All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Zink <j.zink@pengutronix.de>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] fpga: machxo2-spi: fix big-endianness incompatibility
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:41:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8a6c62facf182b9ad4f333af69072e1a8c0293b.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ywx2eeTvBhNw62pW@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>

Hi Yilun, 

On Mon, 2022-08-29 at 16:19 +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On 2022-08-25 at 16:13:34 +0200, Johannes Zink wrote:
> > The SPI message is written into the lowest-addressed bits of an
> > unsigned long variable, but be32_to_cpu is called on the least
> > significant bits of the variable. On big-endian 64-bit systems,
> > this would give a wrong result. Fix this by using the fixed-size
> > u32 instead of unsigned long. This clashes with the use of
> > test_bit, which is unnecessary for a single u32 variable, so
> > we adjust all usage sites appropriately and prefix the macros
> > with MACHXO2_ while at it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Zink <j.zink@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/fpga/machxo2-spi.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > ----
> >  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/machxo2-spi.c b/drivers/fpga/machxo2-
> > spi.c
> > index 5e12612c7289..d1a8f28e04e7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/machxo2-spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/machxo2-spi.c
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> >   */
> >  
> >  #include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> >  #include <linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h>
> >  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > @@ -41,41 +42,40 @@
> >  #define MACHXO2_BUF_SIZE               (MACHXO2_PAGE_SIZE + 4)
> >  
> >  /* Status register bits, errors and error mask */
> > -#define BUSY   12
> > -#define DONE   8
> > -#define DVER   27
> > -#define ENAB   9
> > -#define ERRBITS        23
> > -#define ERRMASK        7
> > -#define FAIL   13
> > -
> > -#define ENOERR 0 /* no error */
> > -#define EID    1
> > -#define ECMD   2
> > -#define ECRC   3
> > -#define EPREAM 4 /* preamble error */
> > -#define EABRT  5 /* abort error */
> > -#define EOVERFL        6 /* overflow error */
> > -#define ESDMEOF        7 /* SDM EOF */
> > -
> > -static inline u8 get_err(unsigned long *status)
> > +#define MACHXO2_BUSY           BIT(12)
> > +#define MACHXO2_DONE           BIT(8)
> > +#define MACHXO2_DVER           BIT(27)
> > +#define MACHXO2_ENAB           BIT(9)
> > +#define MACHXO2_ERR            GENMASK(25, 23)
> > +#define MACHXO2_ERR_ENOERR     0 /* no error */
> > +#define MACHXO2_ERR_EID                1
> > +#define MACHXO2_ERR_ECMD       2
> > +#define MACHXO2_ERR_ECRC       3
> > +#define MACHXO2_ERR_EPREAM     4 /* preamble error */
> > +#define MACHXO2_ERR_EABRT      5 /* abort error */
> > +#define MACHXO2_ERR_EOVERFL    6 /* overflow error */
> > +#define MACHXO2_ERR_ESDMEOF    7 /* SDM EOF */
> > +#define MACHXO2_FAIL           BIT(13)
> > +
> > +static inline u8 get_err(u32 status)
> >  {
> > -       return (*status >> ERRBITS) & ERRMASK;
> > +       return FIELD_GET(MACHXO2_ERR, status);
> >  }
> 
> So far the changes have nothing to do with the endian issue, is it?
> So
> please put it into another patch.

This is explained in the commit message. We need to get rid of unsigned
long, but test_bit requires using that type. Using the BIT and GENMASK
macros instead allows us to work on a u32 directly.

Admittedly, prefixing the macros with MACHXO2_ can be separated out,
but as I am already touching them to make them into masks, which is
required when not using test_bit, I chose to squash this here.

This is also mentioned in the commit message. If you prefer, I do
the rename in a separate patch. I can do that for v2, but I don't
see how I can cleanly separate s/unsigned long/u32/ and test_bit
removal.


