bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Allow bpf_map_lookup_elem() on an xskmap
       [not found] <20190530185709.1861867-1-jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
@ 2019-05-31 11:49 ` Björn Töpel
  2019-05-31 16:27   ` Jonathan Lemon
       [not found] ` <20190530185709.1861867-2-jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Björn Töpel @ 2019-05-31 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Lemon, netdev, magnus.karlsson; +Cc: kernel-team, bpf

On 2019-05-30 20:57, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> Currently, the AF_XDP code uses a separate map in order to
> determine if an xsk is bound to a queue.  Instead of doing this,
> have bpf_map_lookup_elem() return the queue_id, as a way of
> indicating that there is a valid entry at the map index.
> 
> Rearrange some xdp_sock members to eliminate structure holes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
> ---
>   include/net/xdp_sock.h                            |  6 +++---
>   kernel/bpf/verifier.c                             |  6 +++++-
>   kernel/bpf/xskmap.c                               |  4 +++-
>   .../selftests/bpf/verifier/prevent_map_lookup.c   | 15 ---------------
>   4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/xdp_sock.h b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> index d074b6d60f8a..7d84b1da43d2 100644
> --- a/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> @@ -57,12 +57,12 @@ struct xdp_sock {
>   	struct net_device *dev;
>   	struct xdp_umem *umem;
>   	struct list_head flush_node;
> -	u16 queue_id;
> -	struct xsk_queue *tx ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> -	struct list_head list;
> +	u32 queue_id;

Why the increase of size?

>   	bool zc;
>   	/* Protects multiple processes in the control path */
>   	struct mutex mutex;
> +	struct xsk_queue *tx ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> +	struct list_head list;
>   	/* Mutual exclusion of NAPI TX thread and sendmsg error paths
>   	 * in the SKB destructor callback.
>   	 */
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 2778417e6e0c..91c730f85e92 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -2905,10 +2905,14 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>   	 * appear.
>   	 */
>   	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP:
> -	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_XSKMAP:
>   		if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_redirect_map)
>   			goto error;
>   		break;
> +	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_XSKMAP:
> +		if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_redirect_map &&
> +		    func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem)
> +			goto error;
> +		break;
>   	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS:
>   	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS:
>   		if (func_id != BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem)
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/xskmap.c b/kernel/bpf/xskmap.c
> index 686d244e798d..249b22089014 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/xskmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/xskmap.c
> @@ -154,7 +154,9 @@ void __xsk_map_flush(struct bpf_map *map)
>   
>   static void *xsk_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
>   {
> -	return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> +	struct xdp_sock *xs = __xsk_map_lookup_elem(map, *(u32 *)key);
> +
> +	return xs ? &xs->queue_id : NULL;

I like this! I haven't taken it for a spin, but still:

Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>

>   }
>   
>   static int xsk_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/prevent_map_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/prevent_map_lookup.c
> index bbdba990fefb..da7a4b37cb98 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/prevent_map_lookup.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/prevent_map_lookup.c
> @@ -28,21 +28,6 @@
>   	.errstr = "cannot pass map_type 18 into func bpf_map_lookup_elem",
>   	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS,
>   },
> -{
> -	"prevent map lookup in xskmap",
> -	.insns = {
> -	BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
> -	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
> -	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
> -	BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
> -	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
> -	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> -	},
> -	.fixup_map_xskmap = { 3 },
> -	.result = REJECT,
> -	.errstr = "cannot pass map_type 17 into func bpf_map_lookup_elem",
> -	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
> -},
>   {
>   	"prevent map lookup in stack trace",
>   	.insns = {
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/2] libbpf: remove qidconf and better support external bpf programs.
       [not found] ` <20190530185709.1861867-2-jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
@ 2019-05-31 11:55   ` Björn Töpel
  2019-05-31 16:30     ` Jonathan Lemon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Björn Töpel @ 2019-05-31 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Lemon, netdev, magnus.karlsson; +Cc: kernel-team, bpf

