Re: [PATCH] net: bpf: add static in net/core/filter.c

[Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>]

On 16/10/2019 14:10, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 02:02:31PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
>> On 16/10/2019 13:26, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:04:46PM +0100, Ben Dooks (Codethink) wrote:
>>>> There are a number of structs in net/core/filter.c
>>>> that are not exported or declared outside of the
>>>> file. Fix the following warnings by making these
>>>> all static:
>>>>
>>>> net/core/filter.c:8465:31: warning: symbol 'sk_filter_verifier_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>>> net/core/filter.c:8472:27: warning: symbol 'sk_filter_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>> [...]
>>>> net/core/filter.c:8935:27: warning: symbol 'sk_reuseport_prog_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
>>>> ---
>>>> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
>>>> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
>>>> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
>>>> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
>>>> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
>>>> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
>>>> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>>> ---
>>>>    net/core/filter.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>>>>    1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
>>>> index ed6563622ce3..f7338fee41f8 100644
>>>> --- a/net/core/filter.c
>>>> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
>>>> @@ -8462,18 +8462,18 @@ static u32 sk_msg_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
>>>>    	return insn - insn_buf;
>>>>    }
>>>> -const struct bpf_verifier_ops sk_filter_verifier_ops = {
>>>> +static const struct bpf_verifier_ops sk_filter_verifier_ops = {
>>>>    	.get_func_proto		= sk_filter_func_proto,
>>>>    	.is_valid_access	= sk_filter_is_valid_access,
>>>>    	.convert_ctx_access	= bpf_convert_ctx_access,
>>>>    	.gen_ld_abs		= bpf_gen_ld_abs,
>>>>    };
>>>
>>> Big obvious NAK. I'm puzzled that you try to fix a compile warning, but without
>>> even bothering to compile the result after your patch ...
>>
>> builds fine. maybe some effort to stop this happening again should be made.
> 
> It doesn't build, because they are used/needed outside:

Hmm, your config it does, I get /none/ of these warnings.

I guess a lot of this is being built whether or not is then used.

-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius

https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html