All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
To: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org
Cc: clg@kaod.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 14/25] ppc440_sdram: Move RAM size check to ppc440_sdram_init
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 19:09:39 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6be8094-3ab9-58e5-c4ac-a767f552e8e3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41da3797392acaacc7963b79512c8af8005fa4b0.1664021647.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>

Zoltan,

Gitlab didn't like this patch. It broke all 32 bits builds due to an overflow
down there:

On 9/24/22 09:28, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> Move the check for valid memory sizes from board to sdram controller
> init. This adds the missing valid memory sizes of 4 GiB, 16 and 8 MiB
> to the DoC and the board now only checks for additional restrictions
> imposed by its firmware then sdram init checks for valid sizes for SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
> ---
>   hw/ppc/ppc440.h    |  4 ++--
>   hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c | 15 +++++++--------
>   hw/ppc/sam460ex.c  | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
>   3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/ppc440.h b/hw/ppc/ppc440.h
> index 01d76b8000..29f6f14ed7 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/ppc440.h
> +++ b/hw/ppc/ppc440.h
> @@ -11,13 +11,13 @@
>   #ifndef PPC440_H
>   #define PPC440_H
>   
> -#include "hw/ppc/ppc4xx.h"
> +#include "hw/ppc/ppc.h"
>   
>   void ppc4xx_l2sram_init(CPUPPCState *env);
>   void ppc4xx_cpr_init(CPUPPCState *env);
>   void ppc4xx_sdr_init(CPUPPCState *env);
>   void ppc440_sdram_init(CPUPPCState *env, int nbanks,
> -                       Ppc4xxSdramBank *ram_banks);
> +                       MemoryRegion *ram);
>   void ppc4xx_ahb_init(CPUPPCState *env);
>   void ppc4xx_dma_init(CPUPPCState *env, int dcr_base);
>   void ppc460ex_pcie_init(CPUPPCState *env);
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c b/hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c
> index edd0781eb7..2b9d666b71 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c
> @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ void ppc4xx_sdr_init(CPUPPCState *env)
>   typedef struct ppc440_sdram_t {
>       uint32_t addr;
>       uint32_t mcopt2;
> -    int nbanks;
> +    int nbanks; /* Banks to use from the 4, e.g. when board has less slots */
>       Ppc4xxSdramBank bank[4];
>   } ppc440_sdram_t;
>   
> @@ -733,18 +733,17 @@ static void sdram_ddr2_reset(void *opaque)
>   }
>   
>   void ppc440_sdram_init(CPUPPCState *env, int nbanks,
> -                       Ppc4xxSdramBank *ram_banks)
> +                       MemoryRegion *ram)
>   {
>       ppc440_sdram_t *s;
> -    int i;
> +    const ram_addr_t valid_bank_sizes[] = {
> +        4 * GiB, 2 * GiB, 1 * GiB, 512 * MiB, 256 * MiB, 128 * MiB, 64 * MiB,


^ here. ram_addr_t will be a 32 bit var in a 32 bit host, and assigning 4 * GiB will
overflow it back to zero.

Here's the Gitlab error from the 'cross-win32-system' runner:

FAILED: libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_ppc_ppc440_uc.c.obj
2725i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -m32 -Ilibqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p -I. -I.. -Itarget/ppc -I../target/ppc -I../dtc/libfdt -Iqapi -Itrace -Iui -Iui/shader -I/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/glib-2.0/include -fdiagnostics-color=auto -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Werror -std=gnu11 -O2 -g -iquote . -iquote /builds/danielhb/qemu -iquote /builds/danielhb/qemu/include -iquote /builds/danielhb/qemu/tcg/i386 -mms-bitfields -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fno-pie -no-pie -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -Wstrict-prototypes -Wredundant-decls -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fwrapv -Wold-style-declaration -Wold-style-definition -Wtype-limits -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k -Winit-self -Wignored-qualifiers -Wempty-body -Wnested-externs -Wendif-labels -Wexpansion-to-defined -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 -Wno-missing-include-dirs -Wno-shift-negative-value -Wno-psabi -fstack-protector-strong -DNEED_CPU_H '-DCONFIG_TARGET="ppc64-softmmu-config-target.h"' '-DCONFIG_DEVICES="ppc64-softmmu-config-devices.h"' -MD -MQ libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_ppc_ppc440_uc.c.obj -MF libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_ppc_ppc440_uc.c.obj.d -o libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_ppc_ppc440_uc.c.obj -c ../hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c
2726../hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c: In function 'ppc4xx_sdram_ddr2_realize':
2727../hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c:729:9: error: unsigned conversion from 'long long int' to 'unsigned int' changes value from '4294967296' to '0' [-Werror=overflow]
2728  729 |         4 * GiB, 2 * GiB, 1 * GiB, 512 * MiB, 256 * MiB, 128 * MiB, 64 * MiB,
2729      |         ^
2730cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
2731

