[dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 0/2] dm crypt: some fixes to support dm-crypt running in softirq context

dm-crypt.saout.de archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 0/2] dm crypt: some fixes to support dm-crypt running in softirq context
@ 2020-12-30 21:45 Ignat Korchagin
  2020-12-30 21:45 ` [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 1/2] dm crypt: use GFP_ATOMIC when allocating crypto requests from softirq Ignat Korchagin
  2020-12-30 21:45 ` [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 2/2] dm crypt: do not wait for backlogged crypto request completion in softirq Ignat Korchagin
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ignat Korchagin @ 2020-12-30 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: agk, snitzer, dm-devel, dm-crypt, linux-kernel
  Cc: Damien.LeMoal, herbert, kernel-team, nobuto.murata, josef,
	ebiggers, clm, mpatocka, Ignat Korchagin, dsterba, mail,
	linux-btrfs

Changes from v1:
0001: Handle memory allocation failure for GFP_ATOMIC

Ignat Korchagin (2):
  dm crypt: use GFP_ATOMIC when allocating crypto requests from softirq
  dm crypt: do not wait for backlogged crypto request completion in
    softirq

 drivers/md/dm-crypt.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@saout.de
https://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 1/2] dm crypt: use GFP_ATOMIC when allocating crypto requests from softirq
  2020-12-30 21:45 [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 0/2] dm crypt: some fixes to support dm-crypt running in softirq context Ignat Korchagin
@ 2020-12-30 21:45 ` Ignat Korchagin
  2021-01-01 10:00   ` Mikulas Patocka
  2020-12-30 21:45 ` [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 2/2] dm crypt: do not wait for backlogged crypto request completion in softirq Ignat Korchagin
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ignat Korchagin @ 2020-12-30 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: agk, snitzer, dm-devel, dm-crypt, linux-kernel
  Cc: Damien.LeMoal, herbert, kernel-team, nobuto.murata, stable,
	josef, ebiggers, clm, mpatocka, Ignat Korchagin, dsterba, mail,
	linux-btrfs

Commit 39d42fa96ba1b7d2544db3f8ed5da8fb0d5cb877 made it possible for some code
paths in dm-crypt to be executed in softirq context, when the underlying driver
processes IO requests in interrupt/softirq context.

In this case sometimes when allocating a new crypto request we may get a
stacktrace like below:

