From: "Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
"andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/14] ASoC: Intel/SOF: extend run-time driver selection to ACPI devices
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:40:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d94ccf9a3c61460db88f256df1fa3240@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd8e5c2f-e1c2-7fbb-bee1-cc76ec14a801@linux.intel.com>
On 2020-11-18 9:25 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
...
>>
>> Hmm, then maybe I misunderstood Hans. Given his feedback it seemed like
>> Fedora is about to switch to SOF right now.
>>
>> Indeed, before I've sent patches removing Baytrail, basically every
>> support-team had been asked about its usage and the answers were
>> negative. /atom/ was covering basically every case anyway like you
>> pointed out so /baytrail/ solution felt more like a duplication.
>>
>> As SOF is the desired solution for atom-based products, I can see the
>> need for some sort of selection mechanism. The same cannot be said for
>> hsw/bdw though. Let's leave catpt out this, shall we?
>
> It helps everyone to have a single build, e.g. 'make allmodconfig' or
> 'make allyesconfig' would select all possible drivers and bots can run
> wild.
>
Why should bots care about not recommended code?
I'm against adding external dependency (intel-dsp-config) for
catpt for reasons I'd mentioned several times already.
Czarek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-20 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 22:38 [PATCH 00/14] ASoC: Intel/SOF: extend run-time driver selection to ACPI devices Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 01/14] ASoC: Intel: broadwell: add missing pm_ops Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-13 11:17 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 02/14] ASoC: Intel: bdw-rt5677: " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-13 11:19 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 03/14] ALSA: hda: intel-dsp-config: add helper for ACPI DSP driver selection Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 04/14] ASoC: soc-acpi: add helper to identify parent driver Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 05/14] ASoC: Intel: boards: byt/cht: set card and driver name at run time Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-04-25 18:13 ` youling257
2021-04-26 15:12 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 06/14] ASoC: Intel: byt/cht: set pm ops dynamically Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-17 17:18 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-17 17:39 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-18 13:31 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 07/14] ASoC: SOF: acpi: add dynamic selection of DSP driver Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 08/14] ASoC: Intel: Atom: " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 09/14] ASoC: SOF: Intel: allow for coexistence between SOF and Atom/SST drivers Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 10/14] ALSA: hda: intel-dsp-config: add Broadwell ACPI DSP driver selection Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 11/14] ASoC: Intel: broadwell: set card and driver name dynamically Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 12/14] ASoC: Intel: catpt: add dynamic selection of DSP driver Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 13/14] ASoC: SOF: Intel: allow for coexistence between SOF and catpt drivers Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-19 14:06 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-19 17:52 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-19 18:25 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-12 22:38 ` [PATCH 14/14] ALSA: hda: intel-dsp-config: ignore dsp_driver parameter for PCI legacy devices Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-12 23:04 ` [PATCH 00/14] ASoC: Intel/SOF: extend run-time driver selection to ACPI devices Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-13 13:06 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-13 14:40 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-13 16:49 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-13 17:06 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-16 15:39 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-16 17:47 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-17 14:04 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-11-17 17:31 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-17 17:46 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-11-17 22:13 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-17 22:53 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-18 20:15 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-18 20:25 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-11-20 15:40 ` Rojewski, Cezary [this message]
2020-11-20 16:48 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-20 17:10 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-20 18:06 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-20 21:02 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-23 17:35 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-24 11:56 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-24 14:01 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-24 14:15 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-11-24 16:07 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-24 16:14 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-24 16:14 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-11-24 16:12 ` Mark Brown
2020-11-18 7:49 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-11-18 20:59 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2020-11-20 21:29 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d94ccf9a3c61460db88f256df1fa3240@intel.com \
--to=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).