bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] tools: fix compilation failure caused by init_disassemble_info API changes
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 11:13:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YsKvPW+1RkVvq8aX@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220703212551.1114923-1-andres@anarazel.de>

On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 02:25:46PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> binutils changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(), which now causes
> compilation failures for tools/{perf,bpf} on e.g. debian unstable. Relevant
> binutils commit:
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=60a3da00bd5407f07
> 
> I first fixed this without introducing the compat header, as suggested by
> Quentin, but I thought the amount of repeated boilerplate was a bit too
> much. So instead I introduced a compat header to wrap the API changes. Even
> tools/bpf/bpftool/jit_disasm.c, which needs its own callbacks for json, imo
> looks nicer this way.
> 
> I'm not regular contributor, so it very well might be my procedures are a
> bit off...
> 
> I am not sure I added the right [number of] people to CC?
> 
> WRT the feature test: Not sure what the point of the -DPACKAGE='"perf"' is,
> nor why tools/perf/Makefile.config sets some LDFLAGS/CFLAGS that are also
> in feature/Makefile and why -ldl isn't needed in the other places. But...
> 
> V2:
> - split patches further, so that tools/bpf and tools/perf part are entirely
>   separate
> - included a bit more information about tests I did in commit messages
> - add a maybe_unused to fprintf_json_styled's style argument
> 
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
> Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
> To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220622181918.ykrs5rsnmx3og4sv@alap3.anarazel.de
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+icZUVpr8ZeOKCj4zMMqbFT013KJz2T1csvXg+VSkdvJH1Ubw@mail.gmail.com
> 
> Andres Freund (5):
>   tools build: add feature test for init_disassemble_info API changes
>   tools include: add dis-asm-compat.h to handle version differences
>   tools perf: Fix compilation error with new binutils
>   tools bpf_jit_disasm: Fix compilation error with new binutils
>   tools bpftool: Fix compilation error with new binutils

I think the disassembler checks should not be displayed by default,
with your change I can see all the time:

...        disassembler-four-args: [ on  ]
...      disassembler-init-styled: [ OFF ]


could you please squash something like below in? moving disassembler
checks out of sight and do manual detection

thanks,
jirka


---
diff --git a/tools/build/Makefile.feature b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
index 339686b99a6e..bce9a9b52b2c 100644
--- a/tools/build/Makefile.feature
+++ b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
@@ -69,8 +69,6 @@ FEATURE_TESTS_BASIC :=                  \
         setns				\
         libaio				\
         libzstd				\
-        disassembler-four-args		\
-        disassembler-init-styled	\
         file-handle
 
 # FEATURE_TESTS_BASIC + FEATURE_TESTS_EXTRA is the complete list
@@ -106,7 +104,9 @@ FEATURE_TESTS_EXTRA :=                  \
          libbpf-bpf_create_map		\
          libpfm4                        \
          libdebuginfod			\
-         clang-bpf-co-re
+         clang-bpf-co-re		\
+         disassembler-four-args		\
+         disassembler-init-styled
 
 
 FEATURE_TESTS ?= $(FEATURE_TESTS_BASIC)
@@ -135,9 +135,7 @@ FEATURE_DISPLAY ?=              \
          get_cpuid              \
          bpf			\
          libaio			\
-         libzstd		\
-         disassembler-four-args	\
-         disassembler-init-styled
+         libzstd
 
 # Set FEATURE_CHECK_(C|LD)FLAGS-all for all FEATURE_TESTS features.
 # If in the future we need per-feature checks/flags for features not
diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.config b/tools/perf/Makefile.config
index ee417c321adb..2aa0bad11f05 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Makefile.config
+++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.config
@@ -914,8 +914,6 @@ ifndef NO_LIBBFD
         FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-disassembler-init-styled += -liberty -lz -ldl
       endif
     endif
-    $(call feature_check,disassembler-four-args)
-    $(call feature_check,disassembler-init-styled)
   endif
 
   ifeq ($(feature-libbfd-buildid), 1)
@@ -1025,6 +1023,9 @@ ifdef HAVE_KVM_STAT_SUPPORT
     CFLAGS += -DHAVE_KVM_STAT_SUPPORT
 endif
 
+$(call feature_check,disassembler-four-args)
+$(call feature_check,disassembler-init-styled)
+
 ifeq ($(feature-disassembler-four-args), 1)
     CFLAGS += -DDISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE
 endif

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-04  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-22 18:19 init_disassemble_info() signature changes causes compile failures Andres Freund
2022-06-22 22:53 ` Quentin Monnet
2022-06-22 23:16   ` Andres Freund
2022-06-23  9:49     ` Andrew Burgess
2022-07-03 21:25     ` [PATCH v2 0/5] tools: fix compilation failure caused by init_disassemble_info API changes Andres Freund
2022-07-03 21:25       ` [PATCH v2 1/5] tools build: add feature test for " Andres Freund
2022-07-03 21:25       ` [PATCH v2 2/5] tools include: add dis-asm-compat.h to handle version differences Andres Freund
2022-07-05 13:44         ` Quentin Monnet
2022-07-15 19:39           ` Andres Freund
2022-07-15 19:46             ` Andres Freund
2022-07-18  8:58             ` Quentin Monnet
2022-07-03 21:25       ` [PATCH v2 3/5] tools perf: Fix compilation error with new binutils Andres Freund
2022-07-03 21:25       ` [PATCH v2 4/5] tools bpf_jit_disasm: " Andres Freund
2022-07-03 21:25       ` [PATCH v2 5/5] tools bpftool: " Andres Freund
2022-07-04  9:13       ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2022-07-04 20:19         ` [PATCH v2 0/5] tools: fix compilation failure caused by init_disassemble_info API changes Andres Freund
2022-07-04 22:12           ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-01  1:40             ` Andres Freund
2022-07-10 11:43       ` Sedat Dilek
2022-07-10 17:52         ` Sedat Dilek
2022-07-14  9:16       ` Sedat Dilek
2022-07-14 13:25         ` Ben Hutchings
2022-07-15 19:16           ` Andres Freund
2022-07-15 19:18             ` Ben Hutchings
2022-08-01 18:08               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-07-27 15:47             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-07-30 21:45               ` Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38     ` [PATCH v3 0/8] " Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 1/8] tools build: Add feature test for " Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 2/8] tools build: Don't display disassembler-four-args feature test Andres Freund
2022-08-01 18:10         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 3/8] tools include: add dis-asm-compat.h to handle version differences Andres Freund
2022-08-01 18:05         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-01 18:10           ` Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 4/8] tools perf: Fix compilation error with new binutils Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 5/8] tools bpf_jit_disasm: " Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 6/8] tools bpf_jit_disasm: Don't display disassembler-four-args feature test Andres Freund
2022-08-01 18:27         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-01 18:41           ` Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 7/8] tools bpftool: Fix compilation error with new binutils Andres Freund
2022-08-01  1:38       ` [PATCH v3 8/8] tools bpftool: Don't display disassembler-four-args feature test Andres Freund
2022-08-01 18:28         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-01 12:45       ` [PATCH v3 0/8] tools: fix compilation failure caused by init_disassemble_info API changes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-01 15:15         ` Quentin Monnet
2022-08-01 18:02           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-08-08 13:35             ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-08-01 19:53         ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-01 19:12       ` Sedat Dilek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YsKvPW+1RkVvq8aX@krava \
    --to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=andres@anarazel.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).