[  210.103008][    C0] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/mempool.c:381
[  210.104746][    C0] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 2602, name: fio
[  210.106599][    C0] CPU: 0 PID: 2602 Comm: fio Tainted: G        W         5.10.0+ #50
[  210.108331][    C0] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
[  210.110212][    C0] Call Trace:
[  210.110921][    C0]  <IRQ>
[  210.111527][    C0]  dump_stack+0x7d/0xa3
[  210.112411][    C0]  ___might_sleep.cold+0x122/0x151
[  210.113527][    C0]  mempool_alloc+0x16b/0x2f0
[  210.114524][    C0]  ? __queue_work+0x515/0xde0
[  210.115553][    C0]  ? mempool_resize+0x700/0x700
[  210.116586][    C0]  ? crypt_endio+0x91/0x180
[  210.117479][    C0]  ? blk_update_request+0x757/0x1150
[  210.118513][    C0]  ? blk_mq_end_request+0x4b/0x480
[  210.119572][    C0]  ? blk_done_softirq+0x21d/0x340
[  210.120628][    C0]  ? __do_softirq+0x190/0x611
[  210.121626][    C0]  crypt_convert+0x29f9/0x4c00
[  210.122668][    C0]  ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x87/0xe0
[  210.123824][    C0]  ? kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30
[  210.124858][    C0]  ? crypt_iv_tcw_ctr+0x4a0/0x4a0
[  210.125930][    C0]  ? kmem_cache_free+0x104/0x470
[  210.126973][    C0]  ? crypt_endio+0x91/0x180
[  210.127947][    C0]  kcryptd_crypt_read_convert+0x30e/0x420
[  210.129165][    C0]  blk_update_request+0x757/0x1150
[  210.130231][    C0]  blk_mq_end_request+0x4b/0x480
[  210.131294][    C0]  blk_done_softirq+0x21d/0x340
[  210.132332][    C0]  ? _raw_spin_lock+0x81/0xd0
[  210.133289][    C0]  ? blk_mq_stop_hw_queue+0x30/0x30
[  210.134399][    C0]  ? _raw_read_lock_irq+0x40/0x40
[  210.135458][    C0]  __do_softirq+0x190/0x611
[  210.136409][    C0]  ? handle_edge_irq+0x221/0xb60
[  210.137447][    C0]  asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20
[  210.138507][    C0]  </IRQ>
[  210.139118][    C0]  do_softirq_own_stack+0x37/0x40
[  210.140191][    C0]  irq_exit_rcu+0x110/0x1b0
[  210.141151][    C0]  common_interrupt+0x74/0x120
[  210.142171][    C0]  asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
[  210.143206][    C0] RIP: 0010:_aesni_enc1+0x65/0xb0
[  210.144313][    C0] Code: 38 dc c2 41 0f 28 52 d0 66 0f 38 dc c2 41 0f 28 52 e0 66 0f 38 dc c2 41 0f 28 52 f0 66 0f 38 dc c2 41 0f 28 12 66 0f 38 dc c2 <41> 0f 28 52 10 66 0f 38 dc c2 41 0f 28 52 20 66 0f 38 dc c2 41 0f
[  210.148542][    C0] RSP: 0018:ffff88810dbe6db0 EFLAGS: 00000286
[  210.149842][    C0] RAX: ffffffff9a90cdc0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000200
[  210.151576][    C0] RDX: ffff888101e5f240 RSI: ffff888101e5f240 RDI: ffff8881111b5020
[  210.153339][    C0] RBP: ffff88810dbe6e20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000020
[  210.155063][    C0] R10: ffff8881111b5090 R11: 1ffff11021b7cdcc R12: ffffffff9e87cd40
[  210.156791][    C0] R13: ffff8881111b5210 R14: ffff888101e5f0d8 R15: 0000000000000000
[  210.158497][    C0]  ? aesni_set_key+0x1e0/0x1e0
[  210.159523][    C0]  ? aesni_enc+0xf/0x20
[  210.160408][    C0]  ? glue_xts_req_128bit+0x181/0x6f0
[  210.161571][    C0]  ? aesni_set_key+0x1e0/0x1e0
[  210.162560][    C0]  ? glue_ctr_req_128bit+0x630/0x630
[  210.163706][    C0]  ? kasan_save_stack+0x37/0x50
[  210.164761][    C0]  ? kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x50
[  210.165786][    C0]  ? get_page_from_freelist+0x2052/0x36a0
[  210.167024][    C0]  ? __blkdev_direct_IO_simple+0x43b/0x7e0
