From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
To: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/27] bpf: selftests: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in test_lpm_map
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 13:08:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220405130858.12165-9-laoar.shao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220405130858.12165-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Let's set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly, then we can get rid of the
included bpf_rlimit.h.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
index aa294612e0a7..789c9748d241 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
#include "bpf_util.h"
-#include "bpf_rlimit.h"
struct tlpm_node {
struct tlpm_node *next;
@@ -791,6 +790,9 @@ int main(void)
/* we want predictable, pseudo random tests */
srand(0xf00ba1);
+ /* Use libbpf 1.0 API mode */
+ libbpf_set_strict_mode(LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL);
+
test_lpm_basic();
test_lpm_order();
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-05 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 13:08 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/27] bpf: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK cleanups Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/27] bpf: selftests: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in xdping Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/27] bpf: selftests: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in xdpxceiver Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/27] bpf: selftests: No need to include bpf_rlimit.h in test_tcpnotify_user Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/27] bpf: selftests: No need to include bpf_rlimit.h in flow_dissector_load Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/27] bpf: selftests: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in get_cgroup_id_user Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/27] bpf: selftests: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in test_cgroup_storage Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/27] bpf: selftests: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in get_cgroup_id_user Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 20:46 ` Jeff Johnson
2022-04-06 14:33 ` Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` Yafang Shao [this message]
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/27] bpf: selftests: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in test_lru_map Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/27] bpf: selftests: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in test_skb_cgroup_id_user Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/27] bpf: selftests: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in test_sock_addr Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/27] bpf: selftests: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in test_sock Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/27] bpf: selftests: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in test_sockmap Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/27] bpf: selftests: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in test_sysctl Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/27] bpf: selftests: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in test_tag Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/27] bpf: selftests: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in test_tcp_check_syncookie_user Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/27] bpf: selftests: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in test_verifier_log Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 18/27] bpf: samples: Set libbpf 1.0 API mode explicitly in hbm Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 19/27] bpf: selftests: Get rid of bpf_rlimit.h Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 20/27] bpf: selftests: No need to include sys/resource.h in some files Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 21/27] bpf: samples: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in xdpsock_user Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 22/27] bpf: samples: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in xsk_fwd Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 23/27] bpf: samples: No need to include sys/resource.h in many files Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 24/27] bpf: bpftool: Remove useless return value of libbpf_set_strict_mode Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 25/27] bpf: bpftool: Set LIBBPF_STRICT_AUTO_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK for legacy libbpf Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 26/27] bpf: bpftool: remove RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 13:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 27/27] bpf: runqslower: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Yafang Shao
2022-04-05 20:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/27] bpf: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK cleanups Andrii Nakryiko
2022-04-06 14:32 ` Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220405130858.12165-9-laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--to=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).