From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 27/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ptr.c converted to inline assembly
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 04:55:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230325025524.144043-28-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230325025524.144043-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Test verifier/map_ptr.c automatically converted to use inline assembly.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_ptr.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++++
.../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c | 99 -----------
3 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_ptr.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index f8b3b6beba3f..d2f3bff0e942 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include "verifier_int_ptr.skel.h"
#include "verifier_ld_ind.skel.h"
#include "verifier_leak_ptr.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_map_ptr.skel.h"
__maybe_unused
static void run_tests_aux(const char *skel_name, skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_factory)
@@ -70,3 +71,4 @@ void test_verifier_helper_value_access(void) { RUN(verifier_helper_value_access
void test_verifier_int_ptr(void) { RUN(verifier_int_ptr); }
void test_verifier_ld_ind(void) { RUN(verifier_ld_ind); }
void test_verifier_leak_ptr(void) { RUN(verifier_leak_ptr); }
+void test_verifier_map_ptr(void) { RUN(verifier_map_ptr); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_ptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_ptr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..11a079145966
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_map_ptr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Converted from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+#define MAX_ENTRIES 11
+
+struct test_val {
+ unsigned int index;
+ int foo[MAX_ENTRIES];
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, struct test_val);
+} map_array_48b SEC(".maps");
+
+struct other_val {
+ long long foo;
+ long long bar;
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, long long);
+ __type(value, struct other_val);
+} map_hash_16b SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("bpf_map_ptr: read with negative offset rejected")
+__failure __msg("R1 is bpf_array invalid negative access: off=-8")
+__failure_unpriv
+__msg_unpriv("access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN")
+__naked void read_with_negative_offset_rejected(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = r10; \
+ r1 = %[map_array_48b] ll; \
+ r6 = *(u64*)(r1 - 8); \
+ r0 = 1; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_addr(map_array_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("bpf_map_ptr: write rejected")
+__failure __msg("only read from bpf_array is supported")
+__failure_unpriv
+__msg_unpriv("access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN")
+__naked void bpf_map_ptr_write_rejected(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r1 = %[map_array_48b] ll; \
+ *(u64*)(r1 + 0) = r2; \
+ r0 = 1; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_addr(map_array_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("bpf_map_ptr: read non-existent field rejected")
+__failure
+__msg("cannot access ptr member ops with moff 0 in struct bpf_map with off 1 size 4")
+__failure_unpriv
+__msg_unpriv("access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void read_non_existent_field_rejected(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r6 = 0; \
+ r1 = %[map_array_48b] ll; \
+ r6 = *(u32*)(r1 + 1); \
+ r0 = 1; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_addr(map_array_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("bpf_map_ptr: read ops field accepted")
+__success __failure_unpriv
+__msg_unpriv("access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN")
+__retval(1)
+__naked void ptr_read_ops_field_accepted(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r6 = 0; \
+ r1 = %[map_array_48b] ll; \
+ r6 = *(u64*)(r1 + 0); \
+ r0 = 1; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm_addr(map_array_48b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, map_ptr = map_ptr + r")
+__success __failure_unpriv
+__msg_unpriv("R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation")
+__retval(0)
+__naked void map_ptr_map_ptr_r(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ r1 = %[map_hash_16b] ll; \
+ r1 += r0; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm_addr(map_hash_16b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, r = r + map_ptr")
+__success __failure_unpriv
+__msg_unpriv("R0 has pointer with unsupported alu operation")
+__retval(0)
+__naked void _0_r_r_map_ptr(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -8; \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ r0 = %[map_hash_16b] ll; \
+ r1 += r0; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm_addr(map_hash_16b)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 17ee84dc7766..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,99 +0,0 @@
-{
- "bpf_map_ptr: read with negative offset rejected",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, -8),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "R1 is bpf_array invalid negative access: off=-8",
-},
-{
- "bpf_map_ptr: write rejected",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "only read from bpf_array is supported",
-},
-{
- "bpf_map_ptr: read non-existent field rejected",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_6, 0),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 1),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "cannot access ptr member ops with moff 0 in struct bpf_map with off 1 size 4",
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
- "bpf_map_ptr: read ops field accepted",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_6, 0),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .retval = 1,
-},
-{
- "bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, map_ptr = map_ptr + r",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_hash_16b = { 4 },
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
- .result = ACCEPT,
-},
-{
- "bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, r = r + map_ptr",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_hash_16b = { 4 },
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "R0 has pointer with unsupported alu operation",
- .result = ACCEPT,
-},
--
2.40.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-25 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-25 2:54 [PATCH bpf-next 00/43] First set of verifier/*.c migrated to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/43] selftests/bpf: Report program name on parse_test_spec error Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/43] selftests/bpf: __imm_insn & __imm_const macro for bpf_misc.h Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/43] selftests/bpf: Unprivileged tests for test_loader.c Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/43] selftests/bpf: Tests execution support " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/43] selftests/bpf: prog_tests entry point for migrated test_verifier tests Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/and.c converted to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/array_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/basic_stack.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds_deduction.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cfg.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_inv_retcode.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_skb.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/cgroup_storage.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/const_or.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ctx_sk_msg.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/direct_stack_access_wraparound.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/div0.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 19/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/div_overflow.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 20/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_access_var_len.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 21/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_packet_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 22/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_restricted.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 23/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/helper_value_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 24/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/int_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 25/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ld_ind.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 26/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/leak_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 28/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ret_val.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 29/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/masking.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 30/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/meta_access.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 31/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/raw_stack.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 32/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/raw_tp_writable.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 33/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/ringbuf.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 34/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/spill_fill.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 35/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/stack_ptr.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 36/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/uninit.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 37/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_adj_spill.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 38/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 39/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_or_null.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 40/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/var_off.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 41/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/xadd.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 2:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 42/43] selftests/bpf: verifier/xdp.c " Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 3:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/43] First set of verifier/*.c migrated " Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-25 12:20 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-25 16:16 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-26 1:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-27 3:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-27 3:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-27 11:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-27 16:35 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-27 16:37 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-26 1:32 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-03-28 3:48 ` Daniel Borkmann
2023-03-28 21:52 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-28 22:24 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-28 22:38 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-28 23:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-29 0:11 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-29 0:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230325025524.144043-28-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).