[  210.168288][    C0]  ? blkdev_direct_IO+0xd16/0x1020
[  210.169396][    C0]  ? generic_file_direct_write+0x1a3/0x480
[  210.170648][    C0]  ? __generic_file_write_iter+0x1d9/0x530
[  210.171882][    C0]  ? blkdev_write_iter+0x20d/0x3e0
[  210.172954][    C0]  ? vfs_write+0x524/0x770
[  210.173889][    C0]  ? do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[  210.174859][    C0]  ? __zone_watermark_ok+0x340/0x340
[  210.175977][    C0]  ? crypt_convert+0x28b6/0x4c00
[  210.177079][    C0]  ? mempool_alloc+0x107/0x2f0
[  210.178096][    C0]  ? crypt_iv_tcw_ctr+0x4a0/0x4a0
[  210.179193][    C0]  ? bio_add_page+0x111/0x170
[  210.180251][    C0]  ? __bio_try_merge_page+0x480/0x480
[  210.181446][    C0]  ? bio_associate_blkg+0x6d/0x100
[  210.182558][    C0]  ? kcryptd_crypt_write_convert+0x5ea/0x980
[  210.183852][    C0]  ? crypt_map+0x5bf/0xc80
[  210.184838][    C0]  ? bio_clone_blkg_association+0x10e/0x2c0
[  210.186125][    C0]  ? __map_bio.isra.0+0x109/0x3f0
[  210.187204][    C0]  ? __split_and_process_non_flush+0x7f9/0xc50
[  210.188560][    C0]  ? __send_empty_flush+0x2d0/0x2d0
[  210.189697][    C0]  ? __part_start_io_acct+0x70/0x2d0
[  210.190842][    C0]  ? dm_submit_bio+0x4d8/0xe40
[  210.191845][    C0]  ? __split_and_process_non_flush+0xc50/0xc50
[  210.193201][    C0]  ? submit_bio_noacct+0x2b9/0xe50
[  210.194313][    C0]  ? blk_queue_enter+0x6d0/0x6d0
[  210.195372][    C0]  ? __bio_add_page+0x246/0x3d0
[  210.196418][    C0]  ? bio_iov_iter_get_pages+0x7dd/0xbe0
[  210.197611][    C0]  ? submit_bio+0xe2/0x460
[  210.198481][    C0]  ? submit_bio_noacct+0xe50/0xe50
[  210.199496][    C0]  ? free_unref_page_commit.constprop.0+0x130/0x330
[  210.200825][    C0]  ? __blkdev_direct_IO_simple+0x43b/0x7e0
[  210.202050][    C0]  ? bd_link_disk_holder+0x690/0x690
[  210.203239][    C0]  ? put_pages_list+0x210/0x210
[  210.204341][    C0]  ? scan_shadow_nodes+0xb0/0xb0
[  210.205472][    C0]  ? _raw_write_lock_irqsave+0xe0/0xe0
[  210.206698][    C0]  ? bd_may_claim+0xc0/0xc0
[  210.207715][    C0]  ? zero_user_segments.constprop.0+0x2e0/0x2e0
[  210.209092][    C0]  ? blkdev_direct_IO+0xd16/0x1020
[  210.210200][    C0]  ? pagevec_lookup_range_tag+0x28/0x60
[  210.211416][    C0]  ? __filemap_fdatawait_range+0xc4/0x1f0
[  210.212669][    C0]  ? page_cache_next_miss+0x1e0/0x1e0
[  210.213842][    C0]  ? generic_file_buffered_read+0x520/0x9e0
[  210.215128][    C0]  ? delete_from_page_cache_batch+0x850/0x850
[  210.216470][    C0]  ? bd_abort_claiming+0xd0/0xd0
[  210.217531][    C0]  ? file_remove_privs+0x74/0x430
[  210.218589][    C0]  ? filemap_check_errors+0x50/0xe0
[  210.219705][    C0]  ? generic_file_direct_write+0x1a3/0x480
[  210.220979][    C0]  ? __generic_file_write_iter+0x1d9/0x530
[  210.222238][    C0]  ? blkdev_write_iter+0x20d/0x3e0
[  210.223328][    C0]  ? bd_unlink_disk_holder+0x360/0x360
[  210.224464][    C0]  ? new_sync_write+0x37b/0x620
[  210.225511][    C0]  ? new_sync_read+0x610/0x610
[  210.226539][    C0]  ? _cond_resched+0x17/0x80
[  210.227539][    C0]  ? inode_security+0x58/0x100
[  210.228582][    C0]  ? security_file_permission+0x54/0x450
[  210.229796][    C0]  ? vfs_write+0x524/0x770
[  210.230758][    C0]  ? __x64_sys_pwrite64+0x197/0x1f0
[  210.231890][    C0]  ? vfs_write+0x770/0x770
[  210.232869][    C0]  ? do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[  210.233839][    C0]  ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Fix this by allocating crypto requests with GFP_ATOMIC mask in interrupt context

