From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>, <mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com>, <yf.wang@mediatek.com>, <libo.kang@mediatek.com>, <chengci.xu@mediatek.com>, <youlin.pei@mediatek.com>, <anan.sun@mediatek.com>, <xueqi.zhang@mediatek.com>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] iommu/mediatek: Add error path for loop of mm_dts_parse Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 11:10:11 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bfd6d40474d4d5f589a825b0cc193ae229c42d52.camel@mediatek.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220830083206.GT2030@kadam> Hi Dan, Thanks very much for your review:) On Tue, 2022-08-30 at 11:32 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 02:43:03PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > The mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse will parse the smi larbs nodes. if the > > i+1 > > larb is parsed fail, we should put_device for the 0..i larbs. > > > > There are two places need to comment: > > 1) The larbid may be not linear mapping, we should loop whole > > the array in the error path. > > 2) I move this line position: "data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev- > > >dev;" > > That means set data->larb_imu[id].dev before the error path. > > then we don't need "platform_device_put(plarbdev)" again while > > probe_defer case. All depend on "put_device" in the error path > > in error > > cases. > > I don't understand what you're saying here. There is still a > platform_device_put(plarbdev) on the success path after > component_match_add(). > > So if we fail when i == 2 then we do: > > put_device(data->larb_imu[2].dev); > > But for the previous iterations has both platform_device_put() > and put_device() called for them. Sorry for this. Right! For the goto outside the loop, it did put twice. I will fix this. > > regards, > dan carpenter >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>, <mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com>, <yf.wang@mediatek.com>, <libo.kang@mediatek.com>, <chengci.xu@mediatek.com>, <youlin.pei@mediatek.com>, <anan.sun@mediatek.com>, <xueqi.zhang@mediatek.com>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] iommu/mediatek: Add error path for loop of mm_dts_parse Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 11:10:11 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bfd6d40474d4d5f589a825b0cc193ae229c42d52.camel@mediatek.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220830083206.GT2030@kadam> Hi Dan, Thanks very much for your review:) On Tue, 2022-08-30 at 11:32 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 02:43:03PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > The mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse will parse the smi larbs nodes. if the > > i+1 > > larb is parsed fail, we should put_device for the 0..i larbs. > > > > There are two places need to comment: > > 1) The larbid may be not linear mapping, we should loop whole > > the array in the error path. > > 2) I move this line position: "data->larb_imu[id].dev = &plarbdev- > > >dev;" > > That means set data->larb_imu[id].dev before the error path. > > then we don't need "platform_device_put(plarbdev)" again while > > probe_defer case. All depend on "put_device" in the error path > > in error > > cases. > > I don't understand what you're saying here. There is still a > platform_device_put(plarbdev) on the success path after > component_match_add(). > > So if we fail when i == 2 then we do: > > put_device(data->larb_imu[2].dev); > > But for the previous iterations has both platform_device_put() > and put_device() called for them. Sorry for this. Right! For the goto outside the loop, it did put twice. I will fix this. > > regards, > dan carpenter > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-07 3:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-08-24 6:43 [PATCH v4 0/6] iommu/mediatek: Improve safety from invalid dts input Yong Wu 2022-08-24 6:43 ` Yong Wu 2022-08-24 6:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] iommu/mediatek: Add platform_device_put for recovering the device refcnt Yong Wu 2022-08-24 6:43 ` Yong Wu 2022-08-30 8:16 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2022-08-30 8:16 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2022-08-24 6:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] iommu/mediatek: Use component_match_add Yong Wu 2022-08-24 6:43 ` Yong Wu 2022-08-24 6:43 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] iommu/mediatek: Add error path for loop of mm_dts_parse Yong Wu 2022-08-24 6:43 ` Yong Wu 2022-08-30 8:14 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2022-08-30 8:14 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2022-09-07 3:08 ` Yong Wu 2022-09-07 3:08 ` Yong Wu 2022-08-30 8:32 ` Dan Carpenter 2022-08-30 8:32 ` Dan Carpenter 2022-09-07 3:10 ` Yong Wu [this message] 2022-09-07 3:10 ` Yong Wu 2022-08-24 6:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] iommu/mediatek: Validate number of phandles associated with "mediatek,larbs" Yong Wu 2022-08-24 6:43 ` Yong Wu 2022-08-24 6:43 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] iommu/mediatek: Improve safety for mediatek,smi property in larb nodes Yong Wu 2022-08-24 6:43 ` Yong Wu 2022-08-30 8:16 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2022-08-30 8:16 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2022-08-24 6:43 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] iommu/mediatek: Remove unused "mapping" member from mtk_iommu_data Yong Wu 2022-08-24 6:43 ` Yong Wu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bfd6d40474d4d5f589a825b0cc193ae229c42d52.camel@mediatek.com \ --to=yong.wu@mediatek.com \ --cc=anan.sun@mediatek.com \ --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \ --cc=chengci.xu@mediatek.com \ --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \ --cc=groeck@chromium.org \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \ --cc=joro@8bytes.org \ --cc=libo.kang@mediatek.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \ --cc=mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com \ --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --cc=xueqi.zhang@mediatek.com \ --cc=yf.wang@mediatek.com \ --cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.