From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/11] libbpf: move function is_ldimm64() earlier in libbpf.c
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:06:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbsniN=dswRUSeykFkbq22A4JzR7mDnStgdfC5b9cNOxw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210217181811.3191061-1-yhs@fb.com>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 12:55 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>
> Move function is_ldimm64() close to the beginning of libbpf.c,
> so it can be reused by later code and the next patch as well.
> There is no functionality change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
> ---
Thanks!
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index d43cc3f29dae..21a3eedf070d 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -574,6 +574,11 @@ static bool insn_is_subprog_call(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
> insn->off == 0;
> }
>
> +static bool is_ldimm64(struct bpf_insn *insn)
> +{
> + return insn->code == (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW);
> +}
> +
> static int
> bpf_object__init_prog(struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_program *prog,
> const char *name, size_t sec_idx, const char *sec_name,
> @@ -3395,7 +3400,7 @@ static int bpf_program__record_reloc(struct bpf_program *prog,
> return 0;
> }
>
> - if (insn->code != (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW)) {
> + if (!is_ldimm64(insn)) {
> pr_warn("prog '%s': invalid relo against '%s' for insns[%d].code 0x%x\n",
> prog->name, sym_name, insn_idx, insn->code);
> return -LIBBPF_ERRNO__RELOC;
> @@ -5566,11 +5571,6 @@ static void bpf_core_poison_insn(struct bpf_program *prog, int relo_idx,
> insn->imm = 195896080; /* => 0xbad2310 => "bad relo" */
> }
>
> -static bool is_ldimm64(struct bpf_insn *insn)
> -{
> - return insn->code == (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW);
> -}
> -
> static int insn_bpf_size_to_bytes(struct bpf_insn *insn)
> {
> switch (BPF_SIZE(insn->code)) {
> --
> 2.24.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-23 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-17 18:18 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/11] bpf: add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-17 18:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/11] bpf: factor out visit_func_call_insn() in check_cfg() Yonghong Song
2021-02-17 18:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/11] bpf: factor out verbose_invalid_scalar() Yonghong Song
2021-02-17 18:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/11] bpf: refactor check_func_call() to allow callback function Yonghong Song
2021-02-17 18:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/11] bpf: add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-22 20:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-23 18:39 ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-23 18:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-23 19:37 ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-17 18:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/11] bpf: add hashtab support for " Yonghong Song
2021-02-22 22:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-23 18:41 ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-17 18:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/11] bpf: add arraymap " Yonghong Song
2021-02-17 18:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/11] libbpf: move function is_ldimm64() earlier in libbpf.c Yonghong Song
2021-02-23 8:06 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2021-02-17 18:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/11] libbpf: support local function pointer relocation Yonghong Song
2021-02-23 8:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-23 18:55 ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-23 19:07 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-23 19:21 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-23 19:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-23 19:47 ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-23 21:24 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-17 18:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/11] bpftool: print local function pointer properly Yonghong Song
2021-02-23 8:06 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-23 19:00 ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-17 18:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/11] selftests/bpf: add hashmap test for bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-17 18:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/11] selftests/bpf: add arraymap " Yonghong Song
2021-02-17 18:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/11] bpf: add " Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAEf4BzbsniN=dswRUSeykFkbq22A4JzR7mDnStgdfC5b9cNOxw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).