A quick fix that I can make in-tree is to avoid the overflow by doing (4 * GiB) - 1.
But since this might affect some logic in the model I figured I should ask you
first.

Let me know if this is OK with you. Otherwise feel free to propose another
workaround. I appreciate if you can answer quickly because I can't make a ppc-next
PR until this is sorted out.



Thanks,


Daniel



> +        32 * MiB, 16 * MiB, 8 * MiB, 0
> +    };
>   
>       s = g_malloc0(sizeof(*s));
>       s->nbanks = nbanks;
> -    for (i = 0; i < nbanks; i++) {
> -        s->bank[i].ram = ram_banks[i].ram;
> -        s->bank[i].base = ram_banks[i].base;
> -        s->bank[i].size = ram_banks[i].size;
> -    }
> +    ppc4xx_sdram_banks(ram, s->nbanks, s->bank, valid_bank_sizes);
>       qemu_register_reset(&sdram_ddr2_reset, s);
>       ppc_dcr_register(env, SDRAM0_CFGADDR,
>                        s, &sdram_ddr2_dcr_read, &sdram_ddr2_dcr_write);
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/sam460ex.c b/hw/ppc/sam460ex.c
> index b318521b01..13055a8916 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/sam460ex.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/sam460ex.c
> @@ -74,13 +74,6 @@
>   #define EBC_FREQ 115000000
>   #define UART_FREQ 11059200
>   
> -/* The SoC could also handle 4 GiB but firmware does not work with that. */
> -/* Maybe it overflows a signed 32 bit number somewhere? */
> -static const ram_addr_t ppc460ex_sdram_bank_sizes[] = {
> -    2 * GiB, 1 * GiB, 512 * MiB, 256 * MiB, 128 * MiB, 64 * MiB,
> -    32 * MiB, 0
> -};
> -
>   struct boot_info {
>       uint32_t dt_base;
>       uint32_t dt_size;
> @@ -273,7 +266,6 @@ static void sam460ex_init(MachineState *machine)
>   {
>       MemoryRegion *address_space_mem = get_system_memory();
>       MemoryRegion *isa = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> -    Ppc4xxSdramBank *ram_banks = g_new0(Ppc4xxSdramBank, 1);
>       MemoryRegion *l2cache_ram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
>       DeviceState *uic[4];
>       int i;
> @@ -340,12 +332,22 @@ static void sam460ex_init(MachineState *machine)
>       }
>   
>       /* SDRAM controller */
> -    /* put all RAM on first bank because board has one slot
> -     * and firmware only checks that */
> -    ppc4xx_sdram_banks(machine->ram, 1, ram_banks, ppc460ex_sdram_bank_sizes);
> -
> +    /* The SoC could also handle 4 GiB but firmware does not work with that. */
> +    if (machine->ram_size > 2 * GiB) {
> +        error_report("Memory over 2 GiB is not supported");
> +        exit(1);
> +    }
> +    /* Firmware needs at least 64 MiB */
> +    if (machine->ram_size < 64 * MiB) {
> +        error_report("Memory below 64 MiB is not supported");
> +        exit(1);
> +    }
> +    /*
> +     * Put all RAM on first bank because board has one slot
> +     * and firmware only checks that
> +     */
> +    ppc440_sdram_init(env, 1, machine->ram);
>       /* FIXME: does 460EX have ECC interrupts? */
> -    ppc440_sdram_init(env, 1, ram_banks);
>       /* Enable SDRAM memory regions as we may boot without firmware */
>       ppc4xx_sdram_ddr2_enable(env);
>   
> @@ -354,8 +356,8 @@ static void sam460ex_init(MachineState *machine)
>                                  qdev_get_gpio_in(uic[0], 2));
>       i2c = PPC4xx_I2C(dev)->bus;
>       /* SPD EEPROM on RAM module */
> -    spd_data = spd_data_generate(ram_banks->size < 128 * MiB ? DDR : DDR2,
> -                                 ram_banks->size);
> +    spd_data = spd_data_generate(machine->ram_size < 128 * MiB ? DDR : DDR2,
> +                                 machine->ram_size);
>       spd_data[20] = 4; /* SO-DIMM module */
>       smbus_eeprom_init_one(i2c, 0x50, spd_data);
