* AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 @ 2022-04-23 16:01 Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-23 16:06 ` [REGRESSION] " Demi Marie Obenour 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Demi Marie Obenour @ 2022-04-23 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: amd-gfx, regressions [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 512 bytes --] Two Qubes OS users reported that their AMD GPU systems did not work on 5.17.4, while 5.16.18 worked fine. Details can be found on https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462. The initial report listed the GPU as “Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Renoir [1002:1636} (rev d3) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])” and the CPU as “AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U with Radeon Graphics”. #regzbot introduced: v5.16.18..v5.17.4 -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) Invisible Things Lab [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 2022-04-23 16:01 AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 Demi Marie Obenour @ 2022-04-23 16:06 ` Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-24 1:40 ` Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-24 6:12 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Demi Marie Obenour @ 2022-04-23 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: amd-gfx, regressions [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 512 bytes --] Two Qubes OS users reported that their AMD GPU systems did not work on 5.17.4, while 5.16.18 worked fine. Details can be found on https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462. The initial report listed the GPU as “Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Renoir [1002:1636} (rev d3) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])” and the CPU as “AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U with Radeon Graphics”. #regzbot introduced: v5.16.18..v5.17.4 -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) Invisible Things Lab [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 2022-04-23 16:06 ` [REGRESSION] " Demi Marie Obenour @ 2022-04-24 1:40 ` Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-24 6:12 ` Greg KH 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Demi Marie Obenour @ 2022-04-24 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: amd-gfx, regressions [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --] #regzbot introduced: v5.17.3..v5.17.4 (as per https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462#issuecomment-1107679532) -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) Invisible Things Lab [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 2022-04-23 16:06 ` [REGRESSION] " Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-24 1:40 ` Demi Marie Obenour @ 2022-04-24 6:12 ` Greg KH 2022-04-24 9:02 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2022-04-24 6:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Demi Marie Obenour; +Cc: regressions, amd-gfx On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:06:33PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > Two Qubes OS users reported that their AMD GPU systems did not work on > 5.17.4, while 5.16.18 worked fine. Details can be found on > https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462. The initial report > listed the GPU as “Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Renoir > [1002:1636} (rev d3) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])” and the CPU as > “AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U with Radeon Graphics”. > > #regzbot introduced: v5.16.18..v5.17.4 That's a big range, can you use 'git bisect' to track it down? thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 2022-04-24 6:12 ` Greg KH @ 2022-04-24 9:02 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-04-24 15:52 ` Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-24 23:38 ` Demi Marie Obenour 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2022-04-24 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH, Demi Marie Obenour Cc: Alex Deucher, Pan, Xinhui, regressions, amd-gfx, Christian König CCing the amdgpu maintainers On 24.04.22 08:12, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:06:33PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: >> Two Qubes OS users reported that their AMD GPU systems did not work on >> 5.17.4, while 5.16.18 worked fine. Details can be found on >> https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462. The initial report >> listed the GPU as “Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Renoir >> [1002:1636} (rev d3) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])” and the CPU as >> “AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U with Radeon Graphics”. >> >> #regzbot introduced: v5.16.18..v5.17.4 > > That's a big range, can you use 'git bisect' to track it down? FWIW, in another mail in this thread and https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462#issuecomment-1107681126 it was clarified that the problem was introduced between 5.17.3 and 5.17.4, where a few amdgpu changes were applied. Maybe they are the reason. Anyway: Yes, as Gregkh said, a bisection really would help. But maybe the amdgfx developers might already have an idea what might be wrong here? The QubesOS ticket linked above has some more details. Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 2022-04-24 9:02 ` Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2022-04-24 15:52 ` Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-24 15:58 ` Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-24 23:38 ` Demi Marie Obenour 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Demi Marie Obenour @ 2022-04-24 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thorsten Leemhuis, Greg KH Cc: Alex Deucher, Pan, Xinhui, regressions, amd-gfx, Christian König [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1688 bytes --] On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 11:02:43AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > CCing the amdgpu maintainers Also CCing Marek Marczykowski-Górecki as Qubes OS Project Lead. > On 24.04.22 08:12, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:06:33PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > >> Two Qubes OS users reported that their AMD GPU systems did not work on > >> 5.17.4, while 5.16.18 worked fine. Details can be found on > >> https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462. The initial report > >> listed the GPU as “Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Renoir > >> [1002:1636} (rev d3) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])” and the CPU as > >> “AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U with Radeon Graphics”. > >> > >> #regzbot introduced: v5.16.18..v5.17.4 > > > > That's a big range, can you use 'git bisect' to track it down? > > FWIW, in another mail in this thread and > https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462#issuecomment-1107681126 > it was clarified that the problem was introduced between 5.17.3 and > 5.17.4, where a few amdgpu changes were applied. Maybe they are the reason. I suspect they are, but I am not certain. It could also be an interaction between these changes and running as a PV dom0 under Xen. > Anyway: Yes, as Gregkh said, a bisection really would help. But maybe > the amdgfx developers might already have an idea what might be wrong > here? The QubesOS ticket linked above has some more details. I can’t provide a bisection myself as I don’t have the hardware. I asked the user who reported the bug if they are comfortable doing a bisection. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) Invisible Things Lab [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 2022-04-24 15:52 ` Demi Marie Obenour @ 2022-04-24 15:58 ` Demi Marie Obenour 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Demi Marie Obenour @ 2022-04-24 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thorsten Leemhuis, Greg KH Cc: regressions, Pan, Xinhui, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki, amd-gfx, Alex Deucher, Christian König [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 354 bytes --] On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 11:52:05AM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 11:02:43AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > CCing the amdgpu maintainers > > Also CCing Marek Marczykowski-Górecki as Qubes OS Project Lead. For real this time (whoops!). -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) Invisible Things Lab [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 2022-04-24 9:02 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-04-24 15:52 ` Demi Marie Obenour @ 2022-04-24 23:38 ` Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-25 21:29 ` Deucher, Alexander 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Demi Marie Obenour @ 2022-04-24 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thorsten Leemhuis, Greg KH Cc: Alex Deucher, Pan, Xinhui, regressions, amd-gfx, Christian König [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1568 bytes --] On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 11:02:43AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > CCing the amdgpu maintainers > > On 24.04.22 08:12, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:06:33PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > >> Two Qubes OS users reported that their AMD GPU systems did not work on > >> 5.17.4, while 5.16.18 worked fine. Details can be found on > >> https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462. The initial report > >> listed the GPU as “Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Renoir > >> [1002:1636} (rev d3) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])” and the CPU as > >> “AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U with Radeon Graphics”. > >> > >> #regzbot introduced: v5.16.18..v5.17.4 > > > > That's a big range, can you use 'git bisect' to track it down? > > FWIW, in another mail in this thread and > https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462#issuecomment-1107681126 > it was clarified that the problem was introduced between 5.17.3 and > 5.17.4, where a few amdgpu changes were applied. Maybe they are the reason. > > Anyway: Yes, as Gregkh said, a bisection really would help. But maybe > the amdgfx developers might already have an idea what might be wrong > here? The QubesOS ticket linked above has some more details. The reporter was able to bisect the regression. I am not surprised that this commit caused problems for Qubes OS, as dom0 in Qubes OS is technically a guest of Xen. #regzbot ^introduced: b818a5d374542ccec73dcfe578a081574029820e -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) Invisible Things Lab [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 2022-04-24 23:38 ` Demi Marie Obenour @ 2022-04-25 21:29 ` Deucher, Alexander 2022-04-29 11:36 ` [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Deucher, Alexander @ 2022-04-25 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Demi Marie Obenour, Thorsten Leemhuis, Greg KH Cc: Pan, Xinhui, regressions, amd-gfx, Koenig, Christian [Public] > -----Original Message----- > From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@invisiblethingslab.com> > Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2022 7:39 PM > To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>; Greg KH > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; regressions@lists.linux.dev; > Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian > <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>; Pan, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com> > Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 11:02:43AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > CCing the amdgpu maintainers > > > > On 24.04.22 08:12, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:06:33PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > >> Two Qubes OS users reported that their AMD GPU systems did not > > >> work on 5.17.4, while 5.16.18 worked fine. Details can be found > > >> on https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462. The > > >> initial report listed the GPU as “Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. > > >> [AMD/ATI] Renoir [1002:1636} (rev d3) (prog-if 00 [VGA > > >> controller])” and the CPU as “AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U with Radeon Graphics”. > > >> > > >> #regzbot introduced: v5.16.18..v5.17.4 > > > > > > That's a big range, can you use 'git bisect' to track it down? > > > > FWIW, in another mail in this thread and > > https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462#issuecomment- > 11076 > > 81126 it was clarified that the problem was introduced between > > 5.17.3 and 5.17.4, where a few amdgpu changes were applied. Maybe > > they are the reason. > > > > Anyway: Yes, as Gregkh said, a bisection really would help. But > > maybe the amdgfx developers might already have an idea what might be > > wrong here? The QubesOS ticket linked above has some more details. > > The reporter was able to bisect the regression. I am not surprised > that this commit caused problems for Qubes OS, as dom0 in Qubes OS is > technically a guest of Xen. > > #regzbot ^introduced: b818a5d374542ccec73dcfe578a081574029820e Can you please follow up on the bug ticket: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1985 It will be easier to track everything there. Alex ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 #forregzbot 2022-04-25 21:29 ` Deucher, Alexander @ 2022-04-29 11:36 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-05-09 