From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 16/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c converted to inline assembly
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 04:54:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230325025524.144043-17-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230325025524.144043-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Test verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c automatically converted to use inline assembly.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c | 228 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c | 181 --------------
3 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 181 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 36fdede7dcab..29351c774ee2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include "verifier_cgroup_skb.skel.h"
#include "verifier_cgroup_storage.skel.h"
#include "verifier_const_or.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_ctx_sk_msg.skel.h"
__maybe_unused
static void run_tests_aux(const char *skel_name, skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_factory)
@@ -48,3 +49,4 @@ void test_verifier_cgroup_inv_retcode(void) { RUN(verifier_cgroup_inv_retcode)
void test_verifier_cgroup_skb(void) { RUN(verifier_cgroup_skb); }
void test_verifier_cgroup_storage(void) { RUN(verifier_cgroup_storage); }
void test_verifier_const_or(void) { RUN(verifier_const_or); }
+void test_verifier_ctx_sk_msg(void) { RUN(verifier_ctx_sk_msg); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..65edc89799f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_ctx_sk_msg.c
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Converted from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access family in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void access_family_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_family]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_family, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access remote_ip4 in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void remote_ip4_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip4]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip4, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip4))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access local_ip4 in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void local_ip4_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip4]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip4, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip4))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access remote_port in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void remote_port_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_port]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_port, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_port))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access local_port in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void local_port_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_port]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_port, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_port))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_skb")
+__description("valid access remote_ip6 in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void remote_ip6_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_0]); \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_1]); \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_2]); \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_3]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_0, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[0])),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_1, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[1])),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_2, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[2])),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_remote_ip6_3, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[3]))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_skb")
+__description("valid access local_ip6 in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void local_ip6_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip6_0]); \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip6_1]); \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip6_2]); \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_local_ip6_3]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip6_0, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[0])),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip6_1, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[1])),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip6_2, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[2])),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_local_ip6_3, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[3]))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("valid access size in SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void access_size_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_size]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_size, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("invalid 64B read of size in SK_MSG")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void of_size_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_size]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_size, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("invalid read past end of SK_MSG")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__naked void past_end_of_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__imm_0]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__imm_0, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size) + 4)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("invalid read offset in SK_MSG")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void read_offset_in_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__imm_0]); \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(__imm_0, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family) + 1)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("direct packet read for SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void packet_read_for_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data]); \
+ r3 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data_end]); \
+ r0 = r2; \
+ r0 += 8; \
+ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 = *(u8*)(r2 + 0); \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data_end, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("direct packet write for SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void packet_write_for_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data]); \
+ r3 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data_end]); \
+ r0 = r2; \
+ r0 += 8; \
+ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ *(u8*)(r2 + 0) = r2; \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data_end, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("sk_msg")
+__description("overlapping checks for direct packet access SK_MSG")
+__success
+__naked void direct_packet_access_sk_msg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r2 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data]); \
+ r3 = *(u64*)(r1 + %[sk_msg_md_data_end]); \
+ r0 = r2; \
+ r0 += 8; \
+ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ r1 = r2; \
+ r1 += 6; \
+ if r1 > r3 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 = *(u16*)(r2 + 6); \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
+ __imm_const(sk_msg_md_data_end, offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c
deleted file mode 100644
index c6c69220a569..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,181 +0,0 @@
-{
- "valid access family in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "valid access remote_ip4 in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip4)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "valid access local_ip4 in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip4)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "valid access remote_port in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_port)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "valid access local_port in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_port)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "valid access remote_ip6 in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[0])),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[1])),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[2])),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[3])),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
-},
-{
- "valid access local_ip6 in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[0])),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[1])),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[2])),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[3])),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
-},
-{
- "valid access size in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "invalid 64B read of size in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size)),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
- "invalid read past end of SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, size) + 4),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "invalid read offset in SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family) + 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
- "direct packet read for SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "direct packet write for SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
-{
- "overlapping checks for direct packet access SK_MSG",
- .insns = {
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data)),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data_end)),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 4),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 6),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 6),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
-},
--
2.40.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-25 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-25 2:54 [PATCH bpf-next 00/43] First set of verifier/*.c migrated to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/43] selftests/bpf: Report program name on parse_test_spec error Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/43] selftests/bpf: __imm_insn & __imm_const macro for bpf_misc.h Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/43] selftests/bpf: Unprivileged tests for test_loader.c Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/43] selftests/bpf: Tests execution support " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/43] selftests/bpf: prog_tests entry point for migrated test_verifier tests Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/and.c converted to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/array_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/basic_stack.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds_deduction.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cfg.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_inv_retcode.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_skb.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_storage.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/const_or.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/direct_stack_access_wraparound.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/div0.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 19/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/div_overflow.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 20/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_access_var_len.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 21/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_packet_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 22/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_restricted.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 23/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_value_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 24/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/int_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 25/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ld_ind.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 26/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/leak_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 27/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 28/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ret_val.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 29/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/masking.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 30/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/meta_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 31/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/raw_stack.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 32/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/raw_tp_writable.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 33/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ringbuf.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 34/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/spill_fill.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 35/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/stack_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 36/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/uninit.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 37/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_adj_spill.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 38/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 39/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_or_null.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 40/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/var_off.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 41/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/xadd.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 42/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/xdp.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 3:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/43] First set of verifier/*.c migrated " Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-25 12:20 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 16:16 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-26 1:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-27 3:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-27 3:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-27 11:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-27 16:35 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-27 16:37 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-26 1:32 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-03-28 3:48 ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-03-28 21:52 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-28 22:24 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-28 22:38 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-28 23:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-29 0:11 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-29 0:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230325025524.144043-17-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).