> 
> >  
> > -static int get_status(struct spi_device *spi, unsigned long
> > *status)
> > +static int get_status(struct spi_device *spi, u32 *status)
> >  {
> >         struct spi_message msg;
> >         struct spi_transfer rx, tx;
> >         static const u8 cmd[] = LSC_READ_STATUS;
> > +       __be32 tmp;
> >         int ret;
> >  
> >         memset(&rx, 0, sizeof(rx));
> >         memset(&tx, 0, sizeof(tx));
> >         tx.tx_buf = cmd;
> >         tx.len = sizeof(cmd);
> > -       rx.rx_buf = status;
> > -       rx.len = 4;
> > +       rx.rx_buf = &tmp;
> > +       rx.len = sizeof(tmp);
> >         spi_message_init(&msg);
> >         spi_message_add_tail(&tx, &msg);
> >         spi_message_add_tail(&rx, &msg);
> > @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int get_status(struct spi_device *spi,
> > unsigned long *status)
> >         if (ret)
> >                 return ret;
> >  
> > -       *status = be32_to_cpu(*status);
> > +       *status = be32_to_cpu(tmp);
> 
> Why not directly operate on the status, I don't see the difference.

I wanted to state more clearly that the value read in the rx message is
big endian and needs conversion. 

Besides, since be32_to_cpu takes a __be32 as an argument, passing 
status, which is an u32, should give a static analyzer warning.

> 
> >  
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -91,30 +91,30 @@ static int get_status(struct spi_device *spi,
> > unsigned long *status)
> >  static const char *get_err_string(u8 err)
> >  {
> >         switch (err) {
> > -       case ENOERR:    return "No Error";
> > -       case EID:       return "ID ERR";
> > -       case ECMD:      return "CMD ERR";
> > -       case ECRC:      return "CRC ERR";
> > -       case EPREAM:    return "Preamble ERR";
> > -       case EABRT:     return "Abort ERR";
> > -       case EOVERFL:   return "Overflow ERR";
> > -       case ESDMEOF:   return "SDM EOF";
> > +       case MACHXO2_ERR_ENOERR:        return "No Error";
> > +       case MACHXO2_ERR_EID:           return "ID ERR";
> > +       case MACHXO2_ERR_ECMD:          return "CMD ERR";
> > +       case MACHXO2_ERR_ECRC:          return "CRC ERR";
> > +       case MACHXO2_ERR_EPREAM:        return "Preamble ERR";
> > +       case MACHXO2_ERR_EABRT:         return "Abort ERR";
> > +       case MACHXO2_ERR_EOVERFL:       return "Overflow ERR";
> > +       case MACHXO2_ERR_ESDMEOF:       return "SDM EOF";
> >         }
> 
> Same concern, no relation to the commit message

please see my comment above. If you prefer, I split it out in a
separate patch.

> 
> >  
> > -       return "Default switch case";
> > +       return "Unknown";
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void dump_status_reg(unsigned long *status)
> > +static void dump_status_reg(u32 status)
> >  {
> > -       pr_debug("machxo2 status: 0x%08lX - done=%d, cfgena=%d,
> > busy=%d, fail=%d, devver=%d, err=%s\n",
> > -                *status, test_bit(DONE, status), test_bit(ENAB,
> > status),
> > -                test_bit(BUSY, status), test_bit(FAIL, status),
> > -                test_bit(DVER, status),
> > get_err_string(get_err(status)));
> > +       pr_debug("machxo2 status: 0x%08X - done=%d, cfgena=%d,
> > busy=%d, fail=%d, devver=%d, err=%s\n",
> > +                 status, !!FIELD_GET(MACHXO2_DONE, status),
> > !!FIELD_GET(MACHXO2_ENAB, status),
> > +                 !!FIELD_GET(MACHXO2_BUSY, status),
> > !!FIELD_GET(MACHXO2_FAIL, status),
> > +                 !!FIELD_GET(MACHXO2_DVER, status),
> > get_err_string(get_err(status)));
> 
> Same concern. I'll not point out one by one below.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yilun
> 

as I explained in the commit message, I am removing test_bit. As far as
the macro renaming is concerned, please see my comments above.

Best regards
Johannes

> >  }
> 
> 
> >  
> >  static int wait_until_not_busy(struct spi_device *spi)
> >  {
> > -       unsigned long status;
> > +       u32 status;
> >         int ret, loop = 0;
> >  
> >         do {
> > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int wait_until_not_busy(struct
> > spi_device *spi)
> >                         return ret;
> >                 if (++loop >= MACHXO2_MAX_BUSY_LOOP)
> >                         return -EBUSY;
> > -       } while (test_bit(BUSY, &status));
> > +       } while (status & MACHXO2_BUSY);
> >  
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -169,14 +169,14 @@ static int machxo2_cleanup(struct
> > fpga_manager *mgr)
> >  
> >  static bool machxo2_status_done(unsigned long status)
> >  {
> > -       return !test_bit(BUSY, &status) && test_bit(DONE, &status)
> > &&
> > -               get_err(&status) == ENOERR;
> > +       return (((status & (MACHXO2_BUSY | MACHXO2_DONE)) ==
> > MACHXO2_DONE) &&
> > +               get_err(status) == MACHXO2_ERR_ENOERR);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static enum fpga_mgr_states machxo2_spi_state(struct fpga_manager
> > *mgr)
> >  {
> >         struct spi_device *spi = mgr->priv;
> > -       unsigned long status;
> > +       u32 status;
> >  
> >         get_status(spi, &status);
> >         if (machxo2_status_done(status))
> > @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static int machxo2_write_init(struct
> > fpga_manager *mgr,
> >         static const u8 enable[] = ISC_ENABLE;
> >         static const u8 erase[] = ISC_ERASE;
> >         static const u8 initaddr[] = LSC_INITADDRESS;
> > -       unsigned long status;
> > +       u32 status;
> >         int ret;
> >  
> >         if ((info->flags & FPGA_MGR_PARTIAL_RECONFIG)) {
> > @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static int machxo2_write_init(struct
> > fpga_manager *mgr,
> >         }
> >  
> >         get_status(spi, &status);
> > -       dump_status_reg(&status);
> > +       dump_status_reg(status);
> >         memset(tx, 0, sizeof(tx));
> >         spi_message_init(&msg);
> >         tx[0].tx_buf = &enable;
> > @@ -226,11 +226,11 @@ static int machxo2_write_init(struct
> > fpga_manager *mgr,
> >                 goto fail;
> >  
> >         get_status(spi, &status);
> > -       if (test_bit(FAIL, &status)) {
> > +       if (status & MACHXO2_FAIL) {
> >                 ret = -EINVAL;
> >                 goto fail;
> >         }
> > -       dump_status_reg(&status);
> > +       dump_status_reg(status);
> >  
> >         spi_message_init(&msg);
> >         tx[2].tx_buf = &initaddr;
> > @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static int machxo2_write_init(struct
> > fpga_manager *mgr,
> >                 goto fail;
> >  
> >         get_status(spi, &status);
> > -       dump_status_reg(&status);
> > +       dump_status_reg(status);
> >  
> >         return 0;
> >  fail:
> > @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static int machxo2_write(struct fpga_manager
> > *mgr, const char *buf,
> >         struct spi_transfer tx;
> >         static const u8 progincr[] = LSC_PROGINCRNV;
> >         u8 payload[MACHXO2_BUF_SIZE];
> > -       unsigned long status;
> > +       u32 status;
> >         int i, ret;
> >  
> >         if (count % MACHXO2_PAGE_SIZE != 0) {
> > @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static int machxo2_write(struct fpga_manager
> > *mgr, const char *buf,
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> >         }
> >         get_status(spi, &status);
> > -       dump_status_reg(&status);
> > +       dump_status_reg(status);
> >         memcpy(payload, &progincr, sizeof(progincr));
> >         for (i = 0; i < count; i += MACHXO2_PAGE_SIZE) {
> >                 memcpy(&payload[sizeof(progincr)], &buf[i],
> > MACHXO2_PAGE_SIZE);
> > @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static int machxo2_write(struct fpga_manager
> > *mgr, const char *buf,
> >                 }
> >         }
> >         get_status(spi, &status);
> > -       dump_status_reg(&status);
> > +       dump_status_reg(status);
> >  
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int machxo2_write_complete(struct
> > fpga_manager *mgr,
> >         struct spi_transfer tx[2];
> >         static const u8 progdone[] = ISC_PROGRAMDONE;
> >         static const u8 refresh[] = LSC_REFRESH;
> > -       unsigned long status;
> > +       u32 status;
> >         int ret, refreshloop = 0;
> >  
> >         memset(tx, 0, sizeof(tx));
> > @@ -313,8 +313,8 @@ static int machxo2_write_complete(struct
> > fpga_manager *mgr,
> >                 goto fail;
> >  
> >         get_status(spi, &status);
> > -       dump_status_reg(&status);
> > -       if (!test_bit(DONE, &status)) {
> > +       dump_status_reg(status);
> > +       if (!(status & MACHXO2_DONE)) {
> >                 machxo2_cleanup(mgr);
> >                 ret = -EINVAL;
> >                 goto fail;
> > @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static int machxo2_write_complete(struct
> > fpga_manager *mgr,
> >  
> >                 /* check refresh status */
> >                 get_status(spi, &status);
> > -               dump_status_reg(&status);
> > +               dump_status_reg(status);
> >                 if (machxo2_status_done(status))
> >                         break;
> >                 if (++refreshloop == MACHXO2_MAX_REFRESH_LOOP) {
> > @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static int machxo2_write_complete(struct
> > fpga_manager *mgr,
> >         } while (1);
> >  
> >         get_status(spi, &status);
> > -       dump_status_reg(&status);
> > +       dump_status_reg(status);
> >  
> >         return 0;
> >  fail:
> > -- 
> > 2.30.2
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                | Johannes Zink                  |
Steuerwalder Str. 21            | https://www.pengutronix.de/    |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany       | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0       |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686| Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555    |


