From: "Wang, Yipeng1" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
"agupta3@marvell.com" <agupta3@marvell.com>
Cc: "Gobriel, Sameh" <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Honnappa Nagarahalli" <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] test/meson: hash lf test moved to dpdk perf testsuite
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:09:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D2C4A16CA39F7F4E8E384D204491D7A673EF9A5D@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7td0g4l0ni.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Conole [mailto:aconole@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 7:41 AM
> To: agupta3@marvell.com
> Cc: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh
> <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] test/meson: hash lf test moved to
> dpdk perf testsuite
>
> <agupta3@marvell.com> writes:
>
> > From: Amit Gupta <agupta3@marvell.com>
> >
> > hash_readwrite_lf test always getting TIMEOUT as required time to
> > finish this test was much longer compare to time required for fast
> > tests(10s). Hence, the test is being renamed moved to perf test
> > category for its execution to complete.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Gupta <agupta3@marvell.com>
> > ---
>
> Okay. I'll note that we pass the '-t 3' flag, so it is actually timing out with 30s
> instead of the default 10. We do this because occasionally the lpm6 and table
> tests would also exceed the 10s timeout in the travis environment. I agree,
> it's better to pull the perf part of tests out.
>
> I think there isn't any additional functional test in this readwrite - is that so?
> If it is, then we need to also prioritize adding back in some of the functional
> testing. Maybe I misread the lf_autotest, though.
>
[Wang, Yipeng]
Yes that is my concern too, if we just move all the lock-free test into perf test then we miss
the functional test.
Would any of you like to consider adding a small functional test into the readwrite or readwrite_lf_functional?
That would be great :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-13 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-06 5:49 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] test/meson: fix hash readwrite timeout failure agupta3
2019-09-06 5:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/meson: hash test split into shorter subtests agupta3
2019-09-11 17:05 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-10-17 5:02 ` Amit Gupta
2019-11-01 4:54 ` Amit Gupta
2019-11-01 17:04 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-11-05 16:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-11-07 3:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Amit Gupta
2019-12-31 4:56 ` Amit Gupta
2019-09-06 5:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/meson: hash lf test moved to dpdk perf testsuite agupta3
2019-09-11 17:13 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-09-12 15:00 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-13 8:24 ` Amit Gupta
2019-09-13 8:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] " agupta3
2019-09-13 14:40 ` Aaron Conole
2019-09-13 15:09 ` Wang, Yipeng1 [this message]
2019-09-13 15:46 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-16 4:39 ` Amit Gupta
2019-10-17 4:57 ` Amit Gupta
2019-10-17 13:16 ` Aaron Conole
2019-10-24 7:22 ` David Marchand
2019-09-13 8:15 ` agupta3
2019-09-11 5:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] test/meson: fix hash readwrite timeout failure Amit Gupta
2020-02-03 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-03 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] test/meson: hash test split into shorter subtests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-03 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] test/hash: remove duplicated test code Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-05 8:48 ` David Marchand
2020-02-05 16:42 ` David Marchand
2020-02-03 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] test/hash: add lock free reader writer functional tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-05 9:07 ` David Marchand
2020-02-05 16:22 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-05 16:41 ` David Marchand
2020-02-05 19:34 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2020-02-05 19:52 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-05 19:57 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2020-02-03 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] test/hash: move reader writer lock free tests to perf tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-03 19:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] hash: correct lock free extendable table support Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-02-05 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] test/meson: fix hash readwrite timeout failure David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D2C4A16CA39F7F4E8E384D204491D7A673EF9A5D@ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=agupta3@marvell.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).