* [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: fix map leak in HASH_OF_MAPS map
@ 2020-07-24 1:16 Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-24 1:17 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: extend map-in-map selftest to detect memory leaks Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-27 21:02 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: fix map leak in HASH_OF_MAPS map Song Liu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2020-07-24 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, netdev, ast, daniel; +Cc: andrii.nakryiko, kernel-team, Andrii Nakryiko
Fix HASH_OF_MAPS bug of not putting inner map pointer on bpf_map_elem_update()
operation. This is due to per-cpu extra_elems optimization, which bypassed
free_htab_elem() logic doing proper clean ups. Make sure that inner map is put
properly in optimized case as well.
Fixes: 8c290e60fa2a ("bpf: fix hashmap extra_elems logic")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
---
kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index b4b288a3c3c9..b32cc8ce8ff6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -779,15 +779,20 @@ static void htab_elem_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
htab_elem_free(htab, l);
}
-static void free_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
+static void htab_put_fd_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
{
struct bpf_map *map = &htab->map;
+ void *ptr;
if (map->ops->map_fd_put_ptr) {
- void *ptr = fd_htab_map_get_ptr(map, l);
-
+ ptr = fd_htab_map_get_ptr(map, l);
map->ops->map_fd_put_ptr(ptr);
}
+}
+
+static void free_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
+{
+ htab_put_fd_value(htab, l);
if (htab_is_prealloc(htab)) {
__pcpu_freelist_push(&htab->freelist, &l->fnode);
@@ -839,6 +844,7 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
*/
pl_new = this_cpu_ptr(htab->extra_elems);
l_new = *pl_new;
+ htab_put_fd_value(htab, old_elem);
*pl_new = old_elem;
} else {
struct pcpu_freelist_node *l;
--
2.24.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: extend map-in-map selftest to detect memory leaks
2020-07-24 1:16 [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: fix map leak in HASH_OF_MAPS map Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2020-07-24 1:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-27 20:53 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 21:02 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: fix map leak in HASH_OF_MAPS map Song Liu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2020-07-24 1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, netdev, ast, daniel; +Cc: andrii.nakryiko, kernel-team, Andrii Nakryiko
Add test validating that all inner maps are released properly after skeleton
is destroyed. To ensure determinism, trigger kernel-size synchronize_rcu()
before checking map existence by their IDs.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c | 104 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
index f7ee8fa377ad..043e8ffe03d1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
@@ -5,10 +5,50 @@
#include "test_btf_map_in_map.skel.h"
+static int duration;
+
+int bpf_map_id(struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+ struct bpf_map_info info;
+ __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+ int err;
+
+ memset(&info, 0, info_len);
+ err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(bpf_map__fd(map), &info, &info_len);
+ if (err)
+ return 0;
+ return info.id;
+}
+
+int kern_sync_rcu() {
+ int inner_map_fd, outer_map_fd, err, zero = 0;
+
+ inner_map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, 4, 4, 1, 0);
+ if (CHECK(inner_map_fd < 0, "inner_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno))
+ return -1;
+
+ outer_map_fd = bpf_create_map_in_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, NULL,
+ sizeof(int), inner_map_fd, 1, 0);
+ if (CHECK(outer_map_fd < 0, "outer_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno)) {
+ close(inner_map_fd);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_map_fd, &zero, &inner_map_fd, 0);
+ if (err)
+ err = -errno;
+ CHECK(err, "outer_map_update", "failed %d\n", err);
+ close(inner_map_fd);
+ close(outer_map_fd);
+ return err;
+}
+
void test_btf_map_in_map(void)
{
- int duration = 0, err, key = 0, val;
+ int err, key = 0, val, i;
struct test_btf_map_in_map* skel;
+ int outer_arr_fd, outer_hash_fd;
+ int fd, map1_fd, map2_fd, map1_id, map2_id;
skel = test_btf_map_in_map__open_and_load();
if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed to open&load skeleton\n"))
@@ -18,32 +58,70 @@ void test_btf_map_in_map(void)
if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed: %d\n", err))
goto cleanup;
+ map1_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
+ map2_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
+ outer_arr_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr);
+ outer_hash_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash);
+
/* inner1 = input, inner2 = input + 1 */
- val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
- bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr), &key, &val, 0);
- val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
- bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash), &key, &val, 0);
+ map1_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
+ bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &map1_fd, 0);