8:04 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2022-04-29 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: regressions; +Cc: amd-gfx TWIMC: this mail is primarily send for documentation purposes and for regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot. These mails usually contain '#forregzbot' in the subject, to make them easy to spot and filter. #regzbot fixed-by: 78b12008f20 On 25.04.22 23:29, Deucher, Alexander wrote: > [Public] > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@invisiblethingslab.com> >> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2022 7:39 PM >> To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>; Greg KH >> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> >> Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; regressions@lists.linux.dev; >> Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian >> <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>; Pan, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com> >> Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 >> >> On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 11:02:43AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> CCing the amdgpu maintainers >>> >>> On 24.04.22 08:12, Greg KH wrote: >>>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:06:33PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: >>>>> Two Qubes OS users reported that their AMD GPU systems did not >>>>> work on 5.17.4, while 5.16.18 worked fine. Details can be found >>>>> on https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462. The >>>>> initial report listed the GPU as “Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. >>>>> [AMD/ATI] Renoir [1002:1636} (rev d3) (prog-if 00 [VGA >>>>> controller])” and the CPU as “AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U with Radeon Graphics”. >>>>> >>>>> #regzbot introduced: v5.16.18..v5.17.4 >>>> >>>> That's a big range, can you use 'git bisect' to track it down? >>> >>> FWIW, in another mail in this thread and >>> https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462#issuecomment- >> 11076 >>> 81126 it was clarified that the problem was introduced between >>> 5.17.3 and 5.17.4, where a few amdgpu changes were applied. Maybe >>> they are the reason. >>> >>> Anyway: Yes, as Gregkh said, a bisection really would help. But >>> maybe the amdgfx developers might already have an idea what might be >>> wrong here? The QubesOS ticket linked above has some more details. >> >> The reporter was able to bisect the regression. I am not surprised >> that this commit caused problems for Qubes OS, as dom0 in Qubes OS is >> technically a guest of Xen. >> >> #regzbot ^introduced: b818a5d374542ccec73dcfe578a081574029820e > > Can you please follow up on the bug ticket: > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1985 > It will be easier to track everything there. > > Alex ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 #forregzbot 2022-04-29 11:36 ` [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2022-05-09 8:04 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2022-05-09 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: regressions; +Cc: amd-gfx On 29.04.22 13:36, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > TWIMC: this mail is primarily send for documentation purposes and for > regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot. These mails usually > contain '#forregzbot' in the subject, to make them easy to spot and filter. > > #regzbot fixed-by: 78b12008f20 Landed in mainline with a different ID: #regzbot fixed-by: 19965d8259fdabc68 > On 25.04.22 23:29, Deucher, Alexander wrote: >> [Public] >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@invisiblethingslab.com> >>> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2022 7:39 PM >>> To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>; Greg KH >>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> >>> Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; regressions@lists.linux.dev; >>> Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian >>> <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>; Pan, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com> >>> Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 11:02:43AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>> CCing the amdgpu maintainers >>>> >>>> On 24.04.22 08:12, Greg KH wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:06:33PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: >>>>>> Two Qubes OS users reported that their AMD GPU systems did not >>>>>> work on 5.17.4, while 5.16.18 worked fine. Details can be found >>>>>> on https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462. The >>>>>> initial report listed the GPU as “Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. >>>>>> [AMD/ATI] Renoir [1002:1636} (rev d3) (prog-if 00 [VGA >>>>>> controller])” and the CPU as “AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U with Radeon Graphics”. >>>>>> >>>>>> #regzbot introduced: v5.16.18..v5.17.4 >>>>> >>>>> That's a big range, can you use 'git bisect' to track it down? >>>> >>>> FWIW, in another mail in this thread and >>>> https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7462#issuecomment- >>> 11076 >>>> 81126 it was clarified that the problem was introduced between >>>> 5.17.3 and 5.17.4, where a few amdgpu changes were applied. Maybe >>>> they are the reason. >>>> >>>> Anyway: Yes, as Gregkh said, a bisection really would help. But >>>> maybe the amdgfx developers might already have an idea what might be >>>> wrong here? The QubesOS ticket linked above has some more details. >>> >>> The reporter was able to bisect the regression. I am not surprised >>> that this commit caused problems for Qubes OS, as dom0 in Qubes OS is >>> technically a guest of Xen. >>> >>> #regzbot ^introduced: b818a5d374542ccec73dcfe578a081574029820e >> >> Can you please follow up on the bug ticket: >> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1985 >> It will be easier to track everything there. >> >> Alex ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-09 8:09 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-04-23 16:01 AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-23 16:06 ` [REGRESSION] " Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-24 1:40 ` Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-24 6:12 ` Greg KH 2022-04-24 9:02 ` Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-04-24 15:52 ` Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-24 15:58 ` Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-24 23:38 ` Demi Marie Obenour 2022-04-25 21:29 ` Deucher, Alexander 2022-04-29 11:36 ` [REGRESSION] AMD GPU regression in 5.16.18..5.17.4 #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis 2022-05-09 8:04 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).