bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use $(pound) instead of \# in Makefiles
@ 2021-10-06 11:10 Quentin Monnet
  2021-10-06 16:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Monnet @ 2021-10-06 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko
  Cc: netdev, bpf, Quentin Monnet

Recent-ish versions of make do no longer consider number signs ("#") as
comment symbols when they are inserted inside of a macro reference or in
a function invocation. In such cases, the symbols should not be escaped.

There are a few occurrences of "\#" in libbpf's and samples' Makefiles.
In the former, the backslash is harmless, because grep associates no
particular meaning to the escaped symbol and reads it as a regular "#".
In samples' Makefile, recent versions of make will pass the backslash
down to the compiler, making the probe fail all the time and resulting
in the display of a warning about "make headers_install" being required,
even after headers have been installed.

A similar issue has been addressed at some other locations by commit
9564a8cf422d ("Kbuild: fix # escaping in .cmd files for future Make").
Let's address it for libbpf's and samples' Makefiles in the same
fashion, by using a "$(pound)" variable (pulled from
tools/scripts/Makefile.include for libbpf, or re-defined for the
samples).

Reference for the change in make:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/make.git/commit/?id=c6966b323811c37acedff05b57

Fixes: 2f3830412786 ("libbpf: Make libbpf_version.h non-auto-generated")
Fixes: 07c3bbdb1a9b ("samples: bpf: print a warning about headers_install")
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
---
 samples/bpf/Makefile   | 4 +++-
 tools/lib/bpf/Makefile | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
index 4dc20be5fb96..a5783749ec15 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
 BPF_SAMPLES_PATH ?= $(abspath $(srctree)/$(src))
 TOOLS_PATH := $(BPF_SAMPLES_PATH)/../../tools
 
+pound := \#
+
 # List of programs to build
 tprogs-y := test_lru_dist
 tprogs-y += sock_example
@@ -232,7 +234,7 @@ endif
 
 # Don't evaluate probes and warnings if we need to run make recursively
 ifneq ($(src),)
-HDR_PROBE := $(shell printf "\#include <linux/types.h>\n struct list_head { int a; }; int main() { return 0; }" | \
+HDR_PROBE := $(shell printf "$(pound)include <linux/types.h>\n struct list_head { int a; }; int main() { return 0; }" | \
 	$(CC) $(TPROGS_CFLAGS) $(TPROGS_LDFLAGS) -x c - \
 	-o /dev/null 2>/dev/null && echo okay)
 
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile b/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile
index 0f766345506f..41e4f78dbad5 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile
@@ -208,8 +208,8 @@ check_abi: $(OUTPUT)libbpf.so $(VERSION_SCRIPT)
 		exit 1;							 \
 	fi
 
-HDR_MAJ_VERSION := $(shell grep -oE '^\#define LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION ([0-9]+)$$' libbpf_version.h | cut -d' ' -f3)
-HDR_MIN_VERSION := $(shell grep -oE '^\#define LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION ([0-9]+)$$' libbpf_version.h | cut -d' ' -f3)
+HDR_MAJ_VERSION := $(shell grep -oE '^$(pound)define LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION ([0-9]+)$$' libbpf_version.h | cut -d' ' -f3)
+HDR_MIN_VERSION := $(shell grep -oE '^$(pound)define LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION ([0-9]+)$$' libbpf_version.h | cut -d' ' -f3)
 
 check_version: $(VERSION_SCRIPT) libbpf_version.h
 	@if [ "$(HDR_MAJ_VERSION)" != "$(LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION)" ]; then        \
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use $(pound) instead of \# in Makefiles
  2021-10-06 11:10 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use $(pound) instead of \# in Makefiles Quentin Monnet
@ 2021-10-06 16:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2021-10-06 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Quentin Monnet; +Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, netdev, bpf

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Wed,  6 Oct 2021 12:10:49 +0100 you wrote:
> Recent-ish versions of make do no longer consider number signs ("#") as
> comment symbols when they are inserted inside of a macro reference or in
> a function invocation. In such cases, the symbols should not be escaped.
> 
> There are a few occurrences of "\#" in libbpf's and samples' Makefiles.
> In the former, the backslash is harmless, because grep associates no
> particular meaning to the escaped symbol and reads it as a regular "#".
> In samples' Makefile, recent versions of make will pass the backslash
> down to the compiler, making the probe fail all the time and resulting
> in the display of a warning about "make headers_install" being required,
> even after headers have been installed.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf: use $(pound) instead of \# in Makefiles
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/bf2819e0b10f

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-06 16:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-06 11:10 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use $(pound) instead of \# in Makefiles Quentin Monnet
2021-10-06 16:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).