BPF Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: test__skip
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:53:30 -0700
Message-ID: <20190814195330.GL2820@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzaE-KiW1Xt049A4s25YiaLeTH3yhgahwLUdpXNjF1sVpA@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/14, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:22 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 9:48 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Export test__skip() to indicate skipped tests and use it in
> > > test_send_signal_nmi().
> > >
> > > Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > For completeness, we should probably also support test__skip_subtest()
> > eventually, but it's fine until we don't have a use case.
> 
> Hm.. so I think we don't need separate test__skip_subtest().
> test__skip() should skip either test or sub-test, depending on which
> context we are running in. So maybe just make sure this is handled
> correctly?
Do we care if it's a test or a subtest skip? My motivation was to
have a counter that can be examined to make sure we have a full test
coverage, so when people run the tests they can be sure that nothing
is skipped due to missing config or something else.

Let me know if you see a value in highlighting test vs subtest skip.

Other related question is: should we do verbose output in case
of a skip? Right now we don't do it.

> >
> > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
> >
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c | 1 +
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c             | 9 +++++++--
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h             | 2 ++
> > >  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
> > > index 1575f0a1f586..40c2c5efdd3e 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
> > > @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ static int test_send_signal_nmi(void)
> > >                 if (errno == ENOENT) {
> > >                         printf("%s:SKIP:no PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES\n",
> > >                                __func__);
> > > +                       test__skip();
> > >                         return 0;
> > >                 }
> > >                 /* Let the test fail with a more informative message */
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> > > index 1a7a2a0c0a11..1993f2ce0d23 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> > > @@ -121,6 +121,11 @@ void test__force_log() {
> > >         env.test->force_log = true;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +void test__skip(void)
> > > +{
> > > +       env.skip_cnt++;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  struct ipv4_packet pkt_v4 = {
> > >         .eth.h_proto = __bpf_constant_htons(ETH_P_IP),
> > >         .iph.ihl = 5,
> > > @@ -535,8 +540,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > >                         test->test_name);
> > >         }
> > >         stdio_restore();
> > > -       printf("Summary: %d/%d PASSED, %d FAILED\n",
> > > -              env.succ_cnt, env.sub_succ_cnt, env.fail_cnt);
> > > +       printf("Summary: %d/%d PASSED, %d SKIPPED, %d FAILED\n",
> 
> So because some sub-tests might be skipped, while others will be
> running, let's keep output consistent with SUCCESS and use
> <test>/<subtests> format for SKIPPED as well?
> 
> > > +              env.succ_cnt, env.sub_succ_cnt, env.skip_cnt, env.fail_cnt);
> > >
> > >         free(env.test_selector.num_set);
> > >         free(env.subtest_selector.num_set);
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> > > index 37d427f5a1e5..9defd35cb6c0 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
> > > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct test_env {
> > >         int succ_cnt; /* successful tests */
> > >         int sub_succ_cnt; /* successful sub-tests */
> > >         int fail_cnt; /* total failed tests + sub-tests */
> > > +       int skip_cnt; /* skipped tests */
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  extern int error_cnt;
> > > @@ -72,6 +73,7 @@ extern struct test_env env;
> > >
> > >  extern void test__force_log();
> > >  extern bool test__start_subtest(const char *name);
> > > +extern void test__skip(void);
> > >
> > >  #define MAGIC_BYTES 123
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.23.0.rc1.153.gdeed80330f-goog
> > >

  reply index

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-14 16:47 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: misc fixes Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: change formatting of the condenced output Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 17:00   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-14 17:07     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: test__skip Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 19:22   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-14 19:30     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-14 19:53       ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2019-08-14 20:01         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-16  5:16           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-16  5:23             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-14 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: remove global fail/success counts Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 19:47   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-14 20:07     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 20:22       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-08-14 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: test_progs: remove asserts from subtests Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-14 19:52   ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190814195330.GL2820@mini-arch \
    --to=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

BPF Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0 bpf/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 bpf bpf/ https://lore.kernel.org/bpf \
		bpf@vger.kernel.org bpf@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index bpf


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.bpf


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox