Re: [PATCH 0/3] X86/eager-fpu: Switch to eager fpu save/restore

From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Fouad Hilly <fouad.hilly@cloud.com>
Cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>,
	"George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	"Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>,
	"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	"Paul Durrant" <paul@xen.org>,
	"Jun Nakajima" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	"Kevin Tian" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] X86/eager-fpu: Switch to eager fpu save/restore
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:26:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1eb7340-aa11-476e-b2c6-bb8753d7edde@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240304091307.2295344-1-fouad.hilly@cloud.com>

On 04.03.2024 10:13, Fouad Hilly wrote:
> X86 Xen will only eagerly switch FPU context in the scheduler.
> Xen itslef won't set CR0.TS other than for the purpose of servicing
> a PV guset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fouad Hilly <fouad.hilly@cloud.com>

Throughout replying to the series I got back "undeliverable" responses
for Wei's old address at Citrix (noticed only now when I looked at what
has accumulated again in my inbox in the meantime). Can you please avoid
having dead addresses in patch submissions?

Jan