bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	"bjorn@kernel.org" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
	"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH intel-next 2/2] ice: introduce XDP Tx fallback path
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:13:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210608121340.GB1971@ranger.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39b84a66bae09568cd1f95802395af3e2df8fdb1.camel@intel.com>

On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:52:38AM +0100, Nguyen, Anthony L wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 13:32 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > Under rare circumstances there might be a situation where a
> > requirement
> > of having a XDP Tx queue per core could not be fulfilled and some of
> > the
> > Tx resources would have to be shared between cores. This yields a
> > need
> > for placing accesses to xdp_rings array onto critical section
> > protected
> > by spinlock.
> >
> > Design of handling such scenario is to at first find out how many
> > queues
> > are there that XDP could use. Any number that is not less than the
> > half
> > of a count of cores of platform is allowed. XDP queue count < cpu
> > count
> > is signalled via new VSI state ICE_VSI_XDP_FALLBACK which carries the
> > information further down to Rx rings where new ICE_TX_XDP_LOCKED is
> > set
> > based on the mentioned VSI state. This ring flag indicates that
> > locking
> > variants for getting/putting xdp_ring need to be used in fast path.
> >
> > For XDP_REDIRECT the impact on standard case (one XDP ring per CPU)
> > can
> > be reduced a bit by providing a separate ndo_xdp_xmit and swap it at
> > configuration time. However, due to the fact that net_device_ops
> > struct
> > is a const, it is not possible to replace a single ndo, so for the
> > locking variant of ndo_xdp_xmit, whole net_device_ops needs to be
> > replayed.
> >
> > It has an impact on performance (1-2 %) of a non-fallback path as
> > branches are introduced.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice.h          | 37 +++++++++
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c     |  5 ++
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c      |  4 +-
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c     | 76
> > ++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c     | 62 ++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.h     |  2 +
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c | 13 +++-
> >  7 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> This isn't applying to next-queue/dev-queue. I believe it's becuase the
> branch has the soon to be sent tracing patch from Magnus [1].

Thanks for a heads up Tony, I'll send rebased revision.

> 
> Thanks,
> Tony
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-
> lan/patch/20210510093854.31652-3-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-08 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-01 11:32 [PATCH intel-next 0/2] ice: bring up XDP_TX back to life Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-01 11:32 ` [PATCH intel-next 1/2] ice: unify xdp_rings accesses Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-01 11:32 ` [PATCH intel-next 2/2] ice: introduce XDP Tx fallback path Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-01 12:38   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-08 12:12     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-06-08 21:43       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-03  0:52   ` Nguyen, Anthony L
2021-06-08 12:13     ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2021-06-03  8:42   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210608121340.GB1971@ranger.igk.intel.com \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).