From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf, netns: Keep attached programs in bpf_prog_array
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 22:59:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgelmrba.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200623193352.4mdmfg4mfmgfeku4@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 09:33 PM CEST, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> @@ -93,8 +108,16 @@ static int bpf_netns_link_update_prog(struct bpf_link *link,
>> goto out_unlock;
>> }
>>
>> + run_array = rcu_dereference_protected(net->bpf.run_array[type],
>> + lockdep_is_held(&netns_bpf_mutex));
>> + if (run_array)
>> + ret = bpf_prog_array_replace_item(run_array, link->prog, new_prog);
>> + else
> When will this happen?
This will never happen, unless there is a bug. As long as there is a
link attached, run_array should never be detached (null). Because it can
be handled gracefully, we fail the bpf(LINK_UPDATE) syscall.
Your question makes me think that perhaps it should trigger a warning,
with WARN_ON_ONCE, to signal clearly to the reader that this is an
unexpected state.
WDYT?
>
>> + ret = -ENOENT;
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> +
>> old_prog = xchg(&link->prog, new_prog);
>> - rcu_assign_pointer(net->bpf.progs[type], new_prog);
>> bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
>>
>> out_unlock:
>> @@ -142,14 +165,38 @@ static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_netns_link_ops = {
>> .show_fdinfo = bpf_netns_link_show_fdinfo,
>> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-23 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-23 10:34 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf, netns: Prepare for multi-prog attachment Jakub Sitnicki
2020-06-23 10:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] flow_dissector: Pull BPF program assignment up to bpf-netns Jakub Sitnicki
2020-06-23 10:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf, netns: Keep attached programs in bpf_prog_array Jakub Sitnicki
2020-06-23 19:33 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-06-23 20:59 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2020-06-23 21:24 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-06-24 17:33 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-06-24 17:18 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-06-24 17:47 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-06-24 18:13 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-06-24 18:24 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-06-24 18:37 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-06-23 10:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] bpf, netns: Keep a list of attached bpf_link's Jakub Sitnicki
2020-06-29 14:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf, netns: Prepare for multi-prog attachment Daniel Borkmann
2020-06-29 14:57 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sgelmrba.fsf@cloudflare.com \
--to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).