>       /* RTC */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-14 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-24 12:27 [PATCH v6 00/25] ppc4xx_sdram QOMify and clean ups BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:27 ` [PATCH v6 01/25] ppc440_bamboo: Remove unnecessary memsets BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-26 16:46   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-09-24 12:27 ` [PATCH v6 02/25] ppc4xx: Introduce Ppc4xxSdramBank struct BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:27 ` [PATCH v6 03/25] ppc4xx_sdram: Get rid of the init RAM hack BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-26 16:52   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-09-24 12:27 ` [PATCH v6 04/25] ppc4xx: Use Ppc4xxSdramBank in ppc4xx_sdram_banks() BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:27 ` [PATCH v6 05/25] ppc440_bamboo: Add missing 4 MiB valid memory size BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:27 ` [PATCH v6 06/25] ppc4xx_sdram: Move size check to ppc4xx_sdram_init() BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:27 ` [PATCH v6 07/25] ppc4xx_sdram: QOM'ify BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:27 ` [PATCH v6 08/25] ppc4xx_sdram: Drop extra zeros for readability BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:27 ` [PATCH v6 09/25] ppc440_sdram: Split off map/unmap of sdram banks for later reuse BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:27 ` [PATCH v6 10/25] ppc440_sdram: Implement enable bit in the DDR2 SDRAM controller BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-26 16:57   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 11/25] ppc440_sdram: Get rid of the init RAM hack BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-26 16:59   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 12/25] ppc440_sdram: Rename local variable for readability BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 13/25] ppc4xx_sdram: Rename functions to prevent name clashes BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 14/25] ppc440_sdram: Move RAM size check to ppc440_sdram_init BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-26 16:58   ` Cédric Le Goater
2022-10-14 22:09   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza [this message]
2022-10-14 22:52     ` BALATON Zoltan
2022-10-15 10:03       ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-10-15 11:40         ` BALATON Zoltan
2022-10-15 12:03           ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-10-15 13:20             ` BALATON Zoltan
2022-10-15 14:27               ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 15/25] ppc440_sdram: QOM'ify BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 16/25] ppc440_uc.c: Move some macros to ppc4xx.h BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-26 16:57   ` Cédric Le Goater
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 17/25] ppc440_uc.c: Remove unneeded parenthesis BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-26 16:57   ` Cédric Le Goater
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 18/25] ppc440_uc.c: Move DDR2 SDRAM controller model to ppc4xx_sdram.c BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 19/25] ppc4xx_devs.c: Move DDR " BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 20/25] ppc4xx_sdram: Move ppc4xx_sdram_banks() " BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 21/25] ppc4xx_sdram: Use hwaddr for memory bank size BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 22/25] ppc4xx_sdram: Rename local state variable for brevity BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 23/25] ppc4xx_sdram: Generalise bank setup BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 24/25] ppc4xx_sdram: Convert DDR SDRAM controller to new bank handling BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-24 12:28 ` [PATCH v6 25/25] ppc4xx_sdram: Add errp parameter to ppc4xx_sdram_banks() BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-26 17:09 ` [PATCH v6 00/25] ppc4xx_sdram QOMify and clean ups Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-09-26 17:32   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2022-09-26 22:47     ` BALATON Zoltan
2022-10-05 12:02       ` BALATON Zoltan
2022-09-26 17:10 ` Cédric Le Goater
2022-09-26 22:39   ` BALATON Zoltan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d6be8094-3ab9-58e5-c4ac-a767f552e8e3@gmail.com \
    --to=danielhb413@gmail.com \
    --cc=balaton@eik.bme.hu \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.