+ map2_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
+ bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &map2_fd, 0);
skel->bss->input = 1;
usleep(1);
- bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1), &key, &val);
+ bpf_map_lookup_elem(map1_fd, &key, &val);
CHECK(val != 1, "inner1", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 1);
- bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2), &key, &val);
+ bpf_map_lookup_elem(map2_fd, &key, &val);
CHECK(val != 2, "inner2", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 2);
/* inner1 = input + 1, inner2 = input */
- val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
- bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr), &key, &val, 0);
- val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
- bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash), &key, &val, 0);
+ bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &map2_fd, 0);
+ bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &map1_fd, 0);
skel->bss->input = 3;
usleep(1);
- bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1), &key, &val);
+ bpf_map_lookup_elem(map1_fd, &key, &val);
CHECK(val != 4, "inner1", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 4);
- bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2), &key, &val);
+ bpf_map_lookup_elem(map2_fd, &key, &val);
CHECK(val != 3, "inner2", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 3);
+ for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
+ val = i % 2 ? map1_fd : map2_fd;
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &val, 0);
+ if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) {
+ printf("failed to update hash_of_maps on iter #%d\n", i);
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &val, 0);
+ if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) {
+ printf("failed to update hash_of_maps on iter #%d\n", i);
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ }
+
+ map1_id = bpf_map_id(skel->maps.inner_map1);
+ map2_id = bpf_map_id(skel->maps.inner_map2);
+ CHECK(map1_id == 0, "map1_id", "failed to get ID 1\n");
+ CHECK(map2_id == 0, "map2_id", "failed to get ID 2\n");
+
+ test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
+ skel = NULL;
+
+ CHECK(kern_sync_rcu(), "sync_rcu", "failed\n");
+
+ fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map1_id);
+ if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map1_leak", "inner_map1 leaked!\n")) {
+ close(fd);
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map2_id);
+ if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map2_leak", "inner_map2 leaked!\n")) {
+ close(fd);
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+
cleanup:
test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
}
--
2.24.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: extend map-in-map selftest to detect memory leaks
2020-07-24 1:17 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: extend map-in-map selftest to detect memory leaks Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2020-07-27 20:53 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 22:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Song Liu @ 2020-07-27 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Networking, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Andrii Nakryiko, Kernel Team
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 6:17 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> wrote:
>
> Add test validating that all inner maps are released properly after skeleton
> is destroyed. To ensure determinism, trigger kernel-size synchronize_rcu()
> before checking map existence by their IDs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c | 104 +++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> index f7ee8fa377ad..043e8ffe03d1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> @@ -5,10 +5,50 @@
>
> #include "test_btf_map_in_map.skel.h"
>
> +static int duration;
> +
> +int bpf_map_id(struct bpf_map *map)
Should this return __u32?
> +{
> + struct bpf_map_info info;
> + __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> + int err;
> +
> + memset(&info, 0, info_len);
> + err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(bpf_map__fd(map), &info, &info_len);
> + if (err)
> + return 0;
> + return info.id;
> +}
> +
> +int kern_sync_rcu() {
int kern_sync_rcu(void)
{
...
A comment for this function would be nice too.
> + int inner_map_fd, outer_map_fd, err, zero = 0;
> +
> + inner_map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, 4, 4, 1, 0);
> + if (CHECK(inner_map_fd < 0, "inner_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno))
> + return -1;
> +
> + outer_map_fd = bpf_create_map_in_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, NULL,
> + sizeof(int), inner_map_fd, 1, 0);
> + if (CHECK(outer_map_fd < 0, "outer_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno)) {
> + close(inner_map_fd);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_map_fd, &zero, &inner_map_fd, 0);
> + if (err)
> + err = -errno;
> + CHECK(err, "outer_map_update", "failed %d\n", err);
> + close(inner_map_fd);
> + close(outer_map_fd);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> void test_btf_map_in_map(void)
> {
> - int duration = 0, err, key = 0, val;
> + int err, key = 0, val, i;
> struct test_btf_map_in_map* skel;
> + int outer_arr_fd, outer_hash_fd;
> + int fd, map1_fd, map2_fd, map1_id, map2_id;
nit: reverse Christmas tree.
