bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: init_disassemble_info() signature changes causes compile failures
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 23:53:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACdoK4LeRPkACejq87VLFgP-b=y1ZoRX3196f7xEVo-UWm8jWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220622181918.ykrs5rsnmx3og4sv@alap3.anarazel.de>

On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 19:19, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> binutils changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(), which now causes
> perf and bpftool to fail to compile (e.g. on debian unstable).
>
> Relevant binutils commit: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=60a3da00bd5407f07d64dff82a4dae98230dfaac
>
> util/annotate.c: In function ‘symbol__disassemble_bpf’:
> util/annotate.c:1765:9: error: too few arguments to function ‘init_disassemble_info’
>  1765 |         init_disassemble_info(&info, s,
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from util/annotate.c:1718:
> /usr/include/dis-asm.h:472:13: note: declared here
>   472 | extern void init_disassemble_info (struct disassemble_info *dinfo, void *stream,
>       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> with equivalent failures in
>
> tools/bpf/bpf_jit_disasm.c
> tools/bpf/bpftool/jit_disasm.c

Hi Andres,

Too bad the libbfd API is changing again :/ But many thanks for
pinning down the relevant commit, and for the report!

> The fix is easy enough, add a wrapper around fprintf() that conforms to the
> new signature.
>
> However I assume the necessary feature test and wrapper should only be added
> once? I don't know the kernel stuff well enough to choose the right structure
> here.

We can probably find a common header for the wrapper under
tools/include/. One possibility could be a new header under
tools/include/tools/, like for libc_compat.h. Although personally I
don't mind too much about redefining the wrapper several times given
how short it is, and because maybe some tools could redefine it anyway
to use colour output in the future.

The feature test would better be shared, it would probably be similar
to what was done in the following commit to accommodate for a previous
change in libbfd:

    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=fb982666e380c1632a74495b68b3c33a66e76430

> Attached is my local fix for perf. Obviously would need work to be a real
> solution.

Thanks a lot! Would you be willing to submit a patch for the feature
detection and wrapper?

Best regards,
Quentin

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-22 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-22 18:19 init_disassemble_info() signature changes causes compile failures Andres Freund
2022-06-22 22:53 ` Quentin Monnet [this message]
2022-06-22 23:16   ` Andres Freund
2022-06-23  9:49     ` Andrew Burgess
2022-07-03 21:25     ` [PATCH v2 0/5] tools: fix compilation failure caused by init_disassemble_info API changes Andres Freund
2022-07-03 21:25       ` [PATCH v2 1/5] tools build: add feature test for " Andres Freund
2022-07-03 21:25       ` [PATCH v2 2/5] tools include: add dis-asm-compat.h to handle version differences Andres Freund
2022-07-05 13:44         ` Quentin Monnet
2022-07-15 19:39           ` Andres Freund
2022-07-15 19:46             ` Andres Freund
2022-07-18  8:58             ` Quentin Monnet
2022-07-03 21:25       ` [PATCH v2 3/5] tools perf: Fix compilation error with new binutils Andres Freund
2022-07-03 21:25       ` [PATCH v2 4/5] tools bpf_jit_disasm: " Andres Freund
2022-07-03 21:25       ` [PATCH v2 5/5] tools bpftool: " Andres Freund
2022-07-04  9:13       ` [PATCH v2 0/5] tools: fix compilation failure caused by init_disassemble_info API changes Jiri Olsa
2022-07-04 20:19         ` Andres Freund
2022-07-04 22:12           ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-01  1:40             ` Andres Freund
2022-07-10 11:43       ` Sedat Dilek
2022-07-10 17:52         ` Sedat Dilek
2022-07-14  9:16       ` Sedat Dilek
2022-07-14 13:25         ` Ben Hutchings
2022-07-15 19:16           ` Andres Freund
2022-07-15 19:18             ` Ben Hutchings
2022-08-01 18:08               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-07-27 15:47             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-07-30 21:45               ` Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38     ` [PATCH v3 0/8] " Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 1/8] tools build: Add feature test for " Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 2/8] tools build: Don't display disassembler-four-args feature test Andres Freund
2022-08-01 18:10         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 3/8] tools include: add dis-asm-compat.h to handle version differences Andres Freund
2022-08-01 18:05         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-01 18:10           ` Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 4/8] tools perf: Fix compilation error with new binutils Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 5/8] tools bpf_jit_disasm: " Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 6/8] tools bpf_jit_disasm: Don't display disassembler-four-args feature test Andres Freund
2022-08-01 18:27         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-01 18:41           ` Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 7/8] tools bpftool: Fix compilation error with new binutils Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 8/8] tools bpftool: Don't display disassembler-four-args feature test Andres Freund
2022-08-01 18:28         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-01 12:45       ` [PATCH v3 0/8] tools: fix compilation failure caused by init_disassemble_info API changes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-01 15:15         ` Quentin Monnet
2022-08-01 18:02           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-08 13:35             ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-08-01 19:53         ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-01 19:12       ` Sedat Dilek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACdoK4LeRPkACejq87VLFgP-b=y1ZoRX3196f7xEVo-UWm8jWA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=quentin@isovalent.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=andres@anarazel.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).