All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [CI 04/12] drm/i915: Perform manual conversions for crtc uapi/hw split, v2.
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:12:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfe717c9-c8dc-80da-77e2-45d42578da72@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191029132330.GV1208@intel.com>

Op 29-10-2019 om 14:23 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 08:22:21AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> intel_get_load_detect_pipe() needs to set uapi active,
>> uapi enable is set by the call to drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(),
>> so we can remove it.
>>
>> intel_pipe_config_compare() needs to look at hw state, but I didn't
>> change spatch to look at it. It's easy enough to do manually.
>>
>> intel_atomic_check() definitely needs to check for uapi enable,
>> otherwise intel_modeset_pipe_config cannot copy uapi state to hw.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Actually set uapi.active in get_load_detect_pipe().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 42 ++++++++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index d0df9b24a969..4baa0226abff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -11433,7 +11433,7 @@ int intel_get_load_detect_pipe(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>  		goto fail;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	crtc_state->base.active = crtc_state->base.enable = true;
>> +	crtc_state->uapi.active = true;
> The fact that load detection broke in ci makes this a bit suspicious.
> But AFAICS it should work.
>
>
> Hmm. Long ago I had a patch to fix something in
> drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc()...
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/262996/?series=52778&rev=1
>
> Doesn't seem like it should make a difference unless somehow uapi.mode
> is left with the load detect mode but uapi.enable is set to false before
> another call to drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(load_detect_mode).

Ah, I will just put back the base.enable for now then, can fix the core later. :)


>
>>  
>>  	if (!mode)
>>  		mode = &load_detect_mode;
>> @@ -13080,19 +13080,19 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
>>  
>>  	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(output_types);
>>  
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_hblank_start);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_hblank_end);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_hsync_start);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_hsync_end);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hblank_start);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hblank_end);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hsync_start);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hsync_end);
>>  
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vtotal);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_end);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vsync_start);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vsync_end);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vtotal);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_end);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vsync_start);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vsync_end);
>>  
>>  	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pixel_multiplier);
>>  	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(output_format);
>> @@ -13109,17 +13109,17 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
>>  
>>  	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL_INCOMPLETE(has_audio);
>>  
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(base.adjusted_mode.flags,
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(hw.adjusted_mode.flags,
>>  			      DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE);
>>  
>>  	if (!PIPE_CONF_QUIRK(PIPE_CONFIG_QUIRK_MODE_SYNC_FLAGS)) {
>> -		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(base.adjusted_mode.flags,
>> +		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(hw.adjusted_mode.flags,
>>  				      DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC);
>> -		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(base.adjusted_mode.flags,
>> +		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(hw.adjusted_mode.flags,
>>  				      DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC);
>> -		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(base.adjusted_mode.flags,
>> +		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(hw.adjusted_mode.flags,
>>  				      DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC);
>> -		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(base.adjusted_mode.flags,
>> +		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(hw.adjusted_mode.flags,
>>  				      DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC);
>>  	}
>>  
>> @@ -13158,7 +13158,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
>>  
>>  		bp_gamma = intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(pipe_config);
>>  		if (bp_gamma)
>> -			PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT(gamma_mode, base.gamma_lut, bp_gamma);
>> +			PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT(gamma_mode, hw.gamma_lut, bp_gamma);
>>  
>>  	}
>>  
>> @@ -13203,7 +13203,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
>>  	if (IS_G4X(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 5)
>>  		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pipe_bpp);
>>  
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock);
>>  	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY(port_clock);
>>  
>>  	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(min_voltage_level);
>> @@ -14010,7 +14010,7 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
>>  		if (!needs_modeset(new_crtc_state))
>>  			continue;
>>  
>> -		if (!new_crtc_state->base.enable) {
>> +		if (!new_crtc_state->uapi.enable) {
>>  			any_ms = true;
>>  			continue;
>>  		}
>> -- 
>> 2.23.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [CI 04/12] drm/i915: Perform manual conversions for crtc uapi/hw split, v2.
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:12:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfe717c9-c8dc-80da-77e2-45d42578da72@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191030101222.Qelxr1JknTa4GHPfDPsAPd9vIsz_nbksQbCs2Y0mUz8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191029132330.GV1208@intel.com>

Op 29-10-2019 om 14:23 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 08:22:21AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> intel_get_load_detect_pipe() needs to set uapi active,
>> uapi enable is set by the call to drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(),
>> so we can remove it.
>>
>> intel_pipe_config_compare() needs to look at hw state, but I didn't
>> change spatch to look at it. It's easy enough to do manually.
>>
>> intel_atomic_check() definitely needs to check for uapi enable,
>> otherwise intel_modeset_pipe_config cannot copy uapi state to hw.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Actually set uapi.active in get_load_detect_pipe().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 42 ++++++++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index d0df9b24a969..4baa0226abff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -11433,7 +11433,7 @@ int intel_get_load_detect_pipe(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>  		goto fail;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	crtc_state->base.active = crtc_state->base.enable = true;
>> +	crtc_state->uapi.active = true;
> The fact that load detection broke in ci makes this a bit suspicious.
> But AFAICS it should work.
>
>
> Hmm. Long ago I had a patch to fix something in
> drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc()...
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/262996/?series=52778&rev=1
>
> Doesn't seem like it should make a difference unless somehow uapi.mode
> is left with the load detect mode but uapi.enable is set to false before
> another call to drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(load_detect_mode).

