From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 33/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:15:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201112221543.3621014-34-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112221543.3621014-1-guro@fb.com>
Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs. It has been
replaced with memcg-based memory accounting.
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 11 ------
kernel/bpf/core.c | 12 ++-----
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 86 ++++++--------------------------------------
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 6f1ef8a1e25f..73f6503d9170 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1200,8 +1200,6 @@ void bpf_prog_sub(struct bpf_prog *prog, int i);
void bpf_prog_inc(struct bpf_prog *prog);
struct bpf_prog * __must_check bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_prog *prog);
void bpf_prog_put(struct bpf_prog *prog);
-int __bpf_prog_charge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages);
-void __bpf_prog_uncharge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages);
void __bpf_free_used_maps(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux,
struct bpf_map **used_maps, u32 len);
@@ -1482,15 +1480,6 @@ bpf_prog_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_prog *prog)
return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
}
-static inline int __bpf_prog_charge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline void __bpf_prog_uncharge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
-{
-}
-
static inline void bpf_link_init(struct bpf_link *link, enum bpf_link_type type,
const struct bpf_link_ops *ops,
struct bpf_prog *prog)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 8346ebcbde99..2f38ef3e7d24 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -221,23 +221,15 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_realloc(struct bpf_prog *fp_old, unsigned int size,
{
gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO | gfp_extra_flags;
struct bpf_prog *fp;
- u32 pages, delta;
- int ret;
+ u32 pages;
size = round_up(size, PAGE_SIZE);
pages = size / PAGE_SIZE;
if (pages <= fp_old->pages)
return fp_old;
- delta = pages - fp_old->pages;
- ret = __bpf_prog_charge(fp_old->aux->user, delta);
- if (ret)
- return NULL;
-
fp = __vmalloc(size, gfp_flags);
- if (fp == NULL) {
- __bpf_prog_uncharge(fp_old->aux->user, delta);
- } else {
+ if (fp) {
memcpy(fp, fp_old, fp_old->pages * PAGE_SIZE);
fp->pages = pages;
fp->aux->prog = fp;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 9f41edbae3f8..2ab14fe1af14 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -342,23 +342,6 @@ void bpf_map_init_from_attr(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr)
map->numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
}
-static int bpf_charge_memlock(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
-{
- unsigned long memlock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-
- if (atomic_long_add_return(pages, &user->locked_vm) > memlock_limit) {
- atomic_long_sub(pages, &user->locked_vm);
- return -EPERM;
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void bpf_uncharge_memlock(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
-{
- if (user)
- atomic_long_sub(pages, &user->locked_vm);
-}
-
static int bpf_map_alloc_id(struct bpf_map *map)
{
int id;
@@ -1594,51 +1577,6 @@ static void bpf_audit_prog(const struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned int op)
audit_log_end(ab);
}
-int __bpf_prog_charge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
-{
- unsigned long memlock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- unsigned long user_bufs;
-
- if (user) {
- user_bufs = atomic_long_add_return(pages, &user->locked_vm);
- if (user_bufs > memlock_limit) {
- atomic_long_sub(pages, &user->locked_vm);
- return -EPERM;
- }
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-void __bpf_prog_uncharge(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
-{
- if (user)
- atomic_long_sub(pages, &user->locked_vm);
-}
-
-static int bpf_prog_charge_memlock(struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
- struct user_struct *user = get_current_user();
- int ret;
-
- ret = __bpf_prog_charge(user, prog->pages);
- if (ret) {
- free_uid(user);
- return ret;
- }
-
- prog->aux->user = user;
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void bpf_prog_uncharge_memlock(struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
- struct user_struct *user = prog->aux->user;
-
- __bpf_prog_uncharge(user, prog->pages);
- free_uid(user);
-}
-
static int bpf_prog_alloc_id(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
int id;
@@ -1688,7 +1626,7 @@ static void __bpf_prog_put_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
kvfree(aux->func_info);
kfree(aux->func_info_aux);
- bpf_prog_uncharge_memlock(aux->prog);
+ free_uid(aux->user);
security_bpf_prog_free(aux);
bpf_prog_free(aux->prog);
}
@@ -2126,7 +2064,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
dst_prog = bpf_prog_get(attr->attach_prog_fd);
if (IS_ERR(dst_prog)) {
err = PTR_ERR(dst_prog);
- goto free_prog_nouncharge;
+ goto free_prog;
}
prog->aux->dst_prog = dst_prog;
}
@@ -2136,18 +2074,15 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
err = security_bpf_prog_alloc(prog->aux);
if (err)
- goto free_prog_nouncharge;
-
- err = bpf_prog_charge_memlock(prog);
- if (err)
- goto free_prog_sec;
+ goto free_prog;
+ prog->aux->user = get_current_user();
prog->len = attr->insn_cnt;
err = -EFAULT;
if (copy_from_user(prog->insns, u64_to_user_ptr(attr->insns),
bpf_prog_insn_size(prog)) != 0)
- goto free_prog;
+ goto free_prog_sec;
prog->orig_prog = NULL;
prog->jited = 0;
@@ -2158,19 +2093,19 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
if (bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(prog->aux)) {
err = bpf_prog_offload_init(prog, attr);
if (err)
- goto free_prog;
+ goto free_prog_sec;
}
/* find program type: socket_filter vs tracing_filter */
err = find_prog_type(type, prog);
if (err < 0)
- goto free_prog;
+ goto free_prog_sec;
prog->aux->load_time = ktime_get_boottime_ns();
err = bpf_obj_name_cpy(prog->aux->name, attr->prog_name,
sizeof(attr->prog_name));
if (err < 0)
- goto free_prog;
+ goto free_prog_sec;
/* run eBPF verifier */
err = bpf_check(&prog, attr, uattr);
@@ -2215,11 +2150,10 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
*/
__bpf_prog_put_noref(prog, prog->aux->func_cnt);
return err;
-free_prog:
- bpf_prog_uncharge_memlock(prog);
free_prog_sec:
+ free_uid(prog->aux->user);
security_bpf_prog_free(prog->aux);
-free_prog_nouncharge:
+free_prog:
bpf_prog_free(prog);
return err;
}
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-12 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 22:15 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 17:31 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/34] bpf: prepare for memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 17:46 ` Song Liu
2020-11-13 19:40 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 20:48 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/34] bpf: " Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:04 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 13/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 14/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:07 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 16/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 17/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 18/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 19/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 20/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 21/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 22/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 23/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 24/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 25/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 26/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 27/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 28/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 29/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 30/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 31/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:14 ` Song Liu
2020-11-13 19:33 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 20:53 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 32/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:17 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 34/34] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
[not found] ` <20201112221543.3621014-2-guro@fb.com>
2020-11-12 22:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-13 0:26 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 3:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13 3:18 ` Andrew Morton
2020-11-13 3:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13 3:40 ` Andrew Morton
2020-11-13 4:08 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13 4:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 14:25 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-11-13 17:18 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201112221543.3621014-34-guro@fb.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).