On 2019-05-30 20:57, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> Use the recent change to XSKMAP bpf_map_lookup_elem() to test if
> there is a xsk present in the map instead of duplicating the work
> with qidconf.
> 
> Fix things so callers using XSK_LIBBPF_FLAGS__INHIBIT_PROG_LOAD
> bypass any internal bpf maps, so xsk_socket__{create|delete} works
> properly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
> ---
>   tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c | 79 +++++++++------------------------------------
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> index 38667b62f1fe..a150493d51ec 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
> @@ -60,10 +60,8 @@ struct xsk_socket {
>   	struct xsk_umem *umem;
>   	struct xsk_socket_config config;
>   	int fd;
> -	int xsks_map;
>   	int ifindex;
>   	int prog_fd;
> -	int qidconf_map_fd;
>   	int xsks_map_fd;
>   	__u32 queue_id;
>   	char ifname[IFNAMSIZ];
> @@ -265,15 +263,11 @@ static int xsk_load_xdp_prog(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
>   	/* This is the C-program:
>   	 * SEC("xdp_sock") int xdp_sock_prog(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>   	 * {
> -	 *     int *qidconf, index = ctx->rx_queue_index;
> +	 *     int index = ctx->rx_queue_index;
>   	 *
>   	 *     // A set entry here means that the correspnding queue_id
>   	 *     // has an active AF_XDP socket bound to it.
> -	 *     qidconf = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&qidconf_map, &index);
> -	 *     if (!qidconf)
> -	 *         return XDP_ABORTED;
> -	 *
> -	 *     if (*qidconf)
> +	 *     if (bpf_map_lookup_elem(&xsks_map, &index))
>   	 *         return bpf_redirect_map(&xsks_map, index, 0);
>   	 *
>   	 *     return XDP_PASS;
> @@ -286,15 +280,10 @@ static int xsk_load_xdp_prog(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
>   		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -4),
>   		BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
>   		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
> -		BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, xsk->qidconf_map_fd),
> +		BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, xsk->xsks_map_fd),
>   		BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
>   		BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
> -		BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
> -		/* if r1 == 0 goto +8 */
> -		BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 8),
>   		BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2),
> -		/* r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0) */
> -		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, 0),
>   		/* if r1 == 0 goto +5 */
>   		BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 5),
>   		/* r2 = *(u32 *)(r10 - 4) */
> @@ -366,18 +355,11 @@ static int xsk_create_bpf_maps(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
>   	if (max_queues < 0)
>   		return max_queues;
>   
> -	fd = bpf_create_map_name(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, "qidconf_map",
> +	fd = bpf_create_map_name(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, "xsks_map",
>   				 sizeof(int), sizeof(int), max_queues, 0);
>   	if (fd < 0)
>   		return fd;
> -	xsk->qidconf_map_fd = fd;
>   
> -	fd = bpf_create_map_name(BPF_MAP_TYPE_XSKMAP, "xsks_map",
> -				 sizeof(int), sizeof(int), max_queues, 0);
> -	if (fd < 0) {
> -		close(xsk->qidconf_map_fd);
> -		return fd;
> -	}

Uhm, you're removing the XSKMAP here, replacing it with an ARRAY. Have
you run this?