Ah, I will just put back the base.enable for now then, can fix the core later. :)


>
>>  
>>  	if (!mode)
>>  		mode = &load_detect_mode;
>> @@ -13080,19 +13080,19 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
>>  
>>  	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(output_types);
>>  
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_hblank_start);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_hblank_end);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_hsync_start);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_hsync_end);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hblank_start);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hblank_end);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hsync_start);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hsync_end);
>>  
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vtotal);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_end);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vsync_start);
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_vsync_end);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vtotal);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_end);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vsync_start);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vsync_end);
>>  
>>  	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pixel_multiplier);
>>  	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(output_format);
>> @@ -13109,17 +13109,17 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
>>  
>>  	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL_INCOMPLETE(has_audio);
>>  
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(base.adjusted_mode.flags,
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(hw.adjusted_mode.flags,
>>  			      DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE);
>>  
>>  	if (!PIPE_CONF_QUIRK(PIPE_CONFIG_QUIRK_MODE_SYNC_FLAGS)) {
>> -		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(base.adjusted_mode.flags,
>> +		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(hw.adjusted_mode.flags,
>>  				      DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC);
>> -		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(base.adjusted_mode.flags,
>> +		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(hw.adjusted_mode.flags,
>>  				      DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC);
>> -		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(base.adjusted_mode.flags,
>> +		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(hw.adjusted_mode.flags,
>>  				      DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC);
>> -		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(base.adjusted_mode.flags,
>> +		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(hw.adjusted_mode.flags,
>>  				      DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC);
>>  	}
>>  
>> @@ -13158,7 +13158,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
>>  
>>  		bp_gamma = intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(pipe_config);
>>  		if (bp_gamma)
>> -			PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT(gamma_mode, base.gamma_lut, bp_gamma);
>> +			PIPE_CONF_CHECK_COLOR_LUT(gamma_mode, hw.gamma_lut, bp_gamma);
>>  
>>  	}
>>  
>> @@ -13203,7 +13203,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
>>  	if (IS_G4X(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 5)
>>  		PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pipe_bpp);
>>  
>> -	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY(base.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock);
>> +	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY(hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock);
>>  	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY(port_clock);
>>  
>>  	PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(min_voltage_level);
>> @@ -14010,7 +14010,7 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
>>  		if (!needs_modeset(new_crtc_state))
>>  			continue;
>>  
>> -		if (!new_crtc_state->base.enable) {
>> +		if (!new_crtc_state->uapi.enable) {
>>  			any_ms = true;
>>  			continue;
>>  		}
>> -- 
>> 2.23.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-30 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-29  7:22 [CI 01/12] drm/i915: Introduce intel_atomic_get_plane_state_after_check(), v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22 ` [CI 02/12] drm/i915: Handle a few more cases for crtc hw/uapi split, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22 ` [CI 03/12] drm/i915: Add aliases for uapi and hw to crtc_state Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22 ` [CI 04/12] drm/i915: Perform manual conversions for crtc uapi/hw split, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29 13:23   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-29 13:23     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-30 10:12     ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2019-10-30 10:12       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22 ` [CI 05/12] drm/i915: Perform automated conversions for crtc uapi/hw split, base -> hw Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22 ` [CI 06/12] drm/i915: Perform automated conversions for crtc uapi/hw split, base -> uapi Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22 ` [CI 07/12] drm/i915: Complete crtc hw/uapi split, v4 Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29 14:33   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-29 14:33     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-29 14:37     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-29 14:37       ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-29  7:22 ` [CI 08/12] drm/i915: Add aliases for uapi and hw to plane_state Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22 ` [CI 09/12] drm/i915: Perform manual conversions for plane uapi/hw split Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22 ` [CI 10/12] drm/i915: Perform automated conversions for plane uapi/hw split, base -> hw Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29 15:35   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-29 15:35     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-29  7:22 ` [CI 11/12] drm/i915: Perform automated conversions for plane uapi/hw split, base -> uapi Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29 15:43   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-29 15:43     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-30 13:10     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-30 13:10       ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22 ` [CI 12/12] drm/i915: Complete plane hw and uapi split, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  7:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29 18:34   ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-29 18:34     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-30  9:51     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-30  9:51       ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-29  8:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,01/12] drm/i915: Introduce intel_atomic_get_plane_state_after_check(), v2 Patchwork
2019-10-29  8:45   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-10-29  9:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-10-29  9:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-10-29 18:35 ` [CI 01/12] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-29 18:35   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-30  9:17   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-30  9:17     ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2019-10-30 13:37     ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-10-30 13:37       ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dfe717c9-c8dc-80da-77e2-45d42578da72@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.