From: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] mac80211: save transmit power envelope element and power constraint
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:18:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01d9e4eadbb0d87edbc026fc719858a3@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27680423e824dd67217cc6f1e62f9ac0a1af78f2.camel@sipsolutions.net>
On 2021-08-27 15:38, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-08-27 at 15:12 +0800, Wen Gong wrote:
>> On 2021-08-27 14:55, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2021-08-27 at 14:53 +0800, Wen Gong wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Well, there's an existing place in this function that uses
>> > > > cfg80211_find_ext_ie(), and various uses of ieee80211_bss_get_ie(), so
>> > > > it feels like if we're going to do the full parsing, we should switch
>> > > > all the existing "look up an element" to also use the parsed data
>> > > > instead.
>> >
>> > > ok.
>> > > so it ha 2 way to change, right?
>> > > 1.
>> > > change ieee802_11_parse_elems() to ieee80211_bss_get_ie()
>> >
>> > No why?
>> >
>> > I think we should make a first patch (that doesn't add TPE yet) that
>> > changes the function to ieee80211_parse_elems() and removes all the
>> > ieee80211_bss_get_ie() / cfg80211_find_ext_ie() calls in favour of just
>> > parsing once, and then looking at the elements there.
>> >
>> > Then your TPE patch becomes trivial since the elems are already there?
>> this patch still needed, because the lower driver need the info.
>> and this patch is save the info to "struct ieee80211_bss_conf
>> *bss_conf"
>> and
>> pass it to lower driver.
>
> Of course, but you don't have to deal with parsing etc. in that patch
> then.
>
yes.
then should I use "struct ieee802_11_elems elems = {0}" or "struct
ieee802_11_elems *elems = kzalloc(sizeof(*elems))"
in the parsing patch?
> johannes
--
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-27 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-20 12:20 [PATCH v2 0/8] cfg80211/mac80211: Add support for 6GHZ STA for various modes : LPI, SP and VLP Wen Gong
2021-08-20 12:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] cfg80211: add power type definition for 6 GHz Wen Gong
2021-08-26 8:20 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-26 8:22 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-26 11:02 ` Wen Gong
2021-08-26 11:11 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-26 10:57 ` Wen Gong
2021-08-26 10:59 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-26 11:01 ` Wen Gong
2021-08-20 12:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] mac80211: add definition of regulatory info in 6 GHz operation information Wen Gong
2021-08-26 8:20 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-20 12:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] mac80211: add parse " Wen Gong
2021-08-26 8:21 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-20 12:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] cfg80211: add definition for 6 GHz power spectral density(psd) Wen Gong
2021-08-20 12:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] cfg80211: save power spectral density(psd) of regulatory rule Wen Gong
2021-08-26 8:25 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-26 10:43 ` Wen Gong
2021-08-26 10:56 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-26 10:58 ` Wen Gong
2021-08-20 12:20 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] mac80211: add definition for transmit power envelope element Wen Gong
2021-08-26 8:30 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-20 12:20 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] mac80211: add parse " Wen Gong
2021-08-26 8:20 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-20 12:20 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] mac80211: save transmit power envelope element and power constraint Wen Gong
2021-08-26 8:29 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-26 10:50 ` Wen Gong
2021-08-26 10:57 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-26 11:00 ` Wen Gong
2021-08-26 11:10 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-27 2:01 ` Wen Gong
2023-07-19 3:29 ` Wen Gong
2021-08-27 2:11 ` Wen Gong
2021-08-27 6:46 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-27 6:53 ` Wen Gong
2021-08-27 6:55 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-27 7:12 ` Wen Gong
2021-08-27 7:38 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-27 8:18 ` Wen Gong [this message]
2021-08-27 8:20 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-27 8:28 ` Wen Gong
2021-08-27 8:30 ` Johannes Berg
2021-08-27 8:47 ` Wen Gong
2021-08-25 2:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] cfg80211/mac80211: Add support for 6GHZ STA for various modes : LPI, SP and VLP Wen Gong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01d9e4eadbb0d87edbc026fc719858a3@codeaurora.org \
--to=wgong@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).