Björn

>   	xsk->xsks_map_fd = fd;
>   
>   	return 0;
> @@ -385,10 +367,8 @@ static int xsk_create_bpf_maps(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
>   
>   static void xsk_delete_bpf_maps(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
>   {
> -	close(xsk->qidconf_map_fd);
> +	bpf_map_delete_elem(xsk->xsks_map_fd, &xsk->queue_id);
>   	close(xsk->xsks_map_fd);
> -	xsk->qidconf_map_fd = -1;
> -	xsk->xsks_map_fd = -1;
>   }
>   
>   static int xsk_lookup_bpf_maps(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
> @@ -417,10 +397,9 @@ static int xsk_lookup_bpf_maps(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
>   	if (err)
>   		goto out_map_ids;
>   
> -	for (i = 0; i < prog_info.nr_map_ids; i++) {
> -		if (xsk->qidconf_map_fd != -1 && xsk->xsks_map_fd != -1)
> -			break;
> +	xsk->xsks_map_fd = -1;
>   
> +	for (i = 0; i < prog_info.nr_map_ids; i++) {
>   		fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map_ids[i]);
>   		if (fd < 0)
>   			continue;
> @@ -431,11 +410,6 @@ static int xsk_lookup_bpf_maps(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
>   			continue;
>   		}
>   
> -		if (!strcmp(map_info.name, "qidconf_map")) {
> -			xsk->qidconf_map_fd = fd;
> -			continue;
> -		}
> -
>   		if (!strcmp(map_info.name, "xsks_map")) {
>   			xsk->xsks_map_fd = fd;
>   			continue;
> @@ -445,40 +419,18 @@ static int xsk_lookup_bpf_maps(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
>   	}
>   
>   	err = 0;
> -	if (xsk->qidconf_map_fd < 0 || xsk->xsks_map_fd < 0) {
> +	if (xsk->xsks_map_fd == -1)
>   		err = -ENOENT;
> -		xsk_delete_bpf_maps(xsk);
> -	}
>   
>   out_map_ids:
>   	free(map_ids);
>   	return err;
>   }
>   
> -static void xsk_clear_bpf_maps(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
> -{
> -	int qid = false;
> -
> -	bpf_map_update_elem(xsk->qidconf_map_fd, &xsk->queue_id, &qid, 0);
> -	bpf_map_delete_elem(xsk->xsks_map_fd, &xsk->queue_id);
> -}
> -
>   static int xsk_set_bpf_maps(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
>   {
> -	int qid = true, fd = xsk->fd, err;
> -
> -	err = bpf_map_update_elem(xsk->qidconf_map_fd, &xsk->queue_id, &qid, 0);
> -	if (err)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	err = bpf_map_update_elem(xsk->xsks_map_fd, &xsk->queue_id, &fd, 0);
> -	if (err)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	return 0;
> -out:
> -	xsk_clear_bpf_maps(xsk);
> -	return err;
> +	return bpf_map_update_elem(xsk->xsks_map_fd, &xsk->queue_id,
> +				   &xsk->fd, 0);
>   }
>   
>   static int xsk_setup_xdp_prog(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
> @@ -514,6 +466,7 @@ static int xsk_setup_xdp_prog(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
>   
>   out_load:
>   	close(xsk->prog_fd);
> +	xsk->prog_fd = -1;
>   out_maps:
>   	xsk_delete_bpf_maps(xsk);
>   	return err;
> @@ -643,9 +596,7 @@ int xsk_socket__create(struct xsk_socket **xsk_ptr, const char *ifname,
>   		goto out_mmap_tx;
>   	}
>   
> -	xsk->qidconf_map_fd = -1;
> -	xsk->xsks_map_fd = -1;
> -
> +	xsk->prog_fd = -1;
>   	if (!(xsk->config.libbpf_flags & XSK_LIBBPF_FLAGS__INHIBIT_PROG_LOAD)) {
>   		err = xsk_setup_xdp_prog(xsk);
>   		if (err)
> @@ -708,8 +659,10 @@ void xsk_socket__delete(struct xsk_socket *xsk)
>   	if (!xsk)
>   		return;
>   
> -	xsk_clear_bpf_maps(xsk);
> -	xsk_delete_bpf_maps(xsk);
> +	if (xsk->prog_fd != -1) {
> +		xsk_delete_bpf_maps(xsk);
> +		close(xsk->prog_fd);
> +	}
>   
>   	optlen = sizeof(off);
>   	err = getsockopt(xsk->fd, SOL_XDP, XDP_MMAP_OFFSETS, &off, &optlen);
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Allow bpf_map_lookup_elem() on an xskmap
  2019-05-31 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Allow bpf_map_lookup_elem() on an xskmap Björn Töpel
@ 2019-05-31 16:27   ` Jonathan Lemon
  2019-05-31 17:13     ` Björn Töpel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Lemon @ 2019-05-31 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Björn Töpel; +Cc: netdev, magnus.karlsson, kernel-team, bpf

