From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
To: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
"ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
"daniel@iogearbox.net" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"arnaldo.melo@gmail.com" <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>,
"jolsa@kernel.org" <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/4] bpftool: introduce prog profile
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 18:24:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37D64185-5E90-49B4-A6EA-D5E77ACF9D1F@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d3b2e44-48bd-ece2-a1c7-16b7950bc472@isovalent.com>
> On Mar 9, 2020, at 11:04 AM, Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> wrote:
>
> 2020-03-04 21:39 UTC+0000 ~ Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 4, 2020, at 1:29 PM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 09:16:29PM +0000, Song Liu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 4, 2020, at 12:41 PM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 08:08:07PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:07:06AM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
>>>>>>> This set introduces bpftool prog profile command, which uses hardware
>>>>>>> counters to profile BPF programs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This command attaches fentry/fexit programs to a target program. These two
>>>>>>> programs read hardware counters before and after the target program and
>>>>>>> calculate the difference.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Changes v3 => v4:
>>>>>>> 1. Simplify err handling in profile_open_perf_events() (Quentin);
>>>>>>> 2. Remove redundant p_err() (Quentin);
>>>>>>> 3. Replace tab with space in bash-completion; (Quentin);
>>>>>>> 4. Fix typo _bpftool_get_map_names => _bpftool_get_prog_names (Quentin).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hum, I'm getting:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [jolsa@dell-r440-01 bpftool]$ pwd
>>>>>> /home/jolsa/linux-perf/tools/bpf/bpftool
>>>>>> [jolsa@dell-r440-01 bpftool]$ make
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jolsa/linux-perf/tools/lib/bpf'
>>>>>> LINK _bpftool
>>>>>> make: *** No rule to make target 'skeleton/profiler.bpf.c', needed by 'skeleton/profiler.bpf.o'. Stop.
>>>>>
>>>>> ok, I had to apply your patches by hand, because 'git am' refused to
>>>>> due to fuzz.. so some of you new files did not make it to my tree ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> anyway I hit another error now:
>>>>>
>>>>> CC prog.o
>>>>> In file included from prog.c:1553:
>>>>> profiler.skel.h: In function ‘profiler_bpf__create_skeleton’:
>>>>> profiler.skel.h:136:35: error: ‘struct profiler_bpf’ has no member named ‘rodata’
>>>>> 136 | s->maps[4].mmaped = (void **)&obj->rodata;
>>>>> | ^~
>>>>> prog.c: In function ‘profile_read_values’:
>>>>> prog.c:1650:29: error: ‘struct profiler_bpf’ has no member named ‘rodata’
>>>>> 1650 | __u32 m, cpu, num_cpu = obj->rodata->num_cpu;
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll try to figure it out.. might be error on my end
>>>>>
>>>>> do you have git repo with these changes?
>>>>
>>>> I pushed it to
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/song/linux.git/tree/?h=bpf-per-prog-stats
>>>
>>> still the same:
>>>
>>> [jolsa@dell-r440-01 bpftool]$ git show --oneline HEAD | head -1
>>> 7bbda5cca00a bpftool: fix typo in bash-completion
>>> [jolsa@dell-r440-01 bpftool]$ make
>>> make[1]: Entering directory '/home/jolsa/linux-perf/tools/lib/bpf'
>>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jolsa/linux-perf/tools/lib/bpf'
>>> CC prog.o
>>> In file included from prog.c:1553:
>>> profiler.skel.h: In function ‘profiler_bpf__create_skeleton’:
>>> profiler.skel.h:136:35: error: ‘struct profiler_bpf’ has no member named ‘rodata’
>>> 136 | s->maps[4].mmaped = (void **)&obj->rodata;
>>> | ^~
>>> prog.c: In function ‘profile_read_values’:
>>> prog.c:1650:29: error: ‘struct profiler_bpf’ has no member named ‘rodata’
>>> 1650 | __u32 m, cpu, num_cpu = obj->rodata->num_cpu;
>>> | ^~
>>> prog.c: In function ‘profile_open_perf_events’:
>>> prog.c:1810:19: error: ‘struct profiler_bpf’ has no member named ‘rodata’
>>> 1810 | sizeof(int), obj->rodata->num_cpu * obj->rodata->num_metric);
>>> | ^~
>>> prog.c:1810:42: error: ‘struct profiler_bpf’ has no member named ‘rodata’
>>> 1810 | sizeof(int), obj->rodata->num_cpu * obj->rodata->num_metric);
>>> | ^~
>>> prog.c:1825:26: error: ‘struct profiler_bpf’ has no member named ‘rodata’
>>> 1825 | for (cpu = 0; cpu < obj->rodata->num_cpu; cpu++) {
>>> | ^~
>>> prog.c: In function ‘do_profile’:
>>> prog.c:1904:13: error: ‘struct profiler_bpf’ has no member named ‘rodata’
>>> 1904 | profile_obj->rodata->num_cpu = num_cpu;
>>> | ^~
>>> prog.c:1905:13: error: ‘struct profiler_bpf’ has no member named ‘rodata’
>>> 1905 | profile_obj->rodata->num_metric = num_metric;
>>> | ^~
>>> make: *** [Makefile:129: prog.o] Error 1
>>
>> I guess you need a newer version of clang that supports global data in BPF programs.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Song
>>
>
> Thinking about this requirement again... Do you think it would be worth
> adding (as a follow-up) a feature check on the availability of clang
> with global data support to bpftool's Makefile? So that we could compile
> out program profiling if clang is not present or does not support it.
> Just like libbfd support is optional already.
>
> I'm asking mostly because a number of distributions now package bpftool,
> and e.g. Ubuntu builds it from kernel source when creating its
> linux-images and linux-tools-* packages. And I am pretty sure the build
> environment does not have latest clang/LLVM, but it would be great to
> remain able to build bpftool.
Yeah, I think it is a good idea. Some more Makefile fun. ;)
Thanks,
Song
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-09 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-04 18:07 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/4] bpftool: introduce prog profile Song Liu
2020-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/4] bpftool: introduce "prog profile" command Song Liu
2020-03-04 19:21 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-04 21:17 ` Song Liu
2020-03-04 20:38 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-05 20:03 ` Song Liu
2020-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/4] bpftool: Documentation for bpftool prog profile Song Liu
2020-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/4] bpftool: bash completion for "bpftool prog profile" Song Liu
2020-03-04 18:07 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 4/4] bpftool: fix typo in bash-completion Song Liu
2020-03-04 19:08 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/4] bpftool: introduce prog profile Jiri Olsa
2020-03-04 20:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-04 21:16 ` Song Liu
2020-03-04 21:29 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-04 21:39 ` Song Liu
2020-03-05 20:03 ` Song Liu
2020-03-06 8:51 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-09 18:04 ` Quentin Monnet
2020-03-09 18:24 ` Song Liu [this message]
2020-03-09 19:30 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-04 19:13 ` Quentin Monnet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37D64185-5E90-49B4-A6EA-D5E77ACF9D1F@fb.com \
--to=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).