bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	ast@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/3] bpf: Add skb dynptrs
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 19:12:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJnrk1bow8je9VkTAQHiOOPQLWGDg1uDqDRN+tr43bMYtTSGjw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220801163349.4a28d154@kernel.org>

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 4:33 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> (consider cross-posting network-related stuff to netdev@)

Great, I will start cc-ing netdev@

>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:47:04 -0700 Joanne Koong wrote:
> > Add skb dynptrs, which are dynptrs whose underlying pointer points
> > to a skb. The dynptr acts on skb data. skb dynptrs have two main
> > benefits. One is that they allow operations on sizes that are not
> > statically known at compile-time (eg variable-sized accesses).
> > Another is that parsing the packet data through dynptrs (instead of
> > through direct access of skb->data and skb->data_end) can be more
> > ergonomic and less brittle (eg does not need manual if checking for
> > being within bounds of data_end).
>
> Is there really a need for dynptr_from_{skb,xdp} to be different
> function IDs? I was hoping this work would improve portability of
> networking BPF programs across the hooks.

Awesome, I like this idea of having just one generic API named
something like bpf_dynptr_from_packet. I'll add this for v2!

>
> > For bpf prog types that don't support writes on skb data, the dynptr is
> > read-only (writes and data slices are not permitted). For reads on the
> > dynptr, this includes reading into data in the non-linear paged buffers
> > but for writes and data slices, if the data is in a paged buffer, the
> > user must first call bpf_skb_pull_data to pull the data into the linear
> > portion.
> >
> > Additionally, any helper calls that change the underlying packet buffer
> > (eg bpf_skb_pull_data) invalidates any data slices of the associated
> > dynptr.
>
> Grepping the verifier did not help me find that, would you mind
> pointing me to the code?

The base reg type of a skb data slice will be PTR_TO_PACKET - this
gets set in this patch in check_helper_call() in verifier.c:

+ if (func_id == BPF_FUNC_dynptr_data &&
+    meta.type == BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_SKB)
+ regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_PACKET | ret_flag;

Anytime there is a helper call that changes the underlying packet
buffer [0], the verifier iterates through the registers and marks all
PTR_TO_PACKET reg types as unknown, which invalidates them. The dynptr
data slice will be invalidated since its base reg type is
PTR_TO_PACKET

The stack trace is:
   check_helper_call() -> clear_all_pkt_pointers() ->
__clear_all_pkt_pointers() -> mark_reg_unknown()


I will add this explanation to the commit message for v2 since it is non-obvious


[0] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/kernel/bpf/verifier.c#L7143

[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/kernel/bpf/verifier.c#L6489


>
> > Right now, skb dynptrs can only be constructed from skbs that are
> > the bpf program context - as such, there does not need to be any
> > reference tracking or release on skb dynptrs.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-02  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-26 18:47 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/3] Add skb + xdp dynptrs Joanne Koong
2022-07-26 18:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/3] bpf: Add skb dynptrs Joanne Koong
2022-07-27 17:13   ` sdf
2022-07-28 16:49     ` Joanne Koong
2022-07-28 17:28       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-07-28 17:45   ` Hao Luo
2022-07-28 18:36     ` Joanne Koong
2022-07-28 23:39   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-29 20:26     ` Joanne Koong
2022-07-29 21:39       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-01 17:52         ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-01 19:38           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-01 21:16             ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-01 22:14               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-01 22:32               ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-01 22:58                 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-01 23:23                   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-02  0:56                     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-02  3:51                       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-02  4:53                         ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-02  5:14                           ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-03 20:29         ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-03 20:36           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-03 20:56           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-03 23:25           ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-04  1:05             ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-04  1:34               ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-04  3:44                 ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-04  1:27             ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-04  1:44               ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-04 22:58             ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-08-05 23:25               ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-01 22:11   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-02  0:15     ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-01 23:33   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-02  2:12     ` Joanne Koong [this message]
2022-08-04 21:55       ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-05 23:22         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-03  6:37   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-07-26 18:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/3] bpf: Add xdp dynptrs Joanne Koong
2022-07-26 18:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/3] selftests/bpf: tests for using dynptrs to parse skb and xdp buffers Joanne Koong
2022-07-26 19:44   ` Zvi Effron
2022-07-26 20:06     ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-01 17:58   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-02 22:56     ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-03  0:53       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-03 16:11         ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-04 18:45           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-05 16:29             ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-01 19:12   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-02 22:21     ` Joanne Koong
2022-08-04 21:46       ` Joanne Koong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJnrk1bow8je9VkTAQHiOOPQLWGDg1uDqDRN+tr43bMYtTSGjw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).