bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next v2] net_sched: introduce eBPF based Qdisc
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 20:59:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpX2prCpPDmO1U0A_wyJi_LS4wmd9MQiFKiqQT8NfGNNnw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJFbCmzoFM8GGHyLWULSmX75=67Tu0EnTOOoVfH4gE+HA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:18 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 6:27 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ---
> > v2: Rebase on latest net-next
> >     Make the code more complete (but still incomplete)
> What is the point of v2 when feedback on the first RFC was ignored?

They are not ignored for two reasons:

1) I responded to those reasonable ones in the original thread. Clearly
you missed them.

2) I also responded in changelog, please check the difference, clearly
V2 is much more lengthy than V1.

It becomes clear you ignored mine (either email or changelog), not
vice versa.

Please lead by examples, you are not actually following anything you
ask others to do. Remember the last time I asked you to expand your
changelog for bpf timer? You kept ignoring it. ;)


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-22  3:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-13 23:11 [RFC Patch net-next v2] net_sched: introduce eBPF based Qdisc Cong Wang
2021-09-17 18:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-09-22  3:59   ` Cong Wang [this message]
2021-09-22  4:03     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-09-22  4:13       ` Cong Wang
2021-09-23  1:49         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-09-23  2:05           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-09-29 11:47             ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-09-29  5:40           ` Cong Wang
2021-09-29 20:57             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-10-01 13:43               ` Jamal Hadi Salim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAM_iQpX2prCpPDmO1U0A_wyJi_LS4wmd9MQiFKiqQT8NfGNNnw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).