maybe_unused?

...

> +	board = platform_device_register_data(NULL, mach->drv_name,
> +					PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> +					(const void *)mach, sizeof(*mach));
> +	if (!board) {

Here obviously not correct check.

> +		dev_err(cdev->dev, "board register failed\n");
> +		return PTR_ERR(board);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = devm_add_action(cdev->dev, board_pdev_unregister, board);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		platform_device_unregister(board);

> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;

return ret;

...

> +	mutex_init(&cdev->clk_mutex);

+ blank line.

> +	/*
> +	 * Mark both device formats as uninitialized. Once corresponding
> +	 * cpu_dai's pcm is created, proper values are assigned

Please, use period(s) in multi-line comments.

> +	 */

...

> +static int catpt_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct catpt_dev *cdev;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	cdev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cdev)
> +		return -ENOMEM;


> +	cdev->spec = device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	if (!cdev->spec)
> +		return -ENODEV;

You may save some cycles if you do this before memory allocations.

> +	catpt_dev_init(cdev, dev);
> +
> +	/* map DSP bar address */
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	if (!res)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	cdev->lpe_ba = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
> +	if (!cdev->lpe_ba)
> +		return -EIO;
> +	cdev->lpe_base = res->start;

Why the region is not get requested?

> +	/* map PCI bar address */
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
> +	if (!res)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	cdev->pci_ba = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
> +	if (!cdev->pci_ba)
> +		return -EIO;

Ditto.

> +	/* alloc buffer for storing DRAM context during dx transitions */
> +	cdev->dxbuf_vaddr = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, catpt_dram_size(cdev),

dmam_alloc_coherent() ?

> +					       &cdev->dxbuf_paddr, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cdev->dxbuf_vaddr)
> +		return -ENOMEM;

> +	ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto irq_err;
> +	cdev->irq = ret;

But you may return directly if you get IRQ resource before allocation (despite
previous comment).

> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cdev);
> +
> +	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, cdev->irq, catpt_dsp_irq_handler,
> +					catpt_dsp_irq_thread,
> +					IRQF_SHARED, "AudioDSP", cdev);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto irq_err;
> +
> +	ret = catpt_probe_components(cdev);

return ...

> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto irq_err;
> +	return 0;
> +
> +irq_err:
> +	dma_free_coherent(cdev->dev, catpt_dram_size(cdev),
> +			  cdev->dxbuf_vaddr, cdev->dxbuf_paddr);
> +
> +	return ret;

This will be gone...

> +}

...

> +static const struct acpi_device_id catpt_ids[] = {
> +	{ "INT33C8", (unsigned long)&lpt_desc },
> +	{ "INT3438", (unsigned long)&wpt_desc },

> +	{ },

No need to have comma in terminator line.

> +};

...

> +static struct platform_driver catpt_acpi_driver = {
> +	.probe = catpt_acpi_probe,
> +	.remove = catpt_acpi_remove,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "catpt_adsp",

> +		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(catpt_ids),

ACPI_PTR() either bogus (when you have depends on ACPI) or mistake that brings
you compiler warning (unused variable).

I highly recommend in new code avoid completely ACPI_PTR() and of_match_ptr()
macros.

> +		.pm = &catpt_dev_pm,
> +	},
> +};

...

> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>

Missed headers:
bits.h (note, the below guarantees to provide this one)
bitops.h
io.h (writel(), readl(), etc)

...

> +/* DSP Shim registers */
> +
> +#define CATPT_SHIM_CS1		0x0

Please, keep all register definitions of the same width, like 0x00 here or so.

...

> +#define CATPT_CS_SFCR(ssp)	BIT(27 + ssp)

In all macros, try to be a little bit defensive, e.g. here ssp -> (ssp).

...

> +#define CATPT_HMDC_HDDA(e, ch)	BIT(8 * e + ch)

...or e -> (e) and ch -> (ch) here.

...

> +#define CATPT_CS_DEFAULT	0x8480040E
> +#define CATPT_IMC_DEFAULT	0x7FFF0003
> +#define CATPT_IMD_DEFAULT	0x7FFF0003
> +#define CATPT_CLKCTL_DEFAULT	0x7FF

These looks like set of bit fields, can we describe them either in comments
or in the values like GENMASK(x, y) | BIT(z) ?

...

> +/* PCI Configuration registers */
> +
> +#define CATPT_PCI_PMCS		0x84

Why?! We have PCI capability and entire infrastructure for that in PCI core.

...

> +#define CATPT_PMCS_PS		GENMASK(1, 0)
> +#define CATPT_PMCS_PS_D3HOT	(0x3 << 0)

Ditto.

...

> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSC0		0x0
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSC1		0x4
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSS		0x8
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSIT		0xC
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSD		0x10
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSTO		0x28
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSPSP		0x2C
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSTSA		0x30
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSRSA		0x34
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSTSS		0x38
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSC2		0x40
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSPSP2	0x44

Isn't it PXA2xx register set? Can you use their definitions?

...

> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSC0_DEFAULT		0x0
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSC1_DEFAULT		0x0
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSS_DEFAULT		0xF004
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSIT_DEFAULT		0x0
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSD_DEFAULT		0xC43893A3
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSTO_DEFAULT		0x0
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSPSP_DEFAULT		0x0
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSTSA_DEFAULT		0x0
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSRSA_DEFAULT		0x0
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSTSS_DEFAULT		0x0
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSC2_DEFAULT		0x0
> +#define CATPT_SSP_SSPSP2_DEFAULT	0x0

These defaults lack of comments.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko