Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Correctly handle the mmio faulting

From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cjia@nvidia.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Wanghaibin (D)" <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Correctly handle the mmio faulting
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:02:00 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b97415a2-7970-a741-9690-3e4514b4aa7d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871rb3rgpl.wl-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

On 4/21/21 9:59 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:17:44 +0100,
> Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com> wrote:
>> On 2021/4/21 14:20, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> On 4/21/21 12:59 PM, Keqian Zhu wrote:
>>>> On 2020/10/22 0:16, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>>>>> The Commit:6d674e28 introduces a notion to detect and handle the
>>>>> device mapping. The commit checks for the VM_PFNMAP flag is set
>>>>> in vma->flags and if set then marks force_pte to true such that
>>>>> if force_pte is true then ignore the THP function check
>>>>> (/transparent_hugepage_adjust()).
>>>>>
>>>>> There could be an issue with the VM_PFNMAP flag setting and checking.
>>>>> For example consider a case where the mdev vendor driver register's
>>>>> the vma_fault handler named vma_mmio_fault(), which maps the
>>>>> host MMIO region in-turn calls remap_pfn_range() and maps
>>>>> the MMIO's vma space. Where, remap_pfn_range implicitly sets
>>>>> the VM_PFNMAP flag into vma->flags.
>>>> Could you give the name of the mdev vendor driver that triggers this issue?
>>>> I failed to find one according to your description. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think it would be fixed in driver side to set VM_PFNMAP in
>>> its mmap() callback (call_mmap()), like vfio PCI driver does.
>>> It means it won't be delayed until page fault is issued and
>>> remap_pfn_range() is called. It's determined from the beginning
>>> that the vma associated the mdev vendor driver is serving as
>>> PFN remapping purpose. So the vma should be populated completely,
>>> including the VM_PFNMAP flag before it becomes visible to user
>>> space.
> 
> Why should that be a requirement? Lazy populating of the VMA should be
> perfectly acceptable if the fault can only happen on the CPU side.
> 

It isn't a requirement and the drivers needn't follow strictly. I checked
several drivers before looking into the patch and found almost all the
drivers have VM_PFNMAP set at mmap() time. In drivers/vfio/vfio-pci.c,
there is a comment as below, but it doesn't reveal too much about why
we can't set VM_PFNMAP at fault time.

static int vfio_pci_mmap(void *device_data, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
       :
         /*
          * See remap_pfn_range(), called from vfio_pci_fault() but we can't
          * change vm_flags within the fault handler.  Set them now.
          */
         vma->vm_flags |= VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP;
         vma->vm_ops = &vfio_pci_mmap_ops;

         return 0;
}

To set these flags in advance does have advantages. For example, VM_DONTEXPAND
prevents the vma to be merged with another one. VM_DONTDUMP make this vma
isn't eligible for coredump. Otherwise, the address space, which is associated
with the vma is accessed and unnecessary page faults are triggered on coredump.
VM_IO and VM_PFNMAP avoids to walk the page frames associated with the vma since
we don't have valid PFN in the mapping.

>>>
>>> The example can be found from vfio driver in drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c:
>>>      vfio_pci_mmap:       VM_PFNMAP is set for the vma
>>>      vfio_pci_mmap_fault: remap_pfn_range() is called
>> Right. I have discussed the above with Marc. I want to find the driver
>> to fix it. However, AFAICS, there is no driver matches the description...
> 
> I have the feeling this is an out-of-tree driver (and Santosh email
> address is bouncing, so I guess we won't have much information from
> him).
> 
> However, the simple fact that any odd driver can provide a fault
> handler and populate it the VMA on demand makes me think that we need
> to support this case.
> 

Yeah, Santosh's email isn't reachable. I think the VM_PFNMAP need to be
rechecked after gup if we're going to support this case.

Thanks,
Gavin