Re: [PATCH v2] fs: claw back a few FMODE_* bits

From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Aishwarya TCV <Aishwarya.TCV@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: claw back a few FMODE_* bits
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:12:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ccf7feb2-8270-440a-8479-18ae1f29e239@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240405-vorhof-kolossal-c31693e3fdbe@brauner>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 730 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:27:41PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:43:30PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Actually it looks like the issue went away with today's -next, but FWIW
> > the logging for the open_by_handle_at0[12] failures was:

> The bug was with:

> fs: Annotate struct file_handle with __counted_by() and use struct_size()

> and was reported and fixed in the thread around:

> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403110316.qtmypq2rtpueloga@quack3

> so this is really unrelated.

Ah, good - I did actually get to that one on my original bisect but
reran the final section of the bisect since it looked like a false
positive and wanted to confirm.  Not sure why it glitched on the second
run.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]