All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: correct ExynosAutov920 wake-up compatibles
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:18:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c63bd0b3-ecb2-d4c6-2147-43f19c1dcfee@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231210133915.42112-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>


On 23. 12. 10. 22:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> ExynosAutov920 SoC wake-up pin controller has different register layout
> than Exynos7, thus it should not be marked as compatible.  Neither DTS
> nor Linux driver was merged yet, so the change does not impact ABI.
>
> Cc: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
> Fixes: 904140fa4553 ("dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: use Exynos7 fallbacks for newer wake-up controllers")
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>
>

It is reasonable.

I will also fix this in v4 patch.


Reviewed-by:Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>


Thanks,
Jaewon Kim


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: correct ExynosAutov920 wake-up compatibles
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:18:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c63bd0b3-ecb2-d4c6-2147-43f19c1dcfee@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231210133915.42112-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>


On 23. 12. 10. 22:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> ExynosAutov920 SoC wake-up pin controller has different register layout
> than Exynos7, thus it should not be marked as compatible.  Neither DTS
> nor Linux driver was merged yet, so the change does not impact ABI.
>
> Cc: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
> Fixes: 904140fa4553 ("dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: use Exynos7 fallbacks for newer wake-up controllers")
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>
>

It is reasonable.

I will also fix this in v4 patch.


Reviewed-by:Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>


Thanks,
Jaewon Kim


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-11  2:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20231210133927epcas2p3e2633ad371b03d5ab19f9b44118fcb58@epcas2p3.samsung.com>
2023-12-10 13:39 ` [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: correct ExynosAutov920 wake-up compatibles Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-10 13:39   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-11  2:18   ` Jaewon Kim [this message]
2023-12-11  2:18     ` Jaewon Kim
2023-12-11  7:28     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-11  7:28       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-11  7:34     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-11  7:34       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-11  8:24       ` Jaewon Kim
2023-12-11  8:24         ` Jaewon Kim
2023-12-11  7:36   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-11  7:36     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-13 16:09   ` Alim Akhtar
2023-12-13 16:09     ` Alim Akhtar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c63bd0b3-ecb2-d4c6-2147-43f19c1dcfee@samsung.com \
    --to=jaewon02.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.