From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> To: joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, architt-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, srinivas.kandagatla-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, hdoyu-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Subject: [PATCH 0/4] IOMMU group cleanup Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 13:12:34 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <cover.1500637633.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> (raw) Hi all, Prompted by some discussion around the questionable usefulness of iommu_present() for SoC topologies, I took a look at what was left to finish off the intention of making groups mandatory. Turns out it wasn't much, so here it is. As well as the general rationalisation aspect, between this and the probe-deferral changes in 4.12, we should now be able to rely on the presence of a group unambiguously indicating whether a given device is associated with an IOMMU or not. Robin. Robin Murphy (4): iommu/msm: Add iommu_group support iommu/tegra-smmu: Add iommu_group support iommu/tegra-gart: Add iommu_group support iommu: Finish making iommu_group support mandatory drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 19 ++++--------------- drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c | 9 +++++++++ 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) -- 2.12.2.dirty
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: robin.murphy@arm.com (Robin Murphy) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 0/4] IOMMU group cleanup Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 13:12:34 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <cover.1500637633.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> (raw) Hi all, Prompted by some discussion around the questionable usefulness of iommu_present() for SoC topologies, I took a look at what was left to finish off the intention of making groups mandatory. Turns out it wasn't much, so here it is. As well as the general rationalisation aspect, between this and the probe-deferral changes in 4.12, we should now be able to rely on the presence of a group unambiguously indicating whether a given device is associated with an IOMMU or not. Robin. Robin Murphy (4): iommu/msm: Add iommu_group support iommu/tegra-smmu: Add iommu_group support iommu/tegra-gart: Add iommu_group support iommu: Finish making iommu_group support mandatory drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 19 ++++--------------- drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c | 9 +++++++++ 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) -- 2.12.2.dirty
next reply other threads:[~2017-07-21 12:12 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-07-21 12:12 Robin Murphy [this message] 2017-07-21 12:12 ` [PATCH 0/4] IOMMU group cleanup Robin Murphy [not found] ` <cover.1500637633.git.robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> 2017-07-21 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] iommu/msm: Add iommu_group support Robin Murphy 2017-07-21 12:12 ` Robin Murphy [not found] ` <b87d44e09fa18efbb9daf6258c1f8ecbedaac23c.1500637633.git.robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> 2017-07-24 7:34 ` Sricharan R 2017-07-24 7:34 ` Sricharan R [not found] ` <f5071164-c965-b6bf-c330-90ff6ea0c956-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> 2017-07-24 9:55 ` Robin Murphy 2017-07-24 9:55 ` Robin Murphy [not found] ` <e148ac58-2fda-454f-c8b1-e01dd1c1347c-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> 2017-07-26 15:29 ` Sricharan R 2017-07-26 15:29 ` Sricharan R 2017-07-21 12:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] iommu/tegra-smmu: " Robin Murphy 2017-07-21 12:12 ` Robin Murphy 2017-08-02 8:12 ` Mikko Perttunen 2017-08-02 8:12 ` Mikko Perttunen 2017-07-21 12:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/tegra-gart: " Robin Murphy 2017-07-21 12:12 ` Robin Murphy [not found] ` <9c3fa9661e8177f0ccea960dd584a05fc19f92c8.1500637633.git.robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> 2017-07-26 20:56 ` Dmitry Osipenko 2017-07-26 20:56 ` Dmitry Osipenko 2017-07-21 12:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] iommu: Finish making iommu_group support mandatory Robin Murphy 2017-07-21 12:12 ` Robin Murphy 2017-07-26 11:12 ` [PATCH 0/4] IOMMU group cleanup Joerg Roedel 2017-07-26 11:12 ` Joerg Roedel 2017-08-11 15:21 ` Joerg Roedel 2017-08-11 15:21 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=cover.1500637633.git.robin.murphy@arm.com \ --to=robin.murphy-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \ --cc=architt-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \ --cc=hdoyu-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \ --cc=srinivas.kandagatla-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \ --cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.