>
> skel = test_btf_map_in_map__open_and_load();
> if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed to open&load skeleton\n"))
> @@ -18,32 +58,70 @@ void test_btf_map_in_map(void)
> if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed: %d\n", err))
> goto cleanup;
>
> + map1_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> + map2_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> + outer_arr_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr);
> + outer_hash_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash);
> +
> /* inner1 = input, inner2 = input + 1 */
> - val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> - bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr), &key, &val, 0);
> - val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> - bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash), &key, &val, 0);
> + map1_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> + bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &map1_fd, 0);
> + map2_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> + bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &map2_fd, 0);
> skel->bss->input = 1;
> usleep(1);
>
> - bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1), &key, &val);
> + bpf_map_lookup_elem(map1_fd, &key, &val);
> CHECK(val != 1, "inner1", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 1);
> - bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2), &key, &val);
> + bpf_map_lookup_elem(map2_fd, &key, &val);
> CHECK(val != 2, "inner2", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 2);
>
> /* inner1 = input + 1, inner2 = input */
> - val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> - bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr), &key, &val, 0);
> - val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> - bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash), &key, &val, 0);
> + bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &map2_fd, 0);
> + bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &map1_fd, 0);
> skel->bss->input = 3;
> usleep(1);
>
> - bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1), &key, &val);
> + bpf_map_lookup_elem(map1_fd, &key, &val);
> CHECK(val != 4, "inner1", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 4);
> - bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2), &key, &val);
> + bpf_map_lookup_elem(map2_fd, &key, &val);
> CHECK(val != 3, "inner2", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 3);
>
> + for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> + val = i % 2 ? map1_fd : map2_fd;
> + err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &val, 0);
> + if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) {
> + printf("failed to update hash_of_maps on iter #%d\n", i);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> + err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &val, 0);
> + if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) {
> + printf("failed to update hash_of_maps on iter #%d\n", i);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + map1_id = bpf_map_id(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> + map2_id = bpf_map_id(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> + CHECK(map1_id == 0, "map1_id", "failed to get ID 1\n");
> + CHECK(map2_id == 0, "map2_id", "failed to get ID 2\n");
> +
> + test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
> + skel = NULL;
> +
> + CHECK(kern_sync_rcu(), "sync_rcu", "failed\n");
> +
> + fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map1_id);
> + if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map1_leak", "inner_map1 leaked!\n")) {
> + close(fd);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> + fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map2_id);
> + if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map2_leak", "inner_map2 leaked!\n")) {
> + close(fd);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> cleanup:
> test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
> }
> --
> 2.24.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: fix map leak in HASH_OF_MAPS map
2020-07-24 1:16 [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: fix map leak in HASH_OF_MAPS map Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-24 1:17 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: extend map-in-map selftest to detect memory leaks Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2020-07-27 21:02 ` Song Liu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Song Liu @ 2020-07-27 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko
Cc: bpf, Networking, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Andrii Nakryiko, Kernel Team
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 6:17 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> wrote:
>
> Fix HASH_OF_MAPS bug of not putting inner map pointer on bpf_map_elem_update()
> operation. This is due to per-cpu extra_elems optimization, which bypassed
> free_htab_elem() logic doing proper clean ups. Make sure that inner map is put
> properly in optimized case as well.
>
> Fixes: 8c290e60fa2a ("bpf: fix hashmap extra_elems logic")
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.14+
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: extend map-in-map selftest to detect memory leaks
2020-07-27 20:53 ` Song Liu
@ 2020-07-27 22:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2020-07-27 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Song Liu
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko, bpf, Networking, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Kernel Team
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 1:53 PM Song Liu <song@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 6:17 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add test validating that all inner maps are released properly after skeleton
> > is destroyed. To ensure determinism, trigger kernel-size synchronize_rcu()
> > before checking map existence by their IDs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c | 104 +++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> > index f7ee8fa377ad..043e8ffe03d1 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> > @@ -5,10 +5,50 @@
> >
> > #include "test_btf_map_in_map.skel.h"
> >
> > +static int duration;
> > +
> > +int bpf_map_id(struct bpf_map *map)
> Should this return __u32?
yeah, probably, will change
>
> > +{
> > + struct bpf_map_info info;
> > + __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + memset(&info, 0, info_len);
> > + err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(bpf_map__fd(map), &info, &info_len);
> > + if (err)
> > + return 0;
> > + return info.id;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int kern_sync_rcu() {
>
> int kern_sync_rcu(void)
> {
> ...
>
> A comment for this function would be nice too.
Sure.
>
> > + int inner_map_fd, outer_map_fd, err, zero = 0;
> > +
> > + inner_map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, 4, 4, 1, 0);
> > + if (CHECK(inner_map_fd < 0, "inner_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno))
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + outer_map_fd = bpf_create_map_in_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, NULL,
> > + sizeof(int), inner_map_fd, 1, 0);
> > + if (CHECK(outer_map_fd < 0, "outer_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno)) {
> > + close(inner_map_fd);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_map_fd, &zero, &inner_map_fd, 0);
> > + if (err)
> > + err = -errno;
> > + CHECK(err, "outer_map_update", "failed %d\n", err);
> > + close(inner_map_fd);
> > + close(outer_map_fd);
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > void test_btf_map_in_map(void)
> > {
> > - int duration = 0, err, key = 0, val;
> > + int err, key = 0, val, i;
> > struct test_btf_map_in_map* skel;
> > + int outer_arr_fd, outer_hash_fd;
> > + int fd, map1_fd, map2_fd, map1_id, map2_id;
> nit: reverse Christmas tree.
We don't enforce that and it hasn't been a requirement for a long
time. It's better to minimize a code churn rather than preserving
pretty line ordering.
>
> >
> > skel = test_btf_map_in_map__open_and_load();
> > if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed to open&load skeleton\n"))
> > @@ -18,32 +58,70 @@ void test_btf_map_in_map(void)
> > if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed: %d\n", err))
> > goto cleanup;
> >
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-27 22:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-24 1:16 [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: fix map leak in HASH_OF_MAPS map Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-24 1:17 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: extend map-in-map selftest to detect memory leaks Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-27 20:53 ` Song Liu
2020-07-27 22:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-27 21:02 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: fix map leak in HASH_OF_MAPS map Song Liu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).