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-29 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-25 14:13 [PATCH 00/16] Add support for Lattice MachXO2 programming via I2C Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 01/16] dt-bindings: fpga: convert Lattice MachXO2 Slave binding to YAML Johannes Zink
2022-08-30 20:30   ` Rob Herring
2022-08-31  7:12     ` Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 02/16] dt-bindings: fpga: machxo2-slave: add erasure properties Johannes Zink
2022-08-29  7:39   ` Xu Yilun
     [not found]     ` <9d5512768acb4d57f339942007402a9ed9483e84.camel@pengutronix.de>
     [not found]       ` <YwzWt8KjyfdyqehI@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
2022-08-31  7:38         ` Johannes Zink
2022-09-03 14:49           ` Xu Yilun
2022-08-30 20:36   ` Rob Herring
2022-08-31  7:07     ` Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 03/16] dt-bindings: fpga: machxo2-slave: add pin for program sequence init Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 18:51   ` Rob Herring
2022-08-26  7:56     ` Johannes Zink
2022-08-29  7:45   ` Xu Yilun
     [not found]     ` <a42d72cd71c96ca675f5bb0cf59128c7f1cb04bb.camel@pengutronix.de>
     [not found]       ` <YwzZYM6GU0GiqBiq@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
2022-08-31  7:51         ` Johannes Zink
2022-08-31  8:08           ` Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 04/16] dt-bindings: fpga: machxo2-slave: add lattice,machxo2-slave-i2c compatible Johannes Zink
2022-08-30 20:40   ` Rob Herring
2022-08-31  7:10     ` Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 05/16] fpga: machxo2-spi: remove #ifdef DEBUG Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 06/16] fpga: machxo2-spi: factor out status check for readability Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 07/16] fpga: machxo2-spi: fix big-endianness incompatibility Johannes Zink
2022-08-29  8:19   ` Xu Yilun
2022-08-29 10:41     ` Johannes Zink [this message]
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 08/16] fpga: machxo2-spi: simplify with spi_sync_transfer() Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 09/16] fpga: machxo2-spi: simplify spi write commands Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 10/16] fpga: machxo2-spi: prepare extraction of common code Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 11/16] fpga: machxo2: move non-spi-related functionality to " Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 12/16] fpga: machxo2: improve status register dump Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 13/16] fpga: machxo2: add optional additional flash areas to be erased Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 14/16] fpga: machxo2: add program initialization signalling via gpio Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 15/16] fpga: machxo2: extend erase timeout for machxo2 FPGA Johannes Zink
2022-08-29  9:26   ` Xu Yilun
2022-08-29 10:51     ` Johannes Zink
2022-08-29 14:57       ` Xu Yilun
2022-08-31  7:56         ` Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 16/16] fpga: machxo2: add configuration over i2c Johannes Zink
2022-08-29  9:47   ` Xu Yilun
2022-08-29 13:21     ` Johannes Zink
2022-08-29 14:45       ` Xu Yilun
2022-08-31 16:07         ` Johannes Zink
2022-08-25 15:25 ` [PATCH 00/16] Add support for Lattice MachXO2 programming via I2C Ivan Bornyakov
2022-08-26  6:32   ` Johannes Zink
2022-08-26  8:15     ` Ivan Bornyakov
2022-08-26  8:25   ` Sascha Hauer
2022-08-26  9:00     ` Ivan Bornyakov
2022-08-26  9:19       ` Ivan Bornyakov
2022-08-26 15:26         ` Xu Yilun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b8a6c62facf182b9ad4f333af69072e1a8c0293b.camel@pengutronix.de \
    --to=j.zink@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.