On 31 May 2019, at 4:49, Björn Töpel wrote:

> On 2019-05-30 20:57, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>> Currently, the AF_XDP code uses a separate map in order to
>> determine if an xsk is bound to a queue.  Instead of doing this,
>> have bpf_map_lookup_elem() return the queue_id, as a way of
>> indicating that there is a valid entry at the map index.
>>
>> Rearrange some xdp_sock members to eliminate structure holes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   include/net/xdp_sock.h                            |  6 +++---
>>   kernel/bpf/verifier.c                             |  6 +++++-
>>   kernel/bpf/xskmap.c                               |  4 +++-
>>   .../selftests/bpf/verifier/prevent_map_lookup.c   | 15 ---------------
>>   4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/xdp_sock.h b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
>> index d074b6d60f8a..7d84b1da43d2 100644
>> --- a/include/net/xdp_sock.h
>> +++ b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
>> @@ -57,12 +57,12 @@ struct xdp_sock {
>>   	struct net_device *dev;
>>   	struct xdp_umem *umem;
>>   	struct list_head flush_node;
>> -	u16 queue_id;
>> -	struct xsk_queue *tx ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>> -	struct list_head list;
>> +	u32 queue_id;
>
> Why the increase of size?

Currently xskmaps are defined as size=4, so the returned pointer for
bpf must have that many bytes.  I was kicking around the idea of using
a union and returning { qid, zc }, but Alexei pointed out that doesn't
make a good API.

Besides, queue_index in struct xdp_rxq_info is already a u32.
-- 
Jonathan


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/2] libbpf: remove qidconf and better support external bpf programs.
  2019-05-31 11:55   ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/2] libbpf: remove qidconf and better support external bpf programs Björn Töpel
@ 2019-05-31 16:30     ` Jonathan Lemon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Lemon @ 2019-05-31 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Björn Töpel; +Cc: netdev, magnus.karlsson, kernel-team, bpf

On 31 May 2019, at 4:55, Björn Töpel wrote:

> On 2019-05-30 20:57, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>> Use the recent change to XSKMAP bpf_map_lookup_elem() to test if
>> there is a xsk present in the map instead of duplicating the work
>> with qidconf.
>>
>> Fix things so callers using XSK_LIBBPF_FLAGS__INHIBIT_PROG_LOAD
>> bypass any internal bpf maps, so xsk_socket__{create|delete} works
>> properly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c | 79 
>> +++++++++------------------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
>> index 38667b62f1fe..a150493d51ec 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
>> @@ -60,10 +60,8 @@ struct xsk_socket {
>>   	struct xsk_umem *umem;
>>   	struct xsk_socket_config config;
>>   	int fd;
>> -	int xsks_map;
>>   	int ifindex;
>>   	int prog_fd;
>> -	int qidconf_map_fd;
>>   	int xsks_map_fd;
>>   	__u32 queue_id;
>>   	char ifname[IFNAMSIZ];
>> @@ -265,15 +263,11 @@ static int xsk_load_xdp_prog(struct xsk_socket 
>> *xsk)
>>   	/* This is the C-program:
>>   	 * SEC("xdp_sock") int xdp_sock_prog(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>>   	 * {
>> -	 *     int *qidconf, index = ctx->rx_queue_index;
>> +	 *     int index = ctx->rx_queue_index;
>>   	 *
>>   	 *     // A set entry here means that the correspnding queue_id
>>   	 *     // has an active AF_XDP socket bound to it.
>> -	 *     qidconf = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&qidconf_map, &index);
>> -	 *     if (!qidconf)
>> -	 *         return XDP_ABORTED;
>> -	 *
>> -	 *     if (*qidconf)
>> +	 *     if (bpf_map_lookup_elem(&xsks_map, &index))
>>   	 *         return bpf_redirect_map(&xsks_map, index, 0);
>>   	 *
>>   	 *     return XDP_PASS;
>> @@ -286,15 +280,10 @@ static int xsk_load_xdp_prog(struct xsk_socket 
>> *xsk)
>>   		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -4),
>>   		BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
>>   		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
>> -		BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, xsk->qidconf_map_fd),
>> +		BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, xsk->xsks_map_fd),
>>   		BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
>>   		BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
>> -		BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
>> -		/* if r1 == 0 goto +8 */
>> -		BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 8),
>>   		BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2),
>> -		/* r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0) */
>> -		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, 0),
>>   		/* if r1 == 0 goto +5 */
>>   		BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 5),
>>   		/* r2 = *(u32 *)(r10 - 4) */
>> @@ -366,18 +355,11 @@ static int xsk_create_bpf_maps(struct 
>> xsk_socket *xsk)
>>   	if (max_queues < 0)
>>   		return max_queues;
>>  -	fd = bpf_create_map_name(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, "qidconf_map",
>> +	fd = bpf_create_map_name(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, "xsks_map",
>>   				 sizeof(int), sizeof(int), max_queues, 0);
>>   	if (fd < 0)
>>   		return fd;
>> -	xsk->qidconf_map_fd = fd;
>>  -	fd = bpf_create_map_name(BPF_MAP_TYPE_XSKMAP, "xsks_map",
>> -				 sizeof(int), sizeof(int), max_queues, 0);
>> -	if (fd < 0) {
>> -		close(xsk->qidconf_map_fd);
>> -		return fd;
>> -	}
>
> Uhm, you're removing the XSKMAP here, replacing it with an ARRAY. Have
> you run this?

