* [dpdk-dev] DPDK (v17.11) ACL table field format definition enhancement: 'offset' field covering headroom space.
@ 2019-08-17 7:41 Victor Huertas
2019-08-17 7:43 ` Victor Huertas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Victor Huertas @ 2019-08-17 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Hi all,
I am developing an application with DPDK (v17.11) using a concatenation of
pipelines.
Now I find myself on the definition of an ACL table and more precisely the
format of the ACL fields.
One of the parameters of this field format is the 'offset', which indicates
the number of bytes till the start of the field to check.
All the examples I have seen so far assume that an offset value of 0 means
the start of Ethernet header and not the start of rte_mbuf struct. Is there
a way to place the offset start at the rte_mbuf struct? If not, I think
that it would be a useful enhancement. That's why I propose it in the
developers mailing list.
What do you think about this?
Thanks a lot for your attention.
--
Victor
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] DPDK (v17.11) ACL table field format definition enhancement: 'offset' field covering headroom space.
2019-08-17 7:41 [dpdk-dev] DPDK (v17.11) ACL table field format definition enhancement: 'offset' field covering headroom space Victor Huertas
@ 2019-08-17 7:43 ` Victor Huertas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Victor Huertas @ 2019-08-17 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Vikutoru
Hi all,
I am developing an application with DPDK (v17.11) using a concatenation of
pipelines.
Now I find myself on the definition of an ACL table and more precisely the
format of the ACL fields.
One of the parameters of this field format is the 'offset', which indicates
the number of bytes till the start of the field to check.
All the examples I have seen so far assume that an offset value of 0 means
the start of Ethernet header and not the start of rte_mbuf struct. Is there
a way to place the offset start at the rte_mbuf struct? If not, I think
that it would be a useful enhancement. That's why I propose it in the
developers mailing list.
What do you think about this?
Thanks a lot for your attention.
--
Victor
--
Victor
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-17 7:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-17 7:41 [dpdk-dev] DPDK (v17.11) ACL table field format definition enhancement: 'offset' field covering headroom space Victor Huertas
2019-08-17 7:43 ` Victor Huertas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).