From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: do not ignore clang failures
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 08:31:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bzb3BKoEcYiM3qQ6uqn+bZZ7kO2ogvZPba7679TWFT4fmw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2EA9DD60-A922-4056-8775-3F556B9A0087@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 1:56 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Am 28.06.2019 um 22:35 schrieb Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com>:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:15 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> >> index f2dbe2043067..2316fa2d5b3b 100644
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> >> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >>
> >> +SHELL := /bin/bash
> >
> > I am not sure whether it is ok to require bash. I don't see such requirements in
> > other Makefile's under tools/.
> >
> > Can we enable some fall back when bash is not present?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Song
>
> I think checking for bash presence would unnecessarily complicate
> things. What do you think about having separate targets for
> clang-generated bitcode?
Do we still need clang | llc pipeline with new clang? Could the same
be achieved with single clang invocation? That would solve the problem
of not detecting pipeline failures.
But either way, I think .DELETE_ON_ERROR is worth adding nevertheless.
>
> Best regards,
> Ilya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-01 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-27 9:14 [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: do not ignore clang failures Ilya Leoshkevich
2019-06-28 20:35 ` Song Liu
2019-07-01 8:55 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2019-07-01 15:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2019-07-01 18:40 ` [PATCH v2 " Ilya Leoshkevich
2019-07-05 14:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-07-08 15:01 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2019-07-09 18:14 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-07-10 13:25 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2019-07-10 16:04 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEf4Bzb3BKoEcYiM3qQ6uqn+bZZ7kO2ogvZPba7679TWFT4fmw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=liu.song.a23@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).