bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: optimize constant blinding
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:30:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201906141213.LXZteGuk%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190612113208.21865-1-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Hi "Naveen,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
[also build test WARNING on v5.2-rc4 next-20190613]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Naveen-N-Rao/bpf-optimize-constant-blinding/20190614-023948
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.1-rc1-7-g2b96cd8-dirty
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

   kernel/bpf/core.c:210:49: sparse: sparse: arithmetics on pointers to functions
   include/linux/rbtree.h:120:9: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
   include/linux/rbtree.h:120:9: sparse:    struct rb_node [noderef] <asn:4> *
   include/linux/rbtree.h:120:9: sparse:    struct rb_node *
   include/linux/rbtree.h:120:9: sparse: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
   include/linux/rbtree.h:120:9: sparse:    struct rb_node [noderef] <asn:4> *
   include/linux/rbtree.h:120:9: sparse:    struct rb_node *
>> kernel/bpf/core.c:1122:59: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
   kernel/bpf/core.c:1122:62: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
   include/trace/events/xdp.h:28:1: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
   include/trace/events/xdp.h:53:1: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
   include/trace/events/xdp.h:111:1: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
   include/trace/events/xdp.h:126:1: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
   include/trace/events/xdp.h:161:1: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
   include/trace/events/xdp.h:196:1: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
   include/trace/events/xdp.h:231:1: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer

vim +1122 kernel/bpf/core.c

  1101	
  1102	struct bpf_prog *bpf_jit_blind_constants(struct bpf_prog *prog)
  1103	{
  1104		int i, j, rewritten, new_len, insn_cnt, ret = 0;
  1105		struct bpf_insn insn_buff[16], aux[2];
  1106		struct bpf_prog *clone, *tmp;
  1107		struct bpf_insn *insn;
  1108		u32 *clone_index;
  1109	
  1110		if (!bpf_jit_blinding_enabled(prog) || prog->blinded)
  1111			return prog;
  1112	
  1113		/* Dry run to figure out the final number of instructions */
  1114		clone_index = vmalloc(prog->len * sizeof(u32));
  1115		if (!clone_index)
  1116			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
  1117	
  1118		insn_cnt = prog->len;
  1119		insn = prog->insnsi;
  1120		rewritten = 0;
  1121		for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
> 1122			clone_index[i] = bpf_jit_blind_insn(insn, 0, 0);
  1123			if (clone_index[i] > 1)
  1124				rewritten += clone_index[i] - 1;
  1125		}
  1126	
  1127		if (rewritten) {
  1128			/* Needs new allocation, branch adjustment, et al... */
  1129			clone = bpf_prog_clone_create(prog, GFP_USER);
  1130			if (!clone) {
  1131				ret = -ENOMEM;
  1132				goto err;
  1133			}
  1134	
  1135			new_len = prog->len + rewritten;
  1136			tmp = bpf_prog_realloc(clone, bpf_prog_size(new_len), GFP_USER);
  1137			if (!tmp) {
  1138				ret = -ENOMEM;
  1139				goto err;
  1140			}
  1141			clone = tmp;
  1142			clone->len = new_len;
  1143	
  1144			/* rewrite instructions with constant blinding */
  1145			insn_cnt = prog->len;
  1146			insn = prog->insnsi;
  1147			for (i = 0, j = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, j++, insn++) {
  1148				/* capture new instruction index in clone_index */
  1149				clone_index[i] = j;
  1150	
  1151				/* We temporarily need to hold the original ld64 insn
  1152				 * so that we can still access the first part in the
  1153				 * second blinding run.
  1154				 */
  1155				if (insn[0].code == (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW) &&
  1156				    insn[1].code == 0)
  1157					memcpy(aux, insn, sizeof(aux));
  1158	
  1159				rewritten = bpf_jit_blind_insn(insn, aux, insn_buff);
  1160				if (!rewritten) {
  1161					memcpy(clone->insnsi + j, insn,
  1162						sizeof(struct bpf_insn));
  1163				} else {
  1164					memcpy(clone->insnsi + j, insn_buff,
  1165						sizeof(struct bpf_insn) * rewritten);
  1166					j += rewritten - 1;
  1167				}
  1168			}
  1169	
  1170			/* adjust branches */
  1171			for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++) {
  1172				int next_insn_idx = clone->len;
  1173	
  1174				if (i < insn_cnt - 1)
  1175					next_insn_idx = clone_index[i + 1];
  1176	
  1177				insn = clone->insnsi + clone_index[i];
  1178				for (j = clone_index[i]; j < next_insn_idx; j++, insn++) {
  1179					ret = bpf_jit_blind_adj_imm_off(insn, i, j, clone_index);
  1180					if (ret) {
  1181						goto err;
  1182					}
  1183				}
  1184			}
  1185	
  1186			/* adjust linfo */
  1187			if (clone->aux->nr_linfo) {
  1188				struct bpf_line_info *linfo = clone->aux->linfo;
  1189	
  1190				for (i = 0; i < clone->aux->nr_linfo; i++)
  1191					linfo[i].insn_off = clone_index[linfo[i].insn_off];
  1192			}
  1193		} else {
  1194			/* if prog length remains same, not much work to do */
  1195			clone = bpf_prog_clone_create(prog, GFP_USER);
  1196			if (!clone) {
  1197				ret = -ENOMEM;
  1198				goto err;
  1199			}
  1200	
  1201			insn_cnt = clone->len;
  1202			insn = clone->insnsi;
  1203	
  1204			for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
  1205				if (clone_index[i]) {
  1206					bpf_jit_blind_insn(insn, aux, insn_buff);
  1207					memcpy(insn, insn_buff, sizeof(struct bpf_insn));
  1208				}
  1209			}
  1210		}
  1211	
  1212		clone->blinded = 1;
  1213	
  1214	err:
  1215		vfree(clone_index);
  1216	
  1217		if (ret) {
  1218			if (clone)
  1219				bpf_jit_prog_release_other(prog, clone);
  1220			return ERR_PTR(ret);
  1221		}
  1222	
  1223		return clone;
  1224	}
  1225	#endif /* CONFIG_BPF_JIT */
  1226	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-14  4:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-12 11:32 [PATCH] bpf: optimize constant blinding Naveen N. Rao
2019-06-12 14:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-12 15:04   ` Jiong Wang
2019-06-12 15:25     ` Jiong Wang
2019-06-12 15:28       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 15:13         ` Jiong Wang
2019-06-14 17:05           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 22:28             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-06-17 19:47           ` Edward Cree
2019-06-17 19:59             ` Jiong Wang
2019-06-17 20:11               ` Edward Cree
2019-06-17 20:40                 ` Jiong Wang
2019-06-17 20:53                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-17 21:01                     ` Jiong Wang
2019-06-17 21:16                   ` Edward Cree
2019-06-19 20:45                     ` Jiong Wang
2019-06-14  4:30 ` kbuild test robot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201906141213.LXZteGuk%lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).