dm-devel.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Vijayendra Suman <vijayendra.suman@oracle.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] dm: fix bio splitting and its bio completion order for regular IO
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:32:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922023251.47712-2-snitzer@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922023251.47712-1-snitzer@redhat.com>

dm_queue_split() is removed because __split_and_process_bio() _must_
handle splitting bios to ensure proper bio submission and completion
ordering as a bio is split.

Otherwise, multiple recursive calls to ->submit_bio will cause multiple
split bios to be allocated from the same ->bio_split mempool at the same
time. This would result in deadlock in low memory conditions because no
progress could be made (only one bio is available in ->bio_split
mempool).

This fix has been verified to still fix the loss of performance, due
to excess splitting, that commit 120c9257f5f1 provided.

Fixes: 120c9257f5f1 ("Revert "dm: always call blk_queue_split() in dm_process_bio()"")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.0+, requires custom backport due to 5.9 changes
Reported-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/md/dm.c | 23 ++---------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
index 4a40df8af7d3..d948cd522431 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -1724,23 +1724,6 @@ static blk_qc_t __process_bio(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_table *map,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void dm_queue_split(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_target *ti, struct bio **bio)
-{
-	unsigned len, sector_count;
-
-	sector_count = bio_sectors(*bio);
-	len = min_t(sector_t, max_io_len((*bio)->bi_iter.bi_sector, ti), sector_count);
-
-	if (sector_count > len) {
-		struct bio *split = bio_split(*bio, len, GFP_NOIO, &md->queue->bio_split);
-
-		bio_chain(split, *bio);
-		trace_block_split(md->queue, split, (*bio)->bi_iter.bi_sector);
-		submit_bio_noacct(*bio);
-		*bio = split;
-	}
-}
-
 static blk_qc_t dm_process_bio(struct mapped_device *md,
 			       struct dm_table *map, struct bio *bio)
 {
@@ -1768,14 +1751,12 @@ static blk_qc_t dm_process_bio(struct mapped_device *md,
 	if (current->bio_list) {
 		if (is_abnormal_io(bio))
 			blk_queue_split(&bio);
-		else
-			dm_queue_split(md, ti, &bio);
+		/* regular IO is split by __split_and_process_bio */
 	}
 
 	if (dm_get_md_type(md) == DM_TYPE_NVME_BIO_BASED)
 		return __process_bio(md, map, bio, ti);
-	else
-		return __split_and_process_bio(md, map, bio);
+	return __split_and_process_bio(md, map, bio);
 }
 
 static blk_qc_t dm_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
-- 
2.15.0

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-22  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-22  2:32 [PATCH v3 0/6] dm: fix then improve bio splitting Mike Snitzer
2020-09-22  2:32 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2020-09-22  2:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] dm: fix comment in dm_process_bio() Mike Snitzer
2020-09-22  2:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] block: use lcm_not_zero() when stacking chunk_sectors Mike Snitzer
2020-09-22 19:28   ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-09-22  2:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] block: allow 'chunk_sectors' to be non-power-of-2 Mike Snitzer
2020-09-22 19:30   ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-09-22  2:32 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] dm table: stack 'chunk_sectors' limit to account for target-specific splitting Mike Snitzer
2020-09-22  2:32 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] dm: change max_io_len() to use blk_max_size_offset() Mike Snitzer
2020-09-23 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] dm: fix then improve bio splitting Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200922023251.47712-2-snitzer@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=vijayendra.suman@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).