Err... I've been running the code, but this version is wrong.   Let me 
respin this.
-- 
Jonathan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Allow bpf_map_lookup_elem() on an xskmap
  2019-05-31 16:27   ` Jonathan Lemon
@ 2019-05-31 17:13     ` Björn Töpel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Björn Töpel @ 2019-05-31 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Lemon
  Cc: Björn Töpel, Netdev, Karlsson, Magnus, Kernel Team, bpf

On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 18:27, Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 31 May 2019, at 4:49, Björn Töpel wrote:
>
> > On 2019-05-30 20:57, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> >> Currently, the AF_XDP code uses a separate map in order to
> >> determine if an xsk is bound to a queue.  Instead of doing this,
> >> have bpf_map_lookup_elem() return the queue_id, as a way of
> >> indicating that there is a valid entry at the map index.
> >>
> >> Rearrange some xdp_sock members to eliminate structure holes.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>   include/net/xdp_sock.h                            |  6 +++---
> >>   kernel/bpf/verifier.c                             |  6 +++++-
> >>   kernel/bpf/xskmap.c                               |  4 +++-
> >>   .../selftests/bpf/verifier/prevent_map_lookup.c   | 15 ---------------
> >>   4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/net/xdp_sock.h b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> >> index d074b6d60f8a..7d84b1da43d2 100644
> >> --- a/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> >> +++ b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> >> @@ -57,12 +57,12 @@ struct xdp_sock {
> >>      struct net_device *dev;
> >>      struct xdp_umem *umem;
> >>      struct list_head flush_node;
> >> -    u16 queue_id;
> >> -    struct xsk_queue *tx ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> >> -    struct list_head list;
> >> +    u32 queue_id;
> >
> > Why the increase of size?
>
> Currently xskmaps are defined as size=4, so the returned pointer for
> bpf must have that many bytes.  I was kicking around the idea of using
> a union and returning { qid, zc }, but Alexei pointed out that doesn't
> make a good API.
>
> Besides, queue_index in struct xdp_rxq_info is already a u32.

(Resending w/o HTML from mobile client.)

Makes sense. Thanks for clarifying!


Björn

> --
> Jonathan
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-05-31 17:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20190530185709.1861867-1-jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
2019-05-31 11:49 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Allow bpf_map_lookup_elem() on an xskmap Björn Töpel
2019-05-31 16:27   ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-05-31 17:13     ` Björn Töpel
     [not found] ` <20190530185709.1861867-2-jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
2019-05-31 11:55   ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/2] libbpf: remove qidconf and better support external bpf programs Björn Töpel
2019-05-31 16:30     ` Jonathan Lemon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).