Fixes: 39d42fa96ba1 ("dm crypt: add flags to optionally bypass kcryptd workqueues")
Reported-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@cloudflare.com>
---
 drivers/md/dm-crypt.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
index 53791138d78b..e4fd690c70e1 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
@@ -1454,13 +1454,16 @@ static int crypt_convert_block_skcipher(struct crypt_config *cc,
 static void kcryptd_async_done(struct crypto_async_request *async_req,
 			       int error);
 
-static void crypt_alloc_req_skcipher(struct crypt_config *cc,
+static int crypt_alloc_req_skcipher(struct crypt_config *cc,
 				     struct convert_context *ctx)
 {
 	unsigned key_index = ctx->cc_sector & (cc->tfms_count - 1);
 
-	if (!ctx->r.req)
-		ctx->r.req = mempool_alloc(&cc->req_pool, GFP_NOIO);
+	if (!ctx->r.req) {
+		ctx->r.req = mempool_alloc(&cc->req_pool, in_interrupt() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_NOIO);
+		if (!ctx->r.req)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+	}
 
 	skcipher_request_set_tfm(ctx->r.req, cc->cipher_tfm.tfms[key_index]);
 
@@ -1471,13 +1474,18 @@ static void crypt_alloc_req_skcipher(struct crypt_config *cc,
 	skcipher_request_set_callback(ctx->r.req,
 	    CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG,
 	    kcryptd_async_done, dmreq_of_req(cc, ctx->r.req));
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
-static void crypt_alloc_req_aead(struct crypt_config *cc,
+static int crypt_alloc_req_aead(struct crypt_config *cc,
 				 struct convert_context *ctx)
 {
-	if (!ctx->r.req_aead)
-		ctx->r.req_aead = mempool_alloc(&cc->req_pool, GFP_NOIO);
+	if (!ctx->r.req) {
+		ctx->r.req = mempool_alloc(&cc->req_pool, in_interrupt() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_NOIO);
+		if (!ctx->r.req)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+	}
 
 	aead_request_set_tfm(ctx->r.req_aead, cc->cipher_tfm.tfms_aead[0]);
 
@@ -1488,15 +1496,17 @@ static void crypt_alloc_req_aead(struct crypt_config *cc,
 	aead_request_set_callback(ctx->r.req_aead,
 	    CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG,
 	    kcryptd_async_done, dmreq_of_req(cc, ctx->r.req_aead));
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
-static void crypt_alloc_req(struct crypt_config *cc,
+static int crypt_alloc_req(struct crypt_config *cc,
 			    struct convert_context *ctx)
 {
 	if (crypt_integrity_aead(cc))
-		crypt_alloc_req_aead(cc, ctx);
+		return crypt_alloc_req_aead(cc, ctx);
 	else
-		crypt_alloc_req_skcipher(cc, ctx);
+		return crypt_alloc_req_skcipher(cc, ctx);
 }
 
 static void crypt_free_req_skcipher(struct crypt_config *cc,
@@ -1539,7 +1549,10 @@ static blk_status_t crypt_convert(struct crypt_config *cc,
 
 	while (ctx->iter_in.bi_size && ctx->iter_out.bi_size) {
 
-		crypt_alloc_req(cc, ctx);
+		r = crypt_alloc_req(cc, ctx);
+		if (r)
+			return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
+
 		atomic_inc(&ctx->cc_pending);
 
 		if (crypt_integrity_aead(cc))
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@saout.de
https://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 1/2] dm crypt: use GFP_ATOMIC when allocating crypto requests from softirq
  2020-12-30 21:45 ` [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 1/2] dm crypt: use GFP_ATOMIC when allocating crypto requests from softirq Ignat Korchagin
@ 2021-01-01 10:00   ` Mikulas Patocka
  2021-01-01 10:26     ` Ignat Korchagin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mikulas Patocka @ 2021-01-01 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ignat Korchagin
  Cc: Damien.LeMoal, herbert, snitzer, kernel-team, dm-crypt,
	linux-kernel, stable, nobuto.murata, ebiggers, clm, dm-devel,
	linux-btrfs, dsterba, josef, mail, agk

On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Ignat Korchagin wrote:

> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> index 53791138d78b..e4fd690c70e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> @@ -1539,7 +1549,10 @@ static blk_status_t crypt_convert(struct crypt_config *cc,
>  
>  	while (ctx->iter_in.bi_size && ctx->iter_out.bi_size) {
>  
> -		crypt_alloc_req(cc, ctx);
> +		r = crypt_alloc_req(cc, ctx);
> +		if (r)
> +			return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> +
>  		atomic_inc(&ctx->cc_pending);
>  
>  		if (crypt_integrity_aead(cc))
> -- 
> 2.20.1

I'm not quite convinced that returning BLK_STS_RESOURCE will help. The 
block layer will convert this value back to -ENOMEM and return it to the 
caller, resulting in an I/O error.

Note that GFP_ATOMIC allocations may fail anytime and you must handle 
allocation failure gracefully - i.e. process the request without any 
error.

An acceptable solution would be to punt the request to a workqueue and do 
GFP_NOIO allocation from the workqueue. Or add the request to some list 
and process the list when some other request completes.

You should write a test that simulates allocation failure and verify that 
the kernel handles it gracefully without any I/O error.

