From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 21/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:15:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201112221543.3621014-22-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112221543.3621014-1-guro@fb.com>
Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
---
kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 21 +--------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
index 212d6dbbc39a..c28a47d5177a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
@@ -288,8 +288,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *cgroup_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
{
int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map;
- struct bpf_map_memory mem;
- int ret;
if (attr->key_size != sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_key) &&
attr->key_size != sizeof(__u64))
@@ -309,18 +307,10 @@ static struct bpf_map *cgroup_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
/* max_entries is not used and enforced to be 0 */
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- ret = bpf_map_charge_init(&mem, sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map));
- if (ret < 0)
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
-
map = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map),
__GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT, numa_node);
- if (!map) {
- bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+ if (!map)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- }
-
- bpf_map_charge_move(&map->map.memory, &mem);
/* copy mandatory map attributes */
bpf_map_init_from_attr(&map->map, attr);
@@ -509,9 +499,6 @@ struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(struct bpf_prog *prog,
size = bpf_cgroup_storage_calculate_size(map, &pages);
- if (bpf_map_charge_memlock(map, pages))
- return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
-
storage = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage), gfp,
map->numa_node);
if (!storage)
@@ -533,7 +520,6 @@ struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(struct bpf_prog *prog,
return storage;
enomem:
- bpf_map_uncharge_memlock(map, pages);
kfree(storage);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
@@ -560,16 +546,11 @@ void bpf_cgroup_storage_free(struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage)
{
enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype;
struct bpf_map *map;
- u32 pages;
if (!storage)
return;
map = &storage->map->map;
-
- bpf_cgroup_storage_calculate_size(map, &pages);
- bpf_map_uncharge_memlock(map, pages);
-
stype = cgroup_storage_type(map);
if (stype == BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_SHARED)
call_rcu(&storage->rcu, free_shared_cgroup_storage_rcu);
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-12 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 22:15 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 17:31 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/34] bpf: prepare for memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 17:46 ` Song Liu
2020-11-13 19:40 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 20:48 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/34] bpf: " Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:04 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 13/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 14/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:07 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 16/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 17/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 18/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 19/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 20/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 22/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 23/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 24/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 25/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 26/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 27/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 28/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 29/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 30/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 31/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:14 ` Song Liu
2020-11-13 19:33 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 20:53 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 32/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:17 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 33/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 34/34] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
[not found] ` <20201112221543.3621014-2-guro@fb.com>
2020-11-12 22:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-13 0:26 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 3:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13 3:18 ` Andrew Morton
2020-11-13 3:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13 3:40 ` Andrew Morton
2020-11-13 4:08 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13 4:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 14:25 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-11-13 17:18 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201112221543.3621014-22-guro@fb.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).