From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ucounts: Count rlimits in each user namespace
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:42:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtr8sjvr.fsf@disp2133> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgs5+3MLjG_hsQcKdamOcTsJLsk47tV12FfD_0f2h47Rg@mail.gmail.com> (Linus Torvalds's message of "Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:34:17 -0700")
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 8:52 AM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>>
>> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>>
>> > Why the "sigpending < LONG_MAX" test in that
>> >
>> > if (override_rlimit || (sigpending < LONG_MAX && sigpending <=
>> > task_rlimit(t, RLIMIT_SIGPENDING))) {
>> > thing?
>>
>> On second look that sigpending < LONG_MAX check is necessary. When
>> inc_rlimit_ucounts detects a problem it returns LONG_MAX.
>
> I saw that, but _without_ that test you'd be left with just that
>
> sigpending <= task_rlimit(t, RLIMIT_SIGPENDING)
>
> and if task_rlimit() is LONG_MAX, then that means "no limits", so it is all ok.
It means no limits locally. The creator of your user namespace might
have had a limit which you are also bound by.
The other possibility is that inc_rlimits_ucounts caused a sigpending
counter to overflow. In which case we need to fail and run
dec_rlimit_ucounts to keep the counter from staying overflowed.
So I don't see a clever way to avoid the sigpending < LONG_MAX test.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-29 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-28 22:35 [GIT PULL] ucounts: Count rlimits in each user namespace Eric W. Biederman
2021-06-29 3:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-29 15:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-06-29 15:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-06-29 16:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-29 16:42 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2021-06-29 17:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-07-01 16:41 ` Alexey Gladkov
2021-07-01 20:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-06-29 17:17 ` Alexey Gladkov
2021-06-29 18:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-29 20:20 ` Alexey Gladkov
2021-06-29 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-29 21:22 ` Alexey Gladkov
2021-07-02 17:54 ` [PATCH] ucounts: Fix UCOUNT_RLIMIT_SIGPENDING counter leak Alexey Gladkov
2021-07-02 22:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-07-07 16:50 ` Alexey Gladkov
2021-07-07 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-07-08 10:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexey Gladkov
2021-07-08 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-07-08 11:00 ` [PATCH] ucounts: " Alexey Gladkov
2021-06-29 3:50 ` [GIT PULL] ucounts: Count rlimits in each user namespace pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mtr8sjvr.fsf@disp2133 \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=legion@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).