From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] radeon: kill rdev->pciep_(r|w)reg
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:06:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1290967575-22705-8-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290967575-22705-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
pciep_wreg is totally unused, rreg has only one caller and
already checks whether it's an r600 or later chip.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c | 8 --------
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 4 ----
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c | 6 ------
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h | 1 -
5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
index cde1d34..6def8d7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
@@ -561,7 +561,8 @@ int rv370_get_pcie_lanes(struct radeon_device *rdev)
if (rdev->family < CHIP_R600)
link_width_cntl = RREG32_PCIE(RADEON_PCIE_LC_LINK_WIDTH_CNTL);
else
- link_width_cntl = RREG32_PCIE_P(RADEON_PCIE_LC_LINK_WIDTH_CNTL);
+ link_width_cntl = r600_pciep_rreg(rdev,
+ RADEON_PCIE_LC_LINK_WIDTH_CNTL);
switch ((link_width_cntl & RADEON_PCIE_LC_LINK_WIDTH_RD_MASK) >> RADEON_PCIE_LC_LINK_WIDTH_RD_SHIFT) {
case RADEON_PCIE_LC_LINK_WIDTH_X0:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
index b55ee28..a5114ff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
@@ -1905,14 +1905,6 @@ u32 r600_pciep_rreg(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 reg)
return r;
}
-void r600_pciep_wreg(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 reg, u32 v)
-{
- WREG32(PCIE_PORT_INDEX, ((reg) & 0xff));
- (void)RREG32(PCIE_PORT_INDEX);
- WREG32(PCIE_PORT_DATA, (v));
- (void)RREG32(PCIE_PORT_DATA);
-}
-
/*
* CP & Ring
*/
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
index 7afb08e..5fec64c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
@@ -1117,8 +1117,6 @@ struct radeon_device {
radeon_rreg_t pll_rreg;
radeon_wreg_t pll_wreg;
uint32_t pcie_reg_mask;
- radeon_rreg_t pciep_rreg;
- radeon_wreg_t pciep_wreg;
/* io port */
void __iomem *rio_mem;
resource_size_t rio_mem_size;
@@ -1223,8 +1221,6 @@ static inline void r100_mm_wreg(struct radeon_device *rdev, uint32_t reg, uint32
#define WREG32_MC(reg, v) rdev->mc_wreg(rdev, (reg), (v))
#define RREG32_PCIE(reg) rv370_pcie_rreg(rdev, (reg))
#define WREG32_PCIE(reg, v) rv370_pcie_wreg(rdev, (reg), (v))
-#define RREG32_PCIE_P(reg) rdev->pciep_rreg(rdev, (reg))
-#define WREG32_PCIE_P(reg, v) rdev->pciep_wreg(rdev, (reg), (v))
#define WREG32_P(reg, val, mask) \
do { \
uint32_t tmp_ = RREG32(reg); \
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c
index 3d73fe4..668351c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c
@@ -60,8 +60,6 @@ static void radeon_register_accessor_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
rdev->mc_wreg = &radeon_invalid_wreg;
rdev->pll_rreg = &radeon_invalid_rreg;
rdev->pll_wreg = &radeon_invalid_wreg;
- rdev->pciep_rreg = &radeon_invalid_rreg;
- rdev->pciep_wreg = &radeon_invalid_wreg;
/* Don't change order as we are overridding accessor. */
if (rdev->family < CHIP_RV515) {
@@ -94,10 +92,6 @@ static void radeon_register_accessor_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
rdev->mc_rreg = &rs600_mc_rreg;
rdev->mc_wreg = &rs600_mc_wreg;
}
- if ((rdev->family >= CHIP_R600) && (rdev->family <= CHIP_RV740)) {
- rdev->pciep_rreg = &r600_pciep_rreg;
- rdev->pciep_wreg = &r600_pciep_wreg;
- }
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h
index 8e75be1..bad4b88 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h
@@ -294,7 +294,6 @@ void r600_wb_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev);
void r600_cp_commit(struct radeon_device *rdev);
void r600_pcie_gart_tlb_flush(struct radeon_device *rdev);
uint32_t r600_pciep_rreg(struct radeon_device *rdev, uint32_t reg);
-void r600_pciep_wreg(struct radeon_device *rdev, uint32_t reg, uint32_t v);
int r600_cs_parse(struct radeon_cs_parser *p);
void r600_fence_ring_emit(struct radeon_device *rdev,
struct radeon_fence *fence);
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-28 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-28 18:06 [PATCH 0/7] radeon_asic header cleanup, part 2 Daniel Vetter
2010-11-28 18:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] radeon: consolidate asic-specific function decls for pre-r600 Daniel Vetter
2010-11-29 15:29 ` Alex Deucher
2010-11-28 18:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] radeon: consolidate asic-specific function decls for r600 & later Daniel Vetter
2010-11-29 15:34 ` Alex Deucher
2010-11-28 18:06 ` [PATCH 3/7] radeon: drop extern from function decls Daniel Vetter
2010-11-29 15:36 ` Alex Deucher
2010-11-28 18:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] radeon: kill decls for inline functions Daniel Vetter
2010-11-29 15:37 ` Alex Deucher
2010-11-28 18:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] radeon: move blit functions to radeon_asic.h Daniel Vetter
2010-11-29 15:37 ` Alex Deucher
2010-11-28 18:06 ` [PATCH 6/7] radeon: kill r100_io_(r|w)reg Daniel Vetter
2010-11-29 15:40 ` Alex Deucher
2010-11-28 18:06 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2010-11-29 15:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] radeon: kill rdev->pciep_(r|w)reg Alex Deucher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1290967575-22705-8-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).