Mikulas

_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@saout.de
https://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 1/2] dm crypt: use GFP_ATOMIC when allocating crypto requests from softirq
  2021-01-01 10:00   ` Mikulas Patocka
@ 2021-01-01 10:26     ` Ignat Korchagin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ignat Korchagin @ 2021-01-01 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mikulas Patocka
  Cc: Damien Le Moal, Herbert Xu, Mike Snitzer, kernel-team, dm-crypt,
	linux-kernel, stable, Nobuto Murata, Eric Biggers, Chris Mason,
	device-mapper development, linux-btrfs, David Sterba,
	Josef Bacik, Maciej S. Szmigiero, Alasdair G Kergon

On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 10:00 AM Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> > index 53791138d78b..e4fd690c70e1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> > @@ -1539,7 +1549,10 @@ static blk_status_t crypt_convert(struct crypt_config *cc,
> >
> >       while (ctx->iter_in.bi_size && ctx->iter_out.bi_size) {
> >
> > -             crypt_alloc_req(cc, ctx);
> > +             r = crypt_alloc_req(cc, ctx);
> > +             if (r)
> > +                     return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> > +
> >               atomic_inc(&ctx->cc_pending);
> >
> >               if (crypt_integrity_aead(cc))
> > --
> > 2.20.1
>
> I'm not quite convinced that returning BLK_STS_RESOURCE will help. The
> block layer will convert this value back to -ENOMEM and return it to the
> caller, resulting in an I/O error.
>
> Note that GFP_ATOMIC allocations may fail anytime and you must handle
> allocation failure gracefully - i.e. process the request without any
> error.
>
> An acceptable solution would be to punt the request to a workqueue and do
> GFP_NOIO allocation from the workqueue. Or add the request to some list
> and process the list when some other request completes.

We can do the workqueue, if that's the desired behaviour. The second patch
from this patchset already adds the code for the request to be retried from the
workqueue if crypt_convert returns BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE, so all is needed
is to change returning BLK_STS_RESOURCE to BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE
here. Does that sound reasonable?

> You should write a test that simulates allocation failure and verify that
> the kernel handles it gracefully without any I/O error.

I already have the test for the second patch in the set, but will
adapt it to make sure the
allocation failure codepath is covered as well.

> Mikulas
>
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@saout.de
https://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 2/2] dm crypt: do not wait for backlogged crypto request completion in softirq
  2020-12-30 21:45 [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 0/2] dm crypt: some fixes to support dm-crypt running in softirq context Ignat Korchagin
  2020-12-30 21:45 ` [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 1/2] dm crypt: use GFP_ATOMIC when allocating crypto requests from softirq Ignat Korchagin
@ 2020-12-30 21:45 ` Ignat Korchagin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ignat Korchagin @ 2020-12-30 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: agk, snitzer, dm-devel, dm-crypt, linux-kernel
  Cc: Damien.LeMoal, herbert, kernel-team, nobuto.murata, stable,
	josef, ebiggers, clm, mpatocka, Ignat Korchagin, dsterba, mail,
	linux-btrfs

Commit 39d42fa96ba1b7d2544db3f8ed5da8fb0d5cb877 made it possible for some code
paths in dm-crypt to be executed in softirq context, when the underlying driver
processes IO requests in interrupt/softirq context.

When Crypto API backlogs a crypto request, dm-crypt uses wait_for_completion to
avoid sending further requests to an already overloaded crypto driver. However,
if the code is executing in softirq context, we might get the following
stacktrace:

[  210.235213][    C0] BUG: scheduling while atomic: fio/2602/0x00000102
[  210.236701][    C0] Modules linked in:
[  210.237566][    C0] CPU: 0 PID: 2602 Comm: fio Tainted: G        W         5.10.0+ #50
[  210.239292][    C0] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
[  210.241233][    C0] Call Trace:
[  210.241946][    C0]  <IRQ>
[  210.242561][    C0]  dump_stack+0x7d/0xa3
[  210.243466][    C0]  __schedule_bug.cold+0xb3/0xc2
[  210.244539][    C0]  __schedule+0x156f/0x20d0
[  210.245518][    C0]  ? io_schedule_timeout+0x140/0x140
[  210.246660][    C0]  schedule+0xd0/0x270
[  210.247541][    C0]  schedule_timeout+0x1fb/0x280
[  210.248586][    C0]  ? usleep_range+0x150/0x150
[  210.249624][    C0]  ? unpoison_range+0x3a/0x60
[  210.250632][    C0]  ? ____kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0x82/0xa0
[  210.251949][    C0]  ? unpoison_range+0x3a/0x60
[  210.252958][    C0]  ? __prepare_to_swait+0xa7/0x190
[  210.254067][    C0]  do_wait_for_common+0x2ab/0x370
[  210.255158][    C0]  ? usleep_range+0x150/0x150
[  210.256192][    C0]  ? bit_wait_io_timeout+0x160/0x160
[  210.257358][    C0]  ? blk_update_request+0x757/0x1150
[  210.258582][    C0]  ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x82/0xd0
[  210.259674][    C0]  ? _raw_read_unlock_irqrestore+0x30/0x30
[  210.260917][    C0]  wait_for_completion+0x4c/0x90
[  210.261971][    C0]  crypt_convert+0x19a6/0x4c00
[  210.263033][    C0]  ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x87/0xe0
[  210.264193][    C0]  ? kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30
[  210.265191][    C0]  ? crypt_iv_tcw_ctr+0x4a0/0x4a0
[  210.266283][    C0]  ? kmem_cache_free+0x104/0x470
[  210.267363][    C0]  ? crypt_endio+0x91/0x180
[  210.268327][    C0]  kcryptd_crypt_read_convert+0x30e/0x420
[  210.269565][    C0]  blk_update_request+0x757/0x1150
[  210.270563][    C0]  blk_mq_end_request+0x4b/0x480
[  210.271680][    C0]  blk_done_softirq+0x21d/0x340
[  210.272775][    C0]  ? _raw_spin_lock+0x81/0xd0
[  210.273847][    C0]  ? blk_mq_stop_hw_queue+0x30/0x30
[  210.275031][    C0]  ? _raw_read_lock_irq+0x40/0x40
[  210.276182][    C0]  __do_softirq+0x190/0x611
[  210.277203][    C0]  ? handle_edge_irq+0x221/0xb60
[  210.278340][    C0]  asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20
[  210.279514][    C0]  </IRQ>
[  210.280164][    C0]  do_softirq_own_stack+0x37/0x40
[  210.281281][    C0]  irq_exit_rcu+0x110/0x1b0
[  210.282286][    C0]  common_interrupt+0x74/0x120
[  210.283376][    C0]  asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
[  210.284496][    C0] RIP: 0010:_aesni_enc1+0x65/0xb0

Fix this by making crypt_convert function reentrant from the point of a single
bio and make dm-crypt defer further bio processing to a workqueue, if Crypto API
backlogs a request in interrupt context.

Fixes: 39d42fa96ba1 ("dm crypt: add flags to optionally bypass kcryptd workq
ueues")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.9+

Signed-off-by: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@cloudflare.com>
---
 drivers/md/dm-crypt.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
index e4fd690c70e1..0d939fbe51af 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
@@ -1539,13 +1539,19 @@ static void crypt_free_req(struct crypt_config *cc, void *req, struct bio *base_
  * Encrypt / decrypt data from one bio to another one (can be the same one)
  */
 static blk_status_t crypt_convert(struct crypt_config *cc,
-			 struct convert_context *ctx, bool atomic)
+			 struct convert_context *ctx, bool atomic, bool reset_pending)
 {
 	unsigned int tag_offset = 0;
 	unsigned int sector_step = cc->sector_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
 	int r;
 
-	atomic_set(&ctx->cc_pending, 1);
+	/*
+	 * if reset_pending is set we are dealing with the bio for the first time,
+	 * else we're continuing to work on the previous bio, so don't mess with
+	 * the cc_pending counter
+	 */
+	if (reset_pending)
+		atomic_set(&ctx->cc_pending, 1);
 
 	while (ctx->iter_in.bi_size && ctx->iter_out.bi_size) {
 
@@ -1566,7 +1572,24 @@ static blk_status_t crypt_convert(struct crypt_config *cc,
 		 * but the driver request queue is full, let's wait.
 		 */
 		case -EBUSY:
-			wait_for_completion(&ctx->restart);
+			if (in_interrupt()) {
+				if (try_wait_for_completion(&ctx->restart)) {
+					/*
+					 * we don't have to block to wait for completion,
+					 * so proceed
+					 */
+				} else {
+					/*
+					 * we can't wait for completion without blocking
+					 * exit and continue processing in a workqueue
+					 */
+					ctx->r.req = NULL;
+					ctx->cc_sector += sector_step;
+					tag_offset++;
+					return BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE;
+				}
+			} else
+				wait_for_completion(&ctx->restart);
 			reinit_completion(&ctx->restart);
 			fallthrough;
 		/*
@@ -1958,6 +1981,37 @@ static bool kcryptd_crypt_write_inline(struct crypt_config *cc,
 	}
 }
 
+static void kcryptd_crypt_write_continue(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct dm_crypt_io *io = container_of(work, struct dm_crypt_io, work);
+	struct crypt_config *cc = io->cc;
+	struct convert_context *ctx = &io->ctx;
+	int crypt_finished;
+	sector_t sector = io->sector;
+	blk_status_t r;
+
+	wait_for_completion(&ctx->restart);
+	reinit_completion(&ctx->restart);
+
+	r = crypt_convert(cc, &io->ctx, true, false);
+	if (r)
+		io->error = r;
+	crypt_finished = atomic_dec_and_test(&ctx->cc_pending);
+	if (!crypt_finished && kcryptd_crypt_write_inline(cc, ctx)) {
+		/* Wait for completion signaled by kcryptd_async_done() */
+		wait_for_completion(&ctx->restart);
+		crypt_finished = 1;
+	}
+
+	/* Encryption was already finished, submit io now */
+	if (crypt_finished) {
+		kcryptd_crypt_write_io_submit(io, 0);
+		io->sector = sector;
+	}
+
+	crypt_dec_pending(io);
+}
+
 static void kcryptd_crypt_write_convert(struct dm_crypt_io *io)
 {
 	struct crypt_config *cc = io->cc;
@@ -1986,7 +2040,17 @@ static void kcryptd_crypt_write_convert(struct dm_crypt_io *io)
 
 	crypt_inc_pending(io);
 	r = crypt_convert(cc, ctx,
-			  test_bit(DM_CRYPT_NO_WRITE_WORKQUEUE, &cc->flags));
+			  test_bit(DM_CRYPT_NO_WRITE_WORKQUEUE, &cc->flags), true);
+	/*
+	 * Crypto API backlogged the request, because its queue was full
+	 * and we're in softirq context, so continue from a workqueue
+	 * (TODO: is it actually possible to be in softirq in the write path?)
+	 */
+	if (r == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE) {
+		INIT_WORK(&io->work, kcryptd_crypt_write_continue);
+		queue_work(cc->crypt_queue, &io->work);
+		return;
+	}
 	if (r)
 		io->error = r;
 	crypt_finished = atomic_dec_and_test(&ctx->cc_pending);
@@ -2011,6 +2075,25 @@ static void kcryptd_crypt_read_done(struct dm_crypt_io *io)
 	crypt_dec_pending(io);
 }
 
+static void kcryptd_crypt_read_continue(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct dm_crypt_io *io = container_of(work, struct dm_crypt_io, work);
+	struct crypt_config *cc = io->cc;
+	blk_status_t r;
+
+	wait_for_completion(&io->ctx.restart);
+	reinit_completion(&io->ctx.restart);
+
+	r = crypt_convert(cc, &io->ctx, true, false);
+	if (r)
+		io->error = r;
+
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&io->ctx.cc_pending))
+		kcryptd_crypt_read_done(io);
+
+	crypt_dec_pending(io);
+}
+
 static void kcryptd_crypt_read_convert(struct dm_crypt_io *io)
 {
 	struct crypt_config *cc = io->cc;
@@ -2022,7 +2105,16 @@ static void kcryptd_crypt_read_convert(struct dm_crypt_io *io)
 			   io->sector);
 
 	r = crypt_convert(cc, &io->ctx,
-			  test_bit(DM_CRYPT_NO_READ_WORKQUEUE, &cc->flags));
+			  test_bit(DM_CRYPT_NO_READ_WORKQUEUE, &cc->flags), true);
+	/*
+	 * Crypto API backlogged the request, because its queue was full
+	 * and we're in softirq context, so continue from a workqueue
+	 */
+	if (r == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE) {
+		INIT_WORK(&io->work, kcryptd_crypt_read_continue);
+		queue_work(cc->crypt_queue, &io->work);
+		return;
+	}
 	if (r)
 		io->error = r;
 
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@saout.de
https://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-01 10:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-30 21:45 [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 0/2] dm crypt: some fixes to support dm-crypt running in softirq context Ignat Korchagin
2020-12-30 21:45 ` [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 1/2] dm crypt: use GFP_ATOMIC when allocating crypto requests from softirq Ignat Korchagin
2021-01-01 10:00   ` Mikulas Patocka
2021-01-01 10:26     ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-12-30 21:45 ` [dm-crypt] [PATCH v2 2/2] dm crypt: do not wait for backlogged crypto request completion in